Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 29 references

Nano-Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of Nanoprotuberances in MoSe2

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a reduction in the A1g/E2g intensity ratio of monolayer MoSe2 in tip-enhanced Raman maps is a reliable nano-Raman signature of nanoscale contamination, and that contaminant-related peaks reveal oxidation and…

desk verdict A useful empirical observation—A1g/E2g suppression over MoSe2 nanoprotuberances—but the data are consistent with a topographic loss of near-field enhancement, so the 'contamination signature' claim needs a distance-dependence control before it can be called chemical. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19224 v1 pith:J3WIDI7P submitted 2025-05-25 physics.optics

Jane Elisa Guimarães , Rafael Nadas , Rayan Alves , Wenjin Zhang , Takahiko Endo , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Riichiro Saito
show 3 more authors
Yasumitsu Miyata Bernardo R. A. Neves Ado Jorio
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords tip-enhancedRamanspectroscopyMoSe2monolayernanoprotuberancesA1g/E2gratiosurfacecontaminationvanderWaalsheterostructuresO3oxidationnano-Ramanhyperspectralimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nano-Raman (tip-enhanced Raman) measurements on monolayer MoSe2 on hBN show that regions containing 50–200 nm nanoprotuberances have a consistently lower intensity ratio of the $A_{1g}$ (240 cm$^{-1}$) to $E_{2g}$ (287 cm$^{-1}$) Raman bands than the surrounding flat areas. The paper proposes this ratio reduction as a reliable nano-Raman signature of surface contamination, giving experimenters a figure of merit that works where confocal Raman cannot resolve individual protuberances. The same hyperspectral data also reveal contaminant- and oxidation-related peaks (near 974, 998, 1168, 1226, 1423, and 1585 cm$^{-1}$) that appear or change across the protuberances, linking the topographic features to carbon-based contamination and partial oxidation of MoSe2. If the claim holds, TERS ratio maps become a practical way to detect and localize nanoscale impurities in two-dimensional heterostructures.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hyperspectral TERS intensity-ratio map of the $A_{1g}$ to $E_{2g}$ Raman modes of monolayer MoSe2 ($A_{1g}$ at 240 cm$^{-1}$, $E_{2g}$ at 287 cm$^{-1}$). The maps are built from nano-Raman hyperspectra recorded with 15.6 nm steps using AFM-based TERS with plasmon-tunable tip pyramids, then processed by principal component analysis and Lorentzian curve fitting. The ratio map itself is the figure of merit: it separates protuberance pixels from flat-area pixels in two independent sample regions, and it is complemented by amplitude maps of individual contaminant-related Raman peaks that show complementary spatial distributions.

What would settle it

Take the same TERS setup over clean MoSe2 on stepped hBN or lithographically defined mounds with the same 8–25 nm heights as the protuberances but no contamination; if the $A_{1g}/E_{2g}$ ratio falls over these clean raised features as strongly as over the nanoprotuberances, the proposed figure of merit tracks topography rather than contamination.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the intensity ratio $I_{A_{1g}}/I_{E_{2g}}$ of monolayer MoSe2, measured by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, drops markedly over nanoprotuberances and therefore serves as a nano-Raman figure of merit for contamination. In the two near-field maps, the mean ratio on protuberances was 1.5 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.3, versus 2.8 ± 0.8 and 2.5 ± 0.5 in the surrounding flat regions, while a far-field average over the same area gave 1.47 ± 0.08 without spatial discrimination. The authors attribute the lower on-protuberance ratio to a weaker near-field enhancement of the $A_{1g}$ mode, related to loss of light coherence in the near field, and note that a slight increase in tip–sample separation over the raised features may also contribute. Complementary spectral peaks assigned to MoO3 and to carbon/organic species localize preferentially on or around the protuberances, supporting the interpretation that the protuberances are contamination with associated oxidation.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the observed drop in the $A_{1g}/E_{2g}$ ratio over the bumps is caused by the contamination's effect on the near-field Raman signal, not simply by the tip being farther away on top of the raised features.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • TERS ratio maps can localize individual nanoprotuberances that conventional far-field Raman averages cannot resolve.
  • The $A_{1g}/E_{2g}$ ratio can serve as a surface-quality metric when assembling MoSe2-based van der Waals heterostructures.
  • The new contaminant-related peaks (MoO3 near 998 cm$^{-1}$, C=C near 1585 cm$^{-1}$, organic modes at 1168, 1226, and 1423 cm$^{-1}$) identify oxidation and carbon contamination within the protuberances.
  • The ratio contrast appears consistently across two independent hyperspectral maps, indicating reproducibility of the signature.
  • Far-field Raman measurements alone are insufficient to detect the contamination signature because they average over protuberance and surrounding regions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ratio suppression reflects contamination chemistry rather than the raised topography, the same figure of merit is likely to work for other monolayer TMDCs such as MoS2 and WS2, whose $A_{1g}/E_{2g}$ pairs respond similarly to near-field coherence.
  • A control experiment on clean sample steps of comparable height would separate the tip–sample distance contribution from the chemical signature; the paper identifies this distance effect as a possible alternative explanation.
  • The complementary spatial behavior of lower-frequency vs higher-frequency Lorentzian components on and around protuberances suggests local charge doping or strain gradients, which could be tested with nanoscale photoluminescence mapping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) hyperspectral maps of monolayer MoSe2 on hBN, correlating nanoscale protuberances (50–200 nm diameter, 8–25 nm height) with local changes in the A1g/E2g Raman intensity ratio and with new Raman peaks attributed to contamination and oxidation. The authors propose the A1g/E2g ratio reduction over protuberances as a figure of merit for surface contamination. The central evidence is two TERS maps (HS1, HS2) in which the mean ratio is roughly 1.5–1.7 on protuberances versus 2.5–2.8 on surrounding flat areas, while a far-field map of the same region gives 1.47 ± 0.08. Additional spectral peaks (e.g., 974, 998, 1168, 1226, 1423, and 1585 cm−1) are assigned to MoO3 and carbonaceous species, and AFM phase contrast is used to support the contamination interpretation.

Significance. If the ratio reduction truly tracks contamination chemistry, the paper would offer a practical nano-Raman fingerprint for detecting contamination in 2D heterostructures. The main strengths are that the ratio contrast is reproduced in two independent TERS maps, the authors explicitly compare near-field and far-field behavior, and the chemical-peak observations, while tentative, are a valuable starting point for identifying trapped contaminants. The paper is also honest in listing tip–sample separation as a contributing factor. However, the proposed figure of merit is not yet established, because the observed contrast is quantitatively consistent with a topographic artifact from reduced near-field enhancement when the tip rides over the bumps, and the paper does not provide a distance-dependence calibration to separate that effect from a contamination-specific chemical response.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, TERS figure of merit; Table 1] The mean ratios over nanoprotuberances (1.5 ± 0.4 in HS1 and 1.7 ± 0.3 in HS2) are statistically indistinguishable from the far-field ratio (1.47 ± 0.08) reported for the same region. This means the data are fully consistent with a loss of near-field enhancement when the tip rides over 8–25 nm high features, rather than with a contamination-specific effect on the A1g mode. The authors mention tip–sample separation as "another contributing factor" but do not quantify it. Because TERS enhancement decays on a nanometer length scale, a tip-approach curve on flat MoSe2 (or an equivalent distance-dependence model) is required to separate the topographic contribution from any material-specific contribution. Without such a calibration, the ratio contrast is a topography marker, not a material signature of contamination.
  2. [Results, Table 1] No pixel counts or numbers of spectra are given for the inside/outside protuberance classes, and no statistical test is reported. Given the large standard deviations (e.g., 2.8 ± 0.8 for HS1 surroundings), the separation between the two populations needs to be quantified. Please report the number of spectra in each class and the distribution (e.g., histograms or box plots), and provide a significance test (e.g., Welch's t-test or Mann-Whitney U). This is necessary to support the claim that the ratio reliably distinguishes the regions.
  3. [Conclusions] The conclusion that a reduced A1g/E2g ratio "serves as a reliable nano-Raman signature of contamination in monolayer MoSe2 samples" is stronger than what the data support. The measured contrast is a correlation with protuberance topography; the attribution to contamination rests on the auxiliary spectral peaks and on AFM phase contrast, not on the ratio itself. Either add a calibration experiment that rules out the topographic mechanism, or rephrase the claim so that the ratio is presented as a nano-topography marker that accompanies contamination-related spectral signatures rather than as a standalone contamination signature.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, Chemical analysis] The assignments of the 974 cm−1 and 998 cm−1 peaks to MoO3-related modes are plausible, but they are not confirmed by complementary techniques such as XPS or EDS; the text uses "likely" and "may indicate," which is appropriate, but the limitations should be restated in the Conclusions.
  2. [Methods] The PCA preprocessing is described only briefly; please state how many principal components were retained and discuss whether the five-component reconstruction could distort the amplitudes of weak Lorentzian peaks used for the intensity maps.
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] The phase maps and ratio maps lack explicit axis scales and quantified color-bar units; adding scale bars, axis ticks, and unambiguous color-bar labels would improve reproducibility and readability.
  4. [Results] There are several typographical errors with missing spaces, for example "correspondingrespectivelytoregions" and "The resultsreinforce that theintensity ratiois lower"; the manuscript needs a careful proofreading pass.
  5. [Results, Chemical analysis] The sentence about Figure 6, "The map shown in Figure 6 was acquired at the edge of the MoSe2 flake, which accounts for the presence of the observed peak in regions that would otherwise be expected to be flat," is awkward and should be clarified regarding which regions are inside versus outside the protuberance mask.
  6. [References] Reference 21 is a general textbook; citing a specific TERS tip-sample distance-dependence study would strengthen the discussion of the topographic factor and help the reader assess its magnitude.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the A1g/E2g figure of merit is an empirical correlation, and the explanatory self-citations are independently grounded theory, not fitted to this dataset.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization study; it does not derive a theoretical prediction from a fitted model. The central claim is an empirical correlation between AFM-identified nanoprotuberances and the TERS A1g/E2g intensity ratio, supported by topographic/phase maps and by independently identified chemical peaks (MoO3, C-C/C=C, CH2). The only place where prior theory is invoked is the explanation of why the A1g mode is less enhanced over protuberances: 'the loss of light coherence in the near-field, as discussed in references 11,19,20.' References 19 (Cancado et al., Phys. Rev. X 2014) and 20 (Nadas et al., 2025) are the authors' own theoretical/application papers, but they are parameter-free near-field coherence treatments whose assumptions do not include the present MoSe2 ratios, and they are not fitted to the HS1/HS2/HS3 data. Per the review rules, independently published theory cited for interpretation is real evidence and does not constitute circularity. The authors also explicitly list the tip-sample distance increase as 'another contributing factor' with a textbook citation (ref 21), which is a confound acknowledgment rather than a circular step. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to an input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit any physical constants or model parameters; the intensity ratio is computed directly from measured spectra and the Lorentzian peak fits are descriptive. The main assumptions are the standard Raman mode assignments and the interpretation of observed peaks as chemical species, plus the causal role of the protuberances.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The 240 and 287 cm-1 Raman peaks are the A1g and E2g modes of monolayer MoSe2.
    Standard mode assignments from TMDC Raman literature, cited via refs 1,2 and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Nanoprotuberances observed in AFM topography are contamination features (trapped water, hydrocarbons, oxide) rather than intrinsic structural folds.
    Inferred from phase contrast and the appearance of non-MoSe2 Raman peaks; no direct chemical map of the protuberance interior is provided.
  • domain assumption The near-field coherence model from refs 11,19,20 explains why the A1g mode is enhanced less over protuberances.
    This theory is invoked in the Results section to interpret the ratio reduction; it is developed by the authors' own group but published independently.
  • domain assumption The 998 cm-1 peak indicates MoO3 and the 974 cm-1 peak is a shifted/doped Mo-O mode.
    Peak assignments are based on refs 22,23; the interpretation of the 974 cm-1 peak as a doping-related shift is speculative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nano-Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of Nanoprotuberances in MoSe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J3WIDI7P

@misc{pith2026250519224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nano-Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of Nanoprotuberances in MoSe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J3WIDI7P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19224}
}
abstract

Contaminations in the formation of two-dimensional heterostructures can hinder or generate desired properties. Recent advancements have highlighted the potential of tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) for studying materials in the 2D semiconductor class. In this work, we investigate the influence of 50-200nm sized nanoprotuberances within a monolayer of MoSe$_2$ deposited on hBN using nano-Raman spectroscopy, establishing correlations between the presence of localized contaminations and the observed hyperspectral variations. A figure of merit is established for the identification of surface impurities, based on MoSe$_2$ peaks ratio. Notably, new spectral peaks were identified, which are associated with the presence of nanoprotuberances and may indicate contamination and oxidation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Optical microscopy image of the MoSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Topographic map of the MoSe2 sample surface, revealing nanoscale protu￾berances measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The HS1 area is highlighted. (b) Histogram of height distribution, counted by pixels distinguished by regions inside and out￾side the nanoprotuberances. (c) Corresponding phase map. (d) Histogram of phase contrast distribution. (e) Topographic map of the hBN edge with the MoSe2 flake, highli… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of MoSe2 characteristic TERS spectra (a) outside and (b) inside nanoprotuberances, corresponding respectively to regions (a) and (b) marked in (c). Intensity ratio maps of the MoSe2 A1g band to the E2g band for (c) HS1 and (d) HS2 hyperspectra. The color-coded scale bars represent intensity ratios, ranging from lower values (blue regions) to higher values (orange regions). On top of the nanoprotuberances,… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Curve fitting for characteristic peaks in nanoprotuberance regions and correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Curve fitting for characteristic peaks in nanoprotuberance regions and correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Curve fitting for characteristic peaks in nanoprotuberance regions and correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Intensity TERS maps of the 1226cm−1 and 1423cm−1 peaks in nanoprotuberances for HS3 and their corresponding curve fits. Experimental data are represented by open black circles. The black circle indicates the pixel in the map from which the spectrum data was extracted. …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J

    Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotechnology 2012, 7, 699--712

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Strain-modulated excitonic gaps in mono-and bi-layer MoSe2

    Ji, J.; Zhang, A.; Xia, T.; Gao, P.; Jie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Q. Strain-modulated excitonic gaps in mono-and bi-layer MoSe2. Chinese Physics B 2016, 25, 077802

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    J.; Gholinia, A.; Jalil, R.; Romani, S.; Britnell, L.; Elias, D

    Haigh, S. J.; Gholinia, A.; Jalil, R.; Romani, S.; Britnell, L.; Elias, D. C.; Novoselov, K. S.; Ponomarenko, L. A.; Geim, A. K.; Gorbachev, R. Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices. Nature Materials 2012, 11, 764--767

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Universal shape and pressure inside bubbles appearing in van der Waals heterostructures

    Khestanova, E.; Guinea, F.; Fumagalli, L.; Geim, A.; Grigorieva, I. Universal shape and pressure inside bubbles appearing in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature Communications 2016, 7, 12587

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    P.; Tyrrell, J

    Attard, P.; Moody, M. P.; Tyrrell, J. W. Nanobubbles: the big picture. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2002, 314, 696--705

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Surface nanobubbles and nanodroplets

    Lohse, D.; Zhang, X. Surface nanobubbles and nanodroplets. Reviews of modern physics 2015, 87, 981--1035

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    M.; Suh, Y

    Stockle, R. M.; Suh, Y. D.; Suh, Y. D.; Deckert, V.; Zenobi, R. Nanoscale chemical analysis by tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chemical Physics Letters 2000, 318, 131--136

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    Metallized tip amplification of near-field Raman scattering

    Hayazawa, N.; Inouye, Y.; Sekkat, Z.; Kawata, S. Metallized tip amplification of near-field Raman scattering. Optics Communications 2000, 183, 333--336

    work page 2000

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Anderson, M. S. Locally enhanced Raman spectroscopy with an atomic force microscope. Applied Physics Letters 2000, 76, 3130--3132

    2000

  2. [10]

    Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: principles and applications

    Kumar, N.; Mignuzzi, S.; Su, W.; Roy, D. Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: principles and applications. EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation 2015, 2, 1--22

    2015

  3. [11]

    G.; Rabelo, C.; Gadelha, A

    Jorio, A.; Nadas, R.; Pereira, A. G.; Rabelo, C.; Gadelha, A. C.; Vasconcelos, T. L.; Zhang, W.; Miyata, Y.; Saito, R.; Costa, M. D.; others 2D Materials. 2D Materials 2024, 11, 033003

    2024

  4. [12]

    o ppener, C.; Aizpurua, J.; Chen, H.; Gr \

    H \"o ppener, C.; Aizpurua, J.; Chen, H.; Gr \"a fe, S.; Jorio, A.; Kupfer, S.; Zhang, Z.; Deckert, V. Tip-enhanced Raman scattering. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2024, 4, 47

    2024

  5. [13]

    L.; Archanjo, B

    Vasconcelos, T. L.; Archanjo, B. S.; Archanjo, B. S.; Oliveira, B. S.; Valaski, R.; Cordeiro, R. C.; Medeiros, H. G.; Rabelo, C.; Ribeiro, A. R.; Ribeiro, A. R.; Ercius, P.; Achete, C. A.; Jorio, A.; Cançado, L. G. Plasmon-Tunable Tip Pyramids: Monopole Nanoantennas for Near-F...

    2018

  6. [14]

    W.; Cantley, L.; Wadehra, A.; Kim, B

    Lloyd, D.; Liu, X.; Christopher, J. W.; Cantley, L.; Wadehra, A.; Kim, B. L.; Goldberg, B. B.; Swan, A. K.; Bunch, J. S. Band gap engineering with ultralarge biaxial strains in suspended monolayer MoS2. Nano letters 2016, 16, 5836--5841

    2016

  7. [15]

    P.; Krayev, A.; Venkatesh, V.; Saxena, R.; Kysar, J

    Darlington, T. P.; Krayev, A.; Venkatesh, V.; Saxena, R.; Kysar, J. W.; Borys, N. J.; Jariwala, D.; Schuck, P. J. Facile and quantitative estimation of strain in nanobubbles with arbitrary symmetry in 2D semiconductors verified using hyperspectral nano-optical imaging. The Jou...

    2020

  8. [16]

    Phase contrast in tapping-mode scanning force microscopy

    Garcia, R.; Tamayo, J.; Calleja, M.; Garcia, F. Phase contrast in tapping-mode scanning force microscopy. Applied Physics A 1998, 66, S309--S312

    1998

  9. [17]

    Attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy

    Garcia, R.; San Paulo, A. Attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Physical Review B 1999, 60, 4961

    1999

  10. [18]

    S.; Kim, S

    Phani, A.; Jung, H. S.; Kim, S. Deconvolution of dissipative pathways for the interpretation of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy from phase-contrast. Communications Physics 2021, 4, 72

    2021

  11. [19]

    G.; Beams, R.; Jorio, A.; Novotny, L

    Can c c ado, L. G.; Beams, R.; Jorio, A.; Novotny, L. Theory of Spatial Coherence in Near-Field Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. X 2014, 4, 031054

    2014

  12. [20]

    G.; Jorio, A

    Nadas, R.; Correa, R.; Can c ado, L. G.; Jorio, A. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Coherence Length of 2D Materials: An Application to Graphene. physica status solidi (b) 2025, 262, 2400287

    2025

  13. [21]

    Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press, 2012

    Novotny, L.; Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    G.; Ravikumar, R.; Kumar, T

    Krishna, A. G.; Ravikumar, R.; Kumar, T. V.; Ephraim, S. D.; Ranjith, B.; Pranoy, M.; Dola, S. Investigation and comparison of optical and raman bands of mechanically synthesised MoO3 nano powders. Materials Today: Proceedings 2016, 3, 54--63

    2016

  15. [23]

    K.; Padil, V

    Kothaplamoottil Sivan, S.; Padinjareveetil, A. K.; Padil, V. V.; Pilankatta, R.; George, B.; Senan, C.; C ern \' k, M.; Varma, R. S. Greener assembling of MoO 3 nanoparticles supported on gum arabic: Cytotoxic effects and catalytic efficacy towards reduction of p-nitrophenol. ...

    2019

  16. [24]

    S.; Saito, R.; Dresselhaus, G

    Jorio, A.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Saito, R.; Dresselhaus, G. Raman Spectroscopy in Graphene Related Systems; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011

    2011

  17. [25]

    Scientific Reports 2022, 12, 10936

    Masubuchi, S.; Sakano, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Wakafuji, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Okazaki, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Li, J.; Ejima, H.; others Dry pick-and-flip assembly of van der Waals heterostructures for microfocus angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Scientific Reports 2022...

    2022

  18. [26]

    E.; Nakanishi, Y.; others High-throughput dry transfer and excitonic properties of twisted bilayers based on CVD-grown transition metal dichalcogenides

    Naito, H.; Makino, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ogawa, T.; Endo, T.; Sannomiya, T.; Kaneda, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Lim, H. E.; Nakanishi, Y.; others High-throughput dry transfer and excitonic properties of twisted bilayers based on CVD-grown transition metal dichalcogenides. Nanoscale Advances ...

    2023

  19. [27]

    L.; Cançado, L

    Rabelo, C.; Miranda, H.; Vasconcelos, T. L.; Cançado, L. G.; Jorio, A. Tip-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene. 2019 4th International Symposium on Instrumentation Systems, Circuits and Transducers (INSCIT). 2019; pp 1--6

    2019

  20. [28]

    L.; Archanjo, B

    Vasconcelos, T. L.; Archanjo, B. S.; Fragneaud, B.; Oliveira, B. S.; Riikonen, J.; Li, C.; Ribeiro, D. S.; Rabelo, C.; Rodrigues, W. N.; Jorio, A.; others Tuning localized surface plasmon resonance in scanning near-field optical microscopy probes. ACS nano 2015, 9, 6297--6304

    2015

  21. [29]

    L.; Cançado, L

    Miranda, H.; Rabelo, C.; Vasconcelos, T. L.; Cançado, L. G.; Jorio, A. Optical Properties of Plasmon-Tunable Tip Pyramids for Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Physica Status Solidi-rapid Research Letters 2020, 14, 2000212 mcitethebibliography document

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.