Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Discovery of Optical Filaments in the North Polar Spur/eROSITA Bubble

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Faint optical filaments in the North Polar Spur coincide with 144 MHz radio structure and require a powerful Galactic-center engine, disfavoring star-formation winds.

desk verdict A genuinely new morphological detection whose quantitative excess and energetics are weakened by mask selection bias; deserves review but not acceptance as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19529 v1 pith:J6SY4FEZ submitted 2026-07-21 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Julian Shapiro This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords NorthPolarSpureROSITAbubblesopticalfilamentsH-alphaemissionwarmionizedmediumGalacticcenteroutflowradio-opticalcoincidencenarrowbandsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the North Polar Spur, the bright radio arc at the edge of the eROSITA bubble, has a genuine optical counterpart: filaments in H-alpha, [O III], and [S II] that line up with 144 MHz radio structures. The filaments are faint (an excess of about 1.85 Rayleighs after subtracting the warm ionized medium), show structure on a preferred scale of ~0.6 degrees, and have a [S II]/H-alpha ratio that departs from the usual high-latitude trend. The author argues that producing this emission requires a power of roughly 5-12 x 10^41 erg/s from the Galactic center, which would rule out star-formation-driven wind models and favor an AGN jet or hot accretion flow. If correct, these optical filaments become a new, relatively cheap way to study the engine that inflated the Fermi and eROSITA bubbles.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a chain that starts with a 2.5-sigma consensus mask (H-alpha intersected with either [O III] or [S II]) to define the optical filaments, then uses a background-subtracted H-alpha excess to derive an emission measure, an ionizing photon rate of ~1 x 10^51 s^-1, and finally, using geometric factors (distance 6.5 kpc, solid angle 0.12 sr, efficiency 0.5), a required engine power of 5-12 x 10^41 erg/s. The delta-variance and power-spectrum analysis of the H-alpha map provides the structural signature—a preferred filament scale of ~0.6 degrees—that ties the optical emission to the radio filaments rather than to diffuse warm ionized medium.

What would settle it

A deep, small-beam (under ~20 arcmin) H-alpha spectrum across the inner NPS optical peak, separating the filament from the warm ionized medium by velocity, would recover the ~1.85 Rayleigh excess if the claim is right; recovering nothing, or a line ratio consistent with the WIM, would falsify it. An independent narrowband survey using different filters and calibration should also reproduce the 0.6-degree filamentary structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that faint optical line emission—H-alpha, [O III], and [S II]—is present in the North Polar Spur region of the northern eROSITA bubble, spatially coincident with 144 MHz radio filaments and concentrated in an inner region that aligns with magnetized structures. The emission is distinguished from the warm ionized medium by an elevated [S II]/H-alpha ratio and by a break in the H-alpha power spectrum and delta-variance at a lag of ~0.6 degrees, a scale that would have been unresolved by previous one-degree-beam surveys. The background-subtracted H-alpha intensity of 1.85 +/- 1.04 Rayleighs leads, under Galactic-center-origin assumptions, to a required ionizing power of 5-1

Load-bearing premise

The linchpin is the background subtraction: the H-alpha excess is just 3.07 Rayleighs measured on the mask minus a 1.22 Rayleigh foreground value taken from a previous survey, so a systematic error of about one Rayleigh in that foreground—which the paper itself notes was not subtracted in the line-ratio analysis—would leave no significant excess and no required power.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The NPS filaments give observers a new optical tracer for the Fermi/eROSITA bubble system, mapping the bubble edge and interior in emission lines rather than only in X-rays and radio.
  • Star-formation-driven wind models with power ~5 x 10^40 erg/s are disfavored as the ionizing source for this emission even at 100% efficiency; AGN jet models with ~10^44 erg/s comfortably supply the needed power.
  • The ~0.6-degree filament scale explains why previous searches with one-degree-beam H-alpha surveys did not detect the NPS optically.
  • The free-free brightness temperature predicted from H-alpha (~0.1 K) is far below the observed 408 MHz brightness (~7 K), so the radio NPS emission cannot be free-free and must be non-thermal (synchrotron).
  • The concentration of magnetized radio structures at the edges of the optical filaments suggests magnetic draping shapes the emission, linking the optical gas to the bubble's magnetic field geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, this discovery implies that similar faint optical filaments may be found along the southern eROSITA bubble and the Fermi bubble edges, making narrowband optical imaging a new survey tool for Galactic-center outflow history.
  • A testable extension: deep, small-beam H-alpha spectroscopy across the NPS inner peak should reveal a distinct kinematical component at the NPS velocity, cleanly separating the filament from the warm ionized medium and verifying the 1.85 Rayleigh excess.
  • The energetics chain is sensitive to the assumed distance and geometry; if future measurements place the NPS significantly closer or farther than 6.5 kpc, the required power scales accordingly and the exclusion of star-formation winds could weaken.
  • The line-ratio evidence for shock ionization is suggestive but not conclusive; follow-up [N II]/H-alpha and [O III] mapping could distinguish shock from photoionization and thereby discriminate between jet and accretion-flow engines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims the discovery of optical filaments in Hα, [O III], and [S II] from the Northern Sky Narrowband Survey (NSNS), spatially coincident with 144 MHz LoTSS structure in the North Polar Spur (NPS) region of the eROSITA bubbles. The evidence includes a consensus mask (§3.2, Eq. 1), Δ-variance and power-spectrum analysis showing a characteristic scale of ~0.6° (§3.3), multiwavelength profiles (§4.1), and a background-subtracted Hα excess of 1.85±1.04 R (§4.2). From this excess the paper derives an emission measure, free-free brightness temperature, and an ionizing power requirement P_req ≈ 5–12×10^41 erg/s, which is used to compare Galactic-center wind, AGN jet, and star-formation ring models (§4.3–4.4). The paper concludes that the NPS contains real optical filaments and that star-formation-driven winds are disfavored while AGN-related models remain viable.

Significance. If the detection is robust, this would be the first identification of optical emission from the NPS/eROSITA bubble at sub-degree scales, providing a new multiwavelength constraint on the Fermi/eROSITA bubble engine. The paper's strengths are its use of publicly available NSNS data, the multiwavelength comparison with LoTSS and eROSITA, the Δ-variance methodology, and the explicit modeling with MAPPINGS V and Cloudy. However, the central quantitative claims—the background-subtracted Hα excess and the derived P_req—are not yet firmly established because the Hα measurement is made inside a mask selected from the same Hα image, the background subtraction relies on a different instrument/beam, and there are arithmetic inconsistencies in the energetics. The discovery potential is genuine, but the current analysis is insufficient to support the headline conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (1); §4.2] The Hα excess is measured inside a consensus mask that includes M_Hα,2.5σ, defined by thresholding the Gaussian-subtracted Hα map at 2.5σ above local background. Measuring I_Hα inside this same mask guarantees a positive mean even for pure noise plus WIM, biasing the quoted I_Hα=3.07±1.04 R and the excess 1.85±1.04 R. The stated integrated S/N≳65 quantifies the significance of selected pixels relative to noise, not the unbiased surface brightness. This is load-bearing for the line-ratio enhancement, the 0.6° structure interpretation, and the energetics. Please re-measure I_Hα inside a mask defined independently of Hα (e.g., using only the [O III]/[S II] consensus, the LoTSS filament mask, or the Haslam masks), and quantify the selection bias with control fields or Monte Carlo simulations.
  2. [§4.2] The OFF-NPS background of 1.22 R is taken from Y. Sofue et al. (2023), which uses WHAM at ~1° beam, while the NSNS intensities are calibrated to WHAM but have different angular resolution and possibly different zero-points. A systematic offset of only ~1 R would erase the claimed 1.85±1.04 R excess. The paper does not demonstrate that the WHAM background is representative of the local background inside the NPS mask on the scales used. Please provide a local background estimate from the same NSNS data (e.g., a surrounding annulus or a fit to the diffuse component) and quantify the sensitivity of the excess to the choice of background.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (11)] There are arithmetic inconsistencies in the energetics. From Eq. (10) and the text, Q_ion≈1×10^51 s^-1 and ⟨E⟩≈20 eV give L_ion≈3.2×10^40 erg/s, not 1.3×10^40 erg/s. Moreover, inserting the stated values L_ion=1.3×10^40, ε=0.5, r_GC=4–6.5 kpc, Ω=0.12 sr, and D=6.5 kpc into Eq. (11) yields P_req≈1.0–2.7×10^42 erg/s, not 5–12×10^41 erg/s. Even using the quoted L_ion, the range is ~10–27×10^41. The conclusion that star-formation winds are disfavored may survive the corrected numbers, but the quantitative claim in Table 1 and the abstract must be recomputed and verified.
  4. [§3.3, Table 1, §4.4] The line ratios [S II]/Hα and [O III]/Hα are presented as evidence for a distinct ionization source, but Table 1 explicitly states that the intensities are not corrected for diffuse background. The WIM subtraction is nontrivial, and the paper itself acknowledges in §4.4 that a specific ionization source cannot yet be determined due to lack of subtraction of ambient WIM. This does not invalidate the discovery claim, but the line-ratio enhancement should be demoted to a tentative hint until a proper WIM-subtraction or an independent kinematic separation is performed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / §4.2] The abstract states I_Hα=1.85±1.04 R as if it were a firmly established excess. Please clarify in the abstract that this value is mask-dependent and background-subtracted using a literature value.
  2. [Figure 2] The error bars in Figure 2 are statistical only; the text mentions a ~15% systematic uncertainty, but it is not shown or propagated into the line-ratio ranges quoted in Table 1. Please state the source of this systematic and include it in the reported ranges.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (5)–(6)] The free-free calculation assumes T_e=8000 K (typical WIM). If the NPS emission is shock-heated, T_e could differ; a brief discussion of the sensitivity of τ and T_b to T_e would be useful.
  4. [§4.2] The Q parameter is quoted as a broad range (≈320–440). The derivation of this range from the measured intensities should be made explicit, and the uncertainty should be propagated from I_Hα and T_b.
  5. [General] The paper would benefit from a figure showing the consensus mask and the control regions used for the WIM comparison. Currently the control regions are only described in words, and their exact positions are not given.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Hα excess is measured inside a mask that was thresholded on the same Hα image, so the 1.85 R excess and the P_req conclusion are partly guaranteed by construction.

  1. self definitional [§3.2 Eq. (1) and §4.2]
    "In each Gaussian-subtracted channel, emission is masked, and pixels are used where they exceed 2.5σ of the local background noise. ... Mconsensus,2.5σ = MHα,2.5σ ∩(M[Oiii],2.5σ ∪M[Sii],2.5σ) (1) ... The intensity of Hα is measured to be 3.07±1.04 R within the consensus mask ... the excess intensity of the consensus mask is ∆IHα = 1.85±1.04 R."

    The consensus mask includes MHα,2.5σ, defined as pixels where the same NSNS Hα image exceeds 2.5σ above local background. Measuring the mean Hα inside this mask selects from the positive tail of the Hα distribution, so the reported 3.07 R and the background-subtracted 1.85 R are biased upward by construction even if the field is pure WIM plus noise. The quoted integrated S/N≳65 refers to the selected pixels relative to noise, not to an independent detection. Because P_req is proportional to this excess, the energetics and the conclusion that star-formation winds are disfavored inherit the same selection bias.

full rationale

The paper's other lines of evidence are not internally circular: the NSNS photometry is zero-point calibrated to WHAM, the OFF-NPS background is taken from Sofue et al. (2023), extinction uses Bayestar19, and the MAPPINGS/Cloudy comparisons rely on independent literature models and luminosities. There are no load-bearing self-citations, since the author has no prior work cited. The Δ-variance, line-ratio, and spatial-coincidence arguments are partly independent, though they also use the Hα-selected mask. The central quantitative claim, however—the background-subtracted Hα excess and the derived P_req≈5–12×10^41 erg/s—rests on measuring Hα inside an Hα-thresholded mask, so part of the signal is introduced by the selection itself. An independent, non-Hα-based mask (e.g., [O III]/[S II]/radio-only) would be required to validate the excess. This is a partial but load-bearing circularity, warranting a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central energetics are not directly measured but derived from Hα intensity through a chain of assumed f, L, D, r_GC, ε, <E>, and T_e. The detection itself relies on the NSNS-to-WHAM calibration and on masks built from the target channels. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • Filling fraction f = 0.4
    Assumed in Eq. 8 to convert EM to electron density; directly scales n_e, M_ion, and P_req. No independent constraint given.
  • Line-of-sight depth L = 1 kpc
    Assumed in Eq. 8/9; with f, sets n_e and ionized mass. Not measured.
  • Ionization efficiency ε = 0.5
    Adopted in Eq. 11 as a 'conservative, high-efficiency boundary'; P_req scales as 1/ε.
  • Mean ionizing photon energy <E> = 20 eV
    Assumed to convert Q_ion to L_ion; based on Draine 2011, but choice affects L_ion.
  • Heliocentric distance D = 6.5 kpc
    Assumed GC-origin distance in Eq. 9; scales M_ion and hence Q_ion/L_ion.
  • Galactocentric distance r_GC = 4–6.5 kpc
    Range adopted in Eq. 11; sets geometric factor 4πr^2/(ΩD^2) and P_req.
  • Electron temperature T_e = 8000 K
    Assumed WIM temperature for EM conversion, Gaunt factor, and free-free τ; changes derived EM and T_b weakly.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption NSNS photometric zero-point calibration to WHAM is accurate for Hα at the ~1 R level and at angular scales below the WHAM beam.
    Invoked in §2.1 to allow Rayleigh conversion and in §4.2 to compare to WHAM background; if wrong, I_Hα excess and line ratios shift.
  • domain assumption The 1.22 R OFF-NPS Hα background from Sofue et al. (2023) is representative of the foreground/WIM contribution toward the NPS.
    Used in §4.2 to define ΔI_Hα = 1.85±1.04 R; beam/instrument and spatial variations are not quantified.
  • domain assumption The eROSITA bubble/NPS optical filaments are at the Galactic center distance (D ≈ 6.5 kpc) and the geometry is a sheet at inclination i ≈ 0.
    Eq. 9 (M_ion = μ n_e Ω D² L cos i) and Eq. 11 (P_req) depend on this; no distance measurement for the optical filaments is presented.
  • domain assumption The consensus 2.5σ mask in Hα/([O III] or [S II]) selects real NPS emission and excludes all NSNS background grid artifacts.
    Defined in §3.2; the mask is also the aperture for the reported intensity, so a false-positive would directly create a 'detection'.
  • domain assumption The Bayestar19 dust maps contain all relevant foreground dust along the NPS line of sight, so no hidden extinction/foreground contamination remains.
    Used in §3.1 to dismiss foreground dust; distance-resolved maps can miss dust at the distance of the filaments.
  • standard math Case B recombination and standard EM/Hα relations apply (Reynolds 2011; Draine 2011).
    Equations (3)–(6) in §4.2; standard but assumes a homogeneous, optically thin gas at 8000 K.
  • domain assumption The 144 MHz residual structure after extragalactic source subtraction is Galactic and associated with the NPS, not systematic sidelobes or unresolved sources.
    LoTSS filament mask in §3.2; no point-spread-function/systematics check is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of Optical Filaments in the North Polar Spur/eROSITA Bubble." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J6SY4FEZ

@misc{pith2026260719529,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of Optical Filaments in the North Polar Spur/eROSITA Bubble},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J6SY4FEZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19529}
}
abstract

I report the discovery of optical filaments in H$\alpha$, [O III], and [S II], coincident with $144\,\mathrm{MHz}$ structure, associated with the North Polar Spur (NPS) region of the eROSITA bubbles. The optical emission is identified in the Northern Sky Narrowband Survey, and contains distinct structure and potentially elevated $\text{[S II]}/\mathrm{H}\alpha$ relative to typical high-$b$ outflows from the warm ionized medium (WIM). $\Delta$-variance and power spectrum analysis of the NPS H$\alpha$ shows a preference for filaments on the scale of lag $L\approx0.6^{\circ}$. The optical and $144\,\mathrm{MHz}$ emission peaks in intensity in an interior region of the NPS, aligned with surrounding Galactic magnetized structures, and also shows fainter signal at the eROSITA bubble edge. The required power to produce the background-subtracted $I_{\mathrm{H}\alpha}=1.85\pm1.04\,\mathrm{R}$ emission is $P_\mathrm{req}\approx5\mathrm{-}12\times10^{41}\,\mathrm{erg\,s}^{-1}$, comfortably exceeded by AGN jet models, plausible for AGN hot accretion flow and star formation ring models, and disfavoring star formation driven winds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19529 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. All-sky map in eROSITA 0.3−2.3 keV (top; P. Predehl et al. 2020) with the geometry of the eROSITA bubbles (G. Mou et al. 2023; E. Churazov et al. 2026) and approximate extent of the Fermi bubbles (M. Su et al. 2010) highlighted. The orange box shows the coverage of the Fermi bubbles analyzed in WHAM Hα by D. Krishnarao et al. (2020). The bottom row displays cutouts of the North Polar Spur in eROSITA 0.3−2.3 keV, NSN… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. [S ii]/Hα (top left) and [O iii]/Hα (top right) line ratios of the NPS (purple) and comparison WIM regions (blue) by Galactic latitude. The Hα power spectrum and ∆-variance are displayed on the bottom left and right, respectively. Error bars are statistical uncertainty, and do not include an additional ∼ 15% systematic uncertainty. WIM and general Galactic outflows. For consistency, the Haslam mask is not used in th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multiwavelength profiles (a-e) of the North Polar Spur in Hα, [O iii], and [S ii] (Northern Sky Narrowband Survey), 144 MHz (LoTSS), and 0.6−1.0 keV (eROSITA, left image). The magnetized Galactic structure (H.-S. Zhang et al. 2024) is shown in white. The first column shows the intensities of all wavelengths normalized to their peaks in the profiles. The right column displays the averaged optical data with LoTSS and … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: MAPPINGS V shock models (left) and Cloudy photoionization models (right) of the NPS. The lines are colorized by input metallicity Z values. MAPPINGS V is run for two B0 values 2 µG and 8 µG, which is not well constrained for the NPS. The model curves vary significantly…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Research Notes of the AAS , abstract =

    Ziegenbalg, Stefan , title =. Research Notes of the AAS , abstract =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/adfec7 , url =

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/adfec7 2025

  2. [2]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202557749

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey - VII. Third Data Release , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202557749", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557749", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557749

  3. [3]

    I - Observations at southern declinations and for the North Polar region

    A 408 MHz all-sky continuum survey. I - Observations at southern declinations and for the North Polar region. , keywords =

  4. [4]

    and Sunyaev, R

    Predehl, P. and Sunyaev, R. A. and Becker, W. and Brunner, H. and Burenin, R. and Bykov, A. and Cherepashchuk, A. and Chugai, N. and Churazov, E. and Doroshenko, V. and Eismont, N. and Freyberg, M. and Gilfanov, M. and Haberl, F. and Khabibullin, I. and Krivonos, R. and Maitra, C. and Medvedev, P. and Merloni, A. and Nandra, K. and Nazarov, V. and Pavlins...

  5. [5]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201629313

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey - I. Survey description and preliminary data release⋆ , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201629313", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629313", journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313

  6. [6]

    spectra and morphology of the eROSITA bubbles in the western Galactic hemisphere , author=

    The SRG/eROSITA diffuse soft X-ray background II. spectra and morphology of the eROSITA bubbles in the western Galactic hemisphere , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  7. [7]

    and Finkbeiner, Douglas P

    Su, Meng and Slatyer, Tracy R. and Finkbeiner, Douglas P. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1044 , url =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/1044 2010

  8. [8]

    and Bordoloi, Rongmon and Savage, Blair D

    Fox, Andrew J. and Bordoloi, Rongmon and Savage, Blair D. and Lockman, Felix J. and Jenkins, Edward B. and Wakker, Bart P. and Bland-Hawthorn, Joss and Hernandez, Svea and Kim, Tae-Sun and Benjamin, Robert A. and Bowen, David V. and Tumlinson, Jason , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/L7 , url =

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/l7 2015

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    and Lockman, Felix J

    Bordoloi, Rongmon and Fox, Andrew J. and Lockman, Felix J. and Wakker, Bart P. and Jenkins, Edward B. and Savage, Blair D. and Hernandez, Svea and Tumlinson, Jason and Bland-Hawthorn, Joss and Kim, Tae-Sun , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:...

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    , title =

    Finkbeiner, Douglas P. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1086/423482 , url =

    2004 doi

  3. [11]

    Snowden, S. L. and Egger, R. and Freyberg, M. J. and McCammon, D. and Plucinsky, P. P. and Sanders, W. T. and Schmitt, J. H. M. M. and Trümper, J. and Voges, W. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1086/304399 , url =

    1997 doi

  4. [12]

    and Jenkins, Edward B

    Karim, Md Tanveer and Fox, Andrew J. and Jenkins, Edward B. and Bordoloi, Rongmon and Wakker, Bart P. and Savage, Blair D. and Lockman, Felix J. and Crawford, Steven M. and Jorgenson, Regina A. and Bland-Hawthorn, Joss , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2018 , ...

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    and Albert, A

    Ackermann, M. and Albert, A. and Atwood, W. B. and Baldini, L. and Ballet, J. and Barbiellini, G. and Bastieri, D. and Bellazzini, R. and Bissaldi, E. and Blandford, R. D. and Bloom, E. D. and Bottacini, E. and Brandt, T. J. and Bregeon, J. and Bruel, P. and Buehler, R. and Bu...

    2014

  6. [14]

    , title =

    Guo, Fulai and Mathews, William G. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/181 , url =

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    and Bregman, Joel N

    Miller, Matthew J. and Bregman, Joel N. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/9 , url =

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    and Maloney, Philip R

    Bland-Hawthorn, J. and Maloney, Philip R. and Sutherland, Ralph S. and Madsen, G. J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/58 , url =

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    Yang, H.-Y. K. and Ruszkowski, M. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9434 , url =

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Yang, H.-Y. K. and Ruszkowski, M. and Ricker, P. M. and Zweibel, E. and Lee, D. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/185 , url =

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    and Sutherland, Ralph and Groves, Brent and Guglielmo, Magda and Li, Wenhao and Curzons, Andrew and Cecil, Gerald and Fox, Andrew J

    Bland-Hawthorn, Joss and Maloney, Philip R. and Sutherland, Ralph and Groves, Brent and Guglielmo, Magda and Li, Wenhao and Curzons, Andrew and Cecil, Gerald and Fox, Andrew J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab44c8 , url =

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Karen and Ruszkowski, M

    Yang, H.-Y. Karen and Ruszkowski, M. and Zweibel, E. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1772 , url =

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Mou, Guobin and Yuan, Feng and Bu, Defu and Sun, Mouyuan and Su, Meng , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/109 , url =

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Mou, Guobin and Yuan, Feng and Gan, Zhaoming and Sun, Mouyuan , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/37 , url =

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    and Nath, Biman B

    Sarkar, Kartick C. and Nath, Biman B. and Sharma, Prateek , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx314 , url =

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Fujita, Yutaka , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3312 , url =

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    and Arendt, R

    Yusef-Zadeh, F. and Arendt, R. G. and Wardle, M. and Heywood, I. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd54b , url =

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    and Mondal, Santanu and Sharma, Prateek and Piran, Tsvi , title =

    Sarkar, Kartick C. and Mondal, Santanu and Sharma, Prateek and Piran, Tsvi , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd75d , url =

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Keshet, Uri and Gurwich, Ilya , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1533 , url =

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Zhang, Ruiyu and Guo, Fulai , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bd0 , url =

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Mondal, Santanu and Keshet, Uri and Sarkar, Kartick C and Gurwich, Ilya , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1084 , url =

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Zubovas, Kastytis and Nayakshin, Sergei , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21250.x , url =

    2012

  23. [31]

    and Bicknell, Geoffrey V

    Crocker, Roland M. and Bicknell, Geoffrey V. and Taylor, Andrew M. and Carretti, Ettore , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/107 , url =

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    2025 , eprint=

    Fermi Bubbles Without AGN: Gamma-Ray Bubbles in MHD Galaxy Formation Simulations with Full Cosmic Ray Spectra , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  25. [33]

    , title =

    Lacki, Brian C. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu107 , url =

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Sofue, Yoshiaki , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz143 , url =

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Karen and Ruszkowski, Mateusz and Zweibel, Ellen G

    Yang, H.-Y. Karen and Ruszkowski, Mateusz and Zweibel, Ellen G. , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01618-x , url =

    doi

  28. [36]

    Nature Communications , year =

    Mou, Guobin and Sun, Dongze and Fang, Taotao and Wang, Wei and Zhang, Ruiyu and Yuan, Feng and Sofue, Yoshiaki and Wang, Tinggui and He, Zhicheng , title =. Nature Communications , year =. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36478-0 , url =

    doi

  29. [37]

    and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Haverkorn, Marijke and Purcell, Cormac and Gaensler, B

    Carretti, Ettore and Crocker, Roland M. and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Haverkorn, Marijke and Purcell, Cormac and Gaensler, B. M. and Bernardi, Gianni and Kesteven, Michael J. and Poppi, Sergio , title =. Nature , year =. doi:10.1038/nature11734 , url =

    doi

  30. [38]

    and Haffner, L

    Krishnarao, Dhanesh and Benjamin, Robert A. and Haffner, L. Matthew , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba8f0 , url =

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Sofue, Yoshiaki and Kataoka, Jun and Iwashita, Ryoji , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1985 , url =

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    and Demleitner, M

    Roeser, S. and Demleitner, M. and Schilbach, E. , title =. The Astronomical Journal , abstract =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440 , url =

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    Haffner, L. M. and Reynolds, R. J. and Tufte, S. L. and Madsen, G. J. and Jaehnig, K. P. and Percival, J. W. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , abstract =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1086/378850 , url =

    2003 doi

  34. [42]

    and Schlafly, Edward and Zucker, Catherine and Speagle, Joshua S

    Green, Gregory M. and Schlafly, Edward and Zucker, Catherine and Speagle, Joshua S. and Finkbeiner, Douglas , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 , url =

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    , title =

    Green, Gregory M. , title =. 2018 , publisher =. doi:10.21105/joss.00695 , url =

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202243819

    Multicomponent imaging of the Fermi gamma-ray sky in the spatio-spectral domain★ , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202243819", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243819", journal =

    doi

  37. [45]

    South-east side story , author=

    Southern eROSITA bubble as a forward shock and the low-metallicity CGM. South-east side story , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  38. [46]

    and Bicknell, Geoffrey V

    Cooper, Jackie L. and Bicknell, Geoffrey V. and Sutherland, Ralph S. and Bland-Hawthorn, Joss , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/330 , url =

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Bland-Hawthorn, Joss and Cohen, Martin , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1086/344573 , url =

    2003 doi

  40. [48]

    , title =

    Finkbeiner, Douglas P. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , abstract =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1086/374411 , url =

    2003 doi

  41. [49]

    The warm ionized medium in spiral galaxies , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.969 , url =

    2009 doi

  42. [50]

    doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02362-0 , url =

    Nature Astronomy , year =. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02362-0 , url =

    doi

  43. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Iwashita, Ryoji and Kataoka, Jun and Sofue, Yoshiaki , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0374 , url =

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    Shklovskii, I. S. , title =. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR , year =

  45. [53]

    Reynolds, S. P. , title =. Astrophysics and Space Science , year =. doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0559-8 , url =

    doi

  46. [54]

    , year = 1962, month = jan, volume =

    Expanding supernova remnants and galactic radio sources. , year = 1962, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/124.2.125 , adsurl =

    1962 doi

  47. [55]

    Radiative processes in astrophysics

  48. [56]

    Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

  49. [57]

    and Davies, R

    Dickinson, C. and Davies, R. D. and Davis, R. J. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06439.x , url =

    2003

  50. [58]

    2016 , publisher=

    Essential Radio Astronomy , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  51. [59]

    and Dickinson, C

    Remazeilles, M. and Dickinson, C. and Banday, A. J. and Bigot-Sazy, M.-A. and Ghosh, T. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1274 , url =

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Barnes, David G

    Calabretta, Mark R. and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Barnes, David G. , year=. A New 1.4 GHz Radio Continuum Map of the Sky South of Declination +25° , volume=. doi:10.1017/pasa.2013.36 , journal=

    2013 doi

  53. [61]

    Galaxies , VOLUME =

    Kataoka, Jun and Sofue, Yoshiaki and Inoue, Yoshiyuki and Akita, Masahiro and Nakashima, Shinya and Totani, Tomonori , TITLE =. Galaxies , VOLUME =. 2018 , NUMBER =

    2018

  54. [62]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202347061

    The warm-hot circumgalactic medium of the Milky Way as seen by eROSITA , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202347061", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347061", journal =

    doi

  55. [63]

    and Barger, Kathleen A

    Ciampa, Drew A. and Barger, Kathleen A. and Lehner, Nicolas and Horn, Madeline and Hernandez, Michael and Haffner, L. Matthew and Smart, Brianna and Bustard, Chad and Barber, Sam and Boot, Henry , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/153...

    2021 doi

  56. [64]

    and Molinari, S

    Elia, D. and Molinari, S. and Schisano, E. and Soler, J. D. and Merello, M. and Russeil, D. and Veneziani, M. and Zavagno, A. and Noriega-Crespo, A. and Olmi, L. and Benedettini, M. and Hennebelle, P. and Klessen, R. S. and Leurini, S. and Paladini, R. and Pezzuto, S. and Traf...

    2022

  57. [65]

    and Contreras, Yanett and Rathborne, Jill M

    Jackson, James M. and Contreras, Yanett and Rathborne, Jill M. and Whitaker, J. Scott and Guzmán, Andrés and Stephens, Ian W. and Sanhueza, Patricio and Longmore, Steven and Zhang, Qizhou and Allingham, David , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2018 , month =. d...

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    , keywords =

    WHAM Observations of H , [S II], and [N II] toward the Orion and Perseus Arms: Probing the Physical Conditions of the Warm Ionized Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/307734 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9904143 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    , keywords =

    Electron Density Power Spectrum in the Local Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/175515 , adsurl =

    doi

  60. [68]

    and Lazarian, A

    Chepurnov, A. and Lazarian, A. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/853 , url =

    2010 doi

  61. [69]

    Structure analysis of interstellar clouds. I. Improving the -variance method. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079106 , archivePrefix =. 0804.4649 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20079107

    Structure analysis of interstellar clouds - II. Applying the Δ-variance method to interstellar turbulence , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20079107", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079107", journal =

    doi

  63. [71]

    , keywords =

    On the fractal structure of molecular clouds. , keywords =

  64. [72]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20000292

    Quantification of molecular cloud structure using the Δ-variance , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20000292", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20000292", journal =

    doi

  65. [73]

    and Strafella, F

    Elia, D. and Strafella, F. and Schneider, N. and Paladini, R. and Vavrek, R. and Maruccia, Y. and Molinari, S. and Noriega-Crespo, A. and Pezzuto, S. and Rygl, K. L. J. and Di Giorgio, A. M. and Traficante, A. and Schisano, E. and Calzoletti, L. and Pestalozzi, M. and Liu, S. ...

    2014 doi

  66. [74]

    IEEE Proceedings , year = 1966, month = feb, volume =

    Statistics of atomic frequency standards. IEEE Proceedings , year = 1966, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1109/PROC.1966.4634 , adsurl =

    1966

  67. [75]

    and Maloney, Philip R

    Bland-Hawthorn, J. and Maloney, Philip R. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1086/311797 , url =

    1998 doi

  68. [76]

    and Sharma, Prateek , title =

    Sarkar, Kartick Chandra and Nath, Biman B. and Sharma, Prateek , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1806 , url =

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    An Analysis of the Shapes of Interstellar Extinction Curves. VII. Milky Way Spectrophotometric Optical-through-ultraviolet Extinction and Its R-dependence. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a , archivePrefix =. 1910.08852 , primaryClass =

    1910 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Philosophical Magazine , year=

    ON A FEATURE OF GALACTIC RADIO EMISSION , author=. Philosophical Magazine , year=

  71. [79]

    Liu, Teng and Merloni, Andrea and Sanders, Jeremy and Ponti, Gabriele and Strong, Andrew and Yeung, Michael C. H. and Locatelli, Nicola and Predehl, Peter and Zheng, Xueying and Sasaki, Manami and Freyberg, Michael and Dennerl, Konrad and Becker, Werner and Nandra, Kirpal and ...

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1307.6212 , Journal =

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code

  76. [84]

    , keywords =

    The 2025 release of Cloudy. , keywords =. doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2025.61.03.01 , archivePrefix =. 2508.01102 , primaryClass =

    2025 arXiv

  77. [85]

    , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =

    CLOUDY 90: Numerical Simulation of Plasmas and Their Spectra. , year = 1998, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/316190 , adsurl =

    1998 doi

  78. [86]

    Harris and K

    Charles R. Harris and K. Jarrod Millman and St. Array programming with. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , publisher =

    2020 doi

  79. [87]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  80. [88]

    Hunter, J. D. , Title =. Computing in Science & Engineering , Volume =

  81. [89]

    , keywords =

    Fermi Bubbles: Giant, Multibillion-Year-Old Reservoirs of Galactic Center Cosmic Rays. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.101102 , archivePrefix =. 1008.2658 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Das, Kaustav K and Zucker, Catherine and Speagle, Joshua S and Goodman, Alyssa and Green, Gregory M and Alves, João , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2702 , url =

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    and van Hoof, Peter A

    Gunasekera, Chamani M. and van Hoof, Peter A. M. and Chatzikos, Marios and Ferland, Gary J. , title =. Research Notes of the AAS , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad0e75 , url =

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.