pith. sign in

arxiv: 1008.2884 · v2 · pith:JGOA4Y4Unew · submitted 2010-08-17 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · physics.geo-ph

Comparison of 3 absolute gravimeters based on different methods for the e-MASS project

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph physics.geo-ph
keywords absolutecomparisondifferentgravimetersmethodsthreeaccelerationapril
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We report on the comparison between three absolute gravimeters that took place in April 2010 at Laboratoire National de M\'etrologie et d'Essais. The three instruments (FG5#209 from METAS, Switzerland, IMGC-02 from INRIM, Italy, and CAG from LNE-SYRTE, France) rely on different methods: optical and atomic interferometry. We discuss their differences as well as their similarities. We compare their measurements of the gravitational acceleration in 4 points of the same pillar, in the perspective of an absolute determination of g for a watt balance experiment

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.