pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26688 · v1 · pith:J2JZ35VCnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Adaptive Randomized Pivoting for Tensor Singular Value Decomposition Model

Ahmadsho Akdodshoev , Valentin Leplat , Salman Ahmadi-Asl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords tensor CUR approximationadaptive randomized pivotingt-productFourier domain samplingcross approximationexpected error boundfrequency alignment condition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adaptive randomized pivoting extends to tensors with two constructions: slicewise ARP-T-CUR inheriting matrix bounds and coupled T-ARP under a frequency-alignment condition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends adaptive randomized pivoting from matrices to tensors in the t-product framework. ARP-T-CUR applies the matrix method independently to each Fourier frontal slice, yielding a slicewise CUR with an expected-error bound taken directly from matrix results. T-ARP instead selects the same lateral and horizontal slices for the entire tensor, producing a true tensor cross approximation, but requires an explicit frequency-alignment condition on the sampling rules to obtain a comparable error bound. When leverage-score distributions match across frequencies, the bound recovers the familiar r+1 factor; numerical tests on synthetic data, images, and videos compare the methods to standard tensor cross baselines.

Core claim

Adaptive randomized pivoting extends to the tensor setting by either applying it independently per Fourier slice (ARP-T-CUR) or by enforcing common slice indices across all slices (T-ARP); the latter requires a frequency-alignment condition that quantifies how far the shared sampling rule deviates from the per-slice rules, and the condition yields an expected-error bound that reduces to the standard matrix factor when the leverage scores are aligned.

What carries the argument

The frequency-alignment condition measuring deviation between a common tensor-level sampling rule and the individual Fourier-slice ARP rules, which controls the error bound for the coupled T-ARP construction.

If this is right

  • ARP-T-CUR delivers a Fourier-slicewise CUR whose expected error is bounded exactly as in the matrix ARP theory.
  • T-ARP produces a genuine tensor cross approximation using the same lateral and horizontal slices throughout the tensor.
  • The expected-error bound for T-ARP holds once the frequency-alignment condition is satisfied and recovers the r+1 factor when leverage scores align.
  • The resulting tensor cross approximation connects directly to t-DEIM.
  • Experiments on images and videos indicate that common-index sampling improves performance over independent-slice baselines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the alignment condition holds for many real-world tensors such as video data, T-ARP would give structurally coherent approximations at modest extra cost.
  • The common-index requirement could be relaxed by allowing limited frequency-dependent adjustments while still preserving a tensor-level CUR form.
  • The same alignment idea might apply to other tensor factorizations that mix Fourier and spatial sampling.
  • Direct comparison of storage and runtime between ARP-T-CUR and T-ARP on large tensors would quantify the practical price of enforcing common indices.

Load-bearing premise

The frequency-alignment condition must hold so that the common sampling rule stays close enough to the slice-wise rules; if the distributions of leverage scores differ strongly across frequencies the stated T-ARP bound no longer applies.

What would settle it

Construct a tensor whose leverage-score distributions differ markedly across Fourier frequencies, run T-ARP, and check whether the observed approximation error exceeds the bound by more than the factor predicted by the measured alignment distance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26688 by Ahmadsho Akdodshoev, Salman Ahmadi-Asl, Valentin Leplat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tensor SVD and its truncated version. Definition 2.15 (T-QR Decomposition). Let X ∈ R n1×n2×n3 with n1 ≥ n2. The T-QR decomposition of X is given by X = Q ∗ R, where: • Q ∈ R n1×n2×n3 is a tensor with orthonormal lateral slices: Q⊤ ∗ Q = I (the identity tensor of size n2 × n2 × n3); • R ∈ R n2×n2×n3 is an upper triangular tensor (each frontal slice is upper triangular). If n1 > n2, the decomposition is oft… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Tensor approximation based on sampling lateral and horizontal slices. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reconstructions of an image from Kodak dataset, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frame #15 of reconstructions of a video from YUV dataset, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of mean values of metrics on the Kodak dataset. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of reconstruction relative error on synthetic data. Subfigure (a) shows the results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper studies how adaptive randomized pivoting (ARP), recently introduced for matrix column subset selection, can be extended to tensors in the t-product framework. We propose two constructions. The first one, called ARP-T-CUR, applies matrix ARP independently to the frontal slices of the tensor in the Fourier domain. This gives a Fourier-slicewise CUR approximation and leads to a direct expected-error bound inherited from the matrix theory. The second construction, called T-ARP, selects common lateral and horizontal slices for the whole tensor. This produces a genuine tensor cross approximation in the t-product sense, but also introduces a new difficulty: the same pivot indices must be used across all Fourier slices. We make this coupling explicit and prove an expected-error bound under a frequency-alignment condition measuring how far the common tensor-level sampling rule is from the slice-wise ARP sampling rules. This condition recovers the usual $r+1$-type factor when the leverage-score distributions are aligned across frequencies. We also discuss the resulting tensor cross approximation and its connection with t-DEIM. Numerical experiments on synthetic tensors, images, and videos illustrate the behavior of the proposed methods and show the benefit of common-index tensor sampling over standard tensor cross baselines.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends adaptive randomized pivoting (ARP) to tensor CUR approximations in the t-product framework. It proposes ARP-T-CUR, which applies matrix ARP independently to frontal slices in the Fourier domain and inherits expected-error bounds directly from matrix theory, and T-ARP, which enforces common lateral/horizontal slice selection across the tensor and derives an expected-error bound under an explicit frequency-alignment condition on leverage-score distributions; the bound recovers the standard r+1 factor when distributions align. The work also relates the resulting approximation to t-DEIM and reports experiments on synthetic tensors, images, and videos.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies the first ARP-style guarantees for tensor cross approximations with shared indices, which is relevant for applications requiring consistent sampling across modes such as video compression. ARP-T-CUR inherits its bound without additional assumptions, while T-ARP's conditional bound makes the coupling explicit; the experiments provide empirical support for the practical advantage of common-index sampling.

major comments (1)
  1. The frequency-alignment condition is load-bearing for the T-ARP expected-error bound (stated in the abstract and developed in the T-ARP section). The bound recovers the usual r+1 factor precisely when leverage-score distributions align across Fourier slices, but the manuscript supplies no further quantitative control on the degradation factor when the distributions differ; because common-index selection is the defining feature of T-ARP, this gap limits the scope of the claimed guarantee.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the t-product and Fourier slices is introduced without a self-contained summary table; adding one would improve readability for readers outside the immediate t-product literature.
  2. The experimental section reports results on images and videos but does not specify how the alignment condition was monitored or estimated in those runs; a brief diagnostic would clarify whether the observed performance occurs inside or outside the regime where the bound is tight.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the role of the frequency-alignment condition in the T-ARP analysis. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The frequency-alignment condition is load-bearing for the T-ARP expected-error bound (stated in the abstract and developed in the T-ARP section). The bound recovers the usual r+1 factor precisely when leverage-score distributions align across Fourier slices, but the manuscript supplies no further quantitative control on the degradation factor when the distributions differ; because common-index selection is the defining feature of T-ARP, this gap limits the scope of the claimed guarantee.

    Authors: We agree that the frequency-alignment condition is central to the T-ARP bound and that the manuscript provides no quantitative control on the degradation factor when leverage-score distributions differ across Fourier slices. A uniform bound independent of alignment would require additional structural assumptions on the tensor that do not hold in general, as common-index selection can be arbitrarily misaligned with individual slices. The explicit condition is presented precisely to make this coupling transparent and to recover the classical factor when alignment holds. In the revision we will add a dedicated remark clarifying this limitation, together with synthetic examples that illustrate the observed degradation under controlled misalignment. This will better delineate the scope of the T-ARP guarantee while preserving the paper's focus on making the cost of common indices explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations inherit matrix bounds and introduce explicit new condition with stated proof

full rationale

The paper's two constructions are defined explicitly: ARP-T-CUR applies matrix ARP slicewise in the Fourier domain and inherits the matrix expected-error bound directly; T-ARP couples indices across slices and states an expected-error bound that holds precisely when a frequency-alignment condition on leverage-score distributions is met. Both the condition and the bound are introduced and proved within the paper rather than presupposed or fitted to the target result. No parameter is estimated from data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies the central uniqueness or ansatz, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the cited matrix ARP theory and the paper's own definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the provided text. The t-product and Fourier-slice properties are treated as standard domain assumptions from prior tensor literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard properties of the t-product framework and Fourier transform for tensors allowing slicewise matrix operations
    Invoked to justify applying matrix ARP independently to frontal slices in the Fourier domain and to define the common-slice selection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1580 out tokens · 43401 ms · 2026-06-26T04:37:17.243555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. D. Lathauwer, B. D. Moor, J. Vandewalle, A multilinear singular value decomposi- tion, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 21 (4) (2000) 1253–1278

    2000

  2. [2]

    M. E. Kilmer, C. D. Martin, Factorization strategies for third-order tensors, Linear Algebra and its Applications 435 (3) (2011) 641–658

    2011

  3. [3]

    I. V. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 33 (5) (2011) 2295–2317

    2011

  4. [4]

    Q. Zhao, G. Zhou, S. Xie, L. Zhang, A. Cichocki, Tensor ring decomposition, arXiv preprint (2016).arXiv:1606.05535

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Q. Song, H. Ge, J. Caverlee, X. Hu, Tensor completion algorithms in big data analytics, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 13 (1) (2019) 1–48

    2019

  6. [6]

    M. G. Asante-Mensah, A. H. Phan, S. Ahmadi-Asl, Z. Al Aghbari, A. Cichocki, Image reconstruction using superpixel clustering and tensor completion, Signal Processing 212 (2023) 109158

    2023

  7. [7]

    L. Duan, L. Yang, Y. Guo, Paramps: Convolutional neural networks based on tensor de- composition for heart sound signal analysis and cardiovascular disease diagnosis, Signal Processing 227 (2025) 109716

    2025

  8. [8]

    Bortone, Y

    M. Bortone, Y. Rath, G. H. Booth, Simple fermionic backflow states via a systematically improvable tensor decomposition, Communications Physics 8 (1) (2025) 169

    2025

  9. [9]

    K. T. Brice, M. Melgaard, M. Pavlidou, H. Cox, Numerical tensor method for atomic and exotic three-particle systems, Physical Review A 111 (2) (2025) 022812

    2025

  10. [10]

    De Pauw, B

    J. De Pauw, B. Goethals, Weighted tensor decompositions for context-aware collabora- tive filtering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08393 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    F. Zhou, X. Fu, Z. Lu, Tensor ring decomposition based collaborative filtering recommendation with differential privacy, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing & Communications, Data Science & Systems, Smart City & Dependability in Sensor, Cloud & Big Data Systems & Application (HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys), IEEE, 2023, pp. ...

    2023

  12. [12]

    Cortinovis, D

    A. Cortinovis, D. Kressner, Adaptive randomized pivoting for column subset selection, DEIM, and low-rank approximation, arXiv preprint (2024).arXiv:2412.13992v2

    arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    D. A. Tarzanagh, G. Michailidis, Fast randomized algorithms for t-product based tensor operations and decompositions with applications to imaging data, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences 11 (4) (2018) 2629–2664

    2018

  14. [14]

    Ahmadi-Asl, A

    S. Ahmadi-Asl, A. H. Phan, A. Cichocki, A. Sozykina, Z. Al Aghbari, J. Wang, I. Os- eledets, Adaptive cross tubal tensor approximation, Linear Algebra and its Applications 695 (2024) 168–190

    2024

  15. [15]

    Ahmadi-Asl, A.-H

    S. Ahmadi-Asl, A.-H. Phan, C. F. Caiafa, A. Cichocki, Robust low tubal rank tensor recovery using discrete empirical interpolation method with optimized slice/feature se- lection: S. ahmadi-asl et al., Advances in Computational Mathematics 50 (2) (2024) 23

    2024

  16. [16]

    Ahmadi-Asl, A.-H

    S. Ahmadi-Asl, A.-H. Phan, A. Cichocki, A randomized algorithm for tensor singular value decomposition using an arbitrary number of passes, Journal of Scientific Comput- ing 98 (1) (2024) 23

    2024

  17. [17]

    Chaturantabut, D

    S. Chaturantabut, D. C. Sorensen, Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 32 (5) (2010) 2737–2764

    2010

  18. [18]

    Deshpande, L

    A. Deshpande, L. Rademacher, S. S. Vempala, G. Wang, Matrix approximation and projective clustering via volume sampling, Theory of Computing 2 (1) (2006) 225–247

    2006

  19. [19]

    Osinsky, Close to optimal column approximations with a single svd, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09068 (2023)

    A. Osinsky, Close to optimal column approximations with a single svd, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09068 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    C. D. Martin, R. Shafer, B. LaRue, An order-ptensor factorization with applications in imaging, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 35 (1) (2013) A474–A490.doi: 10.1137/110841229. 36

    work page doi:10.1137/110841229 2013