Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Estimating value at risk: LSTM vs. GARCH

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.10539 v1 pith:J3I2NZDK submitted 2022-07-21 q-fin.RM q-fin.STstat.ML

classification q-fin.RMq-fin.STstat.ML
keywords datalstmestimatorsgarchriskvalue-at-riskdynamicsestimating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Estimating value-at-risk on time series data with possibly heteroscedastic dynamics is a highly challenging task. Typically, we face a small data problem in combination with a high degree of non-linearity, causing difficulties for both classical and machine-learning estimation algorithms. In this paper, we propose a novel value-at-risk estimator using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network and compare its performance to benchmark GARCH estimators. Our results indicate that even for a relatively short time series, the LSTM could be used to refine or monitor risk estimation processes and correctly identify the underlying risk dynamics in a non-parametric fashion. We evaluate the estimator on both simulated and market data with a focus on heteroscedasticity, finding that LSTM exhibits a similar performance to GARCH estimators on simulated data, whereas on real market data it is more sensitive towards increasing or decreasing volatility and outperforms all existing estimators of value-at-risk in terms of exception rate and mean quantile score.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Risk forecasting using Long Short-Term Memory Mixture Density Networks

    q-fin.CP 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LSTM-MDNs give adequate but not superior Value-at-Risk forecasts, performing better in high-volatility periods while still lagging GARCH on volatility reactivity.

Pith tools