Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Imagining Computing Education Assessment after Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.04601 v1 pith:JMEJXPV4 submitted 2024-01-09 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords assessmentgenerativeungradingcomputingeducationeducatorsmethodssolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the contemporary landscape of computing education, the ubiquity of Generative Artificial Intelligence has significantly disrupted traditional assessment methods, rendering them obsolete and prompting educators to seek innovative alternatives. This research paper explores the challenges posed by Generative AI in the assessment domain and the persistent attempts to circumvent its impact. Despite various efforts to devise workarounds, the academic community is yet to find a comprehensive solution. Amidst this struggle, ungrading emerges as a potential yet under-appreciated solution to the assessment dilemma. Ungrading, a pedagogical approach that involves moving away from traditional grading systems, has faced resistance due to its perceived complexity and the reluctance of educators to depart from conventional assessment practices. However, as the inadequacies of current assessment methods become increasingly evident in the face of Generative AI, the time is ripe to reconsider and embrace ungrading.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Personalized Assessments from Personal Artifacts

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A personalized puzzle generated from a student's own code can reveal when they may not understand what they submitted.

  2. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Solving Visual Graph and Tree Based Data Structure Problems using Large Multimodal Models

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a newly generated benchmark, multimodal models solve up to 87.6% of visual tree problems and 56.2% of visual graph problems, undercutting the idea that diagrams make exam questions AI-proof.

Pith tools