Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Parameterized k-Clustering: The distance matters!

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.08559 v1 pith:JJVMKZU2 submitted 2019-02-22 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords clusteringdistanceparameterizedmathbborderprovealgorithmcase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the $k$-Clustering problem, which is for a given multiset of $n$ vectors $X\subset \mathbb{Z}^d$ and a nonnegative number $D$, to decide whether $X$ can be partitioned into $k$ clusters $C_1, \dots, C_k$ such that the cost \[\sum_{i=1}^k \min_{c_i\in \mathbb{R}^d}\sum_{x \in C_i} \|x-c_i\|_p^p \leq D,\] where $\|\cdot\|_p$ is the Minkowski ($L_p$) norm of order $p$. For $p=1$, $k$-Clustering is the well-known $k$-Median. For $p=2$, the case of the Euclidean distance, $k$-Clustering is $k$-Means. We show that the parameterized complexity of $k$-Clustering strongly depends on the distance order $p$. In particular, we prove that for every $p\in (0,1]$, $k$-Clustering is solvable in time $2^{O(D \log{D})} (nd)^{O(1)}$, and hence is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $D$. On the other hand, we prove that for distances of orders $p=0$ and $p=\infty$, no such algorithm exists, unless FPT=W[1].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools