The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2407.12216 · v2 · pith:JLMM6PET · submitted 2024-07-16 · cs.IR

Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:JLMM6PETrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.IR
keywords knowledgellmscontextuallyexistingfactsfailuregenerationmethods
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text but face challenges when addressing knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs). However, LLMs often struggle to produce accurate answers despite access to KG-extracted information containing necessary facts. Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points. We observed that these errors predominantly occur due to insufficient focus on discerning the question's intent and adequately gathering relevant context from the knowledge graph facts. Drawing on this analysis, we propose the Mindful-RAG approach, a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval. This method explicitly targets the identified failures and offers improvements in the correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs, representing a significant step forward from existing methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Understanding and Debugging Failures in N-Gram-Based Generative Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents a taxonomy of generative retrieval failures, empirically identifies issues such as ambiguous docids and low diversity in n-gram methods, and introduces a web-based debugging tool.

  2. RAG-Enabled Intent Reasoning for Application-Network Interaction

    cs.NI 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes an intent-RAG framework that combines RAG, machine reasoning, and generative AI to interpret application intents and generate network intents, outperforming LLMs and vanilla RAG in translation tasks.