Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Workgroup Mapping: Visual Analysis of Collaboration Culture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.00402 v2 pith:JFGBKJBB submitted 2020-05-01 cs.HC cs.SI

classification cs.HCcs.SI
keywords visualanalysisworkgroupsanalyticscapabilitiescollaborationculturedesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The digital transformation of work presents new opportunities to understand how informal workgroups organize around the dynamic needs of organizations, potentially in contrast to the formal, static, and idealized hierarchies depicted by org charts. We present a design study that spans multiple enabling capabilities for the visual mapping and analysis of organizational workgroups, including metrics for quantifying two dimensions of collaboration culture: the fluidity of collaborative relationships (measured using network machine learning) and the freedom with which workgroups form across organizational boundaries. These capabilities come together to create a turnkey pipeline that combines the analysis of a target organization, the generation of data graphics and statistics, and their integration in a template-based presentation that enables narrative visualization of results. Our metrics and visuals have supported hundreds of presentations to executives of major US-based and multinational organizations, while our engineering practices have created an ensemble of standalone tools with broad relevance to visualization and visual analytics. We present our work as an example of applied visual analytics research, describing the design iterations that allowed us to move from experimentation to production, as well as the perspectives of the research team and the customer-facing team at each stage in this process.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools