Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generalized Stability Approach for Regularized Graphical Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1605.07072 v1 pith:IXW5JDRH submitted 2016-05-23 stat.ME q-bio.MNstat.APstat.CO

classification stat.MEq-bio.MNstat.APstat.CO
keywords graphicalregularizationselectionstabilitygraphstarsapproachcomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Selecting regularization parameters in penalized high-dimensional graphical models in a principled, data-driven, and computationally efficient manner continues to be one of the key challenges in high-dimensional statistics. We present substantial computational gains and conceptual generalizations of the Stability Approach to Regularization Selection (StARS), a state-of-the-art graphical model selection scheme. Using properties of the Poisson-Binomial distribution and convex non-asymptotic distributional modeling we propose lower and upper bounds on the StARS graph regularization path which results in greatly reduced computational cost without compromising regularization selection. We also generalize the StARS criterion from single edge to induced subgraph (graphlet) stability. We show that simultaneously requiring edge and graphlet stability leads to superior graph recovery performance independent of graph topology. These novel insights render Gaussian graphical model selection a routine task on standard multi-core computers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are machine learning interpretations reliable? A stability study on global interpretations

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Popular machine learning interpretation methods are frequently unstable under small data perturbations, and interpretation stability does not track prediction accuracy.

Pith tools