REVIEW 1 cited by
An Analysis of the Large Scale N-body Simulation using the Minkowski Functionals
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We analyze the Minkowski functionals with a large $N$-body simulation of a standard $\Lambda$CDM model, focusing on transition scales between linear and non-linear gravitational evolution. We numerically calculate the Minkowski functionals with sufficient accuracies to investigate the transition scales, 10--$50\himpc$. The results are compared with analytic formulae of linear and second-order perturbation theories. We first show that the skewness parameters of the density fluctuations, which are important in second-order analytic formulae of the Minkowski functionals, are in good agreement with the perturbation theory. Considering relative differences between the Minkowski functionals of the analytic formulae and that of the simulation data, we evaluate accuracy levels of the predictions of the perturbation theory. When the straightforward threshold $\nu$ by density value is used in Minkowski functionals, the accuracy of the second-order perturbation theory is within 10% for smoothing length $R > 15\himpc$, and within a several % for $R > 20\himpc$. The accuracies of the linear theory are 2--5 times worse than that. When the rescaled threshold by volume fraction, $\nu_{\rm f}$ is used, accuracies of both linear and second-order theories are within a few % on all scales of $10\himpc < R < 50\himpc$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cosmological constraints from the Minkowski functionals of the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample
A simulation-based emulator of Minkowski functionals applied to BOSS CMASS galaxies yields cosmological constraints from both Gaussian and non-Gaussian information, tighter than the 2PCF alone.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.