REVIEW 2 cited by
Imagining Computing Education Assessment after Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the contemporary landscape of computing education, the ubiquity of Generative Artificial Intelligence has significantly disrupted traditional assessment methods, rendering them obsolete and prompting educators to seek innovative alternatives. This research paper explores the challenges posed by Generative AI in the assessment domain and the persistent attempts to circumvent its impact. Despite various efforts to devise workarounds, the academic community is yet to find a comprehensive solution. Amidst this struggle, ungrading emerges as a potential yet under-appreciated solution to the assessment dilemma. Ungrading, a pedagogical approach that involves moving away from traditional grading systems, has faced resistance due to its perceived complexity and the reluctance of educators to depart from conventional assessment practices. However, as the inadequacies of current assessment methods become increasingly evident in the face of Generative AI, the time is ripe to reconsider and embrace ungrading.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Personalized Assessments from Personal Artifacts
A personalized puzzle generated from a student's own code can reveal when they may not understand what they submitted.
-
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Solving Visual Graph and Tree Based Data Structure Problems using Large Multimodal Models
On a newly generated benchmark, multimodal models solve up to 87.6% of visual tree problems and 56.2% of visual graph problems, undercutting the idea that diagrams make exam questions AI-proof.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.