Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

6DMA-Aided Hybrid Beamforming with Joint Antenna Position and Orientation Optimization

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Jointly moving and rotating antenna panels lets sub-connected hybrid beamforming beat fully-digital flexible-antenna designs.

desk verdict A solid extension of 6DMA hybrid beamforming with a clean polarization-aware channel model, but the central channel equation has a dimension mismatch that must be fixed before the numerical claims can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17088 v1 pith:JHJQEYOK submitted 2024-12-22 eess.SP

Yichi Zhang , Yuchen Zhang , Lipeng Zhu , Sa Xiao , Wanbin Tang , Yonina C. Eldar , Rui Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords six-dimensionalmovableantennahybridbeamformingsub-connectedarchitecturefield-responsechannelmodelpolarizationpositionandorientationoptimizationsum-ratemaximizationmulti-userMISO
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a base station whose antenna sub-panels can each move and rotate in six degrees of freedom can make up for using a low-cost sub-connected hybrid beamforming architecture. It claims yes: jointly optimizing sub-array positions, sub-array orientations, the digital beamformer, and the analog phase shifts under a field-response channel model that includes directional radiation patterns and polarization yields higher multi-user sum rate than fully-digital baselines that only move or only rotate antennas. The reason to care is practical: if geometric flexibility really substitutes for radio-frequency chain count, cheaper base stations could reach the performance of costlier fully-digital ones. The simulations also show that optimizing orientation with an unpolarized channel model loses most of the gain, so polarization is not a modeling nicety but a necessary part of the design.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized field-response channel vector $h_k(c,r) = (A_k(r) \otimes \mathbf{1}_M^T) \odot G_k(t)^H \Sigma_k \mathbf{1}_{L_k^r}$, in which $G_k(t)$ carries the phase-only spatial variation of each path and $A_k(r)$ carries the direction-dependent radiation and polarization gains. Proposition 1 collapses those gains into closed forms, $A_E = \sqrt{3/2}\,(1-(e_3^T R_n^T \rho_{k,l})^2)$ and $A_P = e_3^T R_n^T(\rho_{k,l}\rho_{k,l}^T - I_3) p_{k,l}^r / \sqrt{1-(e_3^T R_n^T \rho_{k,l})^2}$, which is what makes gradients with respect to roll, pitch, yaw, and center position computable in closed form. The solving machinery is FP-aided alternating optimization: a Lagrange-multiplier step for the digital beamformer, manifold optimization over the product of complex unit circles for the analog beamformer, and backtracking gradient descent that moves each sub-array's center and orientation only when the step stays feasible and raises the same objective. Keeping one objective through all four subproblems is what guarantees the iterations converge to a non-decreasing sum rate.

What would settle it

Run a ray-tracing or full-wave simulation of a $2\times2$ sub-array moved over a $2\lambda \times 2\lambda$ region and rotated within $\pm20^\circ$ in a realistic indoor environment, and compare the per-path amplitudes and departure angles against the phase-only prediction of Eq. (5); material variation of amplitude or angle across the region would falsify the far-field assumption and with it the predicted 6DMA gains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a sub-connected 6DMA hybrid beamforming design whose joint optimization of positions, orientations, DBF, and ABF achieves higher sum rate than benchmark schemes with less flexibility, including fully-digital systems with position-only or orientation-only antenna adjustment. The channel model is the enabler: it extends the field-response model by multiplying each path's phase response by a radiation-pattern gain and a polarization-matching gain, and Proposition 1 reduces those gains to closed forms that make orientation gradients tractable. In the numerical setup with 16 antennas in four 2x2 movable sub-arrays serving four users at 30 GHz, the proposed scheme beats sub-connected-FA, fully-connected-FA, and fully-digital-FA, and at low transmit power also beats fully-digital systems that move or rotate antennas but not both. The same numbers show about a 352 percent sum-rate gain over a 6DMA baseline designed without polarization, which the paper presents as evidence that polarization must be modeled when antenna orientation is optimized.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each multipath component's departure angle and amplitude do not change as a sub-array moves or rotates within its small assigned region, so only the propagation phase varies; if the movable region is large enough to alter the multipath structure, the channel model and the optimization built on it would need to be replaced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $P = 20$ dBm, the proposed 6DMA scheme improves sum rate over sub-connected-FA, fully-connected-FA, fully-digital-FA, fully-digital position-only MA, and fully-digital orientation-only MA by 135%, 127%, 118%, 4.05%, and 1.19%, respectively.
  • A 6DMA baseline whose beamformers and panel configurations are optimized without polarization loses most of the benefit: the proposed polarized design achieves about 352% higher sum rate at the same operating point.
  • Performance grows with movable-region size only up to the spatial correlation length of the channel; beyond that, the periodicity of the field response means additional movement freedom adds no further spatial degrees of freedom.
  • Widening the allowed rotation range increases sum rate, and more multipath paths per user give the position and orientation optimization more spatial diversity to exploit.
  • The quality gap between sub-connected and fully-digital structures shrinks when panels can rotate, because directional radiation and polarization effects let the array reorient its beam to match the designed beamformer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the closed-form polarization expressions suggest the model can be lifted to dual-polarized or arbitrary feed patterns by replacing the vertical-polarization field components $F_{\tilde\theta}=1$, $F_{\tilde\phi}=0$; the gradient machinery would carry over unchanged.
  • Beyond the paper, the results imply a hardware trade-off curve between RF-chain count and geometric freedom: the number of sub-arrays could be reduced if the movable region or rotation range grows, and a simulation sweep over $(N, D, \zeta)$ could quantify that substitution rate.
  • Beyond the paper, a near-field extension is the natural stress test: because the far-field phase-only assumption is load-bearing, moving sub-arrays into the radiative near field would change path amplitudes and departure angles, so the derived optimal positions would no longer hold and the field-response model would need distance-dependent terms.
  • Beyond the paper, an online re-optimization study under time-varying user positions would show whether the sum-rate gain survives finite channel coherence time, since the algorithm assumes quasi-static slow-fading channels and re-optimizes from scratch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies a sub-connected hybrid beamforming system in which each UPA subarray has a dedicated RF chain and can collectively translate and rotate within given regions. The authors extend the field-response channel model to include directional radiation patterns and polarization, then formulate a sum-rate maximization over the digital beamformer, unit-modulus analog beamformer, subarray positions, and subarray orientations. They propose a fractional-programming-based alternating optimization framework that combines a Lagrange multiplier update for the DBF, manifold optimization for the ABF, and gradient descent with backtracking for positions and orientations. Numerical results compare the proposed 6DMA scheme with fixed-antenna and partially flexible baselines, and show substantial sum-rate gains, including over some fully-digital baselines at low transmit power.

Significance. If the technical presentation is corrected, the paper addresses a genuine gap: most prior 6DMA work assumes fully-digital architectures and often ignores polarization in orientation optimization. The simplification in Proposition 1, which reduces the pattern and polarization factors to a compact per-path coefficient that enters a phase-sum expression, is elegant and makes the gradient-based position/orientation updates tractable. The numerical study is reasonably broad, covering power budget, movable-region size, rotatable-angle range, number of paths, and number of users, with several baseline schemes. However, the manuscript currently contains a dimensionally inconsistent channel-model equation, and no code or data is provided, so the quantitative claims cannot be independently verified as printed. These issues are fixable, and the central approach appears sound once the channel model is stated correctly.

major comments (2)
  1. [II-B, Eq. (14)] Equation (14) is dimensionally inconsistent as written. A_k(r) is defined in R^{N×L_t^k}, so A_k(r) ⊗ 1_M^T has size N×(L_t^k M), whereas G_k(t)^H Σ_k 1_{L_r^k} has size MN×1; the Hadamard product is therefore undefined. The final expression in Proposition 1, Eq. (33), is physically sensible and appears internally consistent, but it cannot be obtained from Eq. (14) as printed. Because all numerical results depend on this channel model and no simulation code is provided, the reader cannot tell whether the implementation used the erroneous Eq. (14) or an unstated corrected formula. Please replace Eq. (14) with a correctly sized construction, e.g., h_k(c,r) = ((A_k(r) ⊗ 1_M) ⊙ G_k(t)^H) Σ_k 1_{L_r^k}, with the row ordering between the Kronecker product and the stacking of antennas made explicit, and check that all subsequent gradient expressions match this corrected form.
  2. [IV, Fig. 4 and baseline descriptions] The fully-digital-MA baselines that underpin the headline claim are not specified enough to guarantee fair comparison. It is not stated whether their antenna positions or orientations are optimized with the same gradient/backtracking routine as the proposed scheme, what movable or rotatable ranges are used for these baselines relative to the subarray-level constraints of the proposed scheme, and whether the fully-digital beamformer is recomputed at every position/orientation update. Please provide these details, since the claim that the sub-connected 6DMA structure can outperform fully-digital schemes with only position or orientation flexibility depends on the baselines being properly optimized within their own feasible sets.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II-B] In the definition of A_k(r), the dimension is written as R^{N×L_t^K}; this should be R^{N×L_t^k}, since the number of paths is user-dependent.
  2. [III-B] The definition of μ_k contains a typo: "μ_k = (1+u_k)|v2_k|" should read "μ_k = (1+u_k)|v_k|^2".
  3. [III-D and Algorithm 2] The text refers to "Section III-E" for the convergence analysis, but no Section III-E is present; the convergence paragraph should be labeled or the cross-reference corrected.
  4. [III-C] The Polak-Ribiere parameter is misspelled as "Polak-Ribirer"; please correct it to "Polak-Ribiere".
  5. [IV, Figs. 5-6] The baselines "sub-connected-MA with flexible orientation" and "sub-connected-MA with flexible position" appear in the discussion and figures but are not defined in the baseline list; please add their definitions and state how they are obtained from the proposed algorithm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the sum-rate gains emerge from a fully specified simulation model and are not fitted or forced by self-referential uniqueness claims.

full rationale

The paper's central numerical claims are produced by an explicit simulation pipeline rather than by fitting. Channel coefficients are drawn from a stated stochastic model (PRM Sigma_k, path angles, path loss), the objective in (15)-(16) is defined directly from the channel model, and Algorithm 2 optimizes that same objective. No parameter is fitted to the reported output and then renamed as a prediction, and no external benchmark is reverse-engineered. The field-response model (5)-(6), cosine radiation pattern (7), and polarization relations (11)-(13) are stated with their assumptions (far-field, quasi-static, vertical polarization), and Proposition 1 is proved in Appendix A from these equations, so the derivation chain is explicit rather than circular. The many self-citations to the same group's earlier models ([17]-[19], [30], [36]) are real supporting references to parameter-free physical models, not invoked as an unverified uniqueness result and not determining the numerical comparison by construction; the baselines are independently defined and optimized within the same framework. The printed Eq. (14) has a dimension mismatch (A_k(r) is N x L_t, 1_M^T is 1 x M, so the Kronecker product is N x L_t M while G_k(t)^H Sigma_k 1_{L_r} is MN x 1, making the Hadamard product undefined), but this is a correctness/reproducibility issue rather than a circularity issue; the per-element form in Proposition 1, Eq. (33), is the sensible corrected model. Overall, no circular step can be exhibited, and the score of 1 merely acknowledges the prevalence of non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; all simulation parameters are fixed and stated. The central claim rests on the far-field invariance assumption, the chosen cosine radiation pattern and vertical polarization model, and the diagonal PRM simulation setup. These are modeling choices, not artifacts of fitting.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Far-field, quasi-static, slow-fading channels: AoD, AoA, and path amplitudes remain constant as UPAs move, only phases vary.
    Stated in Section II-B before Eq. (5); this is what makes the field-response model with a single PRM valid.
  • domain assumption Antenna radiation pattern is a cosine pattern with kappa = 2 and G_kappa = 3/2.
    Chosen in Section II-B2 'for convenience'; not derived from measurements, but common in the literature.
  • domain assumption Transmit antennas are vertically polarized, so F_theta_tilde = 1 and F_phi_tilde = 0.
    Assumed in Section II-B3; this fixes the polarization direction in the local coordinate system.
  • domain assumption In simulation, the path-response matrix Sigma_k is diagonal with i.i.d. complex Gaussian entries scaled by path loss.
    Set in Section IV; this is a simulation choice, not a physical law.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 6DMA-Aided Hybrid Beamforming with Joint Antenna Position and Orientation Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JHJQEYOK

@misc{pith2026241217088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 6DMA-Aided Hybrid Beamforming with Joint Antenna Position and Orientation Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JHJQEYOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17088}
}
read the original abstract

This paper studies a sub-connected six-dimensional movable antenna (6DMA)-aided multi-user communication system. In this system, each sub-array is connected to a dedicated radio frequency chain and collectively moves and rotates as a unit within specific local regions. The movement and rotation capabilities of 6DMAs enhance design flexibility, facilitating the capture of spatial variations for improved communication performance. To fully characterize the effect of antenna position and orientation on wireless channels between the base station (BS) and users, we develop a field-response-based 6DMA channel model to account for the antenna radiation pattern and polarization. We then maximize the sum rate of multiple users, by jointly optimizing the digital and unit-modulus analog beamformers given the transmit power budget as well as the positions and orientations of sub-arrays within given movable and rotatable ranges at the BS. Due to the highly coupled variables, the formulated optimization problem is non-convex and thus challenging to solve. We develop a fractional programming-aided alternating optimization framework that integrates the Lagrange multiplier method, manifold optimization, and gradient descent to solve the problem. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed 6DMA-aided sub-connected structure achieves a substantial sum-rate improvement over various benchmark schemes with less flexibility in antenna movement and can even outperform fully-digital beamforming systems that employ antenna position or orientation adjustments only. The results also highlight the necessity of considering antenna polarization for optimally adjusting antenna orientation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The proposed multi-user communication system aided by 6DMAs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrations of the spherical coordinate system: (a) The transformation from the Cartesian to the spherical coordinates; (b) LCS of an UPA; (c) GCS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Sum rate versus the size of movable region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sum rate versus the power budget. all considered schemes increases as the power budget in￾creases. It is observed that for the same power budget P = 20 dBm, our proposed 6DMA scheme achieves 135%, 127%, 118%, 4.05%, and 1.19% performance improvement over the sub-connec…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: illustrates the sum rate versus the number of users. Note that the increase in sum rate is primarily attributed to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sum rate versus the number of paths for each user. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hybrid Codebook Design for Localization Using Electromagnetically Reconfigurable Fluid Antenna System

    eess.SP 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three beams derived from the array response and its angle derivatives nearly minimize the localization error bound for a base station with pattern-reconfigurable fluid antennas.

  2. Hybrid Near-Far Field 6D Movable Antenna Design Exploiting Directional Sparsity and Deep Learning

    cs.IT 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a hybrid near-far field channel model for 6D movable antennas, a directional-sparsity-based channel estimator, and a deep reinforcement learning algorithm for joint position, rotation, and beamformi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Hybrid precoding ar- chitecture for massive multiuser MIMO with dissipation: Sub-connected or fully connected structures?

    J. Du, W. Xu, H. Shen, X. Dong, and C. Zhao, “Hybrid precoding ar- chitecture for massive multiuser MIMO with dissipation: Sub-connected or fully connected structures?” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 5465–5479, Aug. 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Alternating minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    X. Yu, J.-C. Shen, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Alternating minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 485–500, Apr. 2016

    2016

  3. [3]

    A family of hybrid analog–digital beamforming methods for massive MIMO systems,

    S. S. Ioushua and Y . C. Eldar, “A family of hybrid analog–digital beamforming methods for massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 3243–3257, Jun. 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays,

    F. Sohrabi and W. Yu, “Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 501–513, Apr. 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,

    W. Zhu, H. D. Tuan, E. Dutkiewicz, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5648–5662, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communications,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Imani, and Y . C. Eldar, “Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7476–7490, Sep. 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    O. E. Ayach, S. Rajagopal, S. Abu-Surra, Z. Pi, and R. W. Heath, “Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1499–1513, Mar. 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    On spatial multiplexing of strong line-of- sight MIMO with 3D antenna arrangements,

    X. Song and G. Fettweis, “On spatial multiplexing of strong line-of- sight MIMO with 3D antenna arrangements,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 393–396, Aug. 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Novel unmanned aerial vehicle-based line-of-sight MIMO configuration independent of transmitted distance using millime- ter wave,

    N. Matsumura, K. Nishimori, R. Taniguchi, T. Hiraguri, T. Tomura, and J. Hirokawa, “Novel unmanned aerial vehicle-based line-of-sight MIMO configuration independent of transmitted distance using millime- ter wave,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 11 679–11 691, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Reconfigurable ULAs for line-of-sight MIMO transmission,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Reconfigurable ULAs for line-of-sight MIMO transmission,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2933–2947, May 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K.-K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02362 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fluid antenna system-part I: Preliminaries,

    K.-K. Wong, W. K. New, X. Hao, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid antenna system-part I: Preliminaries,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1919–1923, Aug. 2023

    1919

  5. [13]

    Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, S. Sun, B. Ai, and K. B. Letaief, “Flexible-position MIMO for wireless communications: Fundamentals, challenges, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 18–26, Oct. 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Flexible antenna arrays for wireless communications: Mod- eling and performance evaluation,

    S. Yang, J. An, Y . Xiu, W. Lyu, B. Ning, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Flexible antenna arrays for wireless communications: Mod- eling and performance evaluation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04944 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Movable antenna-enhanced wireless communications: General architec- tures and implementation methods,

    B. Ning, S. Yang, Y . Wu, P. Wang, W. Mei, C. Yuen, and E. Bj ¨ornson, “Movable antenna-enhanced wireless communications: General architec- tures and implementation methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15448 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Jul. 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Movable antenna-aided hybrid beamforming for multi-user communications,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Zhang, L. Zhu, S. Xiao, W. Tang, Y . C. Eldar, and R. Zhang, “Movable antenna-aided hybrid beamforming for multi-user communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00953 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Weighted sum-rate maximiza- tion for movable antenna-enhanced wireless networks,

    B. Feng, Y . Wu, X.-G. Xia, and C. Xiao, “Weighted sum-rate maximiza- tion for movable antenna-enhanced wireless networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1770–1774, Jun. 2024. 13

    2024

  14. [22]

    Flexible precoding for multi-user movable antenna communications,

    S. Yang, W. Lyu, B. Ning, Z. Zhang, and C. Yuen, “Flexible precoding for multi-user movable antenna communications,” IEEE Wireless Com- mun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1404–1408, May 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Two-timescale design for movable antenna array-enabled multiuser uplink communications,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, G. Li, D. Xu, K. Xu, J. Si, Y . Cai, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Two-timescale design for movable antenna array-enabled multiuser uplink communications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Movable-antenna array enhanced beam- forming: Achieving full array gain with null steering,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna array enhanced beam- forming: Achieving full array gain with null steering,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3340–3344, Dec. 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,

    L. Zhu, X. Pi, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15643, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    UA V-mounted movable an- tenna: Joint optimization of UA V placement and antenna configuration,

    X.-W. Tang, Y . Shi, Y . Huang, and Q. Wu, “UA V-mounted movable an- tenna: Joint optimization of UA V placement and antenna configuration,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02469 , 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    On the spectral efficiency of movable and rotary antenna arrays under rician fading,

    E. N. Tominaga, O. L. A. L ´opez, T. Svensson, R. D. Souza, and H. Alves, “On the spectral efficiency of movable and rotary antenna arrays under rician fading,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08112 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Movable antenna- aided federated learning with over-the-air aggregation: Joint optimiza- tion of positioning, beamforming, and user selection,

    Y . Zhao, Y . Xiu, M. Xu, P. Wang, and N. Wei, “Movable antenna- aided federated learning with over-the-air aggregation: Joint optimiza- tion of positioning, beamforming, and user selection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06721, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Movable-antenna position optimization for physical-layer security via discrete sampling,

    W. Mei, X. Wei, Y . Liu, B. Ning, and Z. Chen, “Movable-antenna position optimization for physical-layer security via discrete sampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08322 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    6D movable antenna en- hanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimization,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and R. Schober, “6D movable antenna en- hanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimization,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , early access, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,

    X. Shao and R. Zhang, “6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , early access, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Distributed channel estimation for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, J. Park, T. Q. S. Quek, and R. Schober, “Distributed channel estimation for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16510 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Capacity maximization for base station with hybrid fixed and movable antennas,

    X. Shi, X. Shao, and R. Zhang, “Capacity maximization for base station with hybrid fixed and movable antennas,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2877–2881, Oct. 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    6D movable antenna enhanced interference mitigation for cellular-connected UA V communications,

    T. Ren, X. Zhang, L. Zhu, W. Ma, X. Gao, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna enhanced interference mitigation for cellular-connected UA V communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13278 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Polarization aware movable antenna,

    R. Zhang, Y . Shao, and Y . C. Eldar, “Polarization aware movable antenna,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06690 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 Ghz,

    3GPP, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 Ghz,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 138 901 V18.0.0 (2024-05), 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Near- field communications: A tutorial review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “Near- field communications: A tutorial review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 4, pp. 1999–2049, 2023

    1999

  31. [39]

    Linear polarization optimization for wideband MIMO systems with reconfigurable arrays,

    M. R. Castellanos and R. W. Heath, “Linear polarization optimization for wideband MIMO systems with reconfigurable arrays,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2282–2295, Mar. 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    A new double-directional channel model including antenna patterns, array orientation, and depo- larization,

    R. Bhagavatula, C. Oestges, and R. W. Heath, “A new double-directional channel model including antenna patterns, array orientation, and depo- larization,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2219–2231, Jun. 2010

    2010

  33. [41]

    Communicating with extremely large-scale ar- ray/surface: Unified modeling and performance analysis,

    H. Lu and Y . Zeng, “Communicating with extremely large-scale ar- ray/surface: Unified modeling and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 4039–4053, Jun. 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna theory: analysis and design . John wiley & sons, 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    Intelligent surface-aided transmitter architectures for millimeter-wave ultra massive MIMO systems,

    V . Jamali, A. M. Tulino, G. Fischer, R. R. M ¨uller, and R. Schober, “Intelligent surface-aided transmitter architectures for millimeter-wave ultra massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 2, pp. 144–167, 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Polarized MIMO channels in 3-D: models, measurements and mutual information,

    M. Shafi, M. Zhang, A. Moustakas, P. Smith, A. Molisch, F. Tufvesson, and S. Simon, “Polarized MIMO channels in 3-D: models, measurements and mutual information,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 514–527, Mar. 2006

    2006

  37. [45]

    Fractional programming for communication systems-part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,

    K. Shen and W. Yu, “Fractional programming for communication systems-part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2631–2644, May 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Secure active and passive beamforming in IRS-aided MIMO systems,

    S. Asaad, Y . Wu, A. Bereyhi, R. R. M ¨uller, R. F. Schaefer, and H. V . Poor, “Secure active and passive beamforming in IRS-aided MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Inf. F orensics Security , vol. 17, pp. 1300–1315, 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Absil, R

    P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, and R. Sepulchre, Optimization algorithms on matrix manifolds . Princeton University Press, 2008

    2008

  40. [48]

    Nonlinear programming,

    D. P. Bertsekas, “Nonlinear programming,” J. Oper . Res. Soc. , vol. 48, p. 334, 1997

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.