pith. sign in

arxiv: 1509.06139 · v1 · pith:JINX3MUQnew · submitted 2015-09-21 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.DM· cs.LO· math.LO

On the number of lambda terms with prescribed size of their De Bruijn representation

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.DMcs.LOmath.LO
keywords termslambdabinarysizenumberclassesconstantfree
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

John Tromp introduced the so-called 'binary lambda calculus' as a way to encode lambda terms in terms of binary words. Later, Grygiel and Lescanne conjectured that the number of binary lambda terms with $m$ free indices and of size $n$ (encoded as binary words of length $n$) is $o(n^{-3/2} \tau^{-n})$ for $\tau \approx 1.963448\ldots$. We generalize the proposed notion of size and show that for several classes of lambda terms, including binary lambda terms with $m$ free indices, the number of terms of size $n$ is $\Theta(n^{-3/2} \rho^{-n})$ with some class dependent constant $\rho$, which in particular disproves the above mentioned conjecture. A way to obtain lower and upper bounds for the constant near the leading term is presented and numerical results for a few previously introduced classes of lambda terms are given.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.