Experimental realization of a rotating radio-frequency ion trap for precision metrology

Addison Hartman; Anzhou Wang; Eric A. Cornell; Jun Ye; Kia Boon Ng; Michail Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis; Patricia Hector Hernandez; Rohan Kompella; Sun Yool Park; Tuan Anh Nguyen

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Experimental realization of a rotating radio-frequency ion trap for precision metrology

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first working rotating-radio-frequency ion trap and shows it confines ions more evenly.

desk verdict A credible first realization of the rotating rf trap, with a clean no-fit mode test and a solid—if not fully quantified—demonstration of trap-depth averaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21511 v1 pith:JGA7LZNJ submitted 2026-07-23 physics.atom-ph

Sun Yool Park , Anzhou Wang , Kia Boon Ng , Patricia Hector Hernandez , Addison Hartman , Tuan Anh Nguyen , Rohan Kompella , Michail Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis

show 2 more authors

Jun Ye Eric A. Cornell

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-ph PACS 37.10.Ty

keywords rotatingradio-frequencyiontrappseudopotentialdeptheight-rodelectrodegeometrylosselectronelectricdipolemomentsecularmotionprecessionPaul

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first experimental realization of the rotating-radio-frequency (rrf) ion trap, an idea proposed about two decades ago as a closer analog to the mechanical rotating-saddle Paul-trap demonstration. The central claim is practical: in a realistic eight-rod trap whose rf confinement is not perfectly harmonic, rotating the rf potential instead of flapping it back and forth averages over the angular bumps in the effective confining potential. As a result, the shallowest escape direction is deeper than in the equivalent linear rf trap, and ions survive at equal nominal confinement. The authors verify the dynamics—secular frequencies and a slow precession of the motion—against theory with no fit parameters, and they verify the trap-depth symmetrization by tilting the trap with a static field and watching which directions lose ions first. The payoff is for precision metrology, specifically electron electric dipole moment (eEDM) searches, where sensitivity grows with ion number and coherence time and where a loose but deep trap is desirable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotating pseudopotential. The rf field is written in complex form E(r,t) = Re[E0(r) e^{i omega_rf t}], and the effective confinement is U_pseudo proportional to |grad Phi_0|^2. For the rrf potential Phi_0 proportional to r^2 e^{i2theta}, this decomposes into a cosine quadrature and a sine quadrature related by a 45-degree rotation; it is the average of the two squared gradients that gives the total pseudopotential. That average is the mechanism that symmetrizes the azimuthally non-uniform trap depth of the eight-rod electrode structure. A second piece of machinery is the rotating-frame solution of the equations of motion, which gives two non-degenerate circular eige

What would settle it

Measure the actual energy needed to escape along the weakest axis by adiabatically tilting the trap further and compare with a full time-dependent simulation of ion trajectories through the real electrode fields; if non-adiabatic energy gain at the saddle points lowers the real barrier, the measured survival curve will fall below the pseudopotential prediction for the rrf configuration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the rrf configuration the radial rf potential is not a standing wave that flaps between x and y but a traveling wave that rotates, Phi proportional to r^2 cos(2theta + omega_rf t). Working in the pseudopotential approximation, the paper shows that the effective confining potential is proportional to |grad Phi_0|^2, and that for a rotating field this is the sum of two quadratures, |grad Phi_c|^2 + |grad Phi_s|^2. In the eight-rod electrode geometry of the experiment, each quadrature alone has shallow directions, but the two patterns are misaligned by 45 degrees, so their sum has a deeper minimum than either alone. Measurements of ion survival under an adiabatic static tilt confirm this: io

Load-bearing premise

The paper's depth enhancement rests on the pseudopotential approximation, which assumes the rf drive is fast enough that the time-averaged |grad Phi_0|^2 predicts the real escape barrier; the authors state the validity conditions but do not verify them in the electrode regions where ions actually escape.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the eight-rod geometry, the rrf configuration reduces azimuthal trap-depth anisotropy from several distinct shallow directions to two identical effective axes, with a deeper minimum barrier.
At equal nominal confinement, the rrf trap loses fewer ions over long times, directly serving the sqrt(N tau) sensitivity target of eEDM measurements.
The measured secular-mode frequencies and precession rate match the predicted q-dependence without fit parameters, establishing the rrf dynamics as understood.
The rotating potential creates an effective axial magnetic field of tens of gauss for ion center-of-mass motion, an effect that must be characterized in any time-reversal-symmetry search.
The deeper minimum barrier should hold for any non-ideal electrode geometry where the two quadratures of the complex rf field are misaligned.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same quadrature-averaging argument likely generalizes beyond eight rods: any electrode array whose linear-rf pseudopotential is anisotropic in its anharmonic terms should become more azimuthally uniform under rotation, so the benefit may extend to other ion-trap platforms.
The rrf precession could be used as an in-situ diagnostic of the rf strength or of static field asymmetries; conversely, engineering the rotation direction may allow cancellation of some static imperfections.
The loose-but-deep tradeoff could also benefit other precision measurements and quantum-information experiments that use larger ion clouds, not just eEDM searches.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a serious referee. This is the first experimental implementation of Hasegawa and Bollinger's 2005 rotating rf trap, and the core physics checks out. Figure 3 shows the predicted secular and precession frequencies with no fitted parameters—that is a clean, falsifiable test and the paper nails it. The more pragmatic claim, that the rotating pattern averages over the angular variations in the pseudopotential and deepens the shallowest direction compared to the lrf configuration, is supported both by the field calculations in Fig. 5 and by the survival measurements in Fig. 6. I don't see circularity: the theory curves are external, and the experimental loss data are independent of the computed depth profiles.

The main soft spot is the one the stress-test note flags: the pseudopotential is being used at large ion displacement, right up to the escape barrier, and the paper does not explicitly check its validity near the electrode surfaces. That is a real open question, but I don't think it sinks the paper. The drive-to-secular frequency ratio is about 25, which is comfortably in the usual adiabatic regime at the trap center, and while the local secular frequency rises near the electrodes, the escape barrier is still the saddle of the time-averaged potential. Non-adiabatic rf heating could in principle shift the loss thresholds, but the measured survival curves go in the same direction as the predicted barriers. The bigger practical weakness is that Fig. 6 has no error bars, no repeated-trial scatter, and no quantitative comparison to the calculated barrier heights. That leaves the central metrology claim a bit less crisp than it could be. No raw data or simulation code are provided either, so independent reproduction is limited.

The paper is also honest about its own scope: the discussion explicitly notes that other trap geometries are being considered and that the rotation-induced effective magnetic field must be studied before eEDM use. That is the right level of caution.

Who is this for? Experimental ion trappers, especially people working with non-ideal electrode geometries and precision molecular spectroscopy. It deserves a proper referee round, with a request for error bars and a sanity check on the pseudopotential validity near the escape saddle. Not a desk reject.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first experimental realization of a rotating radio-frequency (rrf) ion trap, following the proposal of Hasegawa and Bollinger. It verifies the predicted rrf transverse mode structure (Eq. 4) in a JILA eight-rod trap used for molecular eEDM searches, with a no-fit comparison in Fig. 3. The authors then compute the pseudopotential for their nonideal eight-rod geometry and argue that the rrf phase pattern averages the two quadrupole quadratures, making the effective potential more azimuthally uniform and raising the shallowest effective trap depth relative to the conventional lrf phase pattern. This claim is supported by measured ion-survival curves under adiabatic tilt (Fig. 6), which qualitatively show less azimuthal variation in loss thresholds for the rrf configuration and a larger minimum loss threshold. The paper frames this as advantageous for precision metrology, where loose yet deep confinement is desired.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful practical demonstration: the rrf trap can mitigate the tradeoff between loose harmonic confinement and shallow effective depth in realistic, non-quadrupolar electrode geometries. The first realization of the rrf trap and the parameter-free agreement of Eq. 4 with the measured mode frequencies (Fig. 3) are concrete strengths, as is the direct computation of |∇Φ|^2 from the electrode geometry. However, the experimental evidence for the load-bearing metrology advantage is currently qualitative: Fig. 6 has no error bars, no statistical treatment, and no quantitative comparison with the computed barriers. The pseudopotential approximation is also used to define the escape barrier without checking its validity at the saddle points, where the adiabatic conditions are most questionable. These gaps prevent the paper from fully establishing the claimed depth enhancement.

major comments (4)

[§III A, Eq. (5), Fig. 5] The escape barrier is defined through the pseudopotential U_pseudo ∝ |∇Φ0|^2, but the stated adiabaticity conditions (ω_rf large compared with local secular frequencies and micromotion small on the field variation scale) are not checked at the barrier locations along cuts (i) and (iv). Near the inter-electrode gaps the field gradients are large, and an ion slows down at the saddle, so the approximation can fail precisely where the depth is determined. The central claim about raising the shallowest depth depends on this. Please quantify the local adiabaticity parameter at the saddle points and/or run time-dependent trajectory calculations for both phase patterns. Without this, the measured loss thresholds in Fig. 6 could reflect non-adiabatic rf heating differences rather than a static effective potential.
[§III B, Fig. 6] The key experimental evidence for depth enhancement consists of survival curves without error bars, repetition counts, or a stated threshold criterion. The claim that the absolute minimum x_eq for escape is 'noticeably larger' in the rrf configuration is a visual judgment. Please provide repeated measurements with propagated uncertainties, a defined escape threshold (e.g., 50% survival), and a statistical test of whether the rrf minimum loss threshold exceeds the lrf cut-(i) threshold. Without this, the experimental support for the central quantitative claim is not established.
[§III B, Fig. 6 caption] The horizontal axis is x_eq = q0Edc/(m\barω_sec^2), normalized by the harmonic secular frequency. The text does not state whether \barω_sec was matched between the lrf and rrf configurations; if it differed, comparing x_eq across configurations is not equivalent to comparing trap depths in energy. Moreover, loss at a given x_eq is not directly the pseudopotential barrier height unless the potential is harmonic up to the saddle. Please state the measured \barω_sec values in both configurations and give the explicit relation between the x_eq thresholds and the energy barriers computed from Fig. 5.
[§III A, Fig. 5] The assertion that the shallowest rrf direction is 'deeper overall' than the lrf direction is presented qualitatively in arbitrary units. The figure shows |∇Φ|^2 traces but does not define the trap-depth metric or quote numerical values. Please specify how the barrier is extracted from each cut (e.g., the maximum before the gap, or a defined saddle point) and provide the numerical depths and their ratios for cuts (i) and (iv). This would make the predicted effect a falsifiable number and allow a direct comparison with the survival data in Fig. 6.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract] Typo: 'reslistic' should be 'realistic'.
[§II B] The phrase 'using techniques schemes developed in Refs' is redundant; use 'techniques developed in Refs'.
[Fig. 5] The x-axes of the cut plots are labeled only '(arb)' and the electrode/gap positions are not marked. Adding geometric reference points (e.g., rod surfaces) would make the barrier locations and the comparison between cuts easier to assess.
[Fig. 6] The caption uses 'cuts (i)-(vi)' but in the rrf panel only three curves are plotted and the ±22.5° directions are symmetric by design. A brief statement that error bars are omitted because the traces are single realizations would improve transparency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rrf/lrf comparison is computed from electrode geometry and tested with independent measurements, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The rrf/lrf pseudopotential comparison (Eqs. 5–6, Fig. 5) is computed directly from the electrode phase patterns and geometry; no parameter is fit to the survival data. The secular and precession frequency prediction in Fig. 3 is explicitly 'evaluated using the calculated trap parameters q and d with no fit parameters,' using Hasegawa and Bollinger's Eq. (4) as external theory. The trap-depth measurements in Fig. 6 are independent survival measurements; the x_eq normalization uses the measured mean secular frequency, but this is a unit conversion and is not adjusted to force agreement with the predicted depth curves. The paper's self-citations ([18], [19], [23], [33]) provide apparatus and eEDM context, not the load-bearing physical prediction. The pseudopotential approximation near the escape barrier is an assumption worth checking, but an unverified assumption is not circularity unless the claimed prediction is equivalent to the input; here it is not.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities are introduced. The central comparisons rely on standard pseudopotential theory, a cited eigenmode calculation, and a harmonic x_eq scaling that is not independently defended.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Pseudopotential approximation U_pseudo proportional to |E0|^2 (Eq. 5) applies to the rrf trap and remains valid up to ion escape.
Central to mapping computed |grad Phi_0|^2 to effective trap depth in Section III A; validity is stated only for high drive frequency and small micromotion, not checked at the escape points.
domain assumption The eigenfrequency splitting formula (Eq. 4) from Hasegawa and Bollinger is correct to leading order in q.
Used to predict and compare measured omega_prec and omega_bar_sec in Figure 3; this is an external theory result, not re-derived here.
domain assumption The electrostatic model of the eight-rod geometry used for Figure 5 accurately represents the real electrode fields.
No machining tolerances, surface effects, or truncation corrections are presented, yet the depth comparison relies on these computed profiles.
domain assumption The harmonic scaling x_eq = q0 Edc/(m omega_bar_sec^2) makes survival curves comparable across configurations at equal confinement strength.
Used to define the horizontal axis in Figure 6; assumes the harmonic approximation even at displacements near escape, and that Coulomb coupling makes the lowest saddle the relevant long-time loss channel.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimental realization of a rotating radio-frequency ion trap for precision metrology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JGA7LZNJ

@misc{pith2026260721511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimental realization of a rotating radio-frequency ion trap for precision metrology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JGA7LZNJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21511}
}

read the original abstract

We discuss the experimental realization of the rotating radio-frequency (rrf) trap, proposed by Hasegawa and Bollinger [Phys. Rev. A 72, 043403 (2005)]. Compared to a traditional linear rf (lrf) Paul trap, the rrf trap is a closer analogy to the popular mechanical lecture demonstration for a Paul trap. In an ion trap with reslistic, non-ideal electrode geometry, the rrf trap averages over angular variations in the effective potential. This averaging provides more uniform confinement and reduces ion loss at equal confinement strength compared with the lrf trap. This feature makes the rrf trap configuration advantageous for precision metrology application, such as electron electric dipole moment (eEDM) measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21511 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Schematic of the trap. The dc potentials are applied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Transverse mode frequencies in the rrf trap as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Transverse ion trajectory in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Transverse field curvature, proportional to the pseudopotential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Ion survival as a function of adiabatic dc tilt for differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references

[1]

A new mass spectrometer without a magnetic field

W. Paul and H. Steinwedel, Notizen: Ein neues massen- spektrometer ohne magnetfeld, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Natur- forschung A8, 448 (1953), German; often cited in En- glish as “A new mass spectrometer without a magnetic field”

1953
[2]

J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Physical Review Letters74, 4091 (1995)

1995
[3]

Monroe, D

C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Physical Review Letters75, 4714 (1995)

1995
[4]

H¨ affner, C

H. H¨ affner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum comput- ing with trapped ions, Physics Reports469, 155 (2008)

2008
[5]

Blatt and D

R. Blatt and D. Wineland, Entangled states of trapped atomic ions, Nature453, 1008 (2008)

2008
[6]

D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature638, 383 (2025)

2025
[7]

M. Liu, R. Shaydulin, P. Niroula, M. DeCross, S.-H. Hung, W. Y. Kon, E. Cervero-Mart ´ ın, K. Chakraborty, O. Amer, S. Aaronson, A. Acharya, Y. Alexeev, K. J. Berg, S. Chakrabarti, F. J. Curchod, J. M. Dreiling, N. Erickson, C. Foltz, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, T. S. Humble, N. Kumar, J. Larson, D. Lykov, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, S. Eloul, P. Sie...

2025
[8]

S. A. Diddams, T. Udem, J. C. Bergquist,et al., An op- tical clock based on a single trapped 199Hg+ ion, Science 293, 825 (2001)

2001

Show all 33 references

[9]

A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 637 (2015)

2015
[10]

M. C. Marshall, D. A. Rodriguez Castillo, W. J. Arthur- Dworschack, A. Aeppli, K. Kim, D. Lee, W. Warfield, J. Hinrichs, N. V. Nardelli, T. M. Fortier, J. Ye, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. B. Hume, High-stability single-ion clock with 5.5×10 −19 systematic uncertainty, Physical Revi...

2025
[11]

Lindvall, T

T. Lindvall, T. Fordell, K. J. Hanhij¨ arvi, M. Doleˇ zal, J. M. Rahm, S. L. Weyers, and A. E. Wallin, 88Sr+ op- tical clock with 7.9×10 −19 systematic uncertainty and measurement of its absolute frequency with 9.8×10 −17 uncertainty, Physical Review Applied24, 044082 (2025)

2025
[12]

Cheung, S

C. Cheung, S. G. Porsev, D. Filin, M. S. Safronova, M. Wehrheim, L. J. Spieß, S. Chen, A. Wilzewski, J. R. Crespo L´ opez-Urrutia, and P. O. Schmidt, Finding the ultranarrow 3p2 → 3p0 electric quadrupole transition in Ni12+ ion for an optical clock, Physical Review Letters 135...

2025
[13]

Willitsch, Coulomb-crystallised molecular ions in traps: methods, applications, prospects, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry31, 175 (2012)

S. Willitsch, Coulomb-crystallised molecular ions in traps: methods, applications, prospects, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry31, 175 (2012)

2012
[14]

B. R. Heazlewood, Cold ion chemistry within coulomb crystals, Molecular Physics117, 1934 (2019)

1934
[15]

O. A. Krohn and H. J. Lewandowski, Cold ion–molecule reactions in the extreme environment of a Coulomb crys- tal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A128, 1737 (2024)

2024
[16]

Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture Demonstrations, Ro- tating saddle, Video, accessed 2026-02-11

2026
[17]

Hasegawa and J

T. Hasegawa and J. J. Bollinger, Rotating-radio- frequency ion traps, Phys. Rev. A72, 043403 (2005)

2005
[18]

Roussy, L

T. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science381, 46 (2023)

2023
[19]

K. B. Ng,The ThF + eEDM experiment: concept, de- sign, and characterization, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder (2023)

2023
[20]

W. B. Cairncross and J. Ye, Atoms and molecules in the search for time-reversal symmetry violation, Nature Reviews Physics1, 510 (2019)

2019
[21]

Leibfried, R

D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Reviews of Modern Physics75, 281 (2003)

2003
[22]

F. G. Major, V. N. Gheorghe, and G. Werth,Charged Particle Traps: Physics and Techniques of Charged Par- ticle Field Confinement(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005)

2005
[23]

Schlossberger,An Apparatus for Measuring the Elec- tron ’s Electric Dipole Moment in Trapped ThF +, Ph.D

N. Schlossberger,An Apparatus for Measuring the Elec- tron ’s Electric Dipole Moment in Trapped ThF +, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Col- orado (2023)

2023
[24]

S. Y. Park,Achieving long coherence time for a multi- plexed, ion-based eEDM experiment, Doctoral thesis, Uni- versity of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO (2026)

2026
[25]

H. Loh, J. Wang, M. Grau, T. S. Yahn, R. W. Field, C. H. Greene, and E. A. Cornell, Laser-induced fluorescence 8 studies of HfF+ produced by autoionization, The Journal of Chemical Physics135, 154308 (2011)

2011
[26]

H. Loh, R. P. Stutz, T. S. Yahn, H. Looser, R. W. Field, and E. A. Cornell, REMPI spectroscopy of HfF, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy276–277, 49 (2012)

2012
[27]

M. Grau, A. E. Leanhardt, H. Loh, L. C. Sinclair, R. P. Stutz, T. S. Yahn, and E. A. Cornell, Near-infrared LIF spectroscopy of HfF, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 272, 32 (2012)

2012
[28]

D. N. Gresh, K. C. Cossel, Y. Zhou, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Broadband velocity modulation spectroscopy of ThF+ for use in a measurement of the electron electric dipole moment, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy319, 1 (2016)

2016
[29]

Y. Zhou, K. B. Ng, L. Cheng, D. N. Gresh, R. W. Field, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Visible and ultraviolet laser spectroscopy of ThF, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 358, 1 (2019)

2019
[30]

Shagam, W

Y. Shagam, W. B. Cairncross, T. S. Roussy, Y. Zhou, K. B. Ng, D. N. Gresh, T. Grogan, J. Ye, and E. A. Cor- nell, Continuous temporal ion detection combined with time-gated imaging: Normalization over a large dynamic range, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy368, 111257 (2020)

2020
[31]

A. V. Gaponov and M. A. Miller, Potential wells for charged particles in a high-frequency electromagnetic field, Soviet Physics JETP7, 168 (1958), Russian origi- nal: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 242–243 (1958)

1958
[32]

Paul, Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles, Reviews of Modern Physics62, 531 (1990)

W. Paul, Electromagnetic traps for charged and neutral particles, Reviews of Modern Physics62, 531 (1990)

1990
[33]

Caldwell, T

L. Caldwell, T. S. Roussy, T. Wright, W. B. Cairn- cross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Systematic and statistical uncertainty evaluation of the HfF + elec- tron’s electric dipole moment experiment, Phys. Rev. A 108, 0128...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A new mass spectrometer without a magnetic field

W. Paul and H. Steinwedel, Notizen: Ein neues massen- spektrometer ohne magnetfeld, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Natur- forschung A8, 448 (1953), German; often cited in En- glish as “A new mass spectrometer without a magnetic field”

1953

[2] [2]

J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Physical Review Letters74, 4091 (1995)

1995

[3] [3]

Monroe, D

C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Physical Review Letters75, 4714 (1995)

1995

[4] [4]

H¨ affner, C

H. H¨ affner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum comput- ing with trapped ions, Physics Reports469, 155 (2008)

2008

[5] [5]

Blatt and D

R. Blatt and D. Wineland, Entangled states of trapped atomic ions, Nature453, 1008 (2008)

2008

[6] [6]

D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature638, 383 (2025)

2025

[7] [7]

M. Liu, R. Shaydulin, P. Niroula, M. DeCross, S.-H. Hung, W. Y. Kon, E. Cervero-Mart ´ ın, K. Chakraborty, O. Amer, S. Aaronson, A. Acharya, Y. Alexeev, K. J. Berg, S. Chakrabarti, F. J. Curchod, J. M. Dreiling, N. Erickson, C. Foltz, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, T. S. Humble, N. Kumar, J. Larson, D. Lykov, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, S. Eloul, P. Sie...

2025

[8] [8]

S. A. Diddams, T. Udem, J. C. Bergquist,et al., An op- tical clock based on a single trapped 199Hg+ ion, Science 293, 825 (2001)

2001