Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 128 references

The User Perspective on Island-Ready 6G Communication: A Survey of Future Smartphone Usage in Crisis-Struck Areas with Local Cellular Connectivity

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Citizens in crisis-hit 6G 'islands' prefer general-purpose apps over dedicated crisis apps for most crisis use cases, a survey of 857 German urban smartphone users finds.

desk verdict A well-run, first-of-its-kind survey of user preferences in a local-only 6G crisis scenario; the main demand-shift claim partly conflates crisis effects with island-connectivity effects, but the paper remains a solid contribution and deserves serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13466 v1 pith:J6Z5HR3S submitted 2025-06-16 cs.HC cs.NI

Leon Janzen , Florentin Putz , Marc-André Kaufhold , Kolja Straub , Matthias Hollick This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.NI
keywords islandconnectivity6Gcrisiscommunicationsmartphoneapppreferencesserviceprioritizationgeneral-purposeappslocalcellularnetworkssurveystudy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish what ordinary smartphone users would want from a 6G network that keeps working locally when a crisis cuts a city off from the Internet. Based on 857 survey responses from adults in major German cities, it argues that users would not rely mainly on dedicated crisis apps: for communication, information, navigation, and distraction they would reach for messengers, news, and navigation apps instead. It also claims that island connectivity would reshape demand upward for messengers, news, and crisis apps and downward for shopping and travel apps. On that basis it constructs a five-tier typology that tells operators, developers, and authorities which smartphone services to prioritize when capacity is limited.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-stage survey instrument plus a classification scheme. Stage one uses comic boards and a short video to make the abstract idea of island connectivity concrete: an earthquake strikes the participant's city, the Internet goes down, and the mobile operator restores only local connectivity. Stage two uses positional voting, in which participants rank app categories, and the rankings are analyzed with the Borda count to compare normal-operation and island-operation demand. The output feeds a five-tier smartphone service typology (Tier 0: crisis-critical cellular services; Tier 1: immediate crisis response apps; Tier 2: critical-purpose services; Tier 3: crisis routine; Tier 4: crisis well-being) that translates demand ranks into prioritization guidance.

What would settle it

Run a field trial in which a city district is put into island operation during a live exercise or a real outage, log actual app usage from the local core network, and compare the observed app ranks with the survey's stated ranks; a clear divergence would falsify the central demand-shift claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that citizens' crisis smartphone behavior is general-purpose first: asked which apps they would use in seven crisis-specific situations, respondents chose crisis apps for warnings, safety tips, and emergency contact, but messengers for communicating with others and for distraction, news apps for information, and navigation apps for moving around the city. When the same participants ranked app categories under a scenario in which only local cellular connectivity remains, messengers stayed at rank 1, news rose to rank 2, and crisis apps jumped from rank 21 to rank 3, while shopping fell from rank 6 to rank 19 and travel from 16 to 21. These shifts are the empirical basis for the paper's smartphone service typology for island connectivity, ordered from Tier 0 (emergency calls and cell broadcasts) through Tier 4 (well-being apps like music and games).

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that what participants said they would do in a scripted, hypothetical earthquake with local-only connectivity matches what they would actually do on their phones during a real crisis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If island connectivity is built into 6G, operators should plan for messengers, news, and crisis apps as the highest-demand data services, not assume that dedicated crisis apps alone will suffice.
  • Capacity-limited island networks can use the five-tier typology as a prioritization ladder, keeping emergency calls and cell broadcasts above telephony and entertainment when capacity is scarce.
  • App developers should prepare general-purpose apps for local operation, including local edge servers and local identity and authentication, so users do not need a separate crisis version.
  • Authorities gain a concrete checklist for regulating 6G resilience, including distributed app stores and geographically adapted crisis content.
  • Demand decreases for shopping, travel, and sports suggest these services can be deprioritized first when edge capacity is limited.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stated preferences carry over to real crises, crisis-app designers may need to interoperate with messengers and news rather than compete with them; a natural test is integrating official warnings into messenger and news feeds.
  • The German urban sample and earthquake scenario mean the ranking might shift for rural users, different risk cultures, or hazards like flooding, which the paper itself notes participants suggested.
  • The typology could be operationalized as technical quality-of-service classes in 6G network slicing, with each tier mapped to a guaranteed capacity and latency profile.
  • A local-only connectivity model creates a new design space for island-aware app features, such as showing which contacts are reachable locally, which the survey's demand data does not by itself specify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript introduces the concept of "island connectivity" for 6G networks to the HCI community and reports a large survey (N=857) of adult smartphone users in major German cities. The survey measures (RQ1) which app categories citizens prefer for crisis-specific use cases, (RQ2) how app demand changes when the participants are asked to imagine a crisis scenario with local-only cellular connectivity, and (RQ3) builds a five-tier smartphone service typology to guide operator prioritization. The headline findings are that general-purpose apps (messengers, news) are preferred for several crisis use cases over dedicated crisis apps, and that in the island scenario demand for messengers, news, and crisis apps rises while demand for shopping and travel apps falls. The typology is then derived by combining these survey results with German regulatory documents and 3GPP standards. The paper includes a replication package with data, analysis scripts, and survey structure.

Significance. If taken as descriptive of user preferences in the combined crisis-plus-island scenario, the study is valuable: it is the first large-sample empirical view of a novel 6G service model, with implications for operators, app developers, and authorities. The methodology is a strength: a pilot study, valid attention checks (SRSI UseMe, IRI), very high inter-coder reliability, Bonferroni corrections, and a public replication package. The findings also support a concrete, actionable prioritization framework that goes beyond prior crisis-informatics studies. However, the load-bearing inference that the observed demand shifts are specifically attributable to island connectivity (rather than to the crisis context alone) is not supported by the design, as discussed in the major comments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] The Q11-to-Q13 comparison conflates two factors: the crisis scenario and the local-only connectivity. Q13 asks participants to imagine an ongoing earthquake with island connectivity, while Q11 asks about everyday normal operation, so these conditions differ in both crisis presence and connectivity mode. The paper itself shows in §5.1 that crisis context alone changes app choices (crisis apps dominate warnings, messengers dominate communication, news dominates information). Therefore, the demand increases for messengers, news, and crisis apps and the decreases for shopping and travel apps cannot be uniquely attributed to island connectivity. This matters because the RQ2 results are the empirical basis for the RQ3 typology and the design implications in §6.2 that specifically target island-ready 6G. The manuscript should either explicitly reframe RQ2 as a descriptive study of the combined scenario (which is arguably the real deployment context) and add a corresponding limitation, or add a crisis-without-island control condition in a future study. As written, the causal-sounding language in §5.2 ("increased demand in island operation") and the design advice derived from it overstate the evidence for island-specific effects.
  2. [§4.2/§4.5/§5.4] There is no comprehension check for the island connectivity concept beyond the video and comic materials. The paper reports six participants doubting the island scenario, including P69, who said "The described scenario is wrong because the Internet does not work locally," and the authors classify these as inattention or misunderstanding. Without a direct measure of comprehension (e.g., a post-video fact-check question), it is difficult to know how many participants actually understood that local cellular connectivity would be available while global Internet connectivity would not. This is particularly relevant given the abstract and hypothetical nature of the scenario. The paper already has strong attention checks, so adding one or two comprehension items about the island model would have strengthened validity. In the current version, the authors should at minimum analyze the open comments to estimate how prevalent misunderstanding of the connectivity model was, and report this as a limitation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.6] The sentence "We warned participants that the survey’s subject included crises, which might be a sensible topic for them" appears to use "sensible" where "sensitive" is intended.
  2. [References] Reference [33] contains a typo: "Turkye" should be "Turkey".
  3. [§5.2] The description of Table 2 refers to arrows ("Dotted arrows indicate trends...") but the manuscript text as provided does not show the arrows in the table; please ensure the published version includes the arrow symbols or reword the description to match the actual table rendering.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey provides primary empirical evidence and the typology is a post-hoc classification informed by external standards, not a prediction derived from its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a self-contained empirical survey rather than a derivation or prediction chain. RQ1 and RQ2 are answered directly from participants' stated preferences collected in Q11, Q12, and Q13, and the reported shifts between normal and island operation are descriptive Borda-count comparisons of those responses. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction, and no equation reduces to an input by construction. RQ3's smartphone service typology is explicitly constructed by combining the survey results with external practice-informed sources (the German federal network agency's resilience strategy [12], the 3GPP system architecture [1], and other cited standards), so the tiers are an interpretive classification rather than a self-justifying output. The paper also publishes its dataset and evaluation scripts, making the empirical claims independently checkable. Although several references are authored by members of the same research group (e.g., [42], [51], [55], [58], [61], [115]), these citations are contextual or supplementary and are not load-bearing for the central survey findings; the core evidence is the N=857 dataset, which stands outside any self-citation chain. The manuscript's own limitation passages, including the participant who rejected the island scenario (P69 in Section 5.4), concern scenario realism and potential misunderstanding of the local-connectivity construct, which are validity threats rather than circularity. Overall, the derivation chain from raw survey responses to reported results and the typology is transparent and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central empirical claims rest primarily on the assumption that the hypothetical island connectivity scenario is understandable and that participants can accurately project their app usage into it. No free parameters or new physical entities are introduced. The 'island' is a conceptual model built from existing networking ideas, not an invented causal entity.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption 6G networks will include distributed core network replicas that can provide local cellular connectivity to crisis-struck islands.
    The entire vision of island connectivity relies on this technical development, which is proposed in cited literature (e.g., refs [19,21,72,82]) but not yet realized or standardized. The paper itself acknowledges this is a visionary concept.
  • domain assumption Self-reported app preferences in a hypothetical scenario (earthquake plus island connectivity) approximate real-world behavior in comparable crises.
    The survey asks participants to imagine a future scenario and state which apps they would use. This is a standard but unvalidated assumption in HCI surveys, acknowledged in Section 4.5 as a limitation.
  • domain assumption The app categorization based on the Apple App Store, modified by the authors, is a valid and comprehensive taxonomy for studying smartphone app usage among German adults.
    The authors note there is no generally accepted categorization and base theirs on the Apple App Store (Section 4.2). The choices to split or omit categories could affect results, though the authors explain their decisions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The User Perspective on Island-Ready 6G Communication: A Survey of Future Smartphone Usage in Crisis-Struck Areas with Local Cellular Connectivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J6Z5HR3S

@misc{pith2026250613466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The User Perspective on Island-Ready 6G Communication: A Survey of Future Smartphone Usage in Crisis-Struck Areas with Local Cellular Connectivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J6Z5HR3S}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13466}
}
read the original abstract

Using smartphone apps during crises is well-established, proving critical for efficient crisis response. However, such apps become futile without an Internet connection, which is a common issue during crises. The ongoing 6G standardization explores the capability to provide local cellular connectivity for areas cut off from the Internet in crises. This paper introduces to the HCI community the concept of cellular island connectivity in isolated areas, promising a seamless transition from normal operation to island operation with local-only cellular connectivity. It presents findings from a survey (N = 857) among adult smartphone users from major German cities regarding their smartphone usage preferences in this model. Results show a shift in app demand, with users favoring general-purpose apps over dedicated crisis apps in specific scenarios. We prioritize smartphone services based on their criticality, distinguishing between apps essential for crisis response and those supporting routines. Our findings provide operators, developers, and authorities insights into making user-centric design decisions for implementing island-ready 6G communication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.13466 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Crisis Scenario. This comic board introduced our participants to the assumed crisis scenario of our study, an earthquake. We individualized the first comic (Figure 1a) by replacing your city with the participant’s city. ABSTRACT Using smartphone apps during crises is well-established, proving critical for efficient crisis response. However, such apps become futile without an Internet connection, which is a common is… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Internet Infrastructure in Germany. A beige line shows the German border, blue triangles highlight known physical interconnection facility locations, e.g., point of pres￾ences (PoPs), Internet exchange points (IXPs), or cable land￾ing sites, and purple lines show the routes of submarine cables and the assumed terrestrial cable routes, following roadways, rails, and power lines [6, 31]. of smartphone services for the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Local Connectivity Model. This comic board intro￾duced our participants to the conceptual model of local con￾nectivity in isolated cities. The message in Figure 3a trans￾lates to "I’m fine!". The text in Figure 3d translates to "A few hours later." [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Positional Voting Distribution for Apps with Strong Trends. Each figure compares the vote distribution of the app demand in normal operation (Q11) and island operation (Q13) in a bivariate kernel density estimation (KDE) plot [110]. The annotated density peaks undersco…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Smartphone Service Typology for Island Connectivity (RQ3). This prioritization organizes smartphone services in tiers based on their criticality for islands. Tier 0 contains vital services for islands, Tiers 1 - 2 focus on immediate crisis response, and Tiers 3 - 4 foc…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Rank Distribution Tendencies of Semantic Groups. This figure compares the app demand of semantic groups based on age (Figure 6a) and education (Figure 6b). Each figure features box plots to show the app demand in island operation (Q13) of a group (e.g., younger adults …
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A.4.2 City Isolation Introduction (Video) . "Please start the video if it does not start automatically. If this does not work either, there is a description of the video below the video." A.4.3 Video Transcript . "First, you want to send a message to a friend outside t…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023.System architecture for the 5G System (5GS), Technical Specification (TS) 23.501, version 18.4.0.Technical Specification

    3GPP. 2023.System architecture for the 5G System (5GS), Technical Specification (TS) 23.501, version 18.4.0.Technical Specification. 3rd Generation Partner- ship Projec (3GPP). https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/ SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3144

    2023

  2. [2]

    Hervé Abdi. 2007. Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics3, 01 (2007), 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Firoj Alam, Ferda Ofli, and Muhammad Imran. 2020. Descriptive and visual summaries of disaster events using artificial intelligence techniques: case studies of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria.Behaviour & Information Technology39, 3 (2020), 288–318. Publisher: Taylor & Francis

    2020

  4. [4]

    Hadi Alizadeh, Ayyoob Sharifi, Safiyeh Damanbagh, Hadi Nazarnia, and Mo- hammad Nazarnia. 2023. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social sphere and lessons for crisis management: a literature review.Natural Hazards 117, 3 (2023), 2139–2164

    2023

  5. [5]

    Flor Álvarez, Lars Almon, Patrick Lieser, Tobias Meuser, Yannick Dylla, Björn Richerzhagen, Matthias Hollick, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2018. Conducting a large- scale field test of a smartphone-based communication network for emergency response. InProceedings of the 13th Workshop on Challenged Networks. ACM, New Dheli, India, 3–10

    2018

  6. [6]

    Scott Anderson, Loqman Salamatian, Zachary S Bischof, Alberto Dainotti, and Paul Barford. 2022. iGDB: connecting the physical and logical layers of the internet. InProceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, Madrid, Spain, 433–448

    2022

  7. [7]

    Apple Inc. 2024. Categories and Discoverability - App Store. https://developer. apple.com/app-store/categories/ [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  8. [8]

    Bahareh Bahrami, Mohammad Reza Khayyambashi, and Seyedali Mirjalili. 2023. Edge server placement problem in multi-access edge computing environment: models, techniques, and applications.Cluster Computing26, 5 (2023), 3237–3262. Publisher: Springer

    2023

Show all 128 references
  1. [9]

    BBK. 2024. Informationstechnik und Telekommunikation. https: //www.bbk.bund.de/DE/Themen/Kritische-Infrastrukturen/Sektoren- Branchen/Informationstechnik-Telekommunikation/informationstechnik- telekommunikation_node.html [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  2. [10]

    Abrudan, Tommy Svensson, Kim Schindhelm, Andreas Wolfgang, Simon Lindberg, and Henk Wymeersch

    Ali Behravan, Vijaya Yajnanarayana, Musa Furkan Keskin, Hui Chen, Deep Shrestha, Traian E. Abrudan, Tommy Svensson, Kim Schindhelm, Andreas Wolfgang, Simon Lindberg, and Henk Wymeersch. 2023. Positioning and Sensing in 6G: Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities.IEEE Vehicular Tec...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Jelke Bethlehem. 2010. Selection bias in web surveys.International statistical review78, 2 (2010), 161–188. Publisher: Wiley Online Library

    2010

  4. [12]

    2022.Resilience of Telecommunications Networks

    BNA. 2022.Resilience of Telecommunications Networks. Technical Re- port. Bundesnetzagentur (BNA). https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/ SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_ Institutionen/Strategiepapier_Resilienz_eng.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

    2022

  5. [13]

    BNA. 2024. Informationsplattform Schienengüterverkehr (ISA). https://isa. bundesnetzagentur.de/home/#/ [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  6. [14]

    1989.Rfc1122: Requirements for internet hosts-communication layers

    Robert Braden. 1989.Rfc1122: Requirements for internet hosts-communication layers. Technical Report. RFC Editor

    1989

  7. [15]

    Aeschbach, and Klaus Opwis

    Florian Brühlmann, Serge Petralito, Lena F. Aeschbach, and Klaus Opwis. 2020. The quality of data collected online: An investigation of careless responding in a crowdsourced sample.Methods in Psychology2 (2020), 100022. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100022

    2020

  8. [16]

    2023.ZwiBACK-Studie: Zwischenfälle in Bezug auf Bedenken und Achtsamkeit bei der Cybersicherheit

    BSI. 2023.ZwiBACK-Studie: Zwischenfälle in Bezug auf Bedenken und Achtsamkeit bei der Cybersicherheit. Technical Report. Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI). https://www.bsi.bund.de/ SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/BSI/Publikationen/Studien/ZwiBACK/ZwiBACK- Studi...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Patrice Calégari, Frédéric Guidec, Pierre Kuonen, and Daniel Kobler. 1997. Par- allel island-based genetic algorithm for radio network design.J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput.47, 1 (1997), 86–90

    1997

  10. [18]

    2016.Big crisis data: social media in disasters and time-critical situations

    Carlos Castillo. 2016.Big crisis data: social media in disasters and time-critical situations. Cambridge University Press, New York, US

    2016

  11. [19]

    Songyan Chen, Junjie Chen, and Hongjun Li. 2024. Joint optimization of UPF placement and traffic routing for 5G core network user plane.Computer Com- munications216 (2024), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2023.12.029

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    1988.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen. 1988.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, New York, US

    1988

  13. [21]

    Marius Corici, Hemant Zope, Hauke Buhr, Christian Scheich, and Thomas Magedanz. 2024. Shortcuts: A Simple Mechanism for Reducing the Data Path Delay in Beyond 5G and 6G Networks. In27th Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN). IEEE, Paris, France, 47–51

    2024

  14. [22]

    Marius-Iulian Corici, Fabian Eichhorn, Roland Bless, Michael Gundall, Daniel Lindenschmitt, Bastian Bloessl, Marina Petrova, Lara Wimmer, Ronny Kreuch, Thomas Magedanz, et al. 2023. Organic 6G networks: Vision, requirements, and research approaches.IEEE Access11 (2023), 70698–...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Alessio Cornia, Kerstin Dressel, and Patricia Pfeil. 2016. Risk cultures and dominant approaches towards disasters in seven European countries.Journal of Risk Research19, 3 (2016), 288–304. Publisher: Taylor & Francis

    2016

  16. [24]

    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. 2024. Communications Sector. https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and- resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/communications-sector [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  17. [25]

    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. 2024. Information Technol- ogy Sector. https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and- resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/information-technology-sector [Ac- cessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  18. [26]

    Irina Dallo and Michèle Marti. 2021. Why should I use a multi-hazard app? Assessing the public’s information needs and app feature preferences in a participatory process.International journal of disaster risk reduction57 (2021), 102197. Publisher: Elsevier

    2021

  19. [27]

    GC Deepak, Alexandros Ladas, Yusuf Abdulrahman Sambo, Haris Pervaiz, Chris- tos Politis, and Muhammad Ali Imran. 2019. An overview of post-disaster emergency communication systems in the future networks.IEEE Wireless Communications26, 6 (2019), 132–139. Publisher: IEEE

    2019

  20. [28]

    Destatis. 2024. Ausstattung privater Haushalte mit Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik - Deutschland. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/ Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Einkommen-Konsum-Lebensbedingungen/Ausstattung- Gebrauchsgueter/Tabellen/liste-infotechnik-d.html#115502 [Accessed 2...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Destatis. 2024. Großstadtregionen im Wandel. https://www.destatis.de/ DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Demografischer-Wandel/Aspekte/demografie- grossstadtregionen.html [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  22. [30]

    2014.Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth, and Leah Melani Christian. 2014.Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, US

    2014

  23. [31]

    Ramakrishnan Durairajan, Paul Barford, Joel Sommers, and Walter Willinger

  24. [32]

    Frances L. Edwards. 2022. Crisis, Emergency, Disaster, and Catastrophe Defined. InGlobal Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Ali Farazmand (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2793–2797. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2878

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Kathrin Eismann, Oliver Posegga, and Kai Fischbach. 2016. Collective behaviour, Social Media, and disasters: a Systematic literature Review.. InECIS. Association for Information Systems, Istanbul, Turkye, 1–20

    2016

  26. [34]

    Dirk M. Elston. 2021. Survivorship bias.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology10 (2021), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.845

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Alexander Fekete and Simone Sandholz. 2021. Here comes the flood, but not failure? Lessons to learn after the heavy rain and pluvial floods in Germany 2021.Water13, 21 (2021), 3016. Publisher: MDPI

    2021

  28. [36]

    Diana Fischer-Preßler, Dario Bonaretti, and Kai Fischbach. 2022. A protection- motivation perspective to explain intention to use and continue to use mobile warning systems.Business & Information Systems Engineering64, 2 (2022), 167–182. Publisher: Springer

    2022

  29. [37]

    Thomas Franke, Christiane Attig, and Daniel Wessel. 2019. A personal re- source for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction35, 6 (2019), 456–467. Publisher: Ta...

    2019

  30. [38]

    Wei Gao and Guohong Cao. 2011. User-centric data dissemination in disruption tolerant networks. In2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, Shanghai, China, 3119–3127

    2011

  31. [39]

    Wei Gao, Guohong Cao, Arun Iyengar, and Mudhakar Srivatsa. 2011. Supporting cooperative caching in disruption tolerant networks. In2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, Minneapolis, USA, 151–161

    2011

  32. [40]

    GapFish GmbH. 2024. GapFish – Knowing what really matters. https://gapfish. com [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  33. [41]

    too fast

    Robert Greszki, Marco Meyer, and Harald Schoen. 2015. Exploring the effects of removing “too fast” responses and respondents from web surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly79, 2 (2015), 471–503. Publisher: Oxford University Press US

    2015

  34. [42]

    Logan, Nadja Thiessen, Katharina Kleinschnitger, Lars Baumgärtner, Jan-Philipp Stroscher, Christian Reuter, Michele Knodt, and Matthias Hollick

    Steffen Haesler, Ragnark Mogk, Florentin Putz, Kevin T. Logan, Nadja Thiessen, Katharina Kleinschnitger, Lars Baumgärtner, Jan-Philipp Stroscher, Christian Reuter, Michele Knodt, and Matthias Hollick. 2021. Connected Self-Organized Citizens in Crises: An Interdisciplinary Resi...

    2021

  35. [43]

    Yunita Astriani Hardayati and Mustikasari Mustikasari. 2019. The implemen- tation of relaxation and distraction techniques on adolescents experiencing anxiety in earthquake prone areas.International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS)2, 3 (2019), 9–15

    2019

  36. [44]

    Jasmin Haunschild, Marc-André Kaufhold, and Christian Reuter. 2020. Sticking with Landlines? Citizens’ and Police Social Media Use and Expectation During Emergencies. InProceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsin- formatik (WI) (Best Paper Social Impact A ward...

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Jasmin Haunschild, Marc-André Kaufhold, and Christian Reuter. 2022. Per- ceptions and Use of Warning Apps – Did Recent Crises Lead to Changes in Germany?. InMensch und Computer - Tagungsband. ACM, New York, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3543770

    2022

  38. [46]

    Jasmin Haunschild, Selina Pauli, and Christian Reuter. 2023. Preparedness Nudging for Warning Apps? A Mixed-Method Study Investigating Popularity and Effects of Preparedness Alerts in Warning Apps.International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS)172 (2023), 102995. https...

    2023

  39. [47]

    2022.A comparative assess- ment of mobile device-based multi-hazard warnings: Saving lives through public alerts in europe

    Andrin Hauri, Kevin Kohler, and Benjamin Scharte. 2022.A comparative assess- ment of mobile device-based multi-hazard warnings: Saving lives through public alerts in europe. Technical Report. ETH Zurich

    2022

  40. [48]

    Heckathorn

    Douglas D. Heckathorn. 2011. Comment: Snowball versus Respondent-Driven Sampling.Sociological Methodology41, 1 (2011), 355–366. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9531.2011.01244.x

    2011

  41. [49]

    Michael Heise, Martin Pietsch, Florian Steinke, Maximilian Bauer, and Burak Yilmaz. 2022. Optimized UAV Placement for Resilient Crisis Communication and Power Grid Restoration. In2022 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe). IEEE, Novi Sad, ...

    2022

  42. [50]

    Joseph Henrich. 2015. Culture and social behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences3 (2015), 84–89. Publisher: Elsevier

    2015

  43. [51]

    Matthias Hollick, Anne Hofmeister, Jens Ivo Engels, Bernd Freisleben, Gerrit Hornung, Anja Klein, Michèle Knodt, Imke Lorenz, Max Mühlhäuser, Peter Pelz, and others. 2019. The emergency responsive digital city. In2019 World Congress on Resilience, Reliability and Asset Managem...

    2019

  44. [52]

    Muzammil Hussain, Ahmed Al-Haiqi, AA Zaidan, BB Zaidan, Miss Laiha Mat Kiah, Nor Badrul Anuar, and Mohamed Abdulnabi. 2015. The landscape of re- search on smartphone medical apps: Coherent taxonomy, motivations, open chal- lenges and recommendations.Computer methods and progra...

    2015

  45. [53]

    Jonas Höchst, Lars Baumgärtner, Franz Kuntke, Alvar Penning, Artur Sterz, Markus Sommer, and Bernd Freisleben. 2023. Mobile Device-to-Device Com- munication for Crisis Scenarios Using Low-Cost LoRa Modems. InDisaster Management and Information Technology: Professional Response...

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)47, 4 (2015), 1–38. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA

    2015

  47. [55]

    2025.Survey Dataset: The User Perspective on Island- Ready 6G Commu- nication

    Leon Janzen, Florentin Putz, Kolja Straub, Marc-André Kaufhold, and Matthias Hollick. 2025.Survey Dataset: The User Perspective on Island- Ready 6G Commu- nication. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14812894

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    Marc-André Kaufhold. 2024. Exploring the evolving landscape of human-centred crisis informatics: current challenges and future trends.i-com - Journal of Interactive Media2 (2024), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0002

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    Marc-André Kaufhold, Julian Bäumler, and Christian Reuter. 2022. The Im- plementation of Protective Measures and Communication of Cybersecurity Alerts in Germany - A Representative Survey of the Population. InMensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband (Mensch und Computer 2022 - ...

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    Marc-André Kaufhold, Margarita Grinko, Christian Reuter, Marén Schorch, Amanda Langer, Sascha Skudelny, and Matthias Hollick. 2019. Potentiale von IKT beim Ausfall kritischer Infrastrukturen: Erwartungen, Informationsgewinnung und Mediennutzung der Zivilbevölkerung in Deutschl...

    2019

  51. [59]

    Marc-André Kaufhold, Thea Riebe, Markus Bayer, and Christian Reuter. 2024. ’We Do Not Have the Capacity to Monitor All Media’: A Design Case Study on Cyber Situational Awareness in Computer Emergency Response Teams. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computin...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Marc-André Kaufhold, Nicola Rupp, Christian Reuter, and Matthias Habdank

  53. [61]

    Ladan Khaloopour, Yanpeng Su, Florian Raskob, Tobias Meuser, Roland Bless, Leon Würsching, Kamyar Abedi, Marko Andjelkovic, Hekma Chaari, Pousali Chakraborty, Michael Kreutzer, Matthias Hollick, Thorsten Strufe, Norman The User Perspective on Island-Ready 6G Communication CHI ...

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Wolfgang Kiess and Ashiq Khan. 2014. Centralized vs. distributed: On the placement of gateway functionality in 5G cellular networks. In2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, Texas, United Stated of America, 4788–4793

    2014

  55. [63]

    Jooho Kim and Makarand Hastak. 2018. Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster.International journal of information management38, 1 (2018), 86–96

    2018

  56. [64]

    Martin Kleppmann, Adam Wiggins, Peter Van Hardenberg, and Mark Mc- Granaghan. 2019. Local-first software: you own your data, in spite of the cloud. InProceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Sof...

    2019

  57. [65]

    2004.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology

    Klaus Krippendorff. 2004.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Inc., London, UK

    2004

  58. [66]

    Ivar Krumpal. 2013. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review.Quality & quantity47, 4 (2013), 2025–2047. Publisher: Springer

    2013

  59. [67]

    Franz Kuntke, Lars Baumgärtner, and Christian Reuter. 2023. Rural Commu- nication in Outage Scenarios: Disruption-Tolerant Networking via LoRaWAN Setups. InProceedings of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Manage- ment (ISCRAM). Department of Information Systems & Qua...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Franz Kuntke, Merve Bektas, Laura Buhleier, Ella Pohl, Rebekka Schiller, and Christian Reuter. 2023. How Would Emergency Communication Based on Lo- RaWAN Perform? Empirical Findings of Signal Propagation in Rural Areas. InProceedings of Information Systems for Crisis Response ...

    2023

  61. [69]

    Jeremy Lakeman, Matthew Lloyd, Romana Challans, Angus Wallace, Paul Gardner-Stephen, Milan Stute, and Matthias Hollick. 2017. A practical and secure social media facility for internet-deprived populations. In2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). IEEE, San...

    2017

  62. [70]

    Glyn Lewis and Simon Wessely. 1992. The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers.Journal of epidemiology and community health46, 2 (1992), 92. Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

    1992

  63. [71]

    Feng Li and Jie Wu. 2009. MOPS: Providing content-based service in disruption- tolerant networkks. In2009 29th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems. IEEE, Montreal, Canada, 526–533

    2009

  64. [72]

    Yuanzhe Li, Xiao Ma, Mengwei Xu, Ao Zhou, Qibo Sun, Ning Zhang, and Shangguang Wang. 2021. Joint placement of UPF and edge server for 6G network.IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 22 (2021), 16370–16378. Publisher: IEEE

    2021

  65. [73]

    LimeSurvey. 2024. LimeSurvey - Free Online Survey Tool. https://www. limesurvey.org/de [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  66. [74]

    MASTD. 2021. Mobilfunk und Breitbandversorgung im Ahrtal weiter im Fokus. https://mastd.rlp.de/service/presse/detail/mobilfunk-und- breitbandversorgung-im-ahrtal-weiter-im-fokus [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2021

  67. [75]

    James Mccauley, Scott Shenker, and George Varghese. 2023. Extracting the essential simplicity of the Internet.Commun. ACM66, 2 (2023), 64–74

    2023

  68. [76]

    Urken, and Fiona Hewitt

    Iain McLean, Arnold B. Urken, and Fiona Hewitt. 1995.Classics of Social Choice. University of Michigan Press, Michigan, US

    1995

  69. [77]

    Adam W Meade and S Bartholomew Craig. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data.Psychological methods17, 3 (2012), 437. Publisher: American Psychological Association

    2012

  70. [78]

    François Michel, Martino Trevisan, Danilo Giordano, and Olivier Bonaventure

  71. [79]

    Thea Palsgaard Møller, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Janne Schurmann Tolstrup, Doris Østergaard, Søren Viereck, Jerry Overton, Fredrik Folke, and Freddy Lippert

  72. [80]

    Neema Moraveji, Jason Li, Jiarong Ding, Patrick O’Kelley, and Suze Woolf. 2007. Comicboarding: using comics as proxies for participatory design with children. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, San Jose, US, 1371–1374

    2007

  73. [81]

    Simon Moss. 2008. Acquiescence bias. http://www.psych-it.com.au/ Psychlopedia/article.asp [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2008

  74. [82]

    Shreyasee Mukherjee, Ravishankar Ravindran, and Dipankar Raychaudhuri

  75. [83]

    Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine23 (2015), 1–10

    2015

  76. [84]

    Francesco Palmieri, Ugo Fiore, Aniello Castiglione, Fang-Yie Leu, and Alfredo De Santis. 2013. Analyzing the internet stability in presence of disasters. In Security Engineering and Intelligence Informatics: CD-ARES 2013 Workshops: MoCrySEn and SeCIHD, Regensburg, Germany, Sep...

    2013

  77. [85]

    Guy Paré, Marie-Claude Trudel, Mirou Jaana, and Spyros Kitsiou. 2015. Syn- thesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & management52, 2 (2015), 183–199

    2015

  78. [86]

    Mukaddim Pathan, Rajkumar Buyya, and Athena Vakali. 2008. Content delivery networks: State of the art, insights, and imperatives.Content Delivery Networks 9 (2008), 3–32

    2008

  79. [87]

    Karl Pearson. 1992. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. InThe London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine a...

    1992

  80. [88]

    Alexandra Olteanu, Sarah Vieweg, and Carlos Castillo. 2015. What to expect when the unexpected happens: Social media communications across crises. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, Vancouver, Canada, 994–1009

    2015

  81. [89]

    2024.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

    R Core Team. 2024.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R- project.org/ [Accessed 2024-09-12]

    2024

  82. [90]

    Springer, Regensburg, Germany, 253–268

  83. [91]

    Christian Reuter, Oliver Heger, and Volkmar Pipek. 2013. Combining real and virtual volunteers through social media.. InProceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference. KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany, Baden-Baden, Germany, 780– 790

    2013

  84. [92]

    Christian Reuter, Amanda Lee Hughes, and Marc-André Kaufhold. 2018. Social Media in Crisis Management: An Evaluation and Analysis of Crisis Informatics Research.International Journal on Human-Computer Interaction (IJHCI)34, 4 (2018), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2...

    2018

  85. [93]

    Christian Reuter, Marc-André Kaufhold, Tom Biselli, and Helene Pleil. 2023. Increasing adoption despite perceived limitations of social media in emergencies: Representative insights on German citizens’ perception and trends from 2017 to 2021.International Journal of Disaster R...

    2023

  86. [94]

    Matteo Pozza, Ashwin Rao, Hannu Flinck, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2018. Network- in-a-box: A survey about on-demand flexible networks.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials20, 3 (2018), 2407–2428

    2018

  87. [95]

    Christian Reuter, Marc-André Kaufhold, Thomas Spielhofer, and Anna Sophie Hahne. 2017. Social Media in Emergencies: A Representative Study on Citizens’ Perception in Germany.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134725 Place: New Y...

    2017 doi

  88. [96]

    Aravindh Raman, Sagar Joglekar, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2019. Challenges in the decentralised web: The mastodon case. InProceedings of the internet measurement conference. ACM, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 217–229

    2019

  89. [97]

    Justus Rischke, Peter Sossalla, Sebastian Itting, Frank HP Fitzek, and Martin Reisslein. 2021. 5G campus networks: A first measurement study.IEEE Access9 (2021), 121786–121803

    2021

  90. [98]

    2017.Adopting a Gateway Centric View for Cellular Network Content Delivery

    John Paul Rula. 2017.Adopting a Gateway Centric View for Cellular Network Content Delivery. PhD Thesis. Northwestern University

    2017

  91. [99]

    Donald G Saari. 2000. Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes: II. Positional voting.Economic Theory15 (2000), 55–102. Publisher: Springer

    2000

  92. [100]

    Christian Reuter, Marc-André Kaufhold, Stefka Schmid, Thomas Spielhofer, and Anna Sophie Hahne. 2019. The Impact of Risk Cultures: Citizens’ Perception of Social Media Use in Emergencies across Europe.Technological Forecasting and Social Change (TFSC)148, 119724 (2019), 1–17. ...

    2019

  93. [101]

    Lucy Simko, Harshini Sri Ramulu, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Yasemin Acar. 2023. The Use and Non-Use of Technology During Hurricanes.Proc. ACM Hum.- Comput. Interact.7, CSCW2 (Oct. 2023), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610215 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Comput...

    2023 doi

  94. [102]

    Matei Ripeanu. 2001. Peer-to-peer architecture case study: Gnutella network. InProceedings first international conference on peer-to-peer computing. IEEE, Linköping, Sweden, 99–100

    2001

  95. [103]

    Robert Soden and Leysia Palen. 2018. Informating crisis: Expanding critical perspectives in crisis informatics.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction2, CSCW (2018), 1–22. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA

    2018

  96. [104]

    Voluntweeters

    Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. " Voluntweeters" self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Vancouver, Canada, 1071–1080. CHI ’25, April 26-May 1, 2025, Yokohama, Japan Janzen et al

    2011

  97. [105]

    Statista. 2024. Number of smartphone users worldwide 2016-2028. On- line. https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users- worldwide/ [Accessed 2024-11-07]

    2024

  98. [106]

    1996.Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context

    Howard Schuman and Stanley Presser. 1996.Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Sage, London, UK

    1996

  99. [107]

    Milan Stute, Max Maass, Tom Schons, and Matthias Hollick. 2017. Reverse Engineering Human Mobility in Large-scale Natural Disasters. InProceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems(Miami, Florida, USA)...

    2017

  100. [108]

    Rishabh Singla, Shreyas Srinivasa, Narasimha Reddy, Jens Myrup Pedersen, Emmanouil Vasilomanolakis, and Riccardo Bettati. 2023. An Analysis of War Impact on Ukrainian Critical Infrastructure Through Network Measurements. In2023 7th Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conf...

    2023

  101. [109]

    Marion Lara Tan, Raj Prasanna, Kristin Stock, Emma Hudson-Doyle, Graham Leonard, and David Johnston. 2017. Mobile applications in crisis informatics literature: A systematic review.International journal of disaster risk reduction24 (2017), 297–311. Publisher: Elsevier

    2017

  102. [110]

    George R Terrell and David W Scott. 1992. Variable kernel density estimation. The Annals of Statistics20, 3 (1992), 1236–1265

    1992

  103. [111]

    Annegret H Thieken, Philip Bubeck, Anna Heidenreich, Jennifer Von Keyser- lingk, Lisa Dillenardt, and Antje Otto. 2023. Performance of the flood warning system in Germany in July 2021–insights from affected residents.Natural haz- ards and earth system sciences23, 2 (2023), 973...

    2023

  104. [112]

    Artur Sterz, Robin Klose, Markus Sommer, Jonas Höchst, Jakob Link, Bernd Simon, Anja Klein, Matthias Hollick, and Bernd Freisleben. 2023. Energy- Efficient Decentralized Broadcasting in Wireless Multi-Hop Networks.Sensors 23, 17 (2023), 7419. Publisher: MDPI

    2023

  105. [113]

    Houcai Wang, Li Xiong, Chengwen Wang, and Nan Chen. 2022. Understanding Chinese mobile social media users’ communication behaviors during public health emergencies.Journal of Risk Research25, 7 (2022), 874–891. Publisher: Taylor & Francis

    2022

  106. [114]

    Marion Lara Tan, Raj Prasanna, Kristin Stock, Emma EH Doyle, Graham Leonard, and David Johnston. 2020. Usability factors influencing the continuance inten- tion of disaster apps: A mixed-methods study.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction50 (2020), 101874. Publisher...

    2020

  107. [115]

    Leon Würsching and Matthias Hollick. 2023. Maintaining App Services in Disrupted Cities: A Crisis and Resilience Evaluation Tool. InNetMob ’23 Book of Abstracts. IMDEA, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain, 141–142. http://tubiblio.ulb.tu- darmstadt.de/140700/ event-place: Madrid, Spain

    2023

  108. [116]

    Kerstin K Zander, Duy Nguyen, Milad Mirbabaie, and Stephen T Garnett. 2023. Aware but not prepared: understanding situational awareness during the century flood in Germany in 2021.International journal of disaster risk reduction96 (2023), 103936. Publisher: Elsevier

    2023

  109. [117]

    Kateryna Zarembo, Michèle Knodt, and Jannis Kachel. 2024. Smartphone re- silience: ICT in Ukrainian civic response to the Russian full-scale invasion. Media, War & Conflict0, 0 (2024), 17506352241236449. Publisher: SAGE Publi- cations Sage UK: London, England

    2024

  110. [118]

    Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty.science185, 4157 (1974), 1124–1131

    1974

  111. [119]

    Haijun Zhang, Chunxiao Jiang, Rose Qingyang Hu, and Yi Qian. 2016. Self- organization in disaster-resilient heterogeneous small cell networks.IEEE Network30, 2 (2016), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2016.7437033

    2016

  112. [120]

    2023.Mapping the World’s Critical Infrastructure Sectors

    Valentin Weber, Maria Pericàs Riera, and Emma Laumann. 2023.Mapping the World’s Critical Infrastructure Sectors. Technical Report. Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V. 9 pages. https://www.ssoar. info/ssoar/handle/document/91328 Publisher: DEU

    2023

  113. [121]

    Shiyao Zhu, Dezhi Li, Haibo Feng, Tiantian Gu, Kasun Hewage, and Rehan Sadiq. 2020. Smart city and resilient city: Differences and connections.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10, 6 (2020), e1388. Publisher: Wiley Online Library

    2020

  114. [122]

    How old are you?

    Naomi Ziv and Revital Hollander-Shabtai. 2022. Music and COVID-19: Changes in uses and emotional reaction to music under stay-at-home restrictions.Psy- chology of Music50, 2 (2022), 475–491. A QUESTIONNAIRE We translated the transcript of the questionnaire from German to Engli...

    2022

  115. [124]

    Kyriakos Zarifis, Tobias Flach, Srikanth Nori, David Choffnes, Ramesh Govin- dan, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Z Morley Mao, and Matt Welsh. 2014. Diagnosing path inflation of mobile client traffic. InPassive and Active Measurement: 15th International Conference, PAM 2014, Los Angeles,...

    2014

  116. [126]

    Zesen Zhang, Alexander Marder, Ricky Mok, Bradley Huffaker, Matthew Luckie, Kimberly C Claffy, and Aaron Schulman. 2021. Inferring regional access network topologies: Methods and applications. InProceedings of the 21st ACM Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, Virtual Event, U...

    2021

  117. [2015]

    In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Com- munication

    InterTubes: A study of the US long-haul fiber-optic infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Com- munication. ACM, London, United Kingdom, 565–578

    2015

  118. [2018]

    In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Networking for Emerging Applications and Technologies

    A distributed core network architecture for 5G systems and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Networking for Emerging Applications and Technologies. ACM, Budapest, Hungary, 33–38

    2018

  119. [2020]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0144929X.2019.1620334

    Mitigating Information Overload in Social Media during Conflicts and Crises: Design and Evaluation of a Cross-Platform Alerting System.Behaviour & Information Technology (BIT)39, 3 (2020), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0144929X.2019.1620334

    2020

  120. [2022]

    InProceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference

    A first look at starlink performance. InProceedings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, Nice, France, 130–136

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.