Pith. sign in

REVIEW

UM 625 Revisited: Multiwavelength Study of A Seyfert 1 Galaxy with a Low-mass Black Hole

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1304.5807 v1 pith:IQVEIMLO submitted 2013-04-21 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords luminosityblackgalaxyholeanalysisbluebulgecentral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

UM 625, previously identified as a narrow-line active galactic nucleus (AGN), actually exhibits broad \ha\ and \hb\ lines whose width and luminosity indicate a low black hole mass of $1.6 \times 10^6$ \msun. We present a detailed multiwavelength study of the nuclear and host galaxy properties of UM 625. Analysis of \chandra\ and \xmm\ observations suggests that this system contains a heavily absorbed and intrinsically X-ray weak ($\aox=-1.72$) nucleus. Although not strong enough to qualify as radio-loud, UM 625 does belong to a minority of low-mass AGNs detected in the radio. The broad-band spectral energy distribution constrains the bolometric luminosity to $\lbol\approx(0.5-3)\times10^{43}$ \lum\ and $\lratio\approx0.02-0.15$. A comprehensive analysis of Sloan Digital Sky Survey and {\it Hubble Space Telescope}\ images shows that UM 625 is a nearly face-on S0 galaxy with a prominent, relatively blue pseudobulge (\sersic\ index $n = 1.60$) that accounts for $\sim$60% of the total light in the $R$ band. The extended disk is featureless, but the central $\sim150-400$ pc contains a conspicuous semi-ring of bright, blue star-forming knots, whose integrated ultraviolet luminosity suggests a star formation rate of $\sim$0.3 \msun yr$^{-1}$. The mass of the central black hole roughly agrees with the value predicted from its bulge velocity dispersion but is significantly lower than that expected from its bulge luminosity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools