Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Going Bananas! - Unfolding Program Synthesis with Origami

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01500 v1 pith:J3WW3JGI submitted 2024-06-03 cs.PL

classification cs.PL
keywords origamiprogramrecursionsynthesisalgorithmsfoldingotherproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatically creating a computer program using input-output examples can be a challenging task, especially when trying to synthesize computer programs that require loops or recursion. Even though the use of recursion can make the algorithmic description more succinct and declarative, this concept creates additional barriers to program synthesis algorithms such as the creation and the (tentative) evaluation of non-terminating programs. One reason is that the recursive function must define how to traverse (or generate) the data structure and, at the same time, how to process it. In functional programming, the concept of recursion schemes decouples these two tasks by putting a major focus on the latter. This can also help to avoid some of the pitfalls of recursive functions during program synthesis, as argued in a previous work where we introduced the Origami technique. In our previous paper, we showed how this technique was effective in finding solutions for programs that require folding lists. In this work, we incorporate other recursion schemes into Origami, such as accumulated folding, unfolding, and the combination of unfolding and folding. We evaluated Origami on the 29 problems of the standard General Program Synthesis Benchmark Suite 1, obtaining favorable results against other well-known algorithms. Overall, Origami achieves the best result in 25% more problems than its predecessor (HOTGP) and an even higher increase when compared to other approaches. Not only that, but it can also consistently find a solution to problems that many algorithms report a low success rate.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools