Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 84 references

The two-dimensional disordered Mott metal-insulator transition

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In two dimensions, disorder converts the Mott metal-insulator transition into a proliferating landscape of metallic and insulating bubbles, smearing the transition in the thermodynamic limit.

desk verdict A solid, honest statDMFT study whose finite-size puddle results are credible, but the thermodynamic-limit smearing claim rides on an Imry-Ma analogy the paper does not actually test. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04144 v2 pith:IY7EHW3W submitted 2019-08-12 cond-mat.str-el

M. Y. Suárez-Villagrán , N. Mitsakos , Tsung-Han Lee , V. Dobrosavljević , J. H. Miller , Jr. , E. Miranda This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el MSC 82B4482B2682B2781V70 PACS 71.30.+h72.15.Rn71.10.Fd
keywords disorderedHubbardmodelMottmetal-insulatortransitionstatisticaldynamicalmean-fieldtheoryImry-Matheoremrandom-fieldIsinguniversalityclasspuddlesclassicalresistornetworkfinite-sizeeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the disordered Hubbard model in two dimensions and argues that disorder fundamentally changes the Mott metal-insulator transition. In a finite sample the transition keeps its first-order character, complete with hysteresis and coexisting metallic and insulating solutions, but as the lattice grows, metallic and insulating bubbles multiply until the sharp transition is smeared away in the thermodynamic limit. The mechanism is the same Imry-Ma argument that destroys long-range order in the two-dimensional random-field Ising model, so the paper presents the result as a generalization of the Imry-Ma theorem to the Mott case. It also shows that in this incoherent regime transport can be described by a classical resistor network in which each site's resistance is set by the imaginary part of its local self-energy at the first Matsubara frequency. If correct, the picture explains nanoscale metallic and insulating puddles seen in materials like VO2 as the intrinsic fate of a disordered two-dimensional Mott system.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Statistical Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (statDMFT), in which each lattice site carries its own local self-energy Sigma_i(i omega_n), so disorder is kept site-resolved while interactions are treated locally as in DMFT; the impurity problems are solved with a Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm. The order parameter used throughout is the imaginary part of the local self-energy at the first Matsubara frequency, ImSigma_i(i omega_1), which acts simultaneously as a metal/insulator classifier and, through the inelastic mean-free-path estimate l_in/a = D/ImSigma, as the local resistivity in a classical resistor network. The Imry-Ma energy balance of Eq. (14), comparing disorder fluctuations in a region with a critical local metallization scale, is what converts the random-field Ising analogy into a prediction that bubbles proliferate with system size.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to measure the width of the hysteresis and coexistence region as a function of lattice size at fixed temperature and disorder within the same statDMFT calculation. The paper's claim predicts that this width shrinks toward zero as L grows, with both bubble types proliferating; if instead the width saturates to a nonzero value for L larger than about 20, or if only one bubble type appears, the Imry-Ma smearing claim is not correct. The same criterion could be tested in controlled-disorder experiments by looking for the disappearance of a sharp resistance jump as sample size increases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that site disorder in two dimensions destroys the first-order Mott transition in the thermodynamic limit. Within statDMFT, finite-size lattices still show hysteresis and coexistence, with per-site loops shifted to higher interactions, but increasing the system size at a fixed interaction produces more metallic bubbles inside the insulator and more insulating bubbles inside the metal, so no sharp jump survives as L grows. This is asserted to be the generalization of the Imry-Ma theorem to the disordered Hubbard model, relying on the mapping of the Mott transition to the random-field Ising universality class. A secondary claim is that the local imaginary self-energy ImSigma_i(i omega_1) is small in the metal and large in the insulator, and that when the inelastic mean free path is about one lattice constant, the same quantity can be used as a local resistivity to build a classical random resistor network; this yields current maps and average conductances across the transition.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the finite-temperature Mott transition in the disordered Hubbard model obeys the same physics as the random-field Ising model, so the Imry-Ma energy balance of Eq. (14) applies; if disorder does not act as a random field on a scalar order parameter, the growing bubble proliferation could be a finite-size effect rather than true thermodynamic-limit smearing. The transport calculation additionally assumes that ImSigma_i(i omega_1) is a valid local resistivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a macroscopic two-dimensional disordered sample, there is no true first-order Mott transition: the jump in the local order parameter is replaced by a smooth crossover controlled by the statistics of bubbles.
  • Bulk transport near the transition is a percolation problem through the coexisting puddle landscape, not a single phase transition; current maps should show spatial texture correlated with local disorder fluctuations.
  • Disorder shifts the coexistence region to larger interactions and shrinks the hysteresis width, so experimentally the transition appears at higher interaction strength and with reduced metastability.
  • Because the inelastic mean free path is at most one lattice constant at the studied temperatures, classical resistor-network transport is the appropriate description, and the metallic conductance should track the local-resistivity distribution while the insulating conductance will not show the activated temperature dependence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the random-field Ising analogy is right, the smearing should be a lower-critical-dimension effect: in three dimensions the same statDMFT calculation should show a first-order transition surviving weak disorder, with bubbles only near the transition. This is a testable extension the paper does not run.
  • The resistor-network mapping implies a direct connection between spectroscopy and transport: local ImSigma maps from scanning tunneling experiments on a disordered Mott material could be fed into the same network to predict the spatial current distribution, a check that nano-imaging and transport measurements could carry out jointly.
  • The persistence of the bubble landscape for a fixed disorder realization at different temperatures suggests that quenched disorder, not thermal nucleation, sets the pattern; if so, sample-specific predictions could be made for repeated imaging of the same device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the site-disordered two-dimensional Hubbard model at half filling using statistical dynamical mean-field theory (statDMFT) with a Hirsch-Fye quantum Monte Carlo impurity solver, for lattice sizes up to L=20, disorder width W=0.52D, and three temperatures near the clean Mott endpoint. The authors report clean and disordered hysteresis loops, spinodal lines, and a disordered-induced shift and shrinking of the coexistence region. They show spatial maps of the local Green's function and self-energy that display metallic and insulating puddles, and they correlate the puddle character with local disorder fluctuations. They interpret the finite-size increase in puddle proliferation as evidence for Imry-Ma smearing of the first-order transition in the thermodynamic limit. Finally, they map each lattice site to a classical resistor value set by ImΣ_i(iω1) and compute average currents through the resulting resistor network.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would establish a disorder-induced smearing of the two-dimensional Mott transition and connect the resulting puddle landscape to the random-field Ising universality class, with direct relevance to nano-imaging experiments on VO2 and other inhomogeneous strongly correlated systems. The statDMFT implementation with site-resolved QMC impurity solutions, the systematic finite-size comparison up to L=20, and the first statDMFT-based transport calculation via a classical resistor network are useful technical contributions. However, the thermodynamic-limit conclusion currently rests on an extrapolation from small systems and an imported Imry-Ma/RFIM analogy rather than on a derived scaling analysis, so the significance is contingent on strengthening that step.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section V, Eqs. (17)-(22) and Section VI C] The transport calculation rests on two unverified identifications: ImΣ_i(iω1) is used as a proxy for ImΣ(k∼k_F, ω→0), and the Fermi velocity is estimated as v_F∼aD with k_F∼1/a. The first identification is particularly fragile because the first Matsubara frequency is not the zero-frequency limit, and the second estimate is order-of-magnitude at best. The paper acknowledges that the resulting description fails in the insulator because ImΣ(iω1) cannot produce the activated temperature dependence of the Mott gap, yet Fig. 14 is then used to draw conclusions about the conductance in the insulating regime. Since the transport section is a secondary application, this issue does not by itself invalidate the main puddle picture, but the claims should be restricted to the metallic and coexistence regions, with the insulator behavior presented as a known limitation rather than as a computed result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption says 'As the temperature increases, the hysteresis loops become smaller,' but Fig. 10 shows hysteresis loops for different lattice sizes at fixed temperature; the caption should instead describe the dependence on system size.
  2. [Reference 66] Reference 66 is incomplete ('See and e, g, World Scientific p. 277 (1997)'); it needs a full citation with authors, title, and publisher information.
  3. [Reference 72] The reference to Fetter and Walecka is listed as 'Philos. Mag. 21, 863 (1970)'; this appears to be a misattribution, as the standard citation is the textbook 'Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems'.
  4. [Eq. (14)] The notation in Eq. (14) is unclear: ∆ϵ is written with an awkward square-root expression and the definition of N (the number of sites in a region) is not given before the equation; please rewrite the definition cleanly.
  5. [Section II, Eq. (2)] The second-neighbor hopping is taken to be purely imaginary (t* = 0.5 i t); the authors should justify this unusual choice more explicitly, since an imaginary hopping is not a standard single-band lattice parameter and its physical interpretation is not explained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim rests on a numerical statDMFT solution plus an external Imry-Ma analogy, and the transport mapping is an acknowledged modeling choice rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical result—spatially resolved statDMFT solutions of the disordered Hubbard model—is not fitted to the Imry-Ma conclusion. The local order parameter ImSigma_i(i omega_1) is obtained from the statDMFT self-consistency loop (Eqs. 6-12) with the Hirsch-Fye QMC solver, and the puddle-disorder correlation in Table I is a post-hoc consistency check with thresholds chosen on ImG, not on the disorder potential. The Imry-Ma/RFIM framework (refs. 66-68) is an external theorem and analogy used to interpret the finite-size trend; the paper explicitly concedes that no full scaling analysis of puddle sizes is possible for L>20, which is a limitation of evidence rather than a circular reduction. In the transport section, the local resistivity is defined as rho_i = ImSigma_i(i omega_1) and the bond resistor as R_ij = (rho_i + rho_j)/2, so the resistor-network current is a deterministic function of the same local self-energy used as the Mott order parameter; however, this is a transparent modeling assumption and a stated classical mapping, not a hidden parameter fit renamed as a prediction, and the paper openly notes that the description fails in the insulating regime. Self-citations to statDMFT and related DMFT disorder work are backed by the algorithm's equations in the text and are not load-bearing for the main thermodynamic-limit claim. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two imported frameworks: statDMFT's local-self-energy approximation and the random-field Ising/Imry-Ma analogy. The only freely chosen physical parameter is W=0.52D, and the analysis introduces hand-picked thresholds for metallic and insulating puddles. The transport section adds an unproven identification between ImSigma(i omega1) and local resistivity. No fundamentally new entity is postulated; the bubbles are consequences, not inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • Disorder width W = 0.52D
    Chosen by hand; the paper studies a single disorder strength, so all conclusions about disorder dependence rest on this value.
  • Second-neighbor hopping t* = 0.5it
    Chosen to move the van Hove singularity away from the band center while preserving particle-hole symmetry; a model-shaping parameter not derived from materials.
  • Puddle classification thresholds = [-ImG]D = 0.45 (metal) and 0.27 (insulator)
    Ad hoc thresholds used to define essentially metallic and essentially insulating regions in Table I; results are qualitative.
  • Temperatures = T = 0.02D, 0.024D, 0.028D
    Three hand-picked temperatures below the clean critical point; no systematic T scan or critical-point determination.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The full self-energy is approximated as site-diagonal: Sigma_ij(i omega_n) -> delta_ij Sigma_i(i omega_n) (Eq. 5).
    statDMFT discards non-local correlations; in 2D this is uncontrolled and could affect puddle physics.
  • ad hoc to paper The disordered Hubbard model maps to the random-field Ising model, with site energy acting as a local random field and Delta epsilon_c ~ U (Eq. 14).
    Asserted by analogy, not derived; the Imry-Ma smearing conclusion depends on this universality assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The Imry-Ma theorem applies to the first-order Mott transition in d=2.
    The paper generalizes Imry-Ma to the Mott case without a proof that the interface energy scaling argument carries over.
  • ad hoc to paper ImSigma_i(i omega1) approximates the zero-frequency inelastic scattering rate and sets the local resistor value (Eqs. 17 and 22).
    The transport mapping assumes coherent quasiparticle Drude form and replaces omega->0 by the first Matsubara frequency; the authors admit it fails in the insulator.
  • ad hoc to paper Finite-size trend from L=10 to 20 can be extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit.
    No scaling analysis; the conclusion of complete smearing relies on the Imry-Ma analogy rather than a demonstrated collapse.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The two-dimensional disordered Mott metal-insulator transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IY7EHW3W

@misc{pith2026190804144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The two-dimensional disordered Mott metal-insulator transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IY7EHW3W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04144}
}
read the original abstract

We studied several aspects of the Mott metal-insulator transition in the disordered case. The model on which we based our analysis is the disordered Hubbard model, which is the simplest model capable of capturing the Mott metal-insulator transition. We investigated this model through the Statistical Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (statDMFT). This theory is a natural extension of the Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (DMFT), which has been used with relative success in the last several years with the purpose of describing the Mott transition in the clean case. As is the case for the latter theory, the statDMFT incorporates the electronic correlation effects only in their local manifestations. Disorder, on the other hand, is treated in such a way as to incorporate Anderson localization effects. With this technique, we analyzed the disordered two-dimensional Mott transition, using Quantum Monte Carlo to solve the associated single-impurity problems. We found spinodal lines at which the metal and insulator cease to be meta-stable. We also studied spatial fluctuations of local quantities, such as the self-energy and the local Green's function, and showed the appearance of metallic regions within the insulator and vice-versa. We carried out an analysis of finite-size effects and showed that, in agreement with the theorems of Imry and Ma, the first-order transition is smeared in the thermodynamic limit. We analyzed transport properties by means of a mapping to a random classical resistor network and calculated both the average current and its distribution across the metal-insulator transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04144 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The clean non-interacting density of states of our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. T − n phase diagram for the Mott transition and occupation number as a function of chemical potential at T = 0 in the Hubbard model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Resistors associated to a 3 x 3 square network. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Square resistor network in which each resistor cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hysteresis curves for different values of tempera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Imaginary part of the Green’s function at the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Imaginary part of the Green’s function at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: For four different realizations of disorder, we show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hysteresis loops for different lattice sizes, below [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Imaginary part of self-energy for the first Matsub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spatial mapping of the current in the vicinity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Average current as a function of Coulomb poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author T. F. Rosenbaum , author R. F. Milligan , author M. A. Paalanen , author G. A. Thomas , author R. N. Bhatt , and author W. Lin , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 27 , pages 7509 ( year 1983 )

    1983

  2. [2]

    author R. M. A. Paalanen , journal Physica B volume 169 , pages 223 ( year 1991 )

    1991

  3. [3]

    Anissimova , author S

    author S. Anissimova , author S. V. Kravchenko , author A. Punnoose , author A. Finkel'stein , and author T. Klapwijk , journal Nature Phys volume 3 , pages 707 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  4. [4]

    Hanein , author U

    author Y. Hanein , author U. Meirav , author D. Shahar , author C. Li , author D. Tsui , and author H. Shtrikman , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 80 , pages 1288 ( year 1998 )

    1998

  5. [5]

    author M. P. Lilly , author J. L. Reno , author J. A. Simmons , author I. B. Spielman , author J. P. Eisenstein , author L. N. Pfeiffer , author K. W. West , author E. H. Hwang , and author S. D. Sarma , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 90 , pages 056806 ( year 2003 )

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Lederer , author H

    author P. Lederer , author H. Launois , author J. P. Pouget , and author A. C. G. Villeneuve , journal Journal of Physics and Chemical of Solid volume 33 , pages 1969 ( year 1972 )

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    author B. J. Mazzaferro , H. Ceva , journal Phys. Rev. B. volume 22 , pages 353 ( year 1980 )

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    Limelette , author P

    author P. Limelette , author P. Wzietek , author S. Florens , author A. Georges , author T. A. Costi , author C. Pasquier , author D. Jerome , author C. Meziere , and author P. Batail , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 91 , pages 016401 ( year 2003 )

    work page 2003

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Liu , author A

    author M. Liu , author A. J. Sternbach , and author D. N. Basov , journal Rep. Prog. Phys. volume 80 , pages 014501 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  2. [10]

    Qazilbash , author M

    author M. Qazilbash , author M. Brehm , author C. Byung-Gyu , author P.-C. Ho , author G. O. Andreev , author K. Bong-Jun , author S. J. Yun , author A. V. Balatsky , author M. B. Maple , author F. Keilmann , et al. , journal Science volume 318 , pages 1750 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  3. [11]

    author M. M. Qazilbash , author M. Brehm , author G. O. Andreev , author A. Frenzel , author P.-C. Ho , author B.-G. Chae , author B.-J. Kim , author S. J. Yun , author H.-T. Kim , author A. V. Balatsky , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 79 , pages 075107 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  4. [12]

    author B. T. O'Callahan , author A. C. Jones , author J. H. Park , author D. H. Cobden , author J. M. Atkin , and author M. B. Raschke , journal Nat. Commun. volume 6 , pages 6849 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  5. [13]

    author M. K. Liu , author M. Wagner , author E. Abreu , author S. Kittiwatanakul , author Z. F. A. McLeod , author M. Goldflam , author S. Dai , author M. M. Fogler , author J. Lu , author S. A. Wolf , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 111 , pages 096602 ( year 2013 )

    2013

  6. [14]

    author P.W.Anderson , journal Phys. Rev. volume 109 , pages 1492 ( year 1958 )

    1958

  7. [15]

    Abrahams , author P

    author E. Abrahams , author P. W. Anderson , author D. C. Licciardello , and author T. V. Ramakrishnan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 42 , pages 673 ( year 1979 )

    1979

  8. [16]

    author N. F. Mott , title Metal-Insulator transition ( publisher Taylor & Francis , address London , year 1990 )

    1990

  9. [17]

    Hubbard , journal Proc

    author J. Hubbard , journal Proc. R. Soc. (London) A volume 276 , pages 238 ( year 1963 )

    1963

  10. [18]

    Hubbard , journal Proc

    author J. Hubbard , journal Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A volume 277 , pages 237 ( year 1964 a )

    1964

  11. [19]

    Hubbard , journal Proc

    author J. Hubbard , journal Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A volume 281 , pages 401 ( year 1964 b )

    1964

  12. [20]

    author P. A. Lee and author T. V. Ramakrishnan , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 57 , pages 287 ( year 1985 )

    1985

  13. [21]

    author B. L. Altshuler and author A. G. Aronov , journal Solid State Commun. volume 30 , pages 115 ( year 1979 )

    1979

  14. [22]

    Castellani , author C

    author C. Castellani , author C. D. Castro , author P. A. Lee , and author M. Ma , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 30 , pages 527 ( year 1984 )

    1984

  15. [23]

    Castellani , author B

    author C. Castellani , author B. G. Kotliar , and author P. A. Lee. , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 56 , pages 1179 ( year 1987 )

    1987

  16. [24]

    author W. F. Brinkman and author T. M. Rice , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 2 , pages 4302 ( year 1970 )

    1970

  17. [25]

    author M. C. Gutzwiller , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 10 , pages 159 ( year 1963 )

    1963

  18. [26]

    author M. C. Gutzwiller , journal Phys. Rev. volume 134 , pages A923 ( year 1964 )

    1964

  19. [27]

    author M. C. Gutzwiller , journal Phys. Rev. volume 137 , pages A1726 ( year 1965 )

    1965

  20. [28]

    Metzner and author D

    author W. Metzner and author D. Vollhardt , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 62 , pages 324 ( year 1989 )

    1989

  21. [29]

    Georges , author G

    author A. Georges , author G. Kotliar , author W. Krauth , and author M. Rozenberg , journal Rev. Mod. Phys. volume 68 , pages 13 ( year 1996 )

    1996

  22. [30]

    Kotlyar and author S

    author R. Kotlyar and author S. Das Sarma , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 86 , pages 2388 ( year 2001 )

    2001

  23. [31]

    Ulmke and author R

    author M. Ulmke and author R. T. Scalettar , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 55 , pages 4149 ( year 1997 )

    1997

  24. [32]

    author P. J. H. Denteneer , author R. T. Scalettar , and author N. Trivedi , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 83 , pages 4610 ( year 1999 )

    1999

  25. [33]

    Paris , author A

    author N. Paris , author A. Baldwin , and author R. T. Scalettar , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 75 , pages 165113 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  26. [34]

    Srinivasan , author G

    author B. Srinivasan , author G. Benenti , and author D. L. Shepelyansky , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 67 , pages 205112 ( year 2003 )

    2003

  27. [35]

    Chang and author R

    author C.-C. Chang and author R. T. Scalettar , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 109 , pages 026404 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  28. [36]

    Heidarian and author N

    author D. Heidarian and author N. Trivedi , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 93 , pages 126401 ( year 2004 )

    2004

  29. [37]

    Shinaoka and author M

    author H. Shinaoka and author M. Imada , journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. volume 78 , pages 094708 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  30. [38]

    Shinaoka and author M

    author H. Shinaoka and author M. Imada , journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. volume 79 , pages 094711 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  31. [39]

    author M. E. Pezzoli and author F. Becca , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 81 , pages 075106 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  32. [40]

    Ulmke , author V

    author M. Ulmke , author V. Jani s s , and author D. Vollhardt , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 51 , pages 10411 ( year 1995 )

    1995

  33. [41]

    Tanaskovi c \' c , author V

    author D. Tanaskovi c \' c , author V. Dobrosavljevi c \' c , author E. Abrahams , and author G. Kotliar , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 91 , pages 066603 ( year 2003 )

    2003

  34. [42]

    author M. C. O. Aguiar , author V. Dobrosavljevi c \' c , author E. Abrahams , and author G. Kotliar , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 71 , pages 205115 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  35. [43]

    author E. C. Andrade , author E. Miranda , and author V. Dobrosavljevi c \' c , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 102 , pages 206403 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  36. [44]

    Dobrosavljevic , author A

    author V. Dobrosavljevic , author A. A. Pastor , and author B. K. Nikoli\'c , journal EPL volume 62 , pages 72 ( year 2003 )

    2003

  37. [45]

    Byczuk , author W

    author K. Byczuk , author W. Hofstetter , and author D. Vollhardt , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 94 , pages 056404 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  38. [46]

    Byczuk , author W

    author K. Byczuk , author W. Hofstetter , and author D. Vollhardt , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 102 , pages 146403 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  39. [47]

    Dobrosavljevic , journal International Journal of Modern Physics B volume 24 , pages 1680 ( year 2010 )

    author V. Dobrosavljevic , journal International Journal of Modern Physics B volume 24 , pages 1680 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  40. [48]

    Sen , author H

    author S. Sen , author H. Terletska , author J. Moreno , author N. S. Vidhyadhiraja , and author M. Jarrell , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 94 , pages 235104 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  41. [49]

    Sen , author N

    author S. Sen , author N. S. Vidhyadhiraja , and author M. Jarrell , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 98 , pages 075112 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  42. [50]

    Benenti , author X

    author G. Benenti , author X. Waintal , and author J.-L. Pichard , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 83 , pages 1826 ( year 1999 )

    1999

  43. [51]

    Punnoose and author A

    author A. Punnoose and author A. M. Finkel stein , journal Science volume 310 , pages 289 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  44. [52]

    Dobrosavljevic and author G

    author V. Dobrosavljevic and author G. Kotliar , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 78 , pages 3943 ( year 1997 )

    1997

  45. [53]

    author J. E. Hirsch and author R. M. Fye. , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 56 , pages 2521 ( year 1986 )

    1986

  46. [54]

    Potthoff and author W

    author M. Potthoff and author W. Nolting , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 59 , pages 2549 ( year 1999 )

    1999

  47. [55]

    Miller and author J

    author P. Miller and author J. K. Freericks , journal J. Phys.: Condens. Matter volume 13 , pages 3187 ( year 2001 )

    2001

  48. [56]

    author J. K. Freericks , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 70 , pages 195342 ( year 2004 )

    2004

  49. [57]

    Okamoto and author A

    author S. Okamoto and author A. J. Millis , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 72 , pages 235108 ( year 2005 )

    2005

  50. [58]

    Chen and author J

    author L. Chen and author J. K. Freericks , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 75 , pages 125114 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  51. [59]

    Florens , journal Phys

    author S. Florens , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 99 , pages 046402 ( year 2007 )

    2007

  52. [60]

    Snoek , author I

    author M. Snoek , author I. Titvinidze , author C. T o ke , author K. Byczuk , and author W. Hofstetter , journal New Journal of Physics volume 10 , pages 093008 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  53. [61]

    author R. W. Helmes , author T. A. Costi , and author A. Rosch , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 056403 ( year 2008 a )

    2008

  54. [62]

    author R. W. Helmes , author T. A. Costi , and author A. Rosch , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 101 , pages 066802 ( year 2008 b )

    2008

  55. [63]

    author E. V. Gorelik , author I. Titvinidze , author W. Hofstetter , author M. Snoek , and author N. Bl\"umer , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 105 , pages 065301 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  56. [64]

    Byczuk , author B

    author K. Byczuk , author B. Chatterjee , and author D. Vollhardt , journal Eur. Phys. J. B volume 92 , pages 93 ( year 2019 )

    2019

  57. [65]

    Kotliar , author E

    author G. Kotliar , author E. Lange , and author M. J. Rozenberg , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 84 , pages 5180 ( year 2000 )

    2000

  58. [66]

    g , journal World Scientific p

    author See and author e. g , journal World Scientific p. pages 277 ( year 1997 )

    1997

  59. [67]

    Liu , author B

    author S. Liu , author B. Phillabaum , author E. W. Carlson , author K. A. Dahmen , author N. S. Vidhyadhiraja , author M. M. Qazilbash , and author D. N. Basov , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 116 , pages 036401 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  60. [68]

    Imry and author S

    author Y. Imry and author S. K. Ma , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 35 , pages 1399 ( year 1975 )

    1975

  61. [69]

    Trivedi and author M

    author N. Trivedi and author M. Randeria , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 75 , pages 312 ( year 1995 )

    1995

  62. [70]

    Landauer , journal Philos

    author R. Landauer , journal Philos. Mag volume 21 , pages 863 ( year 1970 )

    1970

  63. [71]

    Meir and author N

    author Y. Meir and author N. S. Wingreen , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 68 , pages 2512 ( year 1992 )

    1992

  64. [72]

    Fetter and author J

    author A. Fetter and author J. Walecka , journal Philos. Mag volume 21 , pages 863 ( year 1970 )

    1970

  65. [73]

    Vucicevi\'c , author H

    author J. Vucicevi\'c , author H. Terletska , author D. Tanaskovi\'c , and author V. Dobrosavljevic , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 88 , pages 075143 ( year 2013 )

    2013

  66. [74]

    Terletska , author J.Vucicevic , author D.Tanaskovic , and author V.Dobrosavljevic , journal Phys

    author H. Terletska , author J.Vucicevic , author D.Tanaskovic , and author V.Dobrosavljevic , journal Phys. Rev. Lett volume 84 , pages 125120 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  67. [75]

    author N. T. V. Dobrosavljevic , author J. James , and author M. Valles , journal Oxford University p. pages USA ( year 2012 )

    2012

  68. [76]

    Miranda , author D

    author E. Miranda , author D. Garcia , and author M. R. K. Hallberg , journal Physica B: Condensed Matter volume 403 , pages 1465 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  69. [77]

    howpublished See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235112 , note for details about StatDMFT at different temperatures and other values of disorder

    doi

  70. [78]

    Papanikolaou , author R

    author S. Papanikolaou , author R. M. Fernandes , author E. Fradkin , author P. W. Phillips , author J. Schmalian , and author R. Sknepnek , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 026408 ( year 2008 )

    2008

  71. [79]

    Helmes , Ph.D

    author R. Helmes , Ph.D. thesis, school University of Cologne ( year 2008 ), ://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2260/

    2008

  72. [80]

    Liu , Ph.D

    author Q. Liu , Ph.D. thesis, school University of Bonn ( year 2012 ), ://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/2012/2929/2929.htm

    2012

  73. [81]

    author J. H. Park , author J. M. Coy , author T. S. Kasirga , author C. Huang , and author S. Z. Fei , journal Nature volume 500 , pages 431 ( year 2013 )

    2013

  74. [82]

    Pustogow , author A

    author A. Pustogow , author A. S. McLeod , author Y. Saito , author D. N. Basov , and author M. Dressel , journal Sci. Adv. volume 4 , pages eaau9123 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  75. [83]

    Campi , author A

    author G. Campi , author A. Bianconi , author N. Poccia , author G. Bianconi , author L. Barba , author G. Arrighetti , author D. Innocenti , author J. Karpinski , author N. D. Zhigadlo , author S. M. Kazakov , et al. , journal Nature volume 525 , pages 359 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  76. [84]

    author M. P. Allan , author T.-M. Chuang , author F. Massee , author Y. Xie , author N. Ni , author S. L. Budko , author G. S. Boebinger , author Q. Wang , author D. S. Dessau , author P. C. Canfield , et al. , journal Nature Phys volume 9 , pages 220 ( year 2013 )

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.