Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Contact process on interchange process

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fast particle swaps set the epidemic threshold to 1/(2dp)

desk verdict Sharp limit for a new epidemic model with moving particles and vacancies; main proof is solid but leans on an under-specified external lemma. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02747 v1 pith:IZTVZUGV submitted 2025-09-02 math.PR

M. Hilário , D. Ungaretti , D. Valesin , M. E. Vares This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60K3560J8082C22
keywords interchangeprocesscontactinterchange-and-contactcriticalthresholdmean-fieldlimitfaststirringrenormalizationbranchingrandomwalk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper defines the interchange-and-contact process, an epidemic model on Z^d in which infected particles recover at rate 1, infect healthy neighbors at rate λ, and particles of any state swap along edges at rate v. Starting from one infected particle and otherwise independent healthy or vacant sites with density p, it studies the critical infection threshold λ_c(v,p). The main claim is that as v→∞, λ_c(v,p) converges to 1/(2dp): the same mean-field threshold as a contact process in which every transmission succeeds, discounted by the probability p that the target site is actually occupied. If true, the result says that extremely fast mixing makes the environment self-average completely, so the epidemic's critical point is governed by the product of infection rate, degree, and particle density.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three interlocking devices. First, the interchange flow Φ(x,s,t) tracks individual particles, and the paper uses it to define infection paths and a containment flow that bounds the spread of the infection. Second, an up-and-down lemma shows that, under a uniform local density bound, the particle reached by a transmission is nearly in equilibrium, which yields a branching-random-walk approximation with birth rate 2dλp. Third, renormalization schemes on space-time boxes—with horizontal decoupling coming from large-deviation bounds on random walks and vertical decoupling from a refined stochastic-domination coupling—show that bad boxes are exponentially rare across scales. The branching-random-walk approximation is anchored by a large-deviation propagation result for branching Brownian motion, obtained as the diffusive scaling limit of the branching random walk.

What would settle it

Simulate two interchange-flow trajectories started at neighboring sites on a large finite box in d=3 at rate v=1, and measure the total-variation distance between their joint law and the product of their marginals as time T grows; if the distance does not decay to zero, Lemma B.1 fails and the paper's microscopic estimates, hence its proof of the theorem, would lose their grounding.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a theorem: for every p∈(0,1] and every d≥1, lim_{v→∞} λ_c(v,p)=1/(2dp). Equivalently, whenever 2dpλ<1 the infection dies out almost surely for all sufficiently large v, and whenever 2dpλ>1 it survives with positive probability for all sufficiently large v. The proof derives this by approximating the set of infected particles by a branching random walk with death rate 1 and birth rate 2dλp, valid while infections are sparse; extinction and survival are then established through separate renormalization arguments that control rare spatial and temporal fluctuations in particle density. A key structural ingredient is that when the interchange rate is large, each transmission attempt sees the target location in near-equilibrium, so the only effect of the moving environment is to thin transmissions by the occupation probability p.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that two particles moving under the interchange flow become statistically independent as time passes, even in dimensions d≥2; the paper relies on this decorrelation to justify the equilibrium thinning factor p, citing it from an earlier source where the proof is written for d=1 and asserted to extend easily.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed p, if 2dpλ<1, the infection dies out almost surely for all sufficiently large v.
  • For fixed p, if 2dpλ>1, the infection survives with positive probability for all sufficiently large v.
  • Taking p=1 recovers the known fast-stirring threshold 1/(2d) for the contact process with stirring.
  • The threshold depends on the environment only through the particle density p, so highly mobile populations behave like a mean-field epidemic with transmissions thinned by occupancy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not addressed in the paper is the rate of convergence: by analogy with existing refinements for the contact process with stirring, one may expect corrections of order 1/v in d≥3, (log v)/v in d=2, and v^{-1/3} in d=1.
  • The proof's reliance on asymptotic independence of interchange trajectories suggests a direct numerical check in d=3 could decide whether that decorrelation holds beyond the dimension in which the cited source proves it.
  • A testable prediction of the theorem is that on large finite tori with fast swapping, the critical threshold should display finite-size scaling around 1/(2dp), with the scaling window governed by the time the interchange process needs to mix the environment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper defines the "interchange-and-contact process" on Z^d: each site is empty, occupied by a healthy particle, or occupied by an infected particle; infections spread at rate λ to healthy neighbours and particles swap states across edges at rate v. Starting from a single infection and with all other sites independently healthy with probability p or empty otherwise, the authors define λ_c(v,p) and prove Theorem 1.1, which states that lim_{v→∞} λ_c(v,p) = 1/(2dp). The proof is split into an extinction regime (2dpλ<1) and a survival regime (2dpλ>1). The extinction argument combines a microscopic "up-and-down" lemma (Lemma 3.2, proved in Appendix B) with a half-crossing renormalization; the survival argument couples the process to a branching random walk and then runs a multi-scale renormalization with a new deterministic-initial-state decoupling. The paper is dense and the presentation is generally rigorous, but a central microscopic estimate on the extinction side depends on an external decorrelation result whose stated form and application are not fully justified.

Significance. If valid, Theorem 1.1 is a strong and natural result: it gives the exact mean-field critical value 1/(2dp) for epidemics among fast-moving particles, unifying the effective threshold of the fast-stirring contact process with the thinning effect present in the contact process on dynamical percolation. The techniques are also of independent interest: the survival side introduces a careful coupling with a branching random walk, and the refined decoupling for deterministic initial configurations (Lemma 2.7) is a useful improvement over earlier stochastic-domination tools. The paper is largely self-contained and the renormalization arguments are written in detail, with explicit constants and error bounds; these are genuine strengths. However, the extinction side relies at a load-bearing point on Lemma B.1, a decorrelation statement quoted from the literature whose higher-dimensional form is merely asserted and whose application appears to require more than the cited result provides.

major comments (1)
  1. [Appendix B, proof of Lemma 3.2] The proof of Lemma 3.2 derives (111) from (110) by applying Lemma B.1 at the intermediate time t = T - v^{-3/4}. This is not justified: Lemma B.1 only asserts total-variation decay as t→∞, while the allowed range of T in the statement is [v^{-1/2}, log v]. For T near v^{-1/2} (which is a range of positive probability in Lemma 3.3, since σ is exponential with rate up to order log^3 v), the time t is vanishing, not tending to infinity, so the decorrelation estimate cannot be applied uniformly over the claimed domain. This invalidates inequality (36) in Lemma 3.3, which is the step that produces the effective birth rate 2dλ p_1. In turn, Lemma 3.3 is used in Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 3.1, the bottom of the extinction renormalization. The authors should either prove a quantitative two-particle decorrelation bound that is uniform in t over the relevant range, or restructure the proof of Lemma 3.2 to treat small T separately (for example via local CLT estimates together with the density assumption (31)). Additionally, Lemma B.1 is cited from [18] for d=1 with the statement that the extension to d≥1 is easy, but no argument is supplied; since the manuscript's main theorem is for general d, this is a genuine gap. The unused parameter δ>0 in the statement of Lemma B.1 further obscures exactly which quoted assertion is being used.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix B, Lemma B.1] The parameter δ>0 appearing in the statement of Lemma B.1 plays no role in the displayed formula; please remove it or state the stronger version that is actually needed.
  2. [Section 2.2, Lemma 2.7] There is a typo in the phrase "times t,T > 0 with t≤T,and and parameter p∈ [0,1]": the duplicated "and" should be removed.
  3. [Section 2.2.1] "straightfoward" should be "straightforward".
  4. [Section 6.1.3, proof of Lemma 6.4] In the bullet point beginning "iff(j−1) =A", the text reads "(i,j ), so (i,j) gains the property" but the intended clause is "(i,j) is (N−1)-good, so it gains the property"; please correct this omission.
  5. [Section 5.3, paragraph after Definition 2.12] The assertion that the target vertex y at a transmission time t' is in equilibrium because its past trajectory avoids the containment flow is correct, but the sentence would benefit from a brief justification that membership in Ψ^A_s along the trajectory would force the endpoint y at time t' to lie in Ψ^A_{t'}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is derived from model-specific rigorous estimates; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation of Theorem 1.1 does not reduce to its inputs. On the extinction side, Proposition 3.1 is proved from the up-and-down Lemma 3.2, whose proof in Appendix B uses the external decorrelation Lemma B.1 (cited from De Masi–Presutti [18], not from the authors) and standard random-walk estimates; the thinning factor p enters as the equilibrium Bernoulli density, not as a fitted value. The renormalization scheme is borrowed from the authors' earlier work [23], but the paper re-proves the model-specific estimates (Lemmas 4.2–4.4 and Proposition 4.5) rather than importing the target result; Lemma 4.1 is a deterministic combinatorial cascading lemma, independent of the target conclusion. On the survival side, the coupling in Section 5.3 constructs a branching random walk with birth rate 2dλp and justifies that rate from the equilibrium probability that a transmission target is occupied, with the discrepancy controlled by Lemmas 2.11 and 5.5; the survival renormalization (Section 6) again supplies its own decoupling and induction proofs. No parameter is fitted to data, no prediction is renamed from a fit, and no uniqueness theorem by the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. The only debatable ingredient is Lemma B.1, an external d=1 decorrelation estimate whose d≥1 extension is asserted rather than proved; this is a correctness risk, not circularity, because it is an independent cited result whose assumptions do not include the target theorem. Accordingly there are no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the only inputs are model parameters lambda, v, p and standard analytic inequalities. The paper introduces a new interacting particle system and derives its fast-interchange critical threshold from first principles, relying on standard probability tools and two external decoupling results.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bernoulli(p) product measure pi_p is stationary for the interchange process on Z^d
    Used in the definition of the initial configuration and repeatedly in Lemmas 2.8, 3.1, 5.3, and Corollary 6.2 to keep particle density fixed at p.
  • standard math Continuous-time simple random walk estimates: martingale maximal inequality (Lemma 2.1), local CLT (Lemma 2.2), large deviations bounds
    Invoked throughout Sections 2 to 6 for random walk displacement and meeting probabilities.
  • standard math Stochastic domination and coupling results from Baldasso-Teixeira [3] (Theorem 1.5) and its refinement Lemma 2.7
    Lemma 2.7 provides the decoupling between interchange processes used for vertical decoupling in both extinction and survival renormalizations.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic decorrelation of two interchange flow trajectories (Lemma B.1, cited from [18])
    Load-bearing in the proof of Lemma 3.2 and hence in the branching random walk approximation; asserted to extend to d>=1 without proof in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Contact process on interchange process." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IZTVZUGV

@misc{pith2026250902747,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Contact process on interchange process},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IZTVZUGV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02747}
}
abstract

We introduce a model of epidemics among moving particles on any locally finite graph. At any time, each vertex is empty, occupied by a healthy particle, or occupied by an infected particle. Infected particles recover at rate $1$ and transmit the infection to healthy particles at neighboring vertices at rate $\lambda$. In addition, particles perform an interchange process with rate $\mathsf{v}$, that is, the states of adjacent vertices are swapped independently at rate $\mathsf{v}$, allowing the infection to spread also through the movement of infected particles. On $\mathbb{Z}^d$, we start with a single infected particle at the origin and with all the other vertices independently occupied by a healthy particle with probability $p$ or empty with probability $1-p$. We define $\lambda_c(\mathsf{v}, p)$ as the threshold value for $\lambda$ above which the infection persists with positive probability and analyze its asymptotic behavior as $\mathsf{v} \to \infty$ for fixed $p$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02747 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Trajectories involved in the statement of the Up-and-down lemma (Lemma 3.2). The proof of Lemma 3.2 is not too difficult and will be deferred to Appendix B since it requires some preparation involving some bounds for the interchange process and coupling interchange particles with independent random walks. For the remainder of this section, fix λ > 0 and p ∈ [0, 1) such that 2dpλ < 1. As before, we denote by (ζt)t≥0 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the processes (D (j) t )t∈[tj ,t ′ j ] and (E (j) t )t∈[tj ,t ′ j ] . The interchange-and-contact process is depicted on the left. White spots are empty, and gray spots contain healthy particles. For illustrative purposes, distinct infected particles are depicted with different colors. We follow the third infection, which appears at time t3 whose path (X (3) t )t≥t3 is colored in dark purple. The set… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Space-time regions for the coupling in Lemma 2.7, which ensures ξ ′ s (x) ≥ ξs(x) for all (x, s) ∈ B. Intuitively, the coupling works when all the particles passing through B remain nearby on interval [0, T] (controlled by discrip), and ξ ′ particles (cyan) are more frequent (in a precise way) than ξ particles (red) in B0(L) for a sufficiently long time t (controlled by g ↑ + g ↓ ), which gives enough time for every… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Epidemic Phase Transitions in the Zero-Range Process

    math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For an epidemic on a zero-range process, the authors prove a non-trivial critical density for extinction versus survival at every healing rate, and a critical healing threshold at low densities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [18]

    Springer Verlag, 1991

    Anna De Masi and Errico Presutti.Mathematical Methods for Hydrodynamic Limits . Springer Verlag, 1991

    work page 1991

  2. [1]

    Local survival of spread of infection among biased random walks

    Rangel Baldasso and Alexandre Stauffer. Local survival of spread of infection among biased random walks. Electronic Journal of Probability , 27:1–28, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [2]

    Local and global survival for infections with recovery.Stochastic Pro- cesses and their Applications , 160:161–173, 2023

    Rangel Baldasso and Alexandre Stauffer. Local and global survival for infections with recovery.Stochastic Pro- cesses and their Applications , 160:161–173, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    How can a clairvoyant particle escape the exclusion process?Ann

    Rangel Baldasso and Augusto Teixeira. How can a clairvoyant particle escape the exclusion process?Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. , 54(4):2177–2202, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Spread of an infection on the zero range process.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Probabilités et Statistiques , 56(3):1898–1928, 2020

    Rangel Baldasso and Augusto Teixeira. Spread of an infection on the zero range process.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Probabilités et Statistiques , 56(3):1898–1928, 2020

    work page 1928

  6. [5]

    The contact process over a dynamical d-regular graph

    Gabriel Baptista da Silva, Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira, and Daniel Valesin. The contact process over a dynamical d-regular graph. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques , 60(4):2849–2877, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    Fluctuations of the front in a one-dimensional model for the spread of an infection

    Jean Bérard and Alejandro Ramírez. Fluctuations of the front in a one-dimensional model for the spread of an infection. The Annals of Probability , 44(4):2770 – 2816, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Asymptotic behaviour of the critical value for the contact process with rapid stirring

    Roman Berezin and Leonid Mytnik. Asymptotic behaviour of the critical value for the contact process with rapid stirring. Journal of Theoretical Probability , 27(3):1045–1057, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    Survival and extinction of epidemics on random graphs with general degree.Annals of Probability, 49(1):244–286, 2021

    Shankar Bhamidi, Danny Nam, Oanh Nguyen, and Allan Sly. Survival and extinction of epidemics on random graphs with general degree.Annals of Probability, 49(1):244–286, 2021

    2021

  2. [9]

    J.D. Biggins. Uniform convergence of martingales in the branching random walk.The Annals of Probability , 20(1):137–151, 1992

    1992

  3. [10]

    Boucheron, G

    S. Boucheron, G. Lugosi, and P. Massart.Concentration Inequalities. Oxford University Press, 2013

    2013

  4. [11]

    Stochastic domination for a hidden markov chain with applications to the contact process in a randomly evolving environment.The Annals of Probability , pages 2263–2293, 2007

    Erik I Broman. Stochastic domination for a hidden markov chain with applications to the contact process in a randomly evolving environment.The Annals of Probability , pages 2263–2293, 2007

    2007

  5. [12]

    The contact process on dynamical random trees with degree dependence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12689 , 2024

    Natalia Cardona-Tobón, Marcel Ortgiese, Marco Seiler, and Anja Sturm. The contact process on dynamical random trees with degree dependence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12689 , 2024

    2024

  6. [13]

    Contact processes on random graphs with power law degree distributions have critical value 0.The Annals of Probability , 37(6):2332–2356, 2009

    Shirshendu Chatterjee and Rick Durrett. Contact processes on random graphs with power law degree distributions have critical value 0.The Annals of Probability , 37(6):2332–2356, 2009

    2009

  7. [14]

    Sharp threshold for the ballisticity of the random walk on the exclusion process.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02096 , 2024

    Guillaume Conchon-Kerjan, Daniel Kious, and Pierre-François Rodriguez. Sharp threshold for the ballisticity of the random walk on the exclusion process.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02096 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    The SIR model in a moving population: propagation of infection and herd immunity

    Duncan Dauvergne and Allan Sly. The SIR model in a moving population: propagation of infection and herd immunity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06037 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Spread of infections in a heterogeneous moving population.Probab

    Duncan Dauvergne and Allan Sly. Spread of infections in a heterogeneous moving population.Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 187 , 187:73—-131, 2023

    2023

  10. [17]

    Reaction-diffusion equations for interacting particle systems

    Anna De Masi, Pablo A Ferrari, and Joel L Lebowitz. Reaction-diffusion equations for interacting particle systems. Journal of statistical physics , 44(3):589–644, 1986

    1986

  11. [19]

    Oriented percolation in two dimensions.The Annals of Probability , pages 999–1040, 1984

    Richard Durrett. Oriented percolation in two dimensions.The Annals of Probability , pages 999–1040, 1984

    1984

  12. [20]

    Particle systems and reaction-diffusion equations.The Annals of Pro- bability, pages 289–333, 1994

    Richard Durrett and Claudia Neuhauser. Particle systems and reaction-diffusion equations.The Annals of Pro- bability, pages 289–333, 1994

    1994

  13. [21]

    The contact process on a graph adapting to the infection

    John Fernley, Peter Mörters, and Marcel Ortgiese. The contact process on a graph adapting to the infection. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , page 104596, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Cambridge University Press, 2025

    Alan Frieze and Michał Karoński.Introduction to random graphs . Cambridge University Press, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Results on the contact process with dynamic edges or under renewals.Electronic Journal of Probability , 27:1–31, 2022

    Marcelo Hilário, Daniel Ungaretti, Daniel Valesin, and Maria Eulália Vares. Results on the contact process with dynamic edges or under renewals.Electronic Journal of Probability , 27:1–31, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Metastability of the contact process on slowly evolving scale-free networks

    Emmanuel Jacob, Amitai Linker, and Peter Mörters. Metastability of the contact process on slowly evolving scale-free networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04654 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The contact process on dynamical scale-free networks

    Emmanuel Jacob, Amitai Linker, and Peter Mörters. The contact process on dynamical scale-free networks. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques , 61(2):1279–1318, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    The contact process on scale-free networks evolving by vertex updating

    Emmanuel Jacob and Peter Mörters. The contact process on scale-free networks evolving by vertex updating. Royal Society open science , 4(5):170081, 2017. CONTACT PROCESS ON INTERCHANGE PROCESS 59

    2017

  19. [27]

    Front propagation in an exclusion one-dimensional reactive dynamics

    Milton Jara, Gregorio Moreno, and Alejandro F Ramirez. Front propagation in an exclusion one-dimensional reactive dynamics. Markov Processes And Related Fields , 14(2):185–206, 2008

    2008

  20. [28]

    Foundations of modern probability

    Olav Kallenberg. Foundations of modern probability . Springer, 2 edition, 2002

    2002

  21. [29]

    Rigorous results for the diffusive contact processes in d> or= 3.Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General , 27(22):7327, 1994

    Makoto Katori. Rigorous results for the diffusive contact processes in d> or= 3.Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and General , 27(22):7327, 1994

    1994

  22. [30]

    The spread of a rumor or infection in a moving population.Ann

    Harry Kesten and Vladas Sidoravicius. The spread of a rumor or infection in a moving population.Ann. Probab., 33(1):2402–2462, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    A phase transition in a model for the spread of an infection.Illinois Journal of Mathematics , 50(1-4):547–634, 2006

    Harry Kesten and Vladas Sidoravicius. A phase transition in a model for the spread of an infection.Illinois Journal of Mathematics , 50(1-4):547–634, 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    A shape theorem for the spread of an infection.Annals of Mathematics , pages 701–766, 2008

    Harry Kesten and Vladas Sidoravicius. A shape theorem for the spread of an infection.Annals of Mathematics , pages 701–766, 2008

    2008

  25. [33]

    Asymptotic behavior of basic contact process with rapid stirring.Journal of Theoretical Probability, 8(4):833–876, 1995

    Norio Konno. Asymptotic behavior of basic contact process with rapid stirring.Journal of Theoretical Probability, 8(4):833–876, 1995

    1995

  26. [34]

    Cambridge University Press, 2010

    Gregory F Lawler and Vlada Limic.Random walk: a modern introduction , volume 123 ofCambridge studies in advanced mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    Improved asymptotic estimates for the contact process with stirring.Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics , 32(2):254–274, 2017

    Anna Levit and Daniel Valesin. Improved asymptotic estimates for the contact process with stirring.Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics , 32(2):254–274, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Interacting particle systems , volume 276 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften

    Thomas Milton Liggett. Interacting particle systems , volume 276 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Springer, 1985

    1985

  29. [37]

    Stochastic interacting systems: contact, voter and exclusion processes , volume 324 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften

    Thomas Milton Liggett. Stochastic interacting systems: contact, voter and exclusion processes , volume 324 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften . springer science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    The contact process with dynamic edges onZ

    Amitai Linker and Daniel Remenik. The contact process with dynamic edges onZ. Electronic Journal of Proba- bility, 25, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Metastable densities for the contact process on power law random graphs

    Thomas Mountford, Daniel Valesin, and Qiang Yao. Metastable densities for the contact process on power law random graphs. Electron. J. Probab, 18(103):1–36, 2013

    2013

  32. [40]

    The contact process in a dynamic random environment.The Annals of Applied Probability , pages 2392–2420, 2008

    Daniel Remenik. The contact process in a dynamic random environment.The Annals of Applied Probability , pages 2392–2420, 2008

    2008

  33. [41]

    The contact process on dynamic regular graphs: Subcritical phase and monotonicity

    Bruno Schapira and Daniel Valesin. The contact process on dynamic regular graphs: Subcritical phase and monotonicity. The Annals of Probability , 53(2):753–796, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Contact process in an evolving random environment.Electronic Journal of Proba- bility, 28:1–61, 2023

    Marco Seiler and Anja Sturm. Contact process in an evolving random environment.Electronic Journal of Proba- bility, 28:1–61, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    The critical contact process in a randomly evolving environment dies out

    Jeffrey E Steif and Marcus Warfheimer. The critical contact process in a randomly evolving environment dies out. Alea, 4:337–357, 2008

    2008

  36. [44]

    The contact process on random graphs.Ensaios Mat, 40:1–115, 2024

    Daniel Valesin. The contact process on random graphs.Ensaios Mat, 40:1–115, 2024. (M. Hilário) ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil Email address: mhilario@mat.ufmg.br (D. Ungaretti) Instituto de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Email ad...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.