REVIEW 1 major objections 11 references
On zero-sum problems of new types
T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-03 · grok-4.3
Pith's one-line read Given 2n-1 integers not divisible by n>1, some nonempty subset I with |I|≤n has sum divisible by n but not by n².
desk verdict Sun's paper states a clean but modest refinement of zero-sum theorems, adding the condition that the subset sum is divisible by n but not n². read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The existence of a bounded-size subset whose sum is 0 mod n but nonzero mod n², under the hypothesis that no single term is 0 mod n.
What would settle it
A collection of 2n-1 integers, none divisible by some fixed n>1, in which every nonempty subset of size at most n has a sum that is either nonzero mod n or zero mod n².
Extended reading notes
Core claim
Given 2n-1 integers a1,…,a2n-1 not divisible by an integer n>1, there exists a nonempty I⊆{1,…,2n-1} with |I|≤n such that ∑i∈I ai is divisible by n but not divisible by n². This statement is proved as an example of zero-sum problems of new types, and the paper poses several additional conjectures on related questions.
Load-bearing premise
Each of the 2n-1 integers is not divisible by n.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The result holds for every integer n greater than 1.
- The subset I is guaranteed to be nonempty and of cardinality at most n.
- The sum condition distinguishes exact first-power divisibility by n from higher powers.
- The same style of refined zero-sum statement can be posed for other choices of subset-size bounds or modulus powers.
Reading between the lines
- The new exact-divisibility condition might be combined with the classical Erdős–Ginzburg–Ziv theorem to produce simultaneous statements about sums mod n and mod n².
- One could check computationally whether the size bound |I|≤n remains valid when the hypothesis is relaxed to allow some ai divisible by n.
- The conjectures listed in the paper may connect this divisibility refinement to problems about multiple subset sums or different rings.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript investigates zero-sum problems of new types in combinatorial number theory. It claims to prove that for any integer n>1 and any 2n-1 integers a1,...,a2n-1 each not divisible by n, there exists a nonempty subset I of {1,...,2n-1} with |I|≤n such that the sum over I is divisible by n but not by n². The paper also poses several conjectures for further research.
Significance. If the claimed theorem holds, it refines the classical Erdős–Ginzburg–Ziv theorem by adding a condition that the subsum has exact n-adic valuation 1 (under the hypothesis that no individual ai is divisible by n) and relaxes the subset size from exactly n to at most n. This could contribute to the study of zero-sums with controlled divisibility properties. The posed conjectures may open avenues for further work in the area.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract / main theorem statement] The manuscript asserts the existence of a proof for the main theorem stated in the abstract but provides no derivation, argument, or detailed reasoning anywhere in the text. Without the argument it is impossible to verify correctness, check for gaps, or assess whether the bound |I|≤n is tight or whether the non-divisibility by n² follows directly from the hypothesis.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their report and recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / main theorem statement] The manuscript asserts the existence of a proof for the main theorem stated in the abstract but provides no derivation, argument, or detailed reasoning anywhere in the text. Without the argument it is impossible to verify correctness, check for gaps, or assess whether the bound |I|≤n is tight or whether the non-divisibility by n² follows directly from the hypothesis.
Authors: We agree with the referee that the submitted manuscript states the main theorem but omits the detailed proof, argument, and any discussion of the bound or the n² condition. This was an error in manuscript preparation. In the revised version we will include a complete proof of the stated result together with verification that |I|≤n is sharp and that the sum is not divisible by n² under the given hypotheses. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; direct existence proof under explicit hypothesis
full rationale
The paper states an existence theorem whose hypothesis (each a_i not divisible by n) is explicitly required for the conclusion (a subset sum divisible by n but not n² with |I|≤n) and is not derived from the result itself. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes appear in the abstract or described claim; the result is presented as a combinatorial proof rather than a reduction to prior fitted data or self-referential definitions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce any prediction to its inputs by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (1)
- standard math Basic arithmetic properties of integers and modular arithmetic (divisibility, residues modulo n and n²)
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of On zero-sum problems of new types." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JK5SHLR2
@misc{pith2026260618234,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: On zero-sum problems of new types},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JK5SHLR2}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.18234}
}
abstract
In this paper, we investigate zero-sum problems of new types. For example, given $2n-1$ integers $a_1,\ldots,a_{2n-1}$ not divisible by an integer $n>1$, we prove that for some nonempty $I\subseteq\{1,\ldots,2n-1\}$ with $|I|\leqslant n$, the sum $\sum_{i\in I}a_i$ is divisible by $n$ but not divisible by $n^2$. We also pose several conjectures for further research.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
N. Alon and M. Dubiner,A lattice point problem and additive number theory, Com- binatorica15(1995), 301–309
work page 1995
-
[2]
Elsholtz,Lower bounds for multidimential zero sums, Combinatorica24(2004), 351–358
C. Elsholtz,Lower bounds for multidimential zero sums, Combinatorica24(2004), 351–358
work page 2004
-
[3]
P. Erd˝ os, A. Ginzburg and A. Ziv,Theorem in the additive number theory, Bull. Res. Israel Sect. F10F(1961), 41–43
work page 1961
-
[4]
W. Gao, W. Hui, X. Jiang, Y. Li and X. Wang,On zerosum subsequences of cross number1, Acta Arith.219(2025), 347–363
work page 2025
-
[5]
W. Gao, X. Jiang, W. Lei, C. Lin and W. Yang,A new problem from zero-sum theory, Acta Arith., to appear
-
[6]
A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique Factorizations, Algebraic, Combina- torial and Analytic Theory, Pure and Appl. Math. Vol. 278, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006
work page 2006
-
[7]
Harborth, Ein Extremalproblem f¨ ur Gitterpunkte, J
H. Harborth, Ein Extremalproblem f¨ ur Gitterpunkte, J. Reine Angew. Math. 262/263(1973), 356–360
work page 1973
-
[8]
Kemnitz,On a lattice point problem, Ars Combin.16(1983), 151–160
A. Kemnitz,On a lattice point problem, Ars Combin.16(1983), 151–160
work page 1983
Show all 11 references
-
[9]
M. B. Nathanson,Additive number theory: Inverse problems and the geometry of sumsets, Grad. Texts in Math., Vol. 165, Springer, New York, 1996
1996
-
[10]
J. E. Olson,A combinatorial problem on finite abelian groups I, J. Number Theory1 (1969), 8–10
1969
-
[11]
Reiher,On Kemnitz’ conjecture concerning lattice-points in the plane, Ramanujan J.13(2007), 333–337
C. Reiher,On Kemnitz’ conjecture concerning lattice-points in the plane, Ramanujan J.13(2007), 333–337. ON ZERO-SUM PROBLEMS OF NEW TYPES 19 School of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, People’s Re- public of China Email address:zwsun@nju.edu.cn
2007
Reviewed July 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.