Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Discovery of tidally-perturbed pulsations in the eclipsing binary U Gru: a pioneering system for tidal asteroseismology

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read U Gru's TESS light curve reveals a series of pulsation modes spaced by the binary orbital frequency but shifted off exact harmonics, evidence for tidally perturbed pressure modes.

desk verdict A real, interesting frequency comb in the oEA binary U Gru, but the 'tidally-perturbed' interpretation is not established because the paper never tests the straightforward alternative that a low-frequency carrier (near 0.073 d^-1) is modulated by the eclipses. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08468 v1 pith:JCDT2RL7 submitted 2019-08-22 astro-ph.SR

Dominic M. Bowman , Cole Johnston , Andrew Tkachenko , David E. Mkrtichian , Khemsinan Gunsriwiwat , Conny Aerts This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords tidally-perturbedpulsationseclipsingbinaryoEAstarsasteroseismologyTESSphotometrypressuremodesUGrutidal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using 27.9 days of high-cadence TESS photometry, the paper shows that the eclipsing binary U Gru hosts a long series of at least 17 pulsation frequencies between 21 and 31 d⁻¹, each separated from its neighbour by the system's orbital frequency yet offset from the exact orbital harmonics by about 0.074 d⁻¹. Because the offsets are far larger than the measurement uncertainties and no mode sits on an integer harmonic, the series cannot be the tidally excited 'heartbeat' pulsations known from eccentric binaries. The paper interprets the series as free, heat-driven pressure modes whose eigenfrequencies are perturbed by tidal deformation of the star, making U Gru one of the first systems in which tidal asteroseismology can be applied. This matters because binary interaction shapes the evolution of massive stars, and these observations offer a direct way to measure how tides alter stellar structure and pulsation cavities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the residual amplitude spectrum: the light curve is fitted by a multi-frequency non-linear least-squares model containing the orbital frequency and 190 harmonics, the model is subtracted, and the remaining frequencies are extracted by iterative pre-whitening. The key measured quantity is the offset $\nu - i\nu_{\rm orb}$ between each pulsation frequency $\nu$ and the adjacent lower orbital harmonic $i\nu_{\rm orb}$; the near-constant value $\approx 0.074$ d$^{-1}$ across the series is what distinguishes a tidally perturbed ladder from a heartbeat series pinned to exact harmonics.

What would settle it

Compare the 21–31 d⁻¹ series with an independently reduced light curve that does not pre-whiten a 190-harmonic binary model: if the equally spaced offsets vanish or become exact multiples of the orbital frequency, they were eclipse-subtraction artifacts rather than tidally perturbed modes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the residual amplitude spectrum of U Gru, after subtracting a 190-harmonic fit to the eclipses, contains a regular frequency ladder: 17 consecutive frequencies from 21.8802 to 30.3800 d⁻¹, plus two more at 31.4469 and 33.0442 d⁻¹, spaced by the orbital frequency ν_orb = 0.531774 d⁻¹ and all offset from the nearest lower harmonic by an average of 0.074 d⁻¹. The paper argues that these are free p modes self-excited by the opacity mechanism, not tidally forced modes, because exact harmonic spacing is absent; the tidal field perturbs their eigenfrequencies and modulates their amplitudes through binary phase. It further notes independent modes at 33.8598 and 39.4689 d⁻¹ and a high-frequency mode at 66.1853 d⁻¹ that behave differently, supporting a mixed picture in which some modes are free and others carry the tidal signature.

Load-bearing premise

The residual light curve left after subtracting the 190-harmonic binary model contains only genuine stellar pulsations, with no leftover artifacts from imperfect removal of the eclipses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • U Gru becomes a benchmark system in which the tidal perturbation of p-mode eigenfrequencies can be measured and compared with theoretical predictions.
  • Any successful binary-evolution model of U Gru must account for the observed 0.074 d⁻¹ frequency offset and its small scatter, not just for the orbital period and eclipse shape.
  • If the amplitude modulation during primary eclipse originates in the secondary, then U Gru contains two pulsating components, making the mass-accreting star's interior seismically accessible.
  • The same TESS-based search can be applied to other known oEA systems; a population of such ladders would let tidal asteroseismology constrain how mass transfer and tides reshape stellar interiors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tidal interpretation holds, a natural extension is to test whether the offset scales with the tidal potential factor $(R/a)^3$; across several oEA systems, the offset could become an empirical tidal-strength gauge.
  • If the 0.074 d⁻¹ offset is common to all modes, the ladder may be a rotationally or tidally split multiplet viewed at a favourable inclination, and longer TESS coverage could settle this by resolving the multiplet structure.
  • The changing eclipse shape reported near primary ingress and egress could be an independent signature of asynchronous rotation; combining the photometric offset with a spectroscopically measured $v\sin i$ would test the asynchronous-tide scenario without a long baseline.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents TESS photometry of the eclipsing binary U Gru, an Algol-type system, and analyzes the residual light curve after subtracting a 190-harmonic orbital fit. The residual amplitude spectrum shows a series of 17 or more frequencies between roughly 21 and 31 d^-1 that are separated by the orbital frequency and offset from exact orbital harmonics by about 0.074 d^-1, plus several independent pulsation modes at other frequencies. The authors interpret this series as evidence for tidally-perturbed pressure modes, or pulsation-mode geometry affected by tides, and argue that U Gru is a pioneering system for tidal asteroseismology. They also present a PHOEBE binary model, discuss changing eclipse shape, and list three possible mechanisms, concluding that both tidally-perturbed eigenfrequencies and mode geometry are important.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this is a valuable discovery: a long, well-resolved series of pulsation frequencies spaced by the orbital frequency and offset from orbital harmonics would be a striking demonstration of tidal effects on stellar pulsations in a circular binary, offering a rare test bed for tidal asteroseismology. The frequency extraction uses standard, well-established methods, the peaks are resolved from orbital harmonics by more than the Rayleigh resolution, and the paper provides a quantitative frequency list. However, the interpretation that these peaks are many independent tidally-perturbed modes is underdetermined because the paper does not test an alternative explanation: that the series could be sidebands of a single low-frequency carrier modulated by the binary. This alternative is not ad hoc given the paper's own evidence for changing eclipse shape and long-timescale amplitude modulation, and it directly affects the paper's central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, Table 1] The long series of frequencies in Table 1 is also consistent with the sidebands of a single low-frequency carrier at f0 ≈ 0.074 d^-1 modulated by the binary orbit, i.e., ν_k = f0 + kν_orb for k = 41...62. The paper does not test this null hypothesis: it neither searches for a parent peak near f0 in the low-frequency residual spectrum after subtracting the 190-harmonic fit, nor reports the lower sidebands at kν_orb - f0, nor tests whether the amplitudes and phases of the claimed series satisfy the cross-frequency relations expected for sidebands of one modulated signal. This is load-bearing because the discovery claim rests on the interpretation of these peaks as many independent tidally-perturbed p modes. The alternative is not ad hoc: the paper itself documents changing ingress/egress flux (Fig. 3) and amplitude modulation on timescales longer than the orbit (Section 3). The authors should perform the sideband test (e.g., a joint fit of the series to a single modulated carrier and a search for the lower sidebands) and either rule it out or reframe the conclusion.
  2. [Section 2, paragraph on independence] The sentence 'All of the pulsation mode frequencies in the residual amplitude spectrum in Fig. 2 are independent as they are resolved from a harmonic of the orbital frequency by more than twice the Rayleigh resolution' conflates spectral resolution with mode independence. Sidebands of a single modulated carrier are also separated from the harmonics by more than the Rayleigh resolution, so this criterion does not establish that the peaks are independent oscillation modes. The independence claim needs a separate test, such as the phase-amplitude consistency check described in the previous comment.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sections 1 and 2] There are typographical errors: 'such an pulsating eccentric binary' should be 'such a pulsating eccentric binary', and 'the times series' should be 'the time series'.
  2. [Table 1] The last column heading uses 'i' for the harmonic number but the caption also uses 'i'; please define the harmonic index explicitly (e.g., 'k') and state the convention in the caption.
  3. [Figure 4] The phase ranges for the three panels are given in the caption, but the individual panels are not labeled on the figure; adding labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the U Gru pulsation series is measured from residual photometry against an independently fitted orbital frequency, and the tidal interpretation is an inference supported by external theory, not an input to the fit.

full rationale

The paper's chain is observational rather than definitional. The orbital frequency nu_orb = 0.531774 +/- 0.000004 d^-1 is obtained from a nonlinear least-squares fit to the eclipse light curve, with the same value recovered when the harmonic count is extended to 190. The pulsation frequencies in Table 1 are then extracted by iterative prewhitening of the residual light curve, and the reported offsets are measured relative to the independently fitted orbital harmonics. The offset ~0.074 d^-1 is not forced by construction: it is neither zero nor the half-orbital spacing, and the paper explicitly notes a significantly larger offset (0.092 +/- 0.006 d^-1 for 28.2758 d^-1). The claim that the long series is spaced by the orbital frequency is a measurement against that independent reference, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The attribution to tidally-perturbed modes invokes external theoretical work (Polfliet & Smeyers 1990; Reyniers & Smeyers 2003a,b) and is supported by additional empirical facts (amplitude modulation at binary phase, offsets that exclude a heartbeat interpretation). The self-citations (Bowman 2017 for prewhitening; Bowman et al. 2016 for amplitude modulation) are methodological and non-load-bearing. The skeptical alternative that the comb is a low-frequency carrier modulated by the eclipses is a robustness or correctness concern rather than a circular reduction, since the paper does not define the tidal conclusion into the frequency extraction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. The analysis depends mainly on measured orbital and pulsation frequencies, plus standard Fourier and binary modeling assumptions. The only fitted quantities are the orbital frequency, its harmonics, and the (unconstrained) photometric mass ratio, none of which serve as free parameters in a derived theory.

free parameters (2)
  • Orbital frequency ν_orb = 0.531774 d^-1
    Fitted to the TESS light curve; used to define the harmonic series and the frequency offsets used to identify the pulsation series. It is a measured quantity, not a theoretical free parameter.
  • Photometric mass ratio q = ~0.17
    Estimated from PHOEBE modeling but stated to be unconstrained without spectroscopy; used to support the Algol classification but not the pulsation interpretation.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The binary system has zero eccentricity.
    Assumed in the PHOEBE modeling and used to define the harmonic subtraction; based on the light curve showing no eccentricity signature. If wrong, the harmonic series and residuals could be affected.
  • domain assumption The residual amplitude spectrum contains only physical pulsation modes, isolated from orbital harmonics by more than twice the Rayleigh resolution.
    Structural to the frequency list: the authors require modes to be independent from harmonics by >2*(1/ΔT)=0.072 d^-1, which some modes only barely satisfy; systematic residuals from the binary could mimic such modes.
  • domain assumption The theoretical framework for tidally perturbed pulsation eigenfrequencies (Polfliet & Smeyers 1990; Smeyers et al. 1998) applies to stars in close binaries.
    Invoked in Section 3 mechanism (iii) to interpret the observed constant frequency offset as a tidal perturbation; the framework is taken from the literature without re-derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of tidally-perturbed pulsations in the eclipsing binary U Gru: a pioneering system for tidal asteroseismology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCDT2RL7

@misc{pith2026190808468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of tidally-perturbed pulsations in the eclipsing binary U Gru: a pioneering system for tidal asteroseismology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCDT2RL7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08468}
}
read the original abstract

The interior physics of stars is currently not well constrained for early-type stars. This is particularly pertinent for multiple systems as binary interaction becomes more prevalent for more massive stars, which strongly affects their evolution. High-precision photometry from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission offers the opportunity to remedy the dearth of observations of pulsating stars that show evidence of binary interaction, specifically pulsating mass-accreting components of semi-detached Algol-type eclipsing binary (oEA) systems. We present the TESS light curve of the circular eclipsing binary system U Gru (TIC 147201138), which shows evidence for free heat-driven pressure modes and a series of tidally-perturbed pressure modes. We highlight the asteroseismic potential of studying pulsating stars in binary systems, and demonstrate how tidal asteroseismology can be applied to infer the influence of binary interaction on stellar structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08468 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: TESS light curve of the pulsating Algol system U Gru (TIC 147201138). Right: amplitude spectrum showing the low-frequency orbital harmonic series associated with the eclipses in the light curve. 0.00001 d), was determined using a multi-frequency non￾linear least-squares fit to the light curve, which included the orbital frequency and the 35 significant consecutive harmonics that have amplitudes larger than 3σ … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Residual amplitude spectrum after pre-whitening the orbital harmonics (denoted as vertical red lines in main panel and blue lines in sub-panel for clarity) in the TESS light curve of U Gru revealing pulsation mode frequencies. We analysed the TESS light curve of U Gru with the PHOEBE eclipsing binary modeling code3 (Prˇsa & Zwit￾ter 2005) using a semi-detached configuration in which the secondary fills its Roche lob… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bottom panel: binary model (red line) and the phase-folded TESS observations of U Gru (black points). Top panels: binary model for three sections of the TESS data demonstrating how the flux and shape of the light curve at ingress and egress in the primary eclipse changes throughout the observations. The flux offset is largest at the start (green panel) and end (blue panel) of the TESS light curve and reverses symmet… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Amplitude spectra of the residual TESS light curve (i.e. after subtracting the multi-harmonic binary model) of U Gru using data from different binary phases (in primary: −0.09 ≤ ϕ ≤ 0.09 and in secondary: 0.41 ≤ ϕ ≤ 0.59; cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The symphony of pulsations and binarity among massive stars using HERMES spectroscopy and TESS photometry

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An ensemble analysis of 873 O/B stars shows photometric variability in >93%, pulsations in ~82%, and evidence of binarity in at least 14%, including 30 newly discovered eclipsing binaries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ""...

  3. [3]

    Qn W ^ #

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2017

  4. [4]

    2015, Astronomische Nachrichten, 336, 477, 10.1002/asna.201512177

    Aerts , C. 2015, Astronomische Nachrichten, 336, 477, 10.1002/asna.201512177

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201512177 2015

  5. [5]

    Aerts , C., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., & Kurtz , D. W. 2010, Asteroseismology (Springer)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Aerts , C., & Harmanec , P. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 318, Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving the Components of the Close Binary Stars, ed. R. W. Hilditch , H. Hensberge , & K. Pavlovski , 325--333

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    2019, , 57

    Aerts , C., Mathis , S., & Rogers , T. 2019, , 57. 1809.07779

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    2017, , 847, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62

    Aerts , C., Van Reeth , T., & Tkachenko , A. 2017, , 847, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa8a62 2017

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al

    Beck , P. G., Hambleton , K., Vos , J., et al. 2014, , 564, A36, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322477

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Bowman , D. M. 2017, Amplitude Modulation of Pulsation Modes in Delta Scuti Stars (Springer International Publishing), 10.1007/978-3-319-66649-5

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    M., & Kurtz , D

    Bowman , D. M., & Kurtz , D. W. 2018, , 476, 3169, 10.1093/mnras/sty449

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Kurtz , D

    Bowman , D. M., Kurtz , D. W., Breger , M., Murphy , S. J., & Holdsworth , D. L. 2016, , 460, 1970, 10.1093/mnras/stw1153

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    K., & Dworak , T

    Brancewicz , H. K., & Dworak , T. Z. 1980, , 30, 501

    1980

  6. [14]

    2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Breger , M. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. Montgomery , 3

    2000

  7. [15]

    J., & Miglio , A

    Chaplin , W. J., & Miglio , A. 2013, , 51, 353, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140938

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Cowling , T. G. 1941, , 101, 367

    1941

  9. [17]

    De Marco , O., & Izzard , R. G. 2017, , 34, e001, 10.1017/pasa.2016.52

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Deeming , T. J. 1975, , 36, 137, 10.1007/BF00681947

    1975 doi

  11. [19]

    2013, , 51, 269, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602

    Duch \^e ne , G., & Kraus , A. 2013, , 51, 269, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    2019, , 626, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935390

    Escorza , A., Karinkuzhi , D., Jorissen , A., et al. 2019, , 626, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935390

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    2017, , 472, 1538, 10.1093/mnras/stx2135

    Fuller , J. 2017, , 472, 1538, 10.1093/mnras/stx2135

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    2018, , 616, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832822

    Gehan , C., Mosser , B., Michel , E., Samadi , R., & Kallinger , T. 2018, , 616, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832822

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    R., & Matson , R

    Guo , Z., Gies , D. R., & Matson , R. A. 2017, , 851, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa978c

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    R., Matson , R

    Guo , Z., Gies , D. R., Matson , R. A., & Garc \' a Hern \'a ndez , A. 2016, , 826, 69, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/69

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    2018, , 473, 5165, 10.1093/mnras/stx2673

    Hambleton , K., Fuller , J., Thompson , S., et al. 2018, , 473, 5165, 10.1093/mnras/stx2673

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Kurtz , D

    Hambleton , K. M., Kurtz , D. W., Pr s a , A., et al. 2013, , 434, 925, 10.1093/mnras/stt886

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    2017, , 25, 1, 10.1007/s00159-017-0101-x

    Hekker , S., & Christensen-Dalsgaard , J. 2017, , 25, 1, 10.1007/s00159-017-0101-x

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    M., Twicken , J

    Jenkins , J. M., Twicken , J. D., McCauliff , S., et al. 2016, in , Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, 99133E

    2016

  21. [29]

    2019, , 482, 1231, 10.1093/mnras/sty2671

    Johnston , C., Tkachenko , A., Aerts , C., et al. 2019, , 482, 1231, 10.1093/mnras/sty2671

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    2016, , 151, 68, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68

    Kirk , B., Conroy , K., Pr s a , A., et al. 2016, , 151, 68, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    O., & Quataert , E

    Kumar , P., Ao , C. O., & Quataert , E. J. 1995, , 449, 294, 10.1086/176055

    1995 doi

  24. [32]

    Kurtz , D. W. 1985, , 213, 773

    1985

  25. [33]

    MacLeod , M., Vick , M., Lai , D., & Stone , J. M. 2019, , 877, 28, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab184c

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Kusakin , A

    Mkrtichian , D. E., Kusakin , A. V., Gamarova , A. Y., & Nazarenko , V. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 259, IAU Colloq. 185: Radial and Nonradial Pulsationsn as Probes of Stellar Physics, ed. C. Aerts , T. R. Bedding , & J. Christensen-Dal...

    2002

  27. [35]

    E., Kusakin , A

    Mkrtichian , D. E., Kusakin , A. V., Rodriguez , E., et al. 2004, , 419, 1015, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040095

    2004 doi

  28. [36]

    E., Lehmann , H., Rodr \' guez , E., et al

    Mkrtichian , D. E., Lehmann , H., Rodr \' guez , E., et al. 2018, , 475, 4745, 10.1093/mnras/stx2841

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    2017, , 230, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    Moe , M., & Di Stefano , R. 2017, , 230, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Belkacem , K., et al

    Mosser , B., Goupil , M. J., Belkacem , K., et al. 2012, , 548, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220106

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    Ogilvie , G. I. 2014, , 52, 171, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035941

    2014 doi

  32. [40]

    1990, , 237, 110

    Polfliet , R., & Smeyers , P. 1990, , 237, 110

    1990

  33. [41]

    2005, , 628, 426, 10.1086/430591

    Pr s a , A., & Zwitter , T. 2005, , 628, 426, 10.1086/430591

    2005 doi

  34. [42]

    W., et al

    Pr s a , A., Batalha , N., Slawson , R. W., et al. 2011, , 141, 83, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/3/83

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    2002, PhD thesis, Instituut voor Sterrenkunde K.U.Leuven Celestijnenlaan 200B 3001 Leuven Belgium

    Reyniers , K. 2002, PhD thesis, Instituut voor Sterrenkunde K.U.Leuven Celestijnenlaan 200B 3001 Leuven Belgium

    2002

  36. [44]

    2003 a , , 404, 1051, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030501

    Reyniers , K., & Smeyers , P. 2003 a , , 404, 1051, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030501

    2003 doi

  37. [45]

    2003 b , , 409, 677, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031098

    ---. 2003 b , , 409, 677, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031098

    2003 doi

  38. [46]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    E., de Koter , A., et al

    Sana , H., de Mink , S. E., de Koter , A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  40. [48]

    1998, , 335, 622

    Smeyers , P., Willems , B., & Van Hoolst , T. 1998, , 335, 622

    1998

  41. [49]

    A., & Kobulnicky , H

    Smullen , R. A., & Kobulnicky , H. A. 2015, , 808, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/166

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    E., Everett , M., Mullally , F., et al

    Thompson , S. E., Everett , M., Mullally , F., et al. 2012, , 753, 86, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/86

    2012 doi

  43. [51]

    Tkachenko , A., Lehmann , H., & Mkrtichian , D. E. 2009, , 504, 991, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911949

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    F., Orosz , J

    Welsh , W. F., Orosz , J. A., Aerts , C., et al. 2011, , 197, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/1/4

    2011 doi

  45. [53]

    2002, , 384, 441, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020021

    Willems , B., & Aerts , C. 2002, , 384, 441, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020021

    2002 doi

  46. [54]

    1975, , 41, 329

    Zahn , J.-P. 1975, , 41, 329

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.