Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 94 references

Recycled Gas Dominates the Metal-rich Fuel of Supermassive Black Holes

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Across 30 simulated massive galaxies, gas recycled within the host galaxy supplies roughly 59% of the mass accreted by supermassive black holes, and this gas is metal-rich from early cosmic times.

desk verdict The chemistry is new and the census is clean, but the 58.7% recycled-gas fraction is a subgrid-Bondi-selected number, so the title should not outrun the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12462 v1 pith:JI6VX5XO submitted 2026-08-12 astro-ph.GA

Dongyun Kwak , Ena Choi , Hannah Jhee , Rachel S. Somerville , Thorsten Naab , Michaela Hirschmann , Jaejin Shin , Jong-Hak Woo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleisupermassiveblackholeschemicalabundanceshydrodynamicalsimulationsgasrecyclingholefuelingquasarmetallicitycosmologicalzoom-in
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the gas feeding supermassive black holes in massive galaxies is predominantly recycled material — gas that was once inside stars in the host galaxy and returned to the interstellar medium through stellar winds and supernova explosions. Tracing individual gas particles in 30 cosmological zoom-in simulations, the authors find that recycled gas makes up on average 58.7% of all gas accreted by the black holes, with merger-delivered (external), smooth intergalactic, and early-assembly gas contributing smaller fractions. Because recycled gas is born in a metal-rich central environment, it arrives at the black hole already enriched, which naturally explains why quasar broad-line regions show high, roughly redshift-independent metallicities. If this is right, the metal-rich fuel of black holes is a byproduct of ordinary stellar aging in galaxies rather than of mergers or exotic nuclear-scale enrichment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the traced gas particle: each gas element that ever joins the black hole is followed from the moment of black-hole seeding to accretion, with its formation site, trajectory, and chemical history recorded at every simulation snapshot. The argument's load-bearing device is the four-way origin census these trajectories make possible — Recycled, Early, External, and Smooth — combined with the mass-weighted abundance histories that assign each class its characteristic $[{\rm Fe/H}]$ and $[{\rm Mg/Fe}]$. This particle-level classification is what converts the raw simulation into the claim that recycled stellar ejecta dominate the fuel budget.

What would settle it

A zoom-in simulation of the same halo sample that resolves the accretion flow down to sub-parsec scales, rather than using the soft-Bondi subgrid recipe, would settle the claim: if the gas reaching the black hole in such runs is dominated by cold, metal-poor material from the cosmic web or from mergers instead of by recycled stellar ejecta, the 58.7% recycled census would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the cosmological gas supply to supermassive black holes in massive galaxies is dominated by material recycled through stellar evolution within the main galaxy. By classifying the accreted gas into four origin categories — Early (first entering the main halo at $z\ge 3$), External (from other halos or subhalos), Recycled (from asymptotic giant branch winds and supernova ejecta inside the main galaxy), and Smooth (from the intergalactic medium) — the authors find sample-averaged accreted-mass fractions of 58.7% Recycled, 19.8% External, 11.8% Smooth, and 9.8% Early. Recycled gas is intrinsically metal-rich already at early epochs, while the other components become enriched gradually while residing in the galactic environment before accretion. The resulting $[{\rm Fe/H}]$ of the accreted population shows only weak redshift evolution and $[{\rm Mg/Fe}]$ declines mildly, both broadly consistent with observed quasar broad-line region abundances. The authors conclude that the metal-rich nature of supermassive black hole fuel arises naturally from cosmological galaxy evolution and stellar recycling, and need not invoke sub-parsec enrichment processes.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that unresolved small-scale physics near the black hole does not change which large-scale gas reservoirs actually feed it, so the simulation's simplified subgrid accretion recipe reliably selects the gas that a real black hole would consume.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mergers are not the dominant long-term fuel source for supermassive black hole growth in massive group-scale galaxies; recycled stellar ejecta sustain the accretion budget instead.
  • The high, nearly redshift-independent metallicities inferred for quasar broad-line regions need not be produced by sub-parsec enrichment; they follow naturally from galaxy-scale stellar recycling.
  • Because recycled gas is preferentially metal-rich, gas accreted by the black hole is systematically more enriched than the average interstellar gas of the host galaxy, especially at z ~ 1-3.
  • The mild [Mg/Fe] decline of accreted gas toward low redshift is a direct prediction of delayed Type Ia supernova iron enrichment that could be checked against quasar abundance-ratio evolution.
  • In quenched massive galaxies at low redshift, stellar mass loss alone can continue to feed the black hole, providing a physical basis for observed AGN activity in quiescent galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If recycled gas dominates the fuel supply, quasar metallicity should correlate more strongly with a host galaxy's old stellar mass and age than with recent merger activity or gas-richness, a distinction testable with resolved stellar-population observations of quasar hosts.
  • The sample is restricted to massive, group-scale, largely quenched galaxies at z = 0; in lower-mass, star-forming, or gas-rich systems the recycled fraction is likely smaller, and smooth or external gas may dominate at high redshift.
  • The weak redshift evolution of the accreted gas iron abundance implies that, at a fixed epoch, the gas reaching a black hole should be as metal-rich as the most enriched gas in the inner circumgalactic medium, which could be tested by comparing quasar broad-line metallicities with host stellar metallicities at matched stellar mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 30 high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations of massive galaxies from the Choi et al. (2017) suite, tracing individual gas particles that are accreted by the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) under a soft-Bondi prescription. The accreted gas is classified into four origin categories: Recycled, Early, External, and Smooth. The authors report that, on average, 58.70% of the accreted gas mass is Recycled (originating from stellar mass loss within the main galaxy), that this component is already metal-rich at early epochs, and that the gas reaching the SMBH is more metal-rich than the average central galaxy gas. They further examine the redshift evolution of [Fe/H] and [Mg/Fe], find weak trends, and argue that the simulated abundance ratios are broadly compatible with observed quasar broad-line-region metallicities. The paper concludes that metal-rich SMBH fuel is a natural consequence of cosmological galaxy evolution and stellar recycling, and it explicitly frames the results as providing cosmological boundary conditions rather than a direct model of the sub-parsec accretion flow.

Significance. If the reported census is robust, the paper makes a valuable contribution by linking SMBH fueling to internal stellar recycling and by providing a physically grounded explanation for the high, weakly evolving metallicities inferred in quasar environments. The strengths include the large 30-galaxy zoom-in sample, the explicit particle tracing with an 11-element chemical network, the systematic treatment of four origin channels, and the candid enumeration of limitations in Section 4.4. The paper also shows appropriate restraint in treating [Mg/Fe] as a secondary diagnostic and in labeling the observational comparison as qualitative. The central concern is that the headline quantitative result, the 58.70% recycled fraction, is not yet shown to be robust to numerical resolution or to the choice of subgrid accretion model, which is load-bearing for the paper's main claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1, Figure 1] The central quantitative claim that Recycled gas constitutes 58.70% of the accreted mass rests on a single simulation resolution and a single subgrid accretion prescription; no resolution-convergence test is reported, even though the gas distribution and feedback behavior in such simulations can change with resolution. Please add a convergence test on a subset of runs at higher resolution, or explicitly reframe the headline result as conditional on the adopted numerical setup.
  2. [§2.2, item 2] The Early category is defined by first accretion onto the main halo at z≥3, and the text states that recycled gas produced at z>3 is deliberately assigned to Early rather than Recycled. This makes the origin categories non-exclusive and could bias the chemical comparison between Early and Recycled gas reported in Section 3. Please quantify how many z>3 recycled particles are placed in Early and demonstrate that the main conclusions are unchanged if they are reclassified.
  3. [§4.4] The paper concedes that small-scale physics can modify the accretion budget, yet the title and summary assert that Recycled gas dominates the metal-rich fuel of SMBHs. Because the traced sample is selected by the stochastic soft-Bondi criterion, which preferentially chooses dense, low-sound-speed gas, the census may overrepresent centrally enriched recycled ejecta relative to an inflow-based accounting. A minimal remedy is to report the origin distribution of gas within r10 as an accretion-independent reference, and to adjust the conclusions to the demonstrated 'gas reservoir delivered to the smallest resolved scales' rather than to the final accretion flow.
  4. [§4.2, footnote 7] The paper states that the comparison with quasar BLR abundances should be interpreted qualitatively, and the footnote notes that the observational values are not direct intrinsic abundances. This is a reasonable caution, but the abstract's phrase 'broadly compatible' is stronger than the analysis supports; please make the abstract and the conclusions reflect the qualitative nature of this comparison more explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1] The sample-averaged recycled fraction is quoted as 58.70% without a scatter or range; given the visible system-to-system variation, please quote the standard deviation or interquartile range as well.
  2. [§2.2] The definition of r10 as 0.1×r_vir is used to define the central galaxy, but the text does not state whether the same r10 criterion is applied consistently at all redshifts for the classification; please clarify.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract says the abundance ratios 'are broadly compatible with the high metallicities inferred for quasar broad-line regions,' but the body's limitation statement is stronger; aligning the abstract with the body would improve precision.
  4. [General] The draft header includes the string 'LATEXtwocolumnstyle', which appears to be a formatting artifact; this should be cleaned up before final submission.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; only the metal-richness of the 'Recycled' category is definitional, while the 58.70% dominance is a genuine simulation output.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.2 category definition and Section 3 (Figure 2 caption text)]
    "Recycled gas originates from stellar mass loss within the central region of the main galaxy and is therefore already chemically enriched when it is released into the interstellar medium."

    In Section 2.2, 'Recycled gas' is defined as 'gas originating from stellar evolution within the main galaxy, including AGB winds and SN explosions,' and the simulation's enrichment model deposits metals from SN/AGB yield tables onto gas. Stellar ejecta are therefore metal-enriched by construction, so the statement that recycled gas is 'already chemically enriched' and 'intrinsically metal rich' is an immediate consequence of the category definition and the input yields, not an independent numerical prediction. This does not compromise the main census result: the 58.70% recycled fraction and the chemical state of the total accreted population are outputs of the simulation, so the circularity is limited to the characterization of the recycled component itself.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim, that recycled gas constitutes 58.70% of the accreted gas mass in the sample, is a simulation output obtained by tracing individual gas particles; it is not fitted to quasar metallicity observations and is not forced by any normalization or scoring step. The particle-tracing methodology is inherited from Paper I (Choi et al. 2024), but the present analysis re-derives the census on a larger, independent sample of 30 galaxies, so the self-citation is methodological rather than load-bearing. The comparison with BLR abundances from Yoshii et al. (2022) is an external benchmark and is explicitly described as qualitative, with no parameter adjustment to match it. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The only by-construction element is that the 'Recycled' category is defined as gas originating from stellar evolution, which in the adopted enrichment model is metal-enriched stellar ejecta; therefore the finding that recycled gas is already metal-rich is largely definitional. That minor self-definitional step does not propagate to the dominance fraction, which is independently determined, so the overall circularity is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported origin fractions and abundance ratios are outputs of the adopted subgrid model (star formation, stellar yields, feedback, BH accretion). The paper contributes the particle-tracing analysis and physical interpretation, not a first-principles derivation of these modeling parameters. No new entities or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • AGN mechanical and radiative feedback efficiency parameters = Not specified in paper (calibrated in Choi et al. 2015, 2017)
    Feedback strength regulates star formation and BH growth, shaping the gas reservoir from which accretion is drawn.
  • Soft-Bondi accretion probability parameters = Not specified in paper
    The probabilistic accretion criterion and Bondi radius selection determine which gas particles are sampled, directly affecting the origin census.
  • Stellar yield normalization parameters for SNIa, SNII, and AGB enrichment = Not specified in paper (adopted from Iwamoto 1999, Woosley and Weaver 1995, Karakas 2010)
    The chemical abundance ratios and recycled-gas metal content depend on these yield inputs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The adopted subgrid models for star formation, stellar feedback, and chemical enrichment (Aumer et al. 2013; Nunez et al. 2017) are accurate enough to reproduce the metal enrichment of real galaxies.
    Invoked throughout; the entire chemical abundances and recycled-gas fractions are outputs of these models.
  • domain assumption The Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton soft accretion prescription selects the same gas population that real SMBHs accrete on unresolved scales.
    Section 2.1; if small-scale accretion physics changes the selection, the origin census could change.
  • domain assumption Gas particles retain their identity through mass deposition, metal mixing, and particle splitting, allowing reliable tracing.
    Section 2.2; tracing relies on particle IDs surviving mass injection and splitting.
  • standard math WMAP3 cosmological parameters (h=0.72, Omega_b=0.044, Omega_dm=0.26, Omega_Lambda=0.74, sigma8=0.77, ns=0.95) describe the universe.
    Section 2.1, initial conditions; standard cosmological framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recycled Gas Dominates the Metal-rich Fuel of Supermassive Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JI6VX5XO

@misc{pith2026260812462,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recycled Gas Dominates the Metal-rich Fuel of Supermassive Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JI6VX5XO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12462}
}
abstract

Understanding the origin and chemical properties of gas accreted by supermassive black holes (SMBHs) is essential for linking black hole growth to galaxy evolution. Using a suite of 30 high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations, we investigate the chemical properties of gas accreted onto SMBHs in massive galaxies with stellar masses of $10^{10.9-11.9}\,\rm M_\odot$ and black hole masses of $10^{8.5-9.7}\,\rm M_\odot$ at $z=0$. By tracing the full cosmological histories of individual gas particles, we identify their origins and enrichment pathways. The accreted gas is classified into four categories: ``early'' gas accreted during the early assembly phase of the main halo, ``external'' gas originating from other galaxies or subhalos, ``recycled'' gas enriched through stellar evolution processes within the primary galaxy, including asymptotic giant branch (AGB) winds and supernova ejecta, and ``smooth'' gas accreted from the intergalactic medium. We find that recycled gas dominates the accretion budget and is already metal rich at early epochs. Gas from other origins typically undergoes gradual chemical enrichment within the galactic environment prior to black hole accretion. The mean abundance ratios show only weak redshift evolution and are broadly compatible with the high metallicities inferred for quasar broad-line regions. Our results suggest that metal-rich gas supply to SMBHs arises naturally from cosmological galaxy evolution and stellar recycling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12462 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Census of the cosmological origin of gas particles accreted onto the central SMBHs in each simulated galaxy. The accreted gas is classified into four categories: Early (orange), Smooth (cyan), Recycled (red), and External (blue). The first row beneath the x-axis lists the virial mass of each galaxy, while the second row indicates the final BH mass (MBH) at z = 0. Across the sample, gas originating from stellar mass … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative evolutionary pathways of gas particles accreted onto the central SMBHs in two example galaxies, m0053 (left) and m0125 (right). For each gas-origin category, five representative particles are shown. (Top) Radial trajectories of the accreted gas particles, expressed as distances from the galaxy center normalized by the virial radius (r/rvir), illustrating their large-scale dynamical histories prior to … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Redshift evolution of the mass-weighted chemical abundance ratios of gas particles accreted onto the central SMBHs in the simulations. Shaded regions indicate the 1σ dispersion around the mass-weighted mean trends. (Top) Evolution of [Fe/H] and [Mg/Fe] as a function of redshift, shown separately for different gas-origin categories. The side histograms show the distributions of [Fe/H] and [Mg/Fe] for each category. (… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the redshift evolution of the star formation rate (SFR), black hole accretion rate (BHAR), and chemical abundance ratios for gas and stars within galaxies (r < r10 = 0.1×rvir), together with those for gas particles ac￾creted onto the central SMBHs. In the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L., & Georgakakis, A

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., & Georgakakis, A. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 1225, doi: 10.1093/MNRAS/STX2700

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2700 2018

  2. [2]

    L., & Georgakakis, A

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., & Georgakakis, A. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 484, 4360, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz125

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz125 2019

  3. [3]

    L., & Kocevski, D

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., & Kocevski, D. D. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 4860, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2103 Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Quataert, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, L109, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx161 12Kwak et al. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Dav´ e, R., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A.,¨Ozel, F., & Hopkins, P...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2103 2022

  4. [4]

    A., & Plesha, R

    Arav, N., Xu, X., Miller, T., Kriss, G. A., & Plesha, R. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 247, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab66af

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab66af 2020

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    D., Naab, T., & Scannapieco, C

    Aumer, M., White, S. D., Naab, T., & Scannapieco, C. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 434, 3142, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1230

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1230 2013

  7. [7]

    J., Martini, P., Nelson, C

    Barth, A. J., Martini, P., Nelson, C. H., & Ho, L. C. 2003, ApJL, 594, L95, doi: 10.1086/378735

    doi:10.1086/378735 2003

  8. [8]

    S., Wechsler, R

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Wu, H.-Y. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 762, 109, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/109 2013

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 779, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/136

    Bellovary, J., Brooks, A., Volonteri, M., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 779, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/136

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    L., Watson, M

    Birchall, K. L., Watson, M. G., Aird, J., & Starling, R. L. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 4756, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1723

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    1952, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 112, 195, doi: 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    Bondi, H. 1952, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 112, 195, doi: 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    1952 doi

  4. [12]

    1944, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 104, 273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/104.5.273

    Bondi, H., & Hoyle, F. 1944, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 104, 273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/104.5.273

    1944 doi

  5. [13]

    S., et al

    Brennan, R., Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2c4

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    S., et al

    Choi, E., Brennan, R., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abba7d

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Moster, B. P. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 442, 440, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu874

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    P., Naab, T., & Johansson, P

    Choi, E., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., & Johansson, P. H. 2012, Astrophysical Journal, 754, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/125

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    P., Naab, T., Oser, L., & Moster, B

    Choi, E., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., Oser, L., & Moster, B. P. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 449, 4105, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv575

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    P., Naab, T., et al

    Choi, E., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7849

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    S., Ostriker, J

    Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., Ostriker, J. P., Hirschmann, M., & Naab, T. 2024, ApJ, 964, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad245a

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    R., Dav´ e, R., Governato, F., et al

    Christensen, C. R., Dav´ e, R., Governato, F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 57, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/57

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Ciotti, L., & Ostriker, J. P. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 665, 1038, doi: 10.1086/519833

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 669, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17158.x De Rosa, G., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al

    Cullen, L., & Dehnen, W. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 669, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17158.x De Rosa, G., Decarli, R., Walter, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 56, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/56

    2010

  15. [23]

    C., et al

    Dietrich, M., Hamann, F., Shields, J. C., et al. 2003, ApJ, 589, 722, doi: 10.1086/374662

    2003 doi

  16. [24]

    C., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Wang, J.-G., Ho, L. C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/86

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 420, 2662, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20236.x

    Dubois, Y., Devriendt, J., Slyz, A., & Teyssier, R. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 420, 2662, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20236.x

    2012

  18. [26]

    2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx473

    Emsellem, E. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468, 751, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx473

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Wetzel, A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Gandhi, P. J., Wetzel, A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1059, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1584

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    S., et al

    Habouzit, M., Li, Y., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1940, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab496

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al

    Hafen, Z., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C. A., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1773

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa902

    Hafen, Z., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar=, D., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa902

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    1992, ApJL, 391, L53, doi: 10.1086/186397

    Hamann, F., & Ferland, G. 1992, ApJL, 391, L53, doi: 10.1086/186397

    1992 doi

  24. [32]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 589, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    H., Martin, C

    Ho, S. H., Martin, C. L., & Turner, M. L. 2019, ApJ, 875, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ec2

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Hoyle, F., & Lyttleton, R. A. 1939, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 34, 405

    1939

  27. [35]

    Y., Naab, T., Walch, S., Moster, B

    Hu, C. Y., Naab, T., Walch, S., Moster, B. P., & Oser, L. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 443, 1173, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1187

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    1999, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 125, 439, doi: 10.1086/313278

    Iwamoto, K., Brachwitz, F., Nomoto, K., et al. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 125, 439, doi: 10.1086/313278

    1999 doi

  29. [37]

    G., Starkenburg, T

    Iyer, K. G., Starkenburg, T. K., Bryan, G. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 174, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0334 Metal-rich Fuel for SMBHs13

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    S., et al

    Jhee, H., Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 548, stag435, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag435

    2026 doi

  31. [39]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d09

    Jiang, D., Onoue, M., Jiang, L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d09

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    2007, AJ, 134, 1150, doi: 10.1086/520811

    Jiang, L., Fan, X., Vestergaard, M., et al. 2007, AJ, 134, 1150, doi: 10.1086/520811

    2007 doi

  33. [41]

    2009, A&A, 494, L25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811415

    Juarez, Y., Maiolino, R., Mujica, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 494, L25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811415

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    Karakas, A. I. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 403, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16198.x

    2010

  35. [43]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  36. [45]

    D., Walter, F., Fan, X., et al

    Kurk, J. D., Walter, F., Fan, X., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 32, doi: 10.1086/521596

    2007 doi

  37. [46]

    N., & Kravtsov, A

    Leitner, S. N., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2011, Astrophysical Journal, 734, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/48

    2011 doi

  38. [47]

    1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    1998 doi

  39. [48]

    2003, ApJL, 596, L155, doi: 10.1086/379600

    Oliva, E. 2003, ApJL, 596, L155, doi: 10.1086/379600

    2003 doi

  40. [49]

    2015, ApJ, 810, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/51

    Mayer, L., Fiacconi, D., Bonoli, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/51

    2015 doi

  41. [50]

    P., et al

    Mazzucchelli, C., Ba˜ nados, E., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9185

    2017 doi

  42. [51]

    J., & Ma, C.-P

    McConnell, N. J., & Ma, C.-P. 2013, ApJ, 764, 184, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184

    2013 doi

  43. [52]

    C., et al

    Mercedes-Feliz, J., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Hayward, C. C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 3446, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2079

    2023 doi

  44. [53]

    K., et al

    Mercedes-Feliz, J., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Oh, B. K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.19905, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.19905

    2025 doi

  45. [54]

    D., Schaye, J., Bower, R

    Mitchell, P. D., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., & Crain, R. A. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3971, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa938

    2020 doi

  46. [55]

    J., Warren, S

    Mortlock, D. J., Warren, S. J., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2011, Nature, 474, 616, doi: 10.1038/nature10159

    2011 doi

  47. [56]

    Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. 2017, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 59, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019

    2017 doi

  48. [57]

    2006, A&A, 447, 157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054024

    Nagao, T., Marconi, A., & Maiolino, R. 2006, A&A, 447, 157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054024

    2006 doi

  49. [58]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 4778, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2070 N´ u˜ nez, A., Ostriker, J

    Ni, Q., Aird, J., Merloni, A., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 4778, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2070 N´ u˜ nez, A., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 836, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/204

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba193

    Onoue, M., Ba˜ nados, E., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba193

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    2010, Astrophysical Journal, 725, 2312, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2312

    Burkert, A. 2010, Astrophysical Journal, 725, 2312, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2312

    2010 doi

  52. [61]

    P., Choi, E., Ciotti, L., et al

    Ostriker, J. P., Choi, E., Ciotti, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 722, 642, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/642

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    Pellegrini, S., Ciotti, L., Negri, A., & Ostriker, J. P. 2018, ApJ, 856, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae07

    2018 doi

  54. [63]

    Proga, D., & Kallman, T. R. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 616, 688, doi: 10.1086/425117

    2004 doi

  55. [64]

    M., & Kallman, T

    Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 543, 686, doi: 10.1086/317154

    2000 doi

  56. [65]

    I., & Hayfield, T

    Read, J. I., & Hayfield, T. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 422, 3037, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20819.x

    2012

  57. [66]

    A., Bender, R., et al

    Richstone, D., Ajhar, E. A., Bender, R., et al. 1998, Nature, 385, A14, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9810378

    1998 doi arXiv

  58. [67]

    G., Riffel, R

    Riffel, R., Dahmer-Hahn, L. G., Riffel, R. A., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 3906, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac740

    2022 doi

  59. [68]

    D., Rembold, S

    Riffel, R., Mallmann, N. D., Rembold, S. B., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 5640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2234

    2023 doi

  60. [69]

    W., & Thomas, P

    Ritchie, B. W., & Thomas, P. A. 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 323, 743, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04268.x R¨ ottgers, B., Naab, T., Cernetic, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 152, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1490

    2001

  61. [70]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/203

    Sameshima, H., Yoshii, Y., & Kawara, K. 2017, ApJ, 834, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/203

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc33b

    Sameshima, H., Yoshii, Y., Matsunaga, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc33b

    2020 doi

  63. [72]

    N., Bellovary, J

    Sanchez, N. N., Bellovary, J. M., Holley-Bockelmann, K., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/AAC015

    2018 doi

  64. [74]

    Y., Ostriker, J

    Sazonov, S. Y., Ostriker, J. P., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 347, 144, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07184.x

    2004

  65. [75]

    C., Crain, R

    Segers, M. C., Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 456, 1235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2562

    2016 doi

  66. [76]

    S., Choi, E., Somerville, R

    Sharma, R. S., Choi, E., Somerville, R. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9461, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3836 14Kwak et al

    2024 doi

  67. [77]

    2004, ApJ, 614, 547, doi: 10.1086/423607

    Shemmer, O., Netzer, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, 547, doi: 10.1086/423607

    2004 doi

  68. [78]

    Shin, J., Nagao, T., Woo, J.-H., & Le, H. A. N. 2019, ApJ, 874, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab05da

    2019 doi

  69. [79]

    2021, ApJ, 917, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0adf

    Shin, J., Woo, J.-H., Nagao, T., Kim, M., & Bahk, H. 2021, ApJ, 917, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0adf

    2021 doi

  70. [80]

    Shin, J., Woo, J.-H., Nagao, T., & Kim, S. C. 2013, ApJ, 763, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/58

    2013 doi

  71. [81]

    2023, ApJ, 949, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc582

    Shipp, N., Panithanpaisal, N., Necib, L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc582

    2023 doi

  72. [82]

    D., & Hernquist, L

    Sijacki, D., Springel, V., Matteo, T. D., & Hernquist, L. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 380, 877, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12153.x

    2007

  73. [83]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 575, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1340

    Sijacki, D., Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 575, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1340

    2015 doi

  74. [84]

    Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013

    1998 doi arXiv

  75. [85]

    S., & Dav´ e, R

    Somerville, R. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2015, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 53, 51, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951

    2015 doi

  76. [86]

    S., Hopkins, P

    Somerville, R. S., Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Robertson, B. E., & Hernquist, L. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 391, 481, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x

    2008

  77. [87]

    N., Bean, R., Dore, O., et al

    Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 170, 377, doi: 10.1086/513700

    2007 doi

  78. [88]

    2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 364, 1105, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    Springel, V. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 364, 1105, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    2005

  79. [89]

    2005, ApJL, 620, L79, doi: 10.1086/428772

    Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2005, ApJL, 620, L79, doi: 10.1086/428772

    2005 doi

  80. [90]

    A., Bell, E

    Terrazas, B. A., Bell, E. F., Pillepich, A., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493, 1888, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa374 Tollet, ´E., Cattaneo, A., Macci` o, A. V., Dutton, A. A., &

    2020 doi

  81. [91]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 2511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz545

    Kang, X. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz545

    2019 doi

  82. [92]

    2022, ApJ, 925, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3a69

    Wang, S., Jiang, L., Shen, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3a69

    2022 doi

  83. [93]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/49

    Woo, J.-H., Schulze, A., Park, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/49

    2013 doi

  84. [94]

    Woo, J.-H., Yoon, Y., Park, S., Park, D., & Kim, S. C. 2015, ApJ, 801, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/38

    2015 doi

  85. [95]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  86. [96]

    2022, ApJ, 937, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8163

    Yoshii, Y., Sameshima, H., Tsujimoto, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 937, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8163

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.