Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 68 references

Combining laser cooling and Zeeman deceleration for precision spectroscopy in supersonic beams

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Combining a multistage Zeeman decelerator with curved-wavefront transverse laser cooling yields slow, transversely cold metastable-helium beams that give UV linewidths of 5 MHz and line-center precision of $\Delta\nu/\nu = 4\times10^{-11}$.

desk verdict Solid first demonstration of Zeeman deceleration plus curved-wavefront transverse laser cooling with a useful skimmer criterion, but the abstract's 135 µK temperature is unsupported and should be corrected. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02999 v1 pith:J7J4WTC7 submitted 2025-01-06 physics.atom-ph

Gloria Clausen , Laura Gabriel , Josef A. Agner , Hansjürg Schmutz , Tobias Thiele , Andreas Wallraff , Frédéric Merkt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords Zeemandecelerationcurved-wavefrontlasercoolingtransversemetastableheliumprecisionspectroscopyDopplerwidthsupersonicbeamsRydbergstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates a beam source for precision ultraviolet spectroscopy in which metastable helium atoms are slowed by a multistage Zeeman decelerator and then cooled transversely with the curved-wavefront laser-cooling method. The combination yields a beam moving at 175 m/s with a transverse temperature near $T_\perp\approx 135\,\mu$K, dense enough to record high-signal spectra. On the $(1s)(40p)\,{}^3P_J \leftarrow (1s)(2s)\,{}^3S_1$ transition near $1.15\times10^{15}$ Hz, linewidths as narrow as 5 MHz are obtained, and line centers are determined with $\Delta\nu/\nu = 4\times10^{-11}$, limited by signal-to-noise. The paper also shows that, under the tested conditions, a skimmer placed close to the cooled beam reduces intensity but not Doppler width, and it uses particle-trajectory simulations to reproduce the measured line shapes. The result is a high-resolution UV source for spectroscopic tests in a system where theory is highly accurate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the combination of a 30-coil multistage Zeeman decelerator with a curved-wavefront transverse laser-cooling stage. The decelerator pulses currents through successive solenoids to phase-stably slow low-field-seeking He* atoms from 480 to 175 m/s. The cooling stage reflects a 1083 nm laser $N\approx25$ times between two slightly tilted mirrors, so the angle between the laser wavevector and the atomic beam decreases at each reflection; this makes the Doppler shift follow the slowing transverse velocity and gives a capture range up to about 24–25 m/s. The analysis also relies on the geometric expansion angle of the cooled beam, $\gamma_2=\arctan(v_\perp/v_\parallel)$, and the criterion $d_s\sin\gamma_2 \le r$ to decide when a skimmer merely attenuates the beam instead of narrowing the line.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the transverse-velocity distribution at the Zeeman-decelerator exit, obtained by scanning a narrow slit across the beam or by imaging the beam at two positions with the cooling lasers off, would settle whether the simulation input matches the real apparatus; a disagreement would change the inferred 135 $\mu$K transverse temperature and the prediction that skimmers cannot narrow the line.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Zeeman deceleration and transverse laser cooling work together rather than stand as alternatives: the decelerator lowers the forward velocity to 175 m/s, which lengthens the interaction time and shrinks the transverse-velocity window admitted by a downstream aperture, while the curved-wavefront cooler keeps the beam dense and its transverse-velocity spread close to the Doppler limit even though deceleration broadens that spread. The supporting measurement is the Doppler profile of the $(1s)(40p)\,{}^3P_J\leftarrow(1s)(2s)\,{}^3S_1$ transition at $\approx1.15\times10^{15}$ Hz, which narrows from 11.3(3) MHz in the uncooled 480 m/s beam to 7.9(2) MHz after laser cooling, and to 5.0(2) MHz after deceleration to 175 m/s. At that width the line center is located to 50 kHz, corresponding to $\Delta\nu/\nu=4\times10^{-11}$. The paper further establishes a geometric rule for when skimmers cannot improve resolution: once $d_s\sin\gamma_2\le r$, cutting the beam with an aperture only costs signal.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative beam temperatures and the skimmer conclusion depend on simulated, not directly measured, initial transverse-velocity distributions at the decelerator entrance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The slow, dense, transversely cold 175 m/s beam produces single-photon UV linewidths of 5 MHz FWHM, with line centers located to $\Delta\nu/\nu=4\times10^{-11}$ from the recorded signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Because a nearby skimmer does not narrow the line once $d_s\sin\gamma_2\le r$, further linewidth reduction must come from longer flight distances or lower forward velocities, not from tighter apertures.
  • Laser cooling raises the detected He* signal by roughly a factor of three in intensity, i.e., a factor of nine in density, which directly improves the signal-to-noise of Rydberg-state spectra.
  • The demonstrated beam properties are suited to Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy of He* Rydberg transitions, where the long transit times are particularly beneficial.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own scaling suggests that moving the photoexcitation region farther downstream should narrow the 175 m/s line further, since the residual width is set by the transverse-velocity window of the fixed aperture; this is a direct experimental test the paper does not carry out.
  • The geometric angle $\gamma_2=\arctan(v_\perp/v_\parallel)$ implies that as the forward velocity is lowered, the laser-cooled expansion cone widens, so the distance at which a skimmer becomes useful grows; planning for other molecules should therefore put the skimmer much farther downstream.
  • A direct measurement of the transverse phase-space distribution at the decelerator exit, with the cooling lasers off, would test whether the simulated input distribution used throughout the analysis is correct; if it is not, the inferred transverse temperatures would need revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental apparatus that combines a 30-coil multistage Zeeman decelerator with curved-wavefront transverse laser cooling to produce slow supersonic beams of metastable triplet helium. The beam is characterized by imaging MCP detectors, time-of-flight measurements, and Doppler-resolved spectroscopy of the (1s)(40p) 3PJ ← (1s)(2s) 3S1 transition near 1.15×10^15 Hz. The authors find that Zeeman deceleration to 175 m/s combined with transverse cooling yields a 5.0(2) MHz FWHM Doppler linewidth, which they attribute to the geometric selection of atoms with |v_perp| < 0.65 m/s by the 8-mm hole in the mumetal shield. They estimate a line-center precision of Δν/ν = 4×10^-11 and show that adding a skimmer does not reduce the Doppler width once the geometric condition of Eq. (3) is satisfied. Particle-trajectory simulations are used to support the interpretations.

Significance. This is a useful experimental demonstration for precision spectroscopy in slow supersonic beams. The combination of Zeeman deceleration and curved-wavefront transverse laser cooling is relevant for paramagnetic atoms and molecules, and the measured 5 MHz linewidth at UV frequencies is a concrete advance. The paper's measurements are cross-checked by imaging, time-of-flight, and Doppler spectroscopy, and the simulated line shapes reproduce the main observations. The geometric explanation of why skimmers do not always reduce Doppler widths is valuable. The main caveats concern unsupported quantitative claims in the abstract and the projected line-center precision, both of which can be addressed by rewriting rather than by new experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. III A; Sec. III B] The abstract's claim of a transversely ultracold beam with T_perp ≈ 135 µK is not defined or derived anywhere in the body. The only measured transverse velocity after laser cooling, |vx| = 0.86(9) m/s from imaging (Sec. III A, Fig. 5(g)), corresponds, for a thermal 1D distribution, to a temperature of about 0.5 mK, not 135 µK. The 5.0(2) MHz linewidth at 175 m/s (Sec. III B, Fig. 9) is attributed to the geometric acceptance of the 8-mm mumetal hole, i.e., to atoms with |v_perp| < 0.65 m/s; this is an aperture-selected subsample, not a temperature of the full beam. Please either remove the temperature from the abstract or provide an explicit definition, derivation, and the caveat that it applies only to the aperture-filtered sample.
  2. [Sec. III B] The claimed line-center precision of Δν/ν = 4×10^-11 is an estimate based on "1/100 of the linewidth" at the signal-to-noise ratio of the 175 m/s spectrum, but no SNR value, fitting procedure, or repeated line-center determination is reported. As written, this is a projected capability rather than a demonstrated measurement; please specify how the SNR and the factor 1/100 are obtained, or rephrase the claim accordingly.
  3. [Sec. III A] The quantities reported as "mean transverse velocity" derived from the Doppler widths (1.45(7) m/s for cooling off and 1.02(5) m/s for cooling on) are actually half of the velocity-equivalent full width of the Doppler line, not the mean of |v_perp|. This is not the same statistic as the imaging-derived mean |vx| = 0.86(9) m/s, and the "excellent agreement" statement is therefore misleading. Please define the velocity statistic used for each method.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Conclusions vs. Sec. II E] The maximum capture velocity is quoted as 25 m/s in the Conclusions but as 24 m/s in Sec. II E; please harmonize the two values.
  2. [Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), the value v_perp ≈ 1 m/s is used, while the measured value is 0.86(9) m/s; using the measured value would make the expansion angle and the subsequent geometric condition in Eq. (3) internally consistent.
  3. [Sec. III A, Figs. 6 and 7] The simulated line shapes in Figs. 6(c-d) and 7(c-d) use initial transverse distributions taken from the authors' earlier simulation work (Refs. 49, 50, 59) rather than from an independent measurement of this apparatus; the text should state this limitation explicitly, although the direct linewidth and skimmer measurements do not depend on that input.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central linewidth, velocity, and precision claims are direct measurements, and its interpretive simulations are cross-checked against experimental data rather than supplying the claimed results by construction.

full rationale

The central results are experimental: the 5.0(2) MHz linewidth, the 0.86(9) m/s transverse velocity from imaging, the time-of-flight velocities, and the 4e-11 relative line-center precision are measured quantities, not outputs of a fitted model. The particle-trajectory simulations are used interpretively and are validated against measured Doppler profiles and imaging data; the initial transverse distribution is admittedly taken from the authors' prior simulation work, but the paper does not derive its headline numbers solely from that input. The skimmer criterion in Eq. 3 is a geometric inequality, and the 5 MHz linewidth at 175 m/s is explicitly attributed to the 0.65 m/s transverse-velocity acceptance of the 8-mm mumetal hole, which is a geometric selection effect rather than a fitted prediction. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The abstract's T_perp approximately 135 microK is not derived or reconciled with the measured mean transverse velocity of 0.86(9) m/s, but that is a support/correctness concern, not a circularity: nothing in the derivation chain makes the temperature equal to its inputs by construction. Self-citations to prior apparatus and simulation work are present but not load-bearing in a way that forces the paper's conclusions. The verdict is therefore no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper states all control parameters, such as phase angle 35 degrees, beta_0 = 0.05 rad, D = 25 cm, L = 15 cm, and n=40, as fixed apparatus settings rather than values fitted to the data. No free parameters are introduced in the derivations, and the simulations are not described as fitted. The paper introduces no new physical entities; it combines established experimental techniques.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math First-order Doppler shift Delta nu_D = (v_perp / c) nu_L maps the spectral line profile to the transverse-velocity distribution.
    Used in Sec. II F and III A to convert measured spectral widths into velocities; valid for single-photon transitions.
  • domain assumption The (1s)(40p) 3PJ and (1s)(2s) 3S1 transition has negligible fine-structure and stray-electric-field broadening at n=40.
    Invoked in Sec. II F; relies on previous work (Refs. 49, 65) that fine structure scales as n^-3 and Stark shifts are small at n=40.
  • domain assumption The 2 3P2 and 2 3S1 cycle at 1083 nm is closed and efficient enough to cool all captured He* atoms with roughly 60 scattering cycles.
    Sec. II E assumes no significant optical pumping losses; this is standard for He* but is an assumption about the specific beam geometry.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo particle-trajectory simulations with input from prior simulations (light-blue trace in Fig. 3) adequately reproduce the real beam evolution through the decelerator and cooling section.
    Sec. III A compares simulated and measured line shapes; the simulation input distribution is not independently measured here.
  • ad hoc to paper The 8-mm aperture in the mumetal shield and any skimmer act purely as geometric spatial filters, and atoms passing through them have transverse velocities determined by their position and velocity at the cooling-section exit.
    Used in Sec. III A and Fig. 7(e) to explain why skimmers do not reduce Doppler width; this geometric model is the paper's interpretation.
  • domain assumption The pulsed valve discharge produces a supersonic He* beam with mean velocity 480 m/s and a source-volume-limited transverse spread.
    Sec. II B and II D set the initial beam parameters; the source volume, not a point source, sets the transverse velocity spread.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combining laser cooling and Zeeman deceleration for precision spectroscopy in supersonic beams." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7J4WTC7

@misc{pith2026250102999,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combining laser cooling and Zeeman deceleration for precision spectroscopy in supersonic beams},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7J4WTC7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02999}
}
abstract

Precision spectroscopic measurements in atoms and molecules play an increasingly important role in chemistry and physics, e.g., to characterize structure and dynamics at long timescales, to determine physical constants, or to search for physics beyond the standard model of particle physics. In this article, we demonstrate the combination of Zeeman deceleration and transverse laser cooling to generate slow (mean velocity of 175 m/s) and transversely ultracold ($T_\perp \approx 135 \,\mu$K) supersonic beams of metastable $(1s)(2s)\,^3S_1$ He (He$^*$) for precision spectroscopy. The curved-wavefront laser-cooling approach is used to achieve large capture velocities and high He$^*$ number densities. The beam properties are characterized by imaging, time-of-flight and high-resolution spectroscopic methods, and the factors limiting the Doppler widths in single-photon spectroscopic measurements of the $(1 s)(40 p) \,^3 P_J \, \leftarrow (1 s)(2 s) \,^3 S_1$ transition at UV frequencies around $1.15\times 10^{15}$ Hz are analyzed. In particular, the use of skimmers to geometrically confine the beam in the transverse directions is examined and shown to not always lead to a reduction of the Doppler width. Linewidths as narrow as 5 MHz could be obtained, enabling the determination of line centers with a precision of $\Delta \nu/\nu$ of $4\times 10^{-11}$ limited by the signal-to-noise ratio. Numerical particle-trajectory simulations are used to interpret the experimental observations and validate the conclusions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02999 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Particle-trajectory simulations of the (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the propagation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a)-(d) Images of the atomic He∗ cloud recorded with MCP 2 (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Comparison of the spectrum of the (1s)(40p) 3PJ ← (1s)(2s) 3S1 transition of He∗ with the cool￾ing laser turned on (red trace) and turned off (light-blue trace). Sticks (in black) represent the fine-structure compo￾nents of the transition (J = 2, 1, and 0). (b) Nor…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized spectra of the (1s)(40p) 3PJ ← (1s)(2s) 3S1 transition measured for a He∗ beam with a mean velocity of 480 m/s (red) and for He∗ beams decelerated to mean velocities of 320 m/s (blue) and 175 m/s (light blue) using a multistage Zeeman decelerator. toring the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time-of-flight distributions of He∗ after Zeeman deceleration and transverse laser cooling measured by pulsed￾field ionization following photoexcitation to the (1s)(40p) 3PJ Rydberg state. The red trace corresponds to the nondeceler￾ated beam and the blue traces to bea…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The experiment is conducted using a supersonic-beam apparatus under high-vacuum condi- tions

    Several of its main components have been described previously [49, 50]. The experiment is conducted using a supersonic-beam apparatus under high-vacuum condi- tions. A supersonic beam of He ∗ is produced in the source chamber using a pulsed valve. In the interac- tion chamber, a multistage Zeeman decelerator and a transverse-laser-cooling section are used...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Beyer, L

    A. Beyer, L. Maisenbacher, A. Matveev, R. Pohl, K. Khabarova, A. Grinin, T. Lamour, D. C. Yost, T. W. H¨ ansch, N. Kolachevsky, and T. Udem, The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen, Science 358, 79 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    E. R. Hudson, H. J. Lewandowski, B. C. Sawyer, and J. Ye, Cold molecule spectroscopy for constraining the evolution of the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 143004 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    Scheidegger and F

    S. Scheidegger and F. Merkt, Precision-Spectroscopic De- termination of the Binding Energy of a Two-Body Quan- tum System: The Hydrogen Atom and the Proton-Size Puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Grinin, A

    A. Grinin, A. Matveev, D. C. Yost, L. Maisenbacher, V. Wirthl, R. Pohl, T. W. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, Two- photon frequency comb spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen, Science 370, 1061 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Alighanbari, G

    S. Alighanbari, G. S. Giri, F. L. Constantin, V. I. Ko- robov, and S. Schiller, Precise test of quantum electro- dynamics and determination of fundamental constants with HD+ ions, Nature 581, 152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    H¨ olsch, M

    N. H¨ olsch, M. Beyer, E. J. Salumbides, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, Ch. Jungen, and F. Merkt, Benchmarking theory with an improved measurement of the ionization and dissociation energies of H 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 103002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and E. A. Hinds, Improved measurement of the shape of the electron, Nature 473, 493 (2011)

    2011

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Patra, M

    S. Patra, M. Germann, J.-P. Karr, M. Haidar, L. Hilico, V. I. Korobov, F. M. J. Cozijn, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, and J. C. J. Koelemeij, Proton-electron mass ratio from laser spectroscopy of HD + at the part-per- trillion level, Science 369, 1238 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Delaunay, J.-P

    C. Delaunay, J.-P. Karr, T. Kitahara, J. C. J. Koele- meij, Y. Soreq, and J. Zupan, Self-consistent extraction of spectroscopic bounds on light new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 121801 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Andreev, D

    V. Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisenhelder, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, X. Wu, and ACME Collaboration, Im- proved limit on the electric dipole moment of the elec- tron, Nature 562,...

    2018

  4. [12]

    J. K. Messer and F. C. De Lucia, Measurement of Pressure-Broadening Parameters for the CO-He System at 4 K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2555 (1984)

    1984

  5. [13]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science 381, 46 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    N. R. Hutzler, H.-I. Lu, and J. M. Doyle, The buffer gas beam: an intense, cold, and slow source for atoms and molecules, Chem. Rev. 112, 4803 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    S. E. Maxwell, N. Brahms, R. de Carvalho, D. R. Glenn, J. S. Helton, S. V. Nguyen, D. Patterson, J. Petricka, D. DeMille, and J. M. Doyle, High-flux beam source for cold, slow atoms or molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 10 173201 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Kaebert, M

    P. Kaebert, M. Stepanova, T. Poll, M. Petzold, S. Xu, M. Siercke, and S. Ospelkaus, Characterizing the Zeeman slowing force for 40Ca19F molecules, New J. Phys. 23, 093013 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    W. D. Phillips and H. Metcalf, Laser deceleration of an atomic beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 596 (1982)

    1982

  10. [18]

    Osterwalder, S

    A. Osterwalder, S. A. Meek, G. Hammer, H. Haak, and G. Meijer, Deceleration of neutral molecules in macro- scopic traveling traps, Phys. Rev. A 81, 051401 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    H. L. Bethlem, G. Berden, and G. Meijer, Decelerat- ing neutral dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1558 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Vliegen, H

    E. Vliegen, H. J. W¨ orner, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Nonhydrogenic effects in the deceleration of Rydberg atoms in inhomogeneous electric fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033005 (2004)

    2004

  13. [21]

    S. R. Procter, Y. Yamakita, F. Merkt, and T. P. Soft- ley, Controlling the motion of hydrogen molecules, Chem. Phys. Lett. 374, 667 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    Narevicius, A

    E. Narevicius, A. Libson, C. G. Parthey, I. Chavez, J. Narevicius, U. Even, and M. G. Raizen, Stopping su- personic beams with a series of pulsed electromagnetic coils: An atomic coilgun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093003 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Vanhaecke, U

    N. Vanhaecke, U. Meier, M. Andrist, B. H. Meier, and F. Merkt, Multistage Zeeman deceleration of hydrogen atoms, Phys. Rev. A 75, 031402(R) (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    Fitch and M

    N. Fitch and M. Tarbutt, Laser-cooled molecules, in Ad- vances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics(Else- vier, 2021) p. 157–262

    2021

  17. [25]

    S. D. Hogan, A. W. Wiederkehr, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Magnetic trapping of hydrogen after multi- stage Zeeman deceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 143001 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    DeMille, J

    D. DeMille, J. F. Barry, E. R. Edwards, E. B. Norrgard, and M. H. Steinecker, On the transverse confinement of radiatively slowed molecular beams, Mol. Phys. 111, 1805 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Chae, Laser cooling of molecules, Journal of the Ko- rean Physical Society 82, 851 (2023)

    E. Chae, Laser cooling of molecules, Journal of the Ko- rean Physical Society 82, 851 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    J. Lim, J. R. Almond, M. A. Trigatzis, J. A. Devlin, N. J. Fitch, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and E. A. Hinds, Laser Cooled YbF Molecules for Measuring the Elec- tron’s Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 123201 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Zhelyazkova, A

    V. Zhelyazkova, A. Cournol, T. E. Wall, A. Matsushima, J. J. Hudson, E. A. Hinds, M. R. Tarbutt, and B. E. Sauer, Laser cooling and slowing of CaF molecules, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053416 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    R. L. McNally, I. Kozyryev, S. Vazquez-Carson, K. Wenz, T. Wang, and T. Zelevinsky, Optical cycling, radia- tive deflection and laser cooling of barium monohydride (138Ba1H), New J. Phys. 22, 083047 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Most of these molecules have a permanent electric dipole moment and are paramagnetic

    and AlF [32] but also polyatomic molecules such as CaOH [33], YbOH [34], SrOH [35] and CaOCH 3 [36]. Most of these molecules have a permanent electric dipole moment and are paramagnetic. Consequently, combining multistage Zeeman deceleration methods to generate slow beams with...

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Zhang, Z

    Y. Zhang, Z. Zeng, Q. Liang, W. Bu, and B. Yan, Doppler cooling of buffer-gas-cooled barium monofluo- ride molecules, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033307 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    S. F. V´ azquez-Carson, Q. Sun, J. Dai, D. Mitra, and T. Zelevinsky, Direct laser cooling of calcium monohy- dride molecules, New J. Phys. 24, 083006 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Hofs¨ ass, M

    S. Hofs¨ ass, M. Doppelbauer, S. C. Wright, S. Kray, B. G. Sartakov, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, G. Meijer, and S. Truppe, Op- tical cycling of AlF molecules, New J. Phys. 23, 075001 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, P. Robichaud, A. Winnicki, D. Mitra, and J. M. Doyle, Magneto- optical trapping and sub-Doppler cooling of a polyatomic molecule, Nature 606, 70 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    B. L. Augenbraun, Z. D. Lasner, A. Frenett, H. Sawaoka, C. Miller, T. C. Steimle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser- cooled polyatomic molecules for improved electron elec- tric dipole moment searches, New J. Phys. 22, 022003 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Kozyryev, L

    I. Kozyryev, L. Baum, K. Matsuda, B. L. Augenbraun, L. Anderegg, A. P. Sedlack, and J. M. Doyle, Sisyphus laser cooling of a polyatomic molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 173201 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Mitra, N

    D. Mitra, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, L. Baum, C. Miller, S. Raval, and J. M. Doyle, Direct laser cooling of a symmetric top molecule, Science 369, 1366 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    M. R. Tarbutt, B. E. Sauer, J. J. Hudson, and E. A. Hinds, Design for a fountain of YbF molecules to measure the electron’s electric dipole moment, New J. Phys. 15, 053034 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    J. E. van den Berg, S. H. Turkesteen, E. B. Prinsen, and S. Hoekstra, Deceleration and trapping of heavy diatomic molecules using a ring-decelerator, Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 235 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    J. E. van den Berg, S. C. Mathavan, C. Meinema, J. Nauta, T. H. Nijbroek, K. Jungmann, H. L. Beth- lem, and S. Hoekstra, Traveling-wave deceleration of SrF molecules, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 300, 22 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    T. E. Wall, Preparation of cold molecules for high- precision measurements, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 243001 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Laser cooling of a diatomic molecule, Nature 467, 820 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    J. F. Barry, E. S. Shuman, E. B. Norrgard, and D. De- Mille, Laser radiation pressure slowing of a molecular beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 103002 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    J. F. Barry and D. DeMille, A chilling effect for molecules, Nature 491, 539 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Rooijakkers, W

    W. Rooijakkers, W. Hogervorst, and W. Vassen, An in- tense collimated beam of metastable helium atoms by two-dimensional laser cooling, Opt. Commun. 123, 321 (1996)

    1996

  39. [47]

    Aspect, N

    A. Aspect, N. Vansteenkiste, R. Kaiser, H. Haberland, and M. Karrais, Preparation of a pure intense beam of metastable helium by laser cooling, Chem. Phys. 145, 307 (1990)

    1990

  40. [48]

    Pereira Dos Santos, F

    F. Pereira Dos Santos, F. Perales, J. L´ eonard, A. Sinatra, J. Wang, F. S. Pavone, E. Rasel, C. S. Unnikrishnan, and M. Leduc, Efficient magneto-optical trapping of a metastable helium gas, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 14, 69 (2001)

    2001

  41. [49]

    Keller, M

    M. Keller, M. Kotyrba, F. Leupold, M. Singh, M. Ebner, and A. Zeilinger, Bose-Einstein condensate of metastable helium for quantum correlation experiments, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063607 (2014)

    2014

  42. [50]

    J.-J. Chen, Y. R. Sun, J.-L. Wen, and S.-M. Hu, Speed- adjustable atomic beam of metastable helium for preci- sion measurement, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053824 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Clausen, P

    G. Clausen, P. Jansen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Ionization energy of the metastable 2 1S0 state of 4He from Rydberg-series ex- trapolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 093001 (2021). 11

    2021

  44. [52]

    Clausen, S

    G. Clausen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Imaging-assisted single-photon Doppler- free laser spectroscopy and the ionization energy of metastable triplet helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103001 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    D. W. Preston, Doppler-free saturated absorption: Laser spectroscopy, Am. J. Phys. 64, 1432 (1996)

    1996

  46. [54]

    Moron, A

    F. Moron, A. L. Hoendervanger, M. Bonneau, Q. Bou- ton, A. Aspect, D. Boiron, D. Cl´ ement, and C. I. West- brook, An oscillator circuit to produce a radio-frequency discharge and application to metastable helium satu- rated absorption spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instr.83, 044705 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    G. C. Bjorklund, Frequency-modulation spectroscopy: A new method for measuring weak absorptions and disper- sions, Opt. Lett. 5, 15 (1980)

    1980

  48. [56]

    G. C. Bjorklund, M. D. Levenson, W. Lenth, and C. Or- tiz, Frequency modulation (FM) spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 32, 145 (1983)

    1983

  49. [57]

    Jansen and F

    P. Jansen and F. Merkt, Manipulating beams of param- agnetic atoms and molecules using inhomogeneous mag- netic fields, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 120– 121, 118 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Semeria, P

    L. Semeria, P. Jansen, G. Clausen, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Molecular-beam resonance method with Zeeman-decelerated samples: Application to metastable helium molecules, Phys. Rev. A98, 062518 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Jansen, L

    P. Jansen, L. Semeria, and F. Merkt, High-resolution spectroscopy of He + 2 using Rydberg-series extrapolation and Zeeman-decelerated supersonic beams of metastable He2, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 322, 9 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Motsch, P

    M. Motsch, P. Jansen, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Slow and velocity-tunable beams of metastable He2 by multistage Zeeman deceleration, Phys. Rev. A89, 043420 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    A. W. Wiederkehr, M. Motsch, S. D. Hogan, M. Andrist, H. Schmutz, B. Lambillotte, J. A. Agner, and F. Merkt, Multistage Zeeman deceleration of metastable neon, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 214202 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    Chang, A

    R. Chang, A. L. Hoendervanger, Q. Bouton, Y. Fang, T. Klafka, K. Audo, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook, and D. Cl´ ement, Three-dimensional laser cooling at the Doppler limit, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063407 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, J.-L. Wen, and S.- M. Hu, Light-force-induced shift in laser spectroscopy of atomic helium, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032506 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    P. D. Lett, W. D. Phillips, S. L. Rolston, C. E. Tanner, R. N. Watts, and C. I. Westbrook, Optical molasses, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 2084 (1989)

    1989

  57. [65]

    Ritterbusch, Realization of a collimated beam of metastable atoms for ATTA of39Ar, Master’s thesis, Fac- ulty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg (2009)

    F. Ritterbusch, Realization of a collimated beam of metastable atoms for ATTA of39Ar, Master’s thesis, Fac- ulty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Welte, F

    J. Welte, F. Ritterbusch, I. Steinke, M. Henrich, W. Aeschbach-Hertig, and M. K. Oberthaler, Towards the realization of atom trap trace analysis for 39Ar, New J. Phys. 12, 065031 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    G. W. F. Drake, High precision theory of atomic helium, Physica Scripta T83, 83 (1999)

    1999

  60. [68]

    A. W. Wiederkehr, S. D. Hogan, and F. Merkt, Phase stability in a multistage Zeeman decelerator, Phys. Rev. A 82, 043428 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.