Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

p-K\"ahler structures on compact complex manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves the Alessandrini–Bassanelli conjecture for holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds with Gaussian rational structure constants and for (n-2)-Kähler nilpotent nilmanifolds, collapsing intermediate p-Kähler geometry to…

desk verdict Worth reviewing: proves two cases of the Alessandrini-Bassanelli conjecture on nilmanifolds with good new examples, but Theorem 4.1 has a real gap in the induction that needs to be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13546 v1 pith:J2AXPARH submitted 2025-06-16 math.DG

Ettore Lo Giudice This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 32J2753C1532G05
keywords p-Kählerstructurep-symplecticp-pluriclosednilmanifoldnilpotentcomplexholomorphicallyparallelizablebalancedmetricdeformationof
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attacks the Alessandrini–Bassanelli conjecture, which predicts that on a compact complex manifold a $p$-Kähler structure (a closed transverse $(p,p)$-form) implies a $(p+1)$-Kähler structure. It proves the conjecture for holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds whose structure constants lie in $\mathbb{Q}[i]$, and it proves the top case for all nilpotent complex structures: a nilmanifold carrying an $(n-2)$-Kähler structure is balanced. If the arguments are right, the intermediate $p$-Kähler hierarchy in these classes collapses into balanced geometry. The paper also derives a necessary condition for a family of $p$-Kähler structures to move in a differentiable family of complex manifolds, and it shows the cohomology classes of $p$-Kähler, $p$-symplectic, and $p$-pluriclosed structures on invariant nilmanifolds are never zero.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on left-invariant complex structure equations on nilpotent Lie algebras, $d\varphi^j = \sum_{i<k<j} A^j_{ik}\varphi^{ik}$ (with possible mixed $B$ terms in the general nilpotent case), together with the external criterion that a compact complex manifold admits no $p$-Kähler structure exactly when there is a non-zero simple $(n-p,0)$-form that is $\bar\partial$-closed and $\partial$-exact. The induction step passes to the intermediate Lie algebra $\mathfrak{k}$ spanned by the first $n-1$ forms, which inherits a $(p-1)$-Kähler structure and, by Malcev's theorem under the rationality hypothesis, a lattice; the induction hypothesis then produces enough closed $(1,0)$-forms to raise the order of the form. In the $(n-2)$-Kähler case the machinery fixes a coframe with $d\psi^1=d\psi^2=d\psi^3=0$ and builds a transverse $(n-1)$-form by wedging the given $\Omega$ with $\psi^{1\bar1}$ and $\psi^{2\bar2}$. For deformation questions the paper uses the simultaneous contraction operator $e^{\iota_\varphi|\iota_{\bar\varphi}}$ to pull forms on nearby fibers back to the central fiber and differentiates the condition $\partial_t\Omega_t=0$.

What would settle it

The decisive check is to search the families in Examples 4.6 and 4.7 for a 5-dimensional nilpotent nilmanifold that admits a transverse closed real $(3,3)$-form while its structure equations cannot be rearranged into the form $d\psi^1=d\psi^2=d\psi^3=0$. Theorem 4.2 declares this impossible, so one such example would settle the claim against it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 4.2: a compact nilmanifold of complex dimension $n$ with nilpotent complex structure admits a balanced metric as soon as it admits an $(n-2)$-Kähler structure. Theorem 4.1 is the fuller version for holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds: with structure equations $d\varphi^j = \sum_{i<k<j} A^j_{ik}\varphi^{ik}$ and $A^j_{ik}\in\mathbb{Q}[i]$, any $p$-Kähler structure forces a $(p+1)$-Kähler structure. The proof is an induction on dimension: one passes to an intermediate complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{k}$ that inherits a $(p-1)$-Kähler structure, uses Malcev's theorem to give it a lattice, applies the induction hypothesis, and then invokes an external criterion saying that failure to admit a $(p+1)$-Kähler structure is equivalent to the existence of a non-zero simple $\bar\partial$-closed and $\partial$-exact $(n-p-1,0)$-form. The final contradiction upgrades the form along the missing directions. For the $(n-2)$ case, the construction of the balanced form is explicit: $\Omega_1 = \sigma_1(\Omega\wedge\psi^{1\bar1}+\Omega\wedge\psi^{2\bar2})$ is shown transverse by a pointwise check on simple $(1,0)$-forms.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is twofold: the previously established criterion that a manifold has no $p$-Kähler structure exactly when a certain exact holomorphic form exists, and the rationality of the structure constants ($A^j_{ik}\in\mathbb{Q}[i]$) that makes the intermediate Lie algebra admit a lattice; if either premise is wrong, the induction in Theorem 4.1 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds with structure constants in $\mathbb{Q}[i]$, the $p$-Kähler hierarchy collapses: a $p$-Kähler structure forces all higher $q$-Kähler structures up to $q=n-1$, i.e. a balanced metric.
  • On nilpotent nilmanifolds, an $(n-2)$-Kähler structure is automatically a balanced metric, so the conjectured inclusion of $(n-2)$-Kähler into balanced holds in this class.
  • Any smooth curve of $p$-Kähler structures on a fixed central fiber must satisfy $\partial\circ\iota_{\varphi'(0)}(\Omega)=-\partial\Omega'(0)$; in particular the class $[\partial\circ\iota_{\varphi'(0)}(\Omega)]$ vanishes in $H^{p,p+1}_{\bar\partial}(M)$, giving a computable deformation obstruction.
  • On nilmanifolds with invariant complex structures, no $p$-Kähler, $p$-symplectic, or $p$-pluriclosed structure is cohomologically trivial in its natural cohomology.
  • The paper's examples give a new $3$-Kähler structure on the holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifold $\eta^5_\beta$, a family of $3$-Kähler nilmanifolds, a family of $3$-symplectic nilmanifolds, and a family of $3$-Kähler structures moving along a deformation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same induction could run without the rationality hypothesis, the collapse to balanced would follow for all holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds; the $\mathbb{Q}[i]$ condition enters only through the lattice existence step, so removing it is the natural next target.
  • The deformation obstruction yields a practical stability test: compute whether $\partial\circ\iota_{\varphi'(0)}(\Omega)$ is $\bar\partial$-exact; directions where it is not cannot carry any smooth curve of $p$-Kähler structures, which places the known instability examples in a systematic framework.
  • The non-vanishing theorem for nilmanifolds contrasts with known balanced metrics on other compact complex manifolds whose top power has zero cohomology class, so nilmanifolds appear to be the sharp regime for this cohomological obstruction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies p-Kähler, p-symplectic, and p-pluriclosed structures on compact complex manifolds. Its headline results are Theorem 4.1 (a p-Kähler structure on a holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifold with rational structure equations implies a (p+1)-Kähler structure) and Theorem 4.2 ((n−2)-Kähler nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structure are balanced), which together would resolve the Alessandrini–Bassanelli conjecture in these classes. Section 5 gives a deformation obstruction (Theorem 5.1 and Corollary 5.2), and Section 6 gives cohomological nonvanishing criteria for p-Kähler, p-symplectic, and p-pluriclosed classes on nilmanifolds. Several worked examples are provided, including a new 3-Kähler structure on ηβ5 and families of 3-Kähler and 3-symplectic nilmanifolds.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, they settle a long-standing conjecture in a substantial class and reduce p-Kähler geometry to balanced geometry on nilpotent nilmanifolds. The deformation formula and the cohomological nonvanishing theorem are useful and appear sound, and the explicit examples are a strength of the paper. However, the proof of the induction step in Theorem 4.1 contains a serious unsupported descent, the iterative construction has an internal inconsistency, and the proof of Theorem 4.2 contains a division-by-zero gap. Because these issues are load-bearing for the headline results, the significance cannot be fully assessed until they are repaired.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Theorem 4.1 (descent step before Eq. (6))] The induction step depends on the assertion that the complex Lie algebra k, spanned by φ^1,...,φ^{n-1}, φ̄^1,...,φ̄^{n-1}, admits a (p−1)-Kähler structure, with citation only to the proof of [18, Proposition 3.3]. This is not justified in the manuscript. The p-Kähler form on M=Γ\G is not assumed left-invariant, and the subgroup K integrating k does not automatically give a compact submanifold K/Γ_K of M with Γ_K⊂Γ, so the given form cannot be restricted or descended without an argument. Since the induction hypothesis is applied to Mk=Γ_K\K, this step is load-bearing: without an invariant reduction or averaging theorem, the induction does not go through. The author should either state and prove the descent, or prove a version of [18, Proposition 3.3] for the Lie algebra that applies to arbitrary (not necessarily invariant) forms.
  2. [§4, Theorem 4.1, equations (7)–(11)] The construction of ζ_k is internally inconsistent. Equation (10) says 'ζ_{k−1}=0 if and only if ζ_{k−1}=a_k φ^1∧...∧φ^{k−1}', but if ζ_{k−1}=0 then ζ_k=−φ^k∧ζ_{k−1}=0, contradicting the assertion ζ_k≠0 in (11). The preceding formulas also do not rule out the possibility that the form being multiplied by φ^j is already zero at an earlier stage. Moreover, the claim that ζ is left-invariant is asserted without proof: [6, Theorem 3.2] yields an arbitrary smooth ζ, and no symmetrization step is supplied. This part of the proof must be rewritten before the induction can be evaluated.
  3. [§4, Theorem 4.2, after Eq. (13)] The coframe change ψ^2=φ^2−(B^2_{11}/B^3_{11})φ^3 divides by B^3_{11}; the case B^3_{11}=0 is not treated. Since the theorem claims a conclusion for every nilpotent complex structure, this is a genuine gap. In addition, the step applying [43, Theorem 2.3] to conclude that at least one dψ^j vanishes for j≥3, and then re-ordering to obtain dψ^1=dψ^2=dψ^3=0, should be spelled out with the precise statement of the cited theorem; as written, the simultaneous normalization is not evident.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'hyphotesis' in the introduction and 'paralellizable' in Section 2; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  2. [§3, notation] The map denoted eιφ|ιφ is typeset inconsistently, sometimes as 'eιφ|iφ' and sometimes with subscripts missing; please standardize the notation for the deformation isomorphism.
  3. [References] Reference [15] appears in the bibliography but does not appear to be cited in the text; please check whether it should be cited or removed.
  4. [Example 5.3] The identity eΩ_t=e^{iφ(t)|iφ(t)}(Ω*) is asserted without computation; since the example illustrates the obstruction criterion, a short verification or explicit reference would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central results are derived from external theorems and direct computations; the only self-citation appears in peripheral examples.

full rationale

The paper's main claims (Theorems 4.1, 4.2) are not circular. Theorem 4.1 is an induction whose base case cites [18, Theorem 3.8] and whose descent to the subalgebra k cites [18, Proof of Proposition 3.3]; both are external to the author. The induction then uses [43, Theorem 2.3] and [6, Theorem 3.2] as black boxes, and the final contradiction is a contrapositive application of [6, Theorem 3.2], not a restatement of the desired implication. Theorem 4.2 uses [22, Proposition 3.4] and [43, Theorem 2.3] to force a coframe with three closed 1-forms, then verifies by direct computation that the proposed (n-1)-form is d-closed and transverse. The deformation result (Theorem 5.1) is a first-order Taylor expansion of the formula for the pulled-back family of forms, and Section 6 consists of integration by parts; none of these steps feeds a fitted parameter back into the statement. The sole self-citation [28] (Lo Giudice-Tomassini) occurs in Examples 4.5 and 4.7, as a source for transversality and for a 4-symplectic structure on an example; it is not used in any main theorem. Accordingly, no derivation step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's original contribution is conditional on several external results. The main theorems are not derived from first principles; they reduce to prior characterizations of p-Kähler structures on nilmanifolds. No new entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Malcev's theorem: a connected simply connected nilpotent Lie group with rational structure constants admits a lattice.
    Used in Theorem 4.1 and Examples 4.5-4.7 to pass from a complex Lie algebra to a nilmanifold. Unless the structure constants are Gaussian rational (Q[i]), the lattice need not exist.
  • domain assumption [6, Theorem 3.2]: a compact complex manifold admits a p-Kähler structure iff there is no non-zero simple (n-p,0)-form ζ with ∂ζ=0 and ζ=∂α.
    Black-box characterization used twice in the proof of Theorem 4.1; the final contradiction depends on it.
  • domain assumption [43, Theorem 2.3]: existence of p-Kähler structures on nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structures imposes d-closed left-invariant (1,0)-forms in the coframe.
    Used in Theorem 4.2 to force a coframe with three closed forms, and in Theorem 4.1 to get dφ^j=0 for j≤k+1.
  • domain assumption [22, Proposition 3.4]: certain structure constants vanish if a transverse (p,p)-form exists on a nilmanifold with nilpotent complex structure.
    Used in Theorem 4.2 to kill coefficients of dφ^3.
  • standard math Nilpotent complex structures admit a basis of left-invariant (1,0)-forms with structure equations (1).
    Standard from [12,13]; basic to all nilmanifold results.
  • standard math For holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds, left-invariant metrics are balanced ([1]).
    Used at the start of the proof of Theorem 4.1 to handle n≤4 and to note (n-1)-Kähler exists.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of p-K\"ahler structures on compact complex manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J2AXPARH

@misc{pith2026250613546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: p-K\"ahler structures on compact complex manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J2AXPARH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13546}
}
abstract

Let $(M,J)$ be a complex manifold of complex dimension $n$. A $p$-K\"ahler structure on $(M,J)$ is a real, closed $(p,p)$-transverse form. In this paper, we address the conjecture of L. Alessandrini and G. Bassanelli on $(n-2)$-K\"ahler nilmanifolds equipped with nilpotent complex structures and holomorphically parallelizable nilmanifolds. We also derive necessary conditions for the existence of smooth curves of $p$-K\"ahler structures, starting from a fixed $p$-K\"ahler structure, along a differentiable family of compact complex manifolds. In addition, we study the cohomology classes of $p$-K\"ahler (resp. $p$-symplectic, $p$-pluriclosed) structures on compact complex manifolds. We provide several examples of families of compact complex manifolds admitting $p$-K\"ahler or $p$-symplectic structures.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Alessandrini, G

    L. Alessandrini, G. Bassanelli , Positive ∂∂-closed currents and non-K¨ ahler geometry,J. Geom. Anal. , 2 (1992), pp. 291–316. (Cited on p. 2, 8.)

    work page 1992

  2. [18]

    A. Fino, A. Mainenti , A note on p-K¨ ahler structures on compact quotients of Lie groups,Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 203 (2024) pp. 2111–2124. (Cited on p. 8, 10.)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Abbena, A

    E. Abbena, A. Grassi, Hermitian left invariant metrics on complex Lie groups and cosymplectic Hermitian manifolds, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A (6) , 5 (1986), pp. 371–379. (Cited on p. 8.)

    work page 1986

  4. [2]

    Alessandrini, Classes of compact non-K¨ ahler manifolds,C

    L. Alessandrini, Classes of compact non-K¨ ahler manifolds,C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 349 (2011), pp. 1089–1092. (Cited on p. 2.)

    work page 2011

  5. [3]

    Alessandrini, Proper modifications of generalized p-K¨ ahler manifolds,J

    L. Alessandrini, Proper modifications of generalized p-K¨ ahler manifolds,J. Geom. Anal. , 27 (2017), pp. 947–967. (Cited on p. 2.)

    work page 2017

  6. [4]

    Alessandrini, M

    L. Alessandrini, M. Andreatta, Closed transverse ( p, p)-forms on compact complex manifolds, Compo- sitio Math., 61 (1987), pp. 181–200. (Cited on p. 2.)

    work page 1987

  7. [5]

    Alessandrini, G

    L. Alessandrini, G. Bassanelli , Small deformations of a class of compact non-K¨ ahler manifolds. ,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 109 (1990), pp. 1059–1062. (Cited on p. 2, 16.)

    work page 1990

  8. [6]

    Alessandrini, G

    L. Alessandrini, G. Bassanelli , Compact p-K¨ ahler manifolds,Geom. Dedicata, 38 (1991), pp. 199–210. (Cited on p. 4, 9, 12, 13.)

    work page 1991

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Andreatta, Moishezon manifolds, Math

    M. Andreatta, Moishezon manifolds, Math. Z., 230 (1999), pp. 713–726. (Cited on p. 4.)

    1999

  2. [9]

    Angella, L

    D. Angella, L. Ugarte, On small deformations of balanced manifolds,Differential Geom. Appl., 54 (2017), pp. 464–474. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2017

  3. [10]

    Bismut, A local index theorem for non-K¨ ahler manifolds,Math

    J.-M. Bismut, A local index theorem for non-K¨ ahler manifolds,Math. Ann., 284 (1989), pp. 681–699. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1989

  4. [11]

    B l ocki, S

    Z. B l ocki, S. Pli´s, Squares of positive ( p, p)-forms, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 351 (2013), pp. 27–32. (Cited on p. 11.)

    2013

  5. [12]

    L. A. Cordero, M. Fern ´andez, A. Gray, L. Ugarte , Nilpotent complex structures on compact nilmanifolds, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. , 49 (1997), pp. 83–100. (Cited on p. 6.)

    1997

  6. [13]

    L. A. Cordero, M. Fern ´andez, A. Gray, L. Ugarte , Compact nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex structures: Dolbeault cohomology, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352 (2000), pp. 5405–5433. (Cited on p. 6.)

    2000

  7. [14]

    Deligne, P

    P. Deligne, P. Griffiths, J. Morgan, D. Sullivan, Real homotopy theory of K¨ ahler manifolds,Invent. Math., 29 (1975), pp. 245–274. (Cited on p. 1.)

    1975

  8. [15]

    Enrietti, A

    N. Enrietti, A. Fino, L. Vezzoni , Tamed symplectic forms and strong K¨ ahler with torsion metrics, J. Symplectic Geom., 10 (2012), pp. 203–223. (Cited on p. .)

    2012

  9. [16]

    Ehresmann , Sur les espaces fibr´ es diff´ erentiables,C

    C. Ehresmann , Sur les espaces fibr´ es diff´ erentiables,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris , 224 (1947), pp. 1611–1612. (Cited on p. 6.)

    1947

  10. [17]

    Fagioli, A

    F. Fagioli, A. Mainenti, Some criteria for positive forms and applications, preprint arXiv:2502.17317v2. (Cited on p. 4, 11, 12.)

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. Fino, A. Tomassini , Blow-ups and resolutions of strong K¨ ahler with torsion metrics, Adv. Math., 221 (2009), pp. 914–935. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Gauduchon, Le th´ eor` eme de l’excentricit´ e nulle,C

    P. Gauduchon, Le th´ eor` eme de l’excentricit´ e nulle,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. A-B, 285 (1977), pp. A387– A390. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1977

  13. [21]

    Harvey, A

    R. Harvey, A. W. Knapp, Positive (p, p ) forms, Wirtinger’s inequality, and currents, in: Value distribution theory (Proc. Tulane Univ. Program, Tulane Univ., New Orleans, La., 1972-1973), Part A , vol. 25 of Pure Appl. Math., Dekker, New York, (1974), pp. 43–62. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1974

  14. [22]

    R. Hind, C. Medori, A. Tomassini , Families of almost complex structures and transverse ( p, p)-forms, J. Geom. Anal., 33 (2023), Paper No. 334, 23 . (Cited on p. 10, 13.)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Huybrechts, Complex Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005

    D. Huybrechts, Complex Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005. (Cited on p. 6.)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Kodaira , Complex manifolds and deformations of complex structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005

    K. Kodaira , Complex manifolds and deformations of complex structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005. (Cited on p. 6.)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Kodaira, J

    K. Kodaira, J. Morrow, Complex Manifolds, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2006. (Cited on p. 6, 7.)

    2006

  18. [26]

    Kodaira, D.C

    K. Kodaira, D.C. Spencer , On deformations of complex analytic structures. III. Stability theorems for complex structures, Ann. of Math. , 71 (1960), pp. 43–76. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1960

  19. [27]

    Jost, S.-T

    J. Jost, S.-T. Yau , A nonlinear elliptic system for maps from Hermitian to Riemannian manifolds and rigidity theorems in Hermitian geometry, Acta Math., 170 (1993), pp. 221–254. (Cited on p. 2.) 20 ETTORE LO GIUDICE

    1993

  20. [28]

    Lo Giudice, A

    E. Lo Giudice, A. Tomassini p-symplectic and p-pluriclosed structures on solvmanifolds, Pure Appl. Math. Q. 21 (2025), pp. 1519–1555. (Cited on p. 11, 13, 14.)

    2025

  21. [29]

    A. I. Malcev, On a class of homogeneous spaces,Amer. Math. Soc. Translation Ser. 1, 9 (1962), pp. 276–307. (Cited on p. 8, 12, 13.)

    1962

  22. [30]

    M. L. Michelsohn , On the existence of special metrics in complex geometry, Acta Math., 149 (1982), pp. 261–295. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1982

  23. [31]

    Nakamura, Complex parallelisable manifolds and their small deformations, J

    I. Nakamura, Complex parallelisable manifolds and their small deformations, J. Differential Geometry , 10 (1975), pp. 85–112. (Cited on p. 11.)

    1975

  24. [32]

    A. Otal, L. Ugarte, R. Villacampa , Invariant solutions to the Strominger system and the heterotic equations of motion, Nuclear Phys. B , 920 (2017), pp. 442–474. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Piovani, T

    R. Piovani, T. Sferruzza , Deformations of Strong K¨ ahler with torsion metrics, Complex Manifolds , 8 (2021), pp. 286–301. (Cited on p. 3, 15.)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Piovani, A

    R. Piovani, A. Tomassini , Aeppli cohomology and Gauduchon metrics, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory , 14 (2020), no. 1, Art. 22, 15 pp. (Cited on p. 2, 4, 18.)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Popovici, Deformation limits of projective manifolds: Hodge numbers and strongly Gauduchon metrics, Invent

    D. Popovici, Deformation limits of projective manifolds: Hodge numbers and strongly Gauduchon metrics, Invent. Math., 194 (2013), pp. 515–534. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2013

  28. [36]

    S. Rao, X. Wan, Q. Zhao , On local stabilities of p-K¨ ahler structures,Compos. Math., 155 (2019), pp. 455–483. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2019

  29. [37]

    S. Rao, X. Wan, Q. Zhao , Power series proofs for local stabilities of K¨ ahler and balanced structures with mild ∂∂-lemma, Nagoya Math. J. , 246 (2022), pp. 305–354. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2022

  30. [38]

    S. Rao, Q. Zhao , Extension formulas and deformation invariance of Hodge numbers., C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 353 (2015), pp. 979–984. (Cited on p. 4, 7.)

    2015

  31. [39]

    S. Rao, Q. Zhao , Several special complex structures and their deformation properties, J. Geom. Anal. , 28 (2018), pp. 2984–3047. (Cited on p. 4, 7.)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Salamon, Complex structures on nilpotent Lie algebras,J

    S.M. Salamon, Complex structures on nilpotent Lie algebras,J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 157 (2001), pp. 311–333. (Cited on p. 18.)

    2001

  33. [41]

    Sferruzza, Deformations of balanced metrics, Bull

    T. Sferruzza, Deformations of balanced metrics, Bull. Sci. Math. , 178 (2022), Paper No. 103143, 23 pp. (Cited on p. 3, 15.)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Sferruzza , Deformations of astheno-K¨ ahler metrics, Complex Manifolds , 10 (2023), no

    T. Sferruzza , Deformations of astheno-K¨ ahler metrics, Complex Manifolds , 10 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 20230102, 19 pp. (Cited on p. 3, 15.)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Sferruzza, N

    T. Sferruzza, N. Tardini, p-K¨ ahler and balanced structures on nilmanifolds with nilpotent complex struc- tures, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. , 62 (2022), pp. 869–881. (Cited on p. 8, 10.)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Sferruzza, A

    T. Sferruzza, A. Tomassini , On cohomological and formal properties of strong K¨ ahler with torsion and astheno-K¨ ahler metrics,Math. Z., 304 (2023), Paper No. 55, 27. (Cited on p. 13, 14.)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Streets, G

    J. Streets, G. Tian , A parabolic flow of pluriclosed metrics, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (2010), pp. 3101–3133. (Cited on p. 2.)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Sullivan, Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds, Invent

    D. Sullivan, Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds, Invent. Math., 36 (1976), pp. 225–255. (Cited on p. 2.)

    1976

  39. [47]

    H. C. Wang, Complex parallisable manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5 (1954), pp. 771–776. (Cited on p. 5, 8.)

    1954

  40. [48]

    Wu, On the geometry of superstrings with torsion, Thesis (Ph.D.) Harvard University, Proquest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI,, (2006)

    C.-C. Wu, On the geometry of superstrings with torsion, Thesis (Ph.D.) Harvard University, Proquest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI,, (2006). (Cited on p. 2.) (Ettore Lo Giudice) Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Informatiche Unit`a di Matematica e Informatica, Universit`a deg...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.