Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Exploring the True Potential: Evaluating the Black-box Optimization Capability of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.06290 v2 pith:IXRHBRQU submitted 2024-04-09 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords llmsoptimizationlanguagemodelsnumericalperformancepotentialproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance not only in natural language processing tasks but also in a great variety of non-linguistic domains. In diverse optimization scenarios, there is also a rising trend of applying LLMs. However, whether the application of LLMs in the black-box optimization problems is genuinely beneficial remains unexplored. This paper endeavors to offer deep insights into the potential of LLMs in optimization through a comprehensive investigation, which covers both discrete and continuous optimization problems to assess the efficacy and distinctive characteristics that LLMs bring to this field. Our findings reveal both the limitations and advantages of LLMs in optimization. Specifically, on the one hand, despite the significant power consumed for running the models, LLMs exhibit subpar performance in pure numerical tasks, primarily due to a mismatch between the problem domain and their processing capabilities; on the other hand, although LLMs may not be ideal for traditional numerical optimization, their potential in broader optimization contexts remains promising, where LLMs exhibit the ability to solve problems in non-numerical domains and can leverage heuristics from the prompt to enhance their performance. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first systematic evaluation of LLMs for numerical optimization. Our findings pave the way for a deeper understanding of LLMs' role in optimization and guide future application of LLMs in a wide range of scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Better Together, in the Right Order: Classical-then-LLM Optimization for SE

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Classical-then-LLM (SNAP2) reaches the top tier on 85% of 105 SE tasks, ahead of LLM-alone (75%) and all classical-controlled hybrids, while using ~30% fewer tokens.

  2. iDSE: Navigating Design Space Exploration in High-Level Synthesis Using LLMs

    cs.AR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-based design space exploration system for HLS combines design-space pruning, LLM-generated seed directives, and convergent/divergent refinement to approximate Pareto-optimal designs with few synthesis evaluations.

  3. The Problem of Dynamic Spatial Sampling and Geofence Surveillance

    stat.AP 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adaptive geofence radius estimators are proposed to trade off police reverse-location surveillance reach against local privacy under density-aware constraints.

  4. A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving

    cs.NE 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature survey that classifies LLM-based optimization research into modeling and solving, with solving divided into LLMs as optimizers, low-level components, and high-level managers.

  5. On the Convergence of Large Language Model Optimizer for Black-Box Network Management

    cs.IT 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims a first convergence proof for LLM-based black-box optimizers, but the key lemma is proven by assertion rather than derivation.

Pith tools