REVIEW 3 cited by
Liquidity Dynamics in RFQ Markets and Impact on Pricing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
To assign a value to a portfolio, it is common to use Mark-to-Market prices. However, how should one proceed when the securities are illiquid? When transaction prices are scarce, how can one use all the available real-time information? In this article, we address these questions for over-the-counter (OTC) markets based on requests for quotes (RFQs). We extend the concept of micro-price, which was recently introduced for assets exchanged through limit order books in the market microstructure literature, and incorporate ideas from the recent literature on OTC market making. To account for liquidity imbalances in RFQ markets, we use an approach based on bidimensional Markov-modulated Poisson processes. Beyond extending the concept of micro-price to RFQ markets, we introduce the new concept of Fair Transfer Price. Our concepts of price can be used to value securities fairly, even when the market is relatively illiquid and/or tends to be one-sided.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Hawkes-Driven OTC Market Making: Volterra-Riccati Approximation
A Volterra-Riccati approximation lets OTC market makers incorporate Hawkes-type persistence in RFQ flow into quote decisions, tracking the exact solution in exponential benchmarks and producing endogenous long-memory ...
-
Bond Market Making with a Hit-Ratio Target
Exact and approximate optimal quoting strategies for bond dealers are derived under a hit-ratio target using separable HJB equations and Riccati approximations.
-
On a Simple Relationship Between Order Imbalance, Skew and Width in Over-The-Counter Trading
An imbalanced dealer flow is exactly equivalent to a balanced flow with a shifted skew, a widened spread, and a multiplied holding cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.