Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Global regularity results for the fractional heat equation and application to a class of non-linear KPZ problems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read New pointwise estimates on the fractional gradient of the Dirichlet heat kernel yield global regularity for the fractional heat equation and, via a compactness argument, short-time existence for a fractional KPZ problem with nonlocal…

desk verdict A genuinely new kernel estimate and a solid parabolic regularity program, but the advertised range rho < max{1,2s} is not proved; restrict statements or fill the gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06875 v1 pith:JHLUKQYF submitted 2025-06-07 math.AP

Boumediene Abdellaoui , Somia Atmani , Kheireddine Biroud , El-Haj Laamri This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35B0535K1535B4035K5535K65
keywords fractionalheatequationkernelestimatesBesselpotentialspacesSobolevKardar-Parisi-Zhangnonlocalgradientcompactnesspointwisebounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves global regularity, up to the boundary, for solutions of the fractional heat equation $w_t+(-\Delta)^s w=h$ on a bounded domain with zero exterior Dirichlet data, when the data are merely integrable ($h\in L^m$, $w_0\in L^\sigma$). The engine is a new pointwise bound on the fractional gradient $(-\Delta)^{\rho/2}P_\Omega(x,y,t)$ of the Dirichlet heat kernel for $\rho\in[s,\min\{1,2s\})$, with explicit powers of the distance to the boundary and of small time. Feeding this bound into the representation formula for $w$ places $w$ in parabolic Bessel potential spaces $L^r(0,T;L_0^{\rho,r}(\Omega))$ and in fractional Sobolev spaces, with constants controlled by the data norms, and it makes the solution map $(w_0,h)\mapsto w$ compact. As an application, the authors obtain short-time existence for a Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation with fractional diffusion and the nonlocal gradient term $|(-\Delta)^{s/2}u|^q+f$. If correct, this gives a parameter regime in which $L^1$-type data still yield solutions with genuine fractional regularity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Dirichlet heat kernel $P_\Omega(x,y,t)$ of the fractional Laplacian on a bounded domain, together with its standard two-sided estimate $P_\Omega(x,y,t)\asymp (1\wedge \delta^s(x)/\sqrt t)(1\wedge \delta^s(y)/\sqrt t)\,t/(t^{1/(2s)}+|x-y|)^{N+2s}$ and gradient estimate $|\nabla_xP_\Omega|\le C(\delta(x)^{-1}\wedge t^{-1/(2s)})P_\Omega$. The new mechanism is Theorem 3.2's pointwise control of $(-\Delta)^{\rho/2}_xP_\Omega$: the proof splits the fractional Laplacian into integrations over $\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\Omega$ and $\Omega$, uses the gradient bound on the auxiliary function $\Theta_{y,t}(x)=(t^{1/(2s)}+|x-y|)^{N+\sigma}P_\Omega$, and chooses $\sigma=2s+\rho-1$ for $s\le 1/2$ or $\sigma=\rho$ for $s>1/2$ to balance the singular terms. The kernel bound is then transferred to solutions by the representation formula and by $L^p$ estimates for hyper-singular convolution-type integrals; compactness later uses a Marcinkiewicz-space characterization of Bessel potential spaces in terms of the difference quotient $(u(x)-u(y))|x-y|^{-(N/q+s)}$.

What would settle it

Find a bounded domain with the smoothness assumed here, or with only slightly less smoothness, where the bound $|\nabla_x P_\Omega(x,y,t)|\le C(\delta(x)^{-1}\wedge t^{-1/(2s)})P_\Omega(x,y,t)$ fails uniformly in $t$ and $x$; concretely, one could check this estimate near a boundary corner or in a $C^1$ domain with an explicit or numerically computed heat kernel for small $s$. A failure there would remove the foundation of Theorem 3.2 and of the regularity and existence theorems built on it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 3.2: for $s\in(0,1)$ and $\rho\in[s,\min\{1,2s\})$, the fractional Laplacian of the Dirichlet heat kernel satisfies the pointwise estimates (3.7) for $s\le 1/2$ and (3.8) for $s>1/2$, with the factor $(\delta^s(y)/\sqrt t\wedge 1)$ multiplying terms such as $\delta^{s-\rho}(x)(t^{1/(2s)}+|x-y|)^{-(N+s)}$, $t^{(2s-1)/(2s)}\log(D/|x-y|)$, and $|x-y|^{2s-1}$ over the natural kernel denominator. The paper then derives from these bounds, via the representation $w(x,t)=\int_\Omega w_0(y)P_\Omega(x,y,t)\,dy+\int_0^t\int_\Omega h(y,\tau)P_\Omega(x,y,t-\tau)\,dy\,d\tau$ and estimates for hyper-singular integrals, that $(-\Delta)^{\rho/2}w\in L^r(\Omega_T)$ with quantitative bounds depending only on the data norms; in particular $w\in L^r(0,T;L_0^{\rho,r}(\Omega))$ for the admissible $r$, both inside and outside $\Omega$. With further analysis, the same estimates give compactness of the data-to-solution map and existence for the fractional KPZ problem.

Load-bearing premise

The argument imports the sharp two-sided heat-kernel and gradient estimates for the Dirichlet fractional heat kernel in a regular bounded domain (Lemma 3.1) instead of proving them; if those estimates fail, or require boundary smoothness beyond what 'regular boundary' guarantees, the pointwise kernel bound and all downstream regularity, compactness, and KPZ existence results collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $s>1/4$ and $h\in L^m(\Omega_T)$, the fractional gradient $(-\Delta)^{\rho/2}w$ belongs to $L^r(\Omega_T)$ for a range of exponents $r$ above $m$, with norm bounded by $C(\Omega,T)\|h\|_{L^m}$; in particular $w\in L^r(0,T;L_0^{\rho,r}(\Omega))$.
  • For $h=0$, an $L^\sigma$ initial datum gives $(-\Delta)^{\rho/2}w(\cdot,t)\in L^p(\Omega)$ with explicit time singularities, and $w\in L^p(0,T;W_0^{s,p}(\Omega))$ when the stated integrability condition on $\sigma$ holds.
  • The data-to-solution operator $\Phi:(h,w_0)\mapsto w$ is compact as a map into $L^q(0,T;L_0^{\rho,q}(\Omega))$ for $q<\hat\kappa_{s,\rho}$, which is what allows Schauder fixed-point arguments.
  • For the fractional KPZ problem with nonlocal gradient, if $f\in L^m$ or $u_0\in L^\sigma$ in the stated parameter ranges, a weak solution exists on a short time interval $[0,T^*)$.
  • For $s>1/2$, the same regularity transfers to a fractional heat equation perturbed by a drift term satisfying the stated integrability condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the pointwise kernel bound isolates the boundary factors $\delta^{s-\rho}(x)$ and logarithmic terms, it suggests analogous weighted or boundary-Harnack estimates for parabolic nonlocal problems; one could test whether the factor $\delta^{s-\rho}$ is optimal by comparing with explicit kernels in domains where the Green function is known.
  • The authors note that the restriction $s>1/4$ appears naturally in the proof and leave open whether it is technical. A natural test is to run the same time-integration argument for $s\le 1/4$: if the $t^{(2s-1)/(2s)}$ singularities cannot be compensated by the kernel denominator, the threshold is genuine, whereas an improved small-time kernel bound would remove it.
  • The compactness proof, built on a Marcinkiewicz bound for $|u(x)-u(y)||x-y|^{-(N/q+s)}$, likely transfers to other nonlocal parabolic equations with $L^1$ data, such as fractional $p$-Laplacian or measure-data problems where classical Rellich compactness is unavailable.
  • The short-time existence result for the KPZ problem is local in time; extending it to global time would require a priori bounds preventing finite-time blowup, which are not derived here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops global regularity theory for the fractional heat equation with homogeneous exterior Dirichlet conditions on a bounded domain. The main tool is a new pointwise estimate for the fractional gradient of the Dirichlet heat kernel, stated for ρ ∈ [s, max{1,2s}). From this estimate the authors derive global regularity of (−Δ)^{ρ/2}w in parabolic Bessel potential and fractional Sobolev spaces, obtain L^p estimates with explicit constants, and prove compactness of the data-to-solution map (w_0,h) ↦ w. In the second part, these results are applied to a fractional KPZ equation with nonlocal gradient term |(−Δ)^{s/2}u|^q, where existence of small-time solutions is proved by Schauder's fixed-point theorem. The proof of the kernel estimate is detailed and self-contained up to imported heat-kernel bounds; the regularity theorems are then obtained by combining this estimate with hyper-singular integral estimates proved in the appendix.

Significance. If the claimed estimates hold for the stated range, the paper is a substantial contribution: it extends the elliptic Calderón–Zygmund framework of [4] to the parabolic setting, gives global rather than local regularity results, and provides a compactness result that is used to obtain existence for a class of fractional KPZ problems. The proof of the kernel estimate in the range actually treated (ρ < min{1,2s}) is careful and technically involved, and the auxiliary integral estimates in Section 8 are of independent interest. The KPZ application is meaningful because the nonlinearity only uses ρ = s, so the main application is not harmed by the restriction discussed below. However, the advertised range ρ < max{1,2s} is not proved, and this affects the central regularity claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 3.2, Theorem 1.1, Theorem 4.2] The proof of Theorem 3.2 begins with 'Fixed ρ > 0 such that s ≤ ρ < min{1,2s}' and every estimate (3.10)–(3.37) is derived under this restriction. Yet Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.4 and Theorem 4.2 (and similarly Theorem 4.10 and Corollary 3.6) state the same pointwise bound for every ρ ∈ [s, max{1,2s}), which is strictly larger when s ≠ 1/2. For example, with s = 0.3, ρ = 0.8 lies in [s, max{1,2s}) = [0.3,1) but not in [s, min{1,2s}) = [0.3,0.6), and Theorem 4.2(1) applies estimate (3.7) at this ρ. Since Theorem 3.2 is the only source of the kernel estimate, all statements allowing ρ ≥ min{1,2s} are currently unsupported. The authors should either extend the proof to the wider range or restrict all statements to ρ ∈ [s, min{1,2s}); the KPZ application, which only uses ρ = s, does not by itself justify the stronger advertised range.
  2. [Theorem 4.10(2)] In the case 2s + ρ < 1, the first bullet sets the threshold m ≤ (N+2s)/(2s−ρ), while the proof and the parallel statements in Theorem 1.5 and Corollary 4.13 use the threshold (N+2s)/(4s−1). For ρ = s and s < 1/3 these thresholds differ, and as stated the two bullets do not cover the parameter plane consistently; in particular the claimed range for r can be empty. This is a load-bearing inconsistency in a central theorem statement and should be corrected.
  3. [Lemma 3.1] The two-sided heat-kernel estimate (3.2) and the gradient bound (3.3) are imported from [8,16,21,43] and are known in general for domains with C^{1,1} or otherwise sufficiently regular boundaries. The standing assumption in Section 1 is only 'regular boundary'. Since Lemma 3.1 is the sole input for Theorem 3.2 and hence for all downstream regularity, compactness and KPZ results, the precise boundary regularity needed for (3.2)–(3.3) must be stated and, if necessary, verified for the domains covered by Theorems 1.1, 1.4 and 4.10.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and title] The title and abstract contain typographical artifacts ('RESUL TS', 'HEA T', 'A TION', 'majeur'); these should be cleaned in a revised version.
  2. [Proposition 4.5] The proof of Proposition 4.5 refers to 'Proposition 2.15', but the cited statement is Theorem 2.15.
  3. [Section 6] The preamble to Section 6 states 'q ≤ 1', whereas Theorems 6.2 and 6.4 require q > 1 in all branches; the text should read q ≥ 1 (with the status of q = 1 made explicit).
  4. [Section 7] In the first extension, 'Dirichlet heart kernel' should be 'Dirichlet heat kernel'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; kernel estimates are imported from external/prior literature and the central regularity derivation is self-contained.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is not circular. The new pointwise kernel estimates (Theorem 3.2) are obtained from Lemma 3.1's two-sided heat-kernel bounds and gradient bound, which are imported from external probability literature [16,21,43] and the authors' own [8]; those are published, parameter-free estimates with assumptions (regular boundary, 0<s<1) that do not contain the target Bessel-regularity conclusion. The subsequent Section 4 estimates are direct integrations of the representation formula w=P_Omega*w_0+integral P_Omega*h against the kernel bound, using the hyper-singular integral theorems 4.1 and 4.9 whose proofs are given in the appendix; no data are fitted and no quantity is defined through the quantity claimed to be predicted. The compactness theorem 5.4 is derived from these a priori bounds plus the external Marcinkiewicz characterization [35] and standard Hardy/truncation estimates, not from the conclusion itself. The only overlap with the authors' earlier [4] is Corollary 1.3, whose Green-function estimate is explicitly acknowledged there as already proved in [4]; that is a minor overlap rather than a reduction. The consistency gap between Theorem 3.2's restriction rho in [s,min{1,2s}) and Theorem 1.1's advertised range rho in [s,max{1,2s}) is a real correctness concern for the extra range, but it is an overclaim, not circularity: nothing in the paper forces the wider statement by definition or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical constants are fitted; the only parameters are exponents (sigma, rho, m, q, eta, alpha, m0) chosen inside the proofs. The heavy lifting is done by imported kernel bounds, the L^1 existence theory, and a Marcinkiewicz characterization of Bessel spaces; these are listed as axioms.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Heat kernel bounds (3.2)-(3.3) of Lemma 3.1 hold on Omega, in particular |grad_x P_Omega| <= C(1/delta(x) and t^{-1/(2s)}) P_Omega.
    Cited to [8,16,21,43]; used throughout Section 3 to control I22 and the boundary terms. Requires regular (practically C^{1,1}) boundary, which the paper only vaguely states as 'regular boundary' in Section 1.
  • standard math Existence, uniqueness and the representation formula w(x,t) = integral w0 P_Omega + integral integral h P_Omega for L^1 data hold (from [47, Theorem 28]).
    Equation (3.1) is the starting point of all Section 4 estimates; it presupposes the L^1 existence theory of [47].
  • ad hoc to paper The restriction s > 1/4 and the smallness condition rho-s < min{s/(N+2s), (4s-1)/(N+2s-1)} are admissible.
    Introduced to force convergence of the time integrals in Corollary 3.4 and Theorem 4.10; the authors state in Remark 1.7 that they do not know whether s > 1/4 is necessary.
  • standard math Marcinkiewicz characterization (2.5) of Bessel potential spaces from [35, Theorem 1.2] holds.
    Used in Proposition 5.2 and Theorem 5.4 to convert the weak-type estimates into strong convergence in L^q(0,T;L^{s,q}_0(Omega)).
  • standard math Hardy-type inequality (2.7) holds for W^{s,2}_0(Omega).
    Used in the proof of Proposition 5.2 to bound ||T_k(w)/delta^s||_{L^2(Omega_T)}; cited to [29].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global regularity results for the fractional heat equation and application to a class of non-linear KPZ problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JHLUKQYF

@misc{pith2026250606875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global regularity results for the fractional heat equation and application to a class of non-linear KPZ problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JHLUKQYF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06875}
}
abstract

In the first part of this paper, we prove the global regularity, in an adequate parabolic Bessel-Potential space and then in the corresponding parabolic fractional Sobolev space, of the unique solution to following fractional heat equation $ w_t+(-\Delta)^sw= h\;;\; w(x,t)=0 \text{ in } \; (\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\Omega)\times(0,T)\;;\; w(x,0)=w_0(x) \; \text{in}\; \Omega$, where $\Omega$ is an open bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^N$. The proof is based on a new pointwise estimate on the fractional gradient of the corresponding kernel. Moreover, we establish the compactness of $(w_0,h)\mapsto w$. As a majeur application, in the second part , we establish existence and regularity of solutions to a class of Kardar--Parisi--Zhang equations with fractional diffusion and a nonlocal gradient term. Additionally, several auxiliary results of independent interest are obtained.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Abdellaoui, A.J

    B. Abdellaoui, A.J. Fern´ andez, T. Leonori, A. Youness :Global Fractional Calder´ on-Zygmund Regularity. To appear in Communications in Contemporary Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021919972550004X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021919972550004x

  2. [1]

    Abdellaoui, A

    B. Abdellaoui, A. Attar, R. Bentifour, I. Peral :On the fractional p-laplacian parabolic problem with general data.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 197(2) (2018) 329-356

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    Abdellaoui, S

    B. Abdellaoui, S. Boukarabila, R. Bentifour, E.H. Laamri :Existence result for a class of KPZ problem with fractional diffusion and fractional gradient.Preprint 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [3]

    Abdellaoui, A

    B. Abdellaoui, A. J. Fern´ andez :Nonlinear fractional Laplacian problems with nonlocal ’gradient terms’. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 150(5)(2020), 2682-2718

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Abdellaoui, A.J

    B. Abdellaoui, A.J. Fern´ andez, T. Leonori, A. Youness :Deterministic KPZ equations with nonlocal gradient terms. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923-) (2022), 1-18

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Abdellaoui, P

    B. Abdellaoui, P. Ochoa, I. Peral :A note on quasilinear equations with fractional diffusion. Mathematics in Engineering Volume 3 (2021), no. 2, Paper No. 018, 28 pages

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Abdellaoui, I

    B. Abdellaoui, I. Peral :Towards a deterministic KPZ equation with fractional diffusion: the stationary problem.Non- linearity 31 (2018) 1260-1298. Corrigendum, Nonlinearity 33 (2020), no. 3, C1-1. arXiv :1609 .04561v3[math .AP], 2 Oct 2019

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Abdellaoui, I

    B. Abdellaoui, I. Peral, A. Primo, F. Soria :On the KPZ equation with fractional diffusion: Global regularity and existence results.Journal of Differential Equations 312 (2022), 65–147

    work page 2022

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Abels, G

    H. Abels, G. Grubb :MaximalL p-regularity forx-dependent fractional heat equations with Dirichlet conditions. Mathe- matische Annalen, 391(2025), 3295-3331

    2025

  2. [10]

    Adams :Sobolev spaces

    R.A. Adams :Sobolev spaces . Academic Press, New York, 1975

    1975

  3. [11]

    Adams, L.I

    D.R. Adams, L.I. Hedberg :Function spaces and potential theory. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 314, 1996

    1996

  4. [12]

    Bonforte, Y

    M. Bonforte, Y. Sire, J.L. Vazquez :Optimal existence and uniqueness theory for the fractional heat equation.Nonlinear Analysis: TMA. 153, 2017, 142-168

    2017

  5. [13]

    Biccari, M

    U. Biccari, M. Warma, E. Zuazua :Local elliptic regularity for the Dirichlet fractional Laplacian. Advanced Nonlinear Studies 17 (2), 387-409

  6. [14]

    Biccari, M

    U. Biccari, M. Warma, E. Zuazua :Local regularity for fractional heat equations.Recent Advances in PDEs: Analysis, Numerics and Control, SEMA SIMAI Springer Series, Volume 17 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Bogdan, T

    K. Bogdan, T. Byczkowski :Potential theory for the a-stable Schr¨ odinger operator on bounded Lipschitz domain. Studia Math. 133 (1999), 53–92

    1999

  8. [16]

    Bogdan, T

    K. Bogdan, T. Jakubowski :Estimates of Heat Kernel of Fractional Laplacian Perturbed by Gradient Operators. Commun. Math. Phys. 271, (2007), 179-198

    2007

  9. [17]

    Bogdan, T

    K. Bogdan, T. Kulczycki, M. Kwa´ snicki :Estimates and structure of a-harmonic functions. Probab. Theory Related Fields 140(3-4) (2008), 345–381

    2008

  10. [18]

    Bogdan, T

    K. Bogdan, T. Kulczycki, A. Nowak :Gradient estimates for harmonic andq−harmonic functions of Symmetric stable processes.Illinois J. Math. 46(2) (2002), 541–556

    2002

  11. [19]

    Bucur, E

    C. Bucur, E. Valdinoci :Nonlocal Diffusion and Applications . Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    H. Chen, L. V´ eron :Semilinear fractional elliptic equations with gradient nonlinearity involving measures.J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 5467–5492. 48 B. ABDELLAOUI, S. ATMANI, K. BIROUD, E.-H. LAAMRI

    2014

  13. [21]

    Z. Chen, P. Kim, R. Song :Dirichlet heat kernel estimates for fractional Laplacian with gradient perturbation.The Annals of Probability 40(6) (2012), 2483–2538

    2012

  14. [22]

    P. Chen, R. Song, L. Xie, Y. Xie :Heat kernel estimates for Dirichlet fractional Laplacian with gradient perturbation. J. Korean Math Soc, 56 (2019), 91-111

    2019

  15. [23]

    R. Cont, P. Tankov :Financial modelling with jump processes. Financial Mathematics Series, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    Corwin :The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class

    I. Corwin :The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class. Random Matrices Theory Appl. 1(1) (2012), 1130001

    2012

  17. [25]

    Daoud, E.H

    M. Daoud, E.H. Laamri :Fractional Laplacians : A short survey.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. - S 15(1) (2022), 95-116

    2022

  18. [26]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, E. Valdinoci :Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. math. 136(5) (2012), 521-573

    2012

  19. [27]

    Dipierro, A

    S. Dipierro, A. Figalli, E. Valdinoci :Strongly nonlocal dislocation dynamics in crystals.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 39 (12) (2014), 2351-2387

    2014

  20. [28]

    Edmunds, W.D

    D.E. Edmunds, W.D. Evans :Fractional Sobolev Spaces and Inequalities . Cambridge University Press. 2023. ISBN 978- 1-009-25463-2

    2023

  21. [29]

    Edmunds, R

    D.E. Edmunds, R. Hurri-Syrjanen, A.V. Vahakanga :Fcational Hardy-Type inequalities in domain with uniformely fat complement. Proc. American Mathematical Sociely (142)(3), 2014, 897-907

    2014

  22. [30]

    Felsinger, M

    M. Felsinger, M. Kassmann :Local regularity of parabolic nonlocal operators. Comm. PDE (38) (2013), 1539–1573

    2013

  23. [31]

    Fernandez-Real, X

    X. Fernandez-Real, X. Ros-Oton :Boundary regularity for the fractional heat equation. Rev. Acad. Cienc. Ser. A Math. 110 (2016), 49-64

    2016

  24. [32]

    Gilboa, S

    G. Gilboa, S. Osher :Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing.Multiscale Model. Simul., 7 (2008), 1005-1028

    2008

  25. [33]

    Grubb:Fractional Laplacians on domains, a development of H¨ ormander’s theory ofµ-transmission pseudodifferential operators

    G. Grubb:Fractional Laplacians on domains, a development of H¨ ormander’s theory ofµ-transmission pseudodifferential operators. Adv. Math. 268 (2015), 478-528

    2015

  26. [34]

    Grubb :Regularity inL p Sobolev espace of solution to the fractional heat equation.J

    G. Grubb :Regularity inL p Sobolev espace of solution to the fractional heat equation.J. Funct. Anal. 274(9)(2018), 2634-2660

    2018

  27. [35]

    Gu, P.-L

    Q. Gu, P.-L. Yung :A new formula for theL p norm.Journal of Functional Analysis, 281(2021). 109075

    2021

  28. [36]

    Hairer :Solving the KPZ equation

    M. Hairer :Solving the KPZ equation. Ann. Math. 178 (2013) 559-664

    2013

  29. [37]

    Jakubowski, K

    T. Jakubowski, K. Szczypkowski :Time-dependent gradient perturbations of fractional Laplacian. J. Evol. Equ. 10 (2010), 319-339

    2010

  30. [38]

    Jarohs, A

    S. Jarohs, A. Saldana, and T. Weth :A New Look at the Fractional Poisson Problem via the Logarithmic Laplacian. J. Funct. Anal., 279(11), 2020, 108732

    2020

  31. [39]

    Karch, W.A

    G. Karch, W.A. Woyczynski:Fractal Hamilton-Jacobi-KPZ equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 360 (5) (2008) 2423-2442

    2008

  32. [40]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, Y.C. Zhang :Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 889-892

    1986

  33. [41]

    Katzav :Growing surfaces with anomalous diffusion: Results for the fractal Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation.Phys

    E. Katzav :Growing surfaces with anomalous diffusion: Results for the fractal Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation.Phys. Rev. E 68 (2003), 031607

    2003

  34. [42]

    Kellog :Direct observation of substitutional-atom trapping on a metal surface.Phys

    G.L. Kellog :Direct observation of substitutional-atom trapping on a metal surface.Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994), 1662-1665

    1994

  35. [43]

    P. Kim, R. Song :Dirichlet Heat Kernel Estimates for Stable Processes with Singular Drift in UnboundedC 1,1 Open Sets. Potential Analysis 41(2) (2014), 555-581

    2014

  36. [44]

    Kulczycki, M

    T. Kulczycki, M. Ryznar :Gradient estimates of Harmonic function and transition densities for Levy processes.Trans- action of the American Mathematical Sociely, Vol. 368, No 1, (2016), 281-318

    2016

  37. [45]

    Kuusi, G

    T. Kuusi, G. Mingione, Y. Sire :Nonlocal equations with measure data.Comm. Math. Phys., 337 (2015), 1317-1368

    2015

  38. [46]

    Leoni :A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces.Graduate Studies in Mathematics

    G. Leoni :A First Course in Fractional Sobolev Spaces.Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 229, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Leonori, I

    T. Leonori, I. Peral, A. Primo, F. Soria :Basic estimates for solution of elliptic and parabolic equations for a class of nonlocal operators. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A. 35(12), (2015), 6031-6068

    2015

  40. [48]

    Y. Lou, X. Zhang, S. Osher, A. Bertozzi :Image recovery via nonlocal operators.Journal of Scientific Computing, 42 (2010), pp. 185-197

    2010

  41. [49]

    Mann, W.A

    J.A. Mann, W.A. Woyczynski :Growing fractal interfaces in the presence of self-similar hopping surface diffusion. Physica A 291 (2001), 159-183

    2001

  42. [50]

    Molica Bisci, V.D

    G. Molica Bisci, V.D. Radulescu, R. Servadei :Variational methods for nonlocal fractional problems .Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Nowak :H s,p regularity theory for a class of nonlocal elliptic equations.Nonlinear Anal., 195:111730,28,2020

    S. Nowak :H s,p regularity theory for a class of nonlocal elliptic equations.Nonlinear Anal., 195:111730,28,2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Ponce :Elliptic PDEs: measures and capacities

    A.C. Ponce :Elliptic PDEs: measures and capacities . From the Poisson equation to nonlinear Thomas-Fermi problems, Vol. 23. Tracts in Mathematics, European Math. Soc. 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Riesz :Int´ egrales de Riemann–Liouville et potentiels,Acta Sci

    M. Riesz :Int´ egrales de Riemann–Liouville et potentiels,Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 9 (1938), 1-42

    1938

  46. [54]

    T.Runst, W.Sickel :Sobolev spaces of fractional order,nemytskij operators,and nonlinear partial differential equations.In Sobolev Spaces of Fractional Order,Nemytskij Operators,and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations.de Gruyter,2011

    2011

  47. [55]

    Schikorra :Integro-differential harmonic maps into spheres

    A. Schikorra :Integro-differential harmonic maps into spheres. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 40(3) (2015),506- 539

    2015

  48. [56]

    Shieh, D

    T.T. Shieh, D. Spector :On a new class of fractional partial differential equations. Adv. Calc. Var., 8(4) (2014), 321-336

    2014

  49. [57]

    E. M. Stein :The characterization of functions arising as potentials. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1961), 102-104

    1961

  50. [58]

    E. M. Stein :Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions . Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J., 1970

    1970

  51. [59]

    W. A. Woyczy´ nski :Burgers-KPZ turbulence. G¨ ottingen lectures. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1700. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

    1998

  52. [60]

    Younes1, K

    A. Younes1, K. Biroud, F. Mahmoudi and B. Abdellaoui :Fractional KPZ system with nonlocal ”gradient terms”, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A. 44(2), (2024), 342-364. 49 B. Abdellaoui, S. Atmani: Laboratoire d’Analyse Nonlin ´eaire et Math´ematiques Appliqu´ees. Universit´e AbouBe...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.