Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Testing for Efficacy in Single-Subject Trials with Intervention Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1403.4309 v2 pith:IX6KOSNG submitted 2014-03-18 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords interventiontrendanalysissingle-subjectbeendataeffecterror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Single subject or n-of-1 research designs have been widely used to evaluate treatment interventions. Many statistical procedures such as split-middle trend lines, regression trend line, Shewart-chart trend line, binomial tests, randomization tests and Tryon C-statistics have been used to analyze single-subject data, but they fail to control Type I error due to serially-dependent time-series observations. The interrupted time series analysis maintains Type I error but assumes that the intervention effect to be a linear trend change from baseline. In this paper, we consider an improved intervention analysis model (Box and Tiao, 1975) for dynamic characteristics of an intervention effect in a short series of single-subject data. The maximum likelihood estimates are derived and a hypothesis testing procedure is proposed. The method is illustrated with a real clinical trial on constraint induced language therapy for aphasia patients.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools