Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 37 references

A Review on Zeroing Neural Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that zeroing neural networks—recurrent models for time-varying optimization and control—can be organized comprehensively into five model families, three discretization methods, and a shared set of theoretical analysis…

desk verdict A serviceable survey whose 'comprehensive' claim currently outruns its own documentation; send to review with a required protocol section and two small fixes. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00387 v1 pith:JE2CHXAH submitted 2025-07-01 cs.NE

Chengze Jiang , Jie Gui , Long Jin , Shuai Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NE
keywords zeroingneuralnetworkstime-varyingoptimizationevolutionformulaactivationfunctiondiscretizationmethodsconvergenceanalysisrobustnessdynamicquadraticprogramming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Zeroing neural networks (ZNNs) are recurrent neural models that solve time-varying optimization and control problems by defining an error function for the problem and then applying an evolution formula that drives that error to zero. This survey's central claim is that the field can be organized into five model families—noise-tolerant, varying-parameter, finite-time, nonconvex-projection, and extensions to complex, quaternion, and tensor problems—alongside three discretization methods (Euler, Taylor-type, Runge-Kutta) and a shared theoretical toolbox. The paper argues that this organization, which includes recent progress missing from earlier reviews, gives the community a reliable map for understanding how different ZNNs relate and for benchmarking current advances. If the map is correct, a researcher can identify where any ZNN variant sits, which convergence and robustness guarantees apply, and where the open problems lie.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the ZNN solution framework of Section 2.1: Step 1 defines a problem-specific error function $e(t)$; Step 2 chooses an evolution formula $\dot e(t)=F(e(t))$, with the original ZNN $\dot e(t)=-\gamma\Psi(e(t))$ as the base; Step 3 solves the resulting model. The paper uses this template as the organizing axis: each model family changes one component, such as an integration term for noise tolerance, a time-varying scale $\mu(t)$ for the varying-parameter family, an odd-power term for finite-time convergence, a nonconvex projection activation for the NPZNN family, and complex, quaternion, or tensor extensions for generalization. On the discrete side, Euler forward/backward differences, Taylor-type differentiation, and Runge-Kutta methods carry the transition from the continuous-time idealization to real-time computation. Theoretical analyses—Lyapunov functions, ODE solutions, and Laplace transforms—verify convergence and robustness for the different families.

What would settle it

A systematic search of the published ZNN literature from 2015 to 2025, with the survey's categories applied to every retrieved paper, would settle the claim: a substantial number of models fitting none of the five families in Section 3, or discretization methods outside the three in Section 4, would show the map is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that current zeroing neural network research has matured into a systematic framework whose variants all derive from one template: define an error function $e(t)$ for the target problem, choose an evolution formula such as the original ZNN's $\dot e(t)=-\gamma\Psi(e(t))$, and discretize for real-time computation. The survey claims that the resulting models fall into five families—noise-tolerant, varying-parameter, finite-time, nonconvex-projection, and extensions to complex-valued, quaternion-valued, and tensor problems—differing by evolution formula, activation function, and scale parameter. It further claims that discretization is covered by three approaches (Euler differences, Taylor-type differentiation, and Runge-Kutta methods) and that theoretical analysis rests on Lyapunov theory, ordinary differential equation solutions, and Laplace transforms. The contribution is the organization itself: the taxonomy and comparison tables are meant to help the community better understand and benchmark the current state of ZNNs, with open directions such as Nesterov acceleration and deep-learning integration identified in the discussion.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the papers selected and the five-category taxonomy in Sections 3.1 through 3.5 are complete enough to justify calling the review comprehensive; no search protocol, inclusion criteria, or completeness measure is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A new ZNN paper can be situated by asking which evolution formula, activation function, and scale parameter it changes; the survey's template reduces the field to these design choices.
  • Practitioners can benchmark a discrete-time ZNN by choosing among Euler, Taylor-type, and Runge-Kutta discretizations, with the review spelling out the precision and computation trade-offs of each.
  • The comparison table tells readers which model families already have global-convergence, finite-time, and noise-robustness proofs under constant, linear, and bounded-random noise, and which families lack them.
  • The open directions listed in the discussion—Nesterov acceleration, proximal or mirror descent, nonconvex optimization, and deep-learning integration—follow directly from the survey's claim that the field is not yet complete.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the five model families are better read as points in a design space than as disjoint categories; mixing a varying-parameter scale with a nonconvex activation or a Taylor-type discretization is a natural extension the taxonomy does not explicitly enumerate.
  • Editorial inference: the survey's observation that the noise-tolerant integration term resembles heavy-ball momentum suggests that other momentum-based optimizers could be imported into the ZNN evolution formula; the paper only lists Nesterov acceleration as an open direction.
  • Editorial inference: because ZNNs solve dynamic linear systems and quadratic programs by construction, the application list could transfer to online learning and adaptive filtering, where coefficient matrices arrive as data streams.
  • Editorial inference: the comprehensiveness claim is testable—one could enumerate all ZNN papers in a fixed corpus and check whether Sections 3.1 through 3.5 and Table 3 classify every model; the survey itself reports no such protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys zeroing neural networks (ZNNs), aiming to provide a comprehensive summary of the field's methodology, theory, and applications. It introduces the ZNN solution framework, categorizes model families (noise-tolerant, varying-parameter, finite-time, nonconvex projection, and complex/tensor extensions), reviews discretization methods (Euler, Taylor-type, Runge-Kutta), summarizes theoretical analyses (convergence and robustness), and lists applications in control, positioning, image processing, and other domains. The paper positions itself against previous reviews by claiming to cover recent progress and to help the community understand and benchmark current advances.

Significance. If the taxonomy and tables are reliable, this survey could serve as a useful entry point for researchers new to ZNNs and as a reference for experts seeking a structured overview. The paper's strengths include its systematic organization across model families and applications, the comparative tables of evolution formulas and dynamic problems, and the explicit enumeration of open problems in Section 7. However, the lack of a documented selection protocol for the literature and several concrete accuracy issues currently undermine the confidence a reader can place in the central claim of comprehensiveness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, 'Comparison Between this and Previous Reviews'; Section 3] The central claim of comprehensiveness is not auditable. The manuscript does not report a literature search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or any completeness measure. The five-category taxonomy in Sections 3.1–3.5 is asserted rather than derived from a documented corpus, so a reader cannot verify that the map of the ZNN field is complete or that the categories are a non-overlapping partition. Because the paper explicitly promises a 'comprehensive summary' for benchmarking, this missing methodology is load-bearing. I recommend that the authors add a methodology subsection that describes the databases searched, search terms, time span, inclusion criteria, and a completeness check (e.g., cross-referencing with prior bibliographies or citation graphs).
  2. [Section 4.2, three-step Euler difference formula] The three-step Euler formula is printed as ˙x_k = (2x_{k+1} − 3x_k + 2x_{k−1} − x_{k−1})/(2η) + O(η^2), which repeats x_{k−1} and is internally inconsistent. The Taylor-type formula immediately below uses y(x_{k−2}), indicating the intended three-step formula should involve (2x_{k+1} − 3x_k + 2x_{k−1} − x_{k−2})/(2η). As printed, the formula is unusable and would mislead readers implementing the method. The authors must correct the equation and verify it against the cited source [Tan et al., 2022].
  3. [Table 3] Table 3 assigns check marks for Global Convergence, Convergence Speed, Finite-Time Convergence, and robustness properties (Constant, Linear, Bounded Random noise) across model families, but no criteria or verification protocol is stated. It is unclear whether these marks reflect formal proofs in the cited papers, the authors' own re-analysis, or a heuristic assessment. Without this information, the table's accuracy cannot be evaluated. The table should either include a legend specifying the verification basis or be relabeled as a summary of reported properties rather than verified facts.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2, first row] In the Linear system row, the error function is printed as e(t) = A(x)x(t) − b(t); the argument of the matrix should be t, i.e., A(t)x(t) − b(t).
  2. [Table 2, Lyapunov equation row] The error function for the Lyapunov equation has an extra closing parenthesis and an inconsistent symbol: it reads vec(X(t))) and uses Q(t) where the problem statement defines B(t). Please revise to vec(X(t)) and B(t).
  3. [Section 4.2, Euler Difference Methods] The sentence 'the larger value results in more efficient computation and less precision' is imprecise; it should clearly state that a larger sample gap η reduces computation cost but increases the discretization error.
  4. [Section 3.3] The condition 'odd integer b and c satisfy b > c >0' should be punctuated as 'b > c > 0' and clarify that both are odd integers if that is intended.
  5. [References] Several references lack complete bibliographic information, including [Tan et al., 2022], [Zhang et al., 2022a], and [Zhang et al., 2022b], which have no volume, issue, or page numbers. Please complete these entries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's claims summarize external prior publications, and its self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a literature synthesis, not a derivation with fitted parameters. Its central promise of a comprehensive summary is supported by a catalog of external, peer-reviewed ZNN results: the framework in Section 2 is the standard error-function/evolution-formula construction, Sections 3 and 4 describe previously published model families and discretization methods, Section 5 reports existing convergence and robustness analyses, and Section 6 lists applications. None of these sections derives a predicted quantity from a parameter fitted to the same quantity, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported to force the survey's organization. The authors do cite their own prior works, such as [Jin et al., 2017b] in the Comparison paragraph and [Jin et al., 2015] for the NTZNN, but these citations identify external published results and are not used to define the review's conclusions; removing or replacing them would not change any equation or taxonomic claim. Two non-circular weaknesses exist: the 'comprehensive summary' claim is not auditable because no search protocol or inclusion criteria are reported, and Section 4.2's three-step Euler formula appears corrupted (2x_{k+1} - 3x_k + 2x_{k-1} - x_{k-1} repeats x_{k-1} instead of using x_{k-2} as in the Taylor formula below). These are completeness and accuracy risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper, so the ledger contains no fitted parameters and no invented entities. The survey's claims rest on two classes of inputs: the correctness of the cited primary literature (assumed, not re-derived) and the adequacy of the authors' chosen taxonomy and selection of works. These are the points that would invalidate the review if wrong.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The mathematical results of the cited ZNN papers are correctly represented in the text and tables.
    The paper performs no re-derivation; Table 3 and Sections 3 and 5 depend entirely on cited theorems for convergence, finite-time convergence, and robustness.
  • ad hoc to paper The five-family taxonomy in Sections 3.1 through 3.5 is a complete and non-overlapping partition of the ZNN literature.
    The taxonomy structures the entire survey but is asserted rather than justified by a search or formal criterion.
  • domain assumption Existing prior reviews are insufficient, so a new comprehensive review is needed.
    The 'Comparison Between this and Previous Reviews' paragraph asserts this without enumerating the added material or performing a gap analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Review on Zeroing Neural Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JE2CHXAH

@misc{pith2026250700387,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Review on Zeroing Neural Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JE2CHXAH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00387}
}
read the original abstract

Zeroing neural networks (ZNNs) have demonstrated outstanding performance on time-varying optimization and control problems. Nonetheless, few studies are committed to illustrating the relationship among different ZNNs and the derivation of them. Therefore, reviewing the advances for a systematical understanding of this field is desirable. This paper provides a survey of ZNNs' progress regarding implementing methods, analysis theory, and practical applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    DRDNN: A robust model for time-variant nonlinear optimization under mul- tiple equality and inequality constraints

    [Chen and Li, 2022] D Chen and S Li. DRDNN: A robust model for time-variant nonlinear optimization under mul- tiple equality and inequality constraints. Neurocomputing, 511:198–212,

    work page 2022

  2. [4]

    [Guo et al., 2021] J. Guo, B. Qiu, M. Yang, and Y . Zhang. Zhang neural network model for solving LQ decomposi- tion problem of dynamic matrix with application to mobile object localization. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , pages 1–6. IEEE,

    work page 2021

  3. [5]

    [He et al., 2022] Y . He, L. Xiao, F. Sun, and Y . Wang. A variable-parameter ZNN with predefined-time conver- gence for dynamic complex-valued Lyapunov equation and its application to AoA positioning. Applied Soft Com- puting, 130:109703,

    work page 2022

  4. [6]

    Huang, D

    [Huang et al., 2020] H. Huang, D. Fu, X. Xiao, Y . Ning, H. Wang, L. Jin, and S. Liao. Modified Newton inte- gration neural algorithm for dynamic complex-valued ma- trix pseudoinversion applied to mobile object localization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(4):2432– 2442,

    work page 2020

  5. [8]

    [Jin et al., 2015] L. Jin, Y . Zhang, and S. Li. Integration- enhanced Zhang neural network for real-time-varying ma- trix inversion in the presence of various kinds of noises. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Sys- tems, 27(12):2615–2627,

    work page 2015

  6. [11]

    N Katsikis, S

    [Katsikis et al., 2022] V . N Katsikis, S. D. Mourtas, P. S Sta- nimirovi´c, and Y . Zhang. Solving complex-valued time- varying linear matrix equations via QR decomposition with applications to robotic motion tracking and on angle- of-arrival localization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works and Learning Systems , 33(8):3415–3424,

    work page 2022

  7. [12]

    Li and Y

    [Li and Li, 2013] S. Li and Y . Li. Nonlinearly activated neu- ral network for solving time-varying complex Sylvester equation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(8):1397– 1407,

    work page 2013

  8. [14]

    [Li et al., 2019] W. Li, X. Ma, J. Luo, and L. Jin. A strictly predefined-time convergent neural solution to equality- and inequality-constrained time-variant quadratic pro- gramming. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cy- bernetics: Systems, 51(7):4028–4039,

    work page 2019

Show all 37 references
  1. [16]

    [Lu et al., 2019] H. Lu, L. Jin, X. Luo, B. Liao, D. Guo, and L. Xiao. RNN for solving perturbed time-varying underde- termined linear system with double bound limits on resid- ual errors and state variables. IEEE Transactions on In- dustrial Informatics, 15(11):5931–5942,

    2019

  2. [17]

    [Mo et al., 2021] C. Mo, D. Gerontitis, and P. S. Stan- imirovi´c. Solving the time-varying tensor square root equation by varying-parameters finite-time Zhang neural network. Neurocomputing, 445:309–325,

    2021

  3. [18]

    [Qi et al., 2019] Y . Qi, L. Jin, Y . Wang, L. Xiao, and J. Zhang. Complex-valued discrete-time neural dynamics for perturbed time-dependent complex quadratic program- ming with applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works and Learning Systems , 31(9):3555–3569,

    2019

  4. [19]

    Shi and Y

    [Shi and Zhang, 2017] Y . Shi and Y . Zhang. New discrete- time models of zeroing neural network solving systems of time-variant linear and nonlinear inequalities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , 50(2):565–576,

    2017

  5. [20]

    [Simos et al., 2022] T. E. Simos, V . N Katsikis, S. D Mour- tas, P. S. Stanimirovi´c, and D. Gerontitis. A higher-order zeroing neural network for pseudoinversion of an arbitrary time-varying matrix with applications to mobile object lo- calization. Information Sciences, 600:226–238,

    2022

  6. [21]

    [Sun et al., 2022] Z. Sun, G. Wang, L. Jin, C. Cheng, B. Zhang, and J. Yu. Noise-suppressing zeroing neural net- work for online solving time-varying matrix square roots problems: A control-theoretic approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 192:116272,

    2022

  7. [22]

    [Tan et al., 2019] Z. Tan, W. Li, L. Xiao, and Y . Hu. New varying-parameter ZNN models with finite-time conver- gence and noise suppression for time-varying matrix moore–penrose inversion. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 31(8):2980–2992,

    2019

  8. [23]

    [Tan et al., 2022] N. Tan, P. Yu, Z. Zhong, and Y . Zhang. Data-driven control for continuum robots based on dis- crete zeroing neural networks. IEEE Transactions on In- dustrial Informatics,

    2022

  9. [24]

    [Wang et al., 2019] X. Wang, M. Che, and Y . Wei. Neu- ral networks based approach solving multi-linear systems with M-tensors. Neurocomputing, 351:33–42,

    2019

  10. [25]

    [Wang et al., 2022] G. Wang, Q. Li, S. Liu, H. Xiao, and B. Zhang. New zeroing neural network with finite- time convergence for dynamic complex-value linear equa- tion and its applications. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , 164:112674,

    2022

  11. [26]

    [Wei et al., 2022] L. Wei, L. Jin, and X. Luo. Noise- suppressing neural dynamics for time-dependent con- strained nonlinear optimization with applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , 52(10):6139–6150,

    2022

  12. [27]

    Xiao and L

    [Xiao and Jia, 2022] L. Xiao and L. Jia. Zeroing neural net- works: Finite-time convergence design, analysis and ap- plications. IEEE Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,

    2022

  13. [28]

    [Xiao et al., 2020] X. Xiao, C. Jiang, H. Lu, L. Jin, D. Liu, H. Huang, and Y . Pan. A parallel computing method based on zeroing neural networks for time-varying complex- valued matrix Moore-Penrose inversion. Information Sci- ences, 524:216–228,

    2020

  14. [29]

    [Yang et al., 2021] M. Yang, Y . Zhang, Z. Zhang, and H. Hu. 6-step discrete ZNN Model for repetitive motion control of redundant manipulator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems ,

    2021

  15. [30]

    [Yang et al., 2023] M. Yang, Y . Zhang, N. Tan, and H. Hu. Explicit linear left-and-right 5-step formulas with zeroing neural network for time-varying applications.IEEE Trans- actions on Cybernetics, 53(2):1133–1143,

    2023

  16. [32]

    Zhang, L

    [Zhang et al., 2015] Y . Zhang, L. Jin, D. Guo, Y . Yin, and Y . Chou. Taylor-type 1-step-ahead numerical differen- tiation rule for first-order derivative approximation and ZNN discretization. Journal of Computational and Ap- plied Mathematics, 273:29–40,

    2015

  17. [34]

    Zhang, H

    [Zhang et al., 2019] Y . Zhang, H. Gong, M. Yang, J. Li, and X. Yang. Stepsize range and optimal value for Taylor–Zhang discretization formula applied to zeroing neurodynamics illustrated via future equality-constrained quadratic programming. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networ...

    2019

  18. [35]

    Zhang, B

    [Zhang et al., 2021] Y . Zhang, B. Qiu, and X. Li. Zhang- Gradient Control. Springer,

    2021

  19. [36]

    Zhang, B

    [Zhang et al., 2022a] Z. Zhang, B. Chen, and Y . Luo. A deep ensemble dynamic learning network for Corona virus dis- ease 2019 diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works and Learning Systems ,

    2019

  20. [37]

    Zhang, X

    [Zhang et al., 2022c] Z. Zhang, X. Deng, and L. Zheng. A review on varying-parameter convergence differential neu- ral network. Neurocomputing, 490:54–65, 2022

    2022

  21. [2013]

    [Li et al., 2013] S. Li, S. Chen, and B. Liu. Accelerating a recurrent neural network to finite-time convergence for solving time-varying Sylvester equation by using a sign- bi-power activation function. Neural Processing Letters , 37(2):189–205,

    2013

  22. [2015]

    Zhang, Y

    [Zhang et al., 2018] Z. Zhang, Y . Lu, L. Zheng, S. Li, Z. Yu, and Y . Li. A new varying-parameter convergent- differential neural-network for solving time-varying con- vex QP problem constrained by linear-equality. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 63(12):4110–4125,

    2018

  23. [2017]

    [Jin et al., 2018] L. Jin, S. Li, H. Wang, and Z. Zhang. Non- convex projection activated zeroing neurodynamic models for time-varying matrix pseudoinversion with accelerated finite-time convergence. Applied Soft Computing, 62:840– 850,

    2018

  24. [2018]

    [Jin et al., 2019] L. Jin, S. Li, B. Hu, and M. Liu. A sur- vey on projection neural networks and their applications. Applied Soft Computing, 76:533–544,

    2019

  25. [2019]

    [Liao et al., 2022] S. Liao, S. Li, J. Liu, H. Huang, and X. Xiao. A zeroing neural dynamics based acceleration optimization approach for optimizers in deep neural net- works. Neural Networks, 150:440–461,

    2022

  26. [2020]

    Jiang, X

    [Jiang et al., 2020] C. Jiang, X. Xiao, D. Liu, H. Huang, H. Xiao, and H. Lu. Nonconvex and bound constraint ze- roing neural network for solving time-varying complex- valued quadratic programming problem. IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Informatics , 17(10):6864–6874,

    2020

  27. [2021]

    [Dai et al., 2022] J. Dai, Y . Li, L. Xiao, and L. Jia. Zeroing neural network for time-varying linear equations with ap- plication to dynamic positioning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(3):1552–1561,

    2022

  28. [2022]

    [Chen et al., 2021] D. Chen, S. Li, and Q. Wu. A novel supertwisting zeroing neural network with application to mobile robot manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 32(4):1776–1787,

    2021

  29. [2023]

    Zhang and L

    [Zhang and Jin, 2017] Y . Zhang and L. Jin.Robot manipula- tor redundancy resolution. John Wiley & Sons,

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.