Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Optical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Encoding logical bits in the coherence rank of a partially coherent field allows error-free transmission through channels that scramble both polarization and spatial modes from bit to bit.

desk verdict Coherence-rank encoding is a real, exact idea with a clean proof-of-principle; its 'scattering immunity' is conditional on the full mode space being monitored, which the paper should say more loudly. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19683 v1 pith:JNHWLDMJ submitted 2025-07-25 physics.optics

Mitchell Harling , Chandler Stevenson , Ayman F. Abouraddy , Kimani C. Toussaint Jr This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.25.Kb42.79.Sz
keywords partialcoherenceopticalcommunicationsscattering-immuneencodingrankmatrixpolarizationspatialmodesunitarilyinvariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that partially coherent light can transmit information error-free through the worst-case optical scattering: channels that scramble polarization and spatial modes, couple the two, and change unpredictably from bit to bit. The trick is to encode logical bits in the coherence rank, the number of nonzero eigenvalues of the 4x4 coherence matrix spanning the two polarizations and two spatial modes, rather than in any particular field state. Any unitary transformation of the full four-mode field preserves the eigenvalue spectrum, so the rank survives even when the channel is informationally opaque to conventional encoding. If the claim holds, optical links through turbulent or turbid media, multimode fibers, and other scrambling environments could dispense with adaptive optics and still achieve error-free transmission.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the coherence rank of the $4\times4$ coherence matrix $G$ that spans two polarization and two spatial modes: the number of nonzero eigenvalues of $G$. A unitary channel acts as $G\to UGU^{\dagger}$, so the eigenvalues, and therefore the rank, are unchanged; this is what makes the rank a stable label for the transmitted symbol. The paper chooses, for each rank, the maximum-entropy representative, $\mathrm{diag}\{1,0,0,0\}$ for rank 1, $\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{diag}\{1,1,0,0\}$ for rank 2, $\frac{1}{3}\mathrm{diag}\{1,1,1,0\}$ for rank 3, and $\frac{1}{4}\mathrm{diag}\{1,1,1,1\}$ for rank 4, and decodes by sorting the reconstructed eigenvalues in descending order and selecting the vertex nearest in Euclidean distance.

What would settle it

Transmit a rank-2 maximum-entropy field ($\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{diag}\{1,1,0,0\}$) through a channel that couples the two spatial modes to a third unmonitored spatial mode, then tomographically reconstruct the 4x4 coherence matrix at the output: if more than two eigenvalues are comparable in size and a rank-2 codeword is misclassified, the central claim fails. In the same setup, adding controlled additive noise that fills the zero eigenvalue of a rank-3 field should produce errors at the Euclidean decision threshold, demonstrating where unitary-only invariance stops.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the coherence rank of the full polarization-plus-spatial coherence matrix is a physically realizable, unitarily invariant code for optical communications, and that this code remains error-free through exactly the channels that defeat conventional encoding. In the experiment, a 242-bit image was sent through two channels: a half-wave plate that randomly scrambles polarization bit to bit, and a more severe channel built from half-wave plates and a polarizing beam splitter that randomly couples polarization to two spatial modes. Conventional encoding (orthogonal polarizations, or polarized versus unpolarized) fails in these channels with roughly 50% bit-error rate, while rank encoding, mapping 00, 01, 10, 11 to ranks 1 through 4 of the coherence matrix, reconstructs the image with 100% fidelity. Because the rank of the full 4x4 matrix is preserved under any unitary transformation, the transmitted symbol does not depend on the particular scattering realization.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme works only if the channel is a reversible mixing of the four modes, meaning it may dim the signal overall but cannot completely destroy any one mode, and only if the channel stays fixed during each bit interval; any loss that extinguishes a mode or any noise that changes which eigenvalues are exactly zero can flip the decoded rank.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any unknown unitary transformation of the four-mode field, including a random polarization-basis misalignment between sender and receiver, leaves the decoded symbol unchanged, so the scheme needs no shared frame and no adaptive probing.
  • The encoding alphabet can grow with the total mode count: with two degrees of freedom of dimensions $N_1$ and $N_2$, the coherence matrix has $N_1N_2$ eigenvalues, and each rank level adds a distinguishable symbol.
  • A spatial-only version of the scheme, coherent versus incoherent spatial fields, is scattering-immune to spatial-mode coupling but fails when the spatial degree of freedom couples to polarization, which is why the full two-degree-of-freedom rank code is needed in the coupled channel.
  • The paper identifies multimode fibers with bend-induced modal scattering, biological samples, underwater links, the turbulent atmosphere, and turbid media as immediate candidate channels for coherence-rank communications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the scheme sacrifices the continuous 'angular' parameters of the coherence matrix for robustness, so in weak-scattering regimes one could in principle multiplex the rank channel with those parameters to exceed $\log_2(N_1N_2)$ bits per symbol.
  • Editorial inference: symbol-error probabilities should be strongly rank-dependent, since the rank-4 state is exactly invariant under every unitary while rank-1 sits one eigenvalue away from rank-2; a likelihood-based decoder that models eigenvalue noise should outperform the Euclidean-distance rule when noise is heteroscedastic.
  • Editorial inference: extending the Hartley-Shannon analysis to this code, which the paper flags as open, would likely show that additive noise converts the rank channel into a stepwise erasure channel before the Shannon capacity of the underlying mode space is reached, so the practical rate depends on how much of the eigenvalue margin is consumed by noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an optical communications scheme in which pairs of bits are encoded in the coherence rank (the number of nonzero eigenvalues) of a 4x4 coherence matrix spanning two polarization and two spatial modes. Because a lossless channel acts as a unitary similarity transformation on this matrix, the eigenvalue spectrum and hence the rank are exactly preserved even when the channel couples the two degrees of freedom randomly from bit to bit. The authors prepare maximum-entropy field states for ranks 1 through 4 and demonstrate experimentally that this rank encoding transmits a 242-bit image with zero measured errors through a model channel (Ch-2) that strongly couples polarization and spatial modes, while conventional polarization encoding fails on the same channel. They also show that degree-of-polarization encoding works through a purely polarizing random channel (Ch-1), and they provide simulations for both channels. The mathematical core is exact: for any fixed 4x4 unitary U, the coherence matrix transforms as UGU^dagger, so the rank is invariant. The main caveats, acknowledged in the Discussion, are that the channel must be unitary over the monitored mode space, that modal-dependent losses can shift eigenvalues across decision boundaries, and that additive noise is not addressed.

Significance. If the result is taken in its intended scope, this is a conceptually interesting and clearly demonstrated use of partial coherence: the rank of the coherence matrix is a structural parameter that is exactly invariant under any unitary transformation of a closed mode space, and the paper exploits this with no fitted parameters. The experimental design is a strength: conventional polarization schemes are shown to fail on the same physical channel on which the rank scheme succeeds, and the simulations are consistent with the experiment. The proof-of-principle is clean and the paper is generally well written. However, the practical significance for real 'highly scattering channels' is limited by the closed-system assumption: the demonstrated invariance holds only when the channel is unitary on the full monitored mode space, and the experiment uses a lossless, exactly unitary 4-mode circuit with all modes monitored. The paper's own Discussion lists modal-dependent losses and additive noise as open issues, and these are precisely the mechanisms that can change the rank of the reduced monitored system or move reconstructed eigenvalues across the decision boundaries.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II and Section IV] The central invariance claim is stated for a 4x4 coherence matrix under a 4x4 unitary that acts on the complete monitored space (Section II, 'we consider here a model optical channel'). In a real scattering medium, the field occupies a much larger mode space; if the unitary couples the monitored modes a and b to an unmonitored mode e, the reduced 4x4 matrix transforms as Tr_e(U G U^dagger), which is not a similarity transformation and can increase the rank of the monitored subsystem. A rank-1 input can become entangled with mode e and appear mixed in the monitored subspace. The abstract's claim of immunity in the 'worst-case-scenario' that couples 'even unused DoFs' is therefore broader than what the 4x4 theorem establishes. The Discussion lists only modal-dependent losses and fast channel variations as limitations, not mode leakage. Please either restrict the claims to closed 4-mode unitary channels or add an analysis (or simulation) of coupling to unmonitored modes, which is a central requirement for the advertised scattering immunity.
  2. [Section III, Fig. S6(f)] The experimental validation of coherence-rank encoding uses 121 symbols (242 bits) and reports '100% fidelity' without error bars or confidence intervals. With 121 binary decisions at the symbol level, a zero-error result gives only a coarse upper bound on the error probability (roughly 2.5% at 95% confidence under independent errors). More importantly, Ch-2 is a specially constructed lossless, exactly unitary circuit of HWPs and a PBS; it does not expose the scheme to additive noise, modal-dependent loss, or coupling to unmonitored modes, which are the mechanisms that can change the rank or shift eigenvalues across the Euclidean decision boundaries of Fig. S4(c). Please provide a statistical statement of the measured error rate and, ideally, a quantitative noise/loss model showing the margin of the scattered eigenvalue points to the decision boundaries.
  3. [Appendix: Thresholding for bits / Fig. S4] The decoder does not estimate the mathematical rank (the number of strictly positive eigenvalues); it computes the Euclidean distance in eigenvalue space from the measured eigenvalues to the four ideal vertices diag{1,0,0,0}, 1/2 diag{1,1,0,0}, 1/3 diag{1,1,1,0}, and 1/4 diag{1,1,1,1} (Appendix: Thresholding for bits in encoding scheme-3). Because reconstructed eigenvalues are never exactly zero, the robustness of the scheme depends on the margin between the reconstructed points and the decision surfaces. The paper states that the experimental points 'cluster around the vertices' and that measurement errors do not cross the boundaries, but it provides no quantitative information about the spread of the reconstructed eigenvalues, the standard deviation of the reconstruction, or the minimum observed distance to a decision boundary. This should be quantified to support the central claim of error-free decoding.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix: Channel-2, Eq. (S1)] The matrix T in Eq. (S1) is called the 'general matrix representation' for Ch-2; it would be clearer to state explicitly that this is unitary (a product of unitary HWP blocks and the PBS) and lossless, since that unitarity is exactly what guarantees the rank preservation claimed in the main text.
  2. [Section IV, Discussion] The statement that 'modal-dependent losses (barring modal extinction) are also rank-preserving' is correct for an invertible diagonal loss operator, but a one-sentence justification (an invertible diagonal scaling preserves the zero eigenvalue pattern of a positive semidefinite matrix) would help readers who may not immediately see why that is the case.
  3. [Supplementary Material, Fig. S11] There is a typo in the caption of Fig. S11: 'repectively' should be 'respectively'.
  4. [Section III, Fig. S6] The use of 'cross-talk matrix' for the 4x4 rank-symbol classification is understandable, but it may be confusing because in the rank scheme the 'symbols' are the four two-bit pairs rather than the physical modes; a short definition in the caption or main text would remove ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coherence-rank invariance is a direct mathematical identity under unitary similarity, and the codebook/threshold design is standard rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The key claim—that the eigenvalue spectrum of the 4x4 coherence matrix G is preserved under a channel modeled as a unitary transformation U acting as G' = UGU†—is a direct mathematical identity, since a similarity transformation preserves eigenvalues and hence the number of nonzero eigenvalues, i.e., the coherence rank. This is stated in Sections II and III and in the Appendix thresholding methods, and the paper fits no parameter to make the invariance hold. The encoding states are chosen as the maximum-entropy representatives of each rank, and the decoder uses Euclidean distances to those same codebook vertices; that is standard codebook design rather than a fitted prediction, and it is tested against independently reconstructed tomographic matrices. The reliance on the authors' prior work (Refs. 33–38) is for terminology and for classifying coherence matrices, but the rank concept is defined in the paper itself and the invariance follows from linear algebra rather than from those citations. The acknowledged limitations—modal extinction, channel variations faster than the data rate, and additive noise—are scope conditions explicitly stated in the Discussion, not circular assumptions that smuggle in the conclusion. Therefore no load-bearing circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data: the four code states are maximum-entropy representatives of each rank, and the decision rule is Euclidean nearest-vertex in eigenvalue space. The central invariance is a theorem of linear algebra applied to a standard coherence-matrix model. The load-bearing assumptions are the unitarity of the channel, the absence of leakage into modes outside the 4x4 space, and the accuracy of the tomographic reconstruction.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The optical field is fully described by a 4x4 coherence matrix G that is Hermitian, unity-trace, positive semidefinite, and transforms under deterministic devices as G' = TGT†.
    Used throughout Sections II and the Appendix; this is the standard optical coherence matrix formalism.
  • domain assumption The scattering channel is lossless aside from rank-preserving losses and can be represented, after factoring out losses, by a unitary transformation on the full 4-mode space spanning polarization and two spatial modes.
    Section II assumptions (1)-(6) and the Ch-2 model in the Appendix; if the channel is not unitary or leaks into unmonitored modes, rank preservation is not guaranteed.
  • domain assumption The complete physical space is exactly spanned by two polarization states (H,V) and two spatial modes (a,b), so no light escapes into additional modes.
    Section II defines the 4x4 space and the experimental set-up uses two slits; the abstract's mention of 'unused DoFs' refers to one of these DoFs being unused by the sender, not to external modes.
  • standard math Eigenvalues and rank of a Hermitian matrix are invariant under unitary similarity transformations.
    Core mathematical fact used to claim that rank survives arbitrary unitary scattering (Section II, Fig. S3).
  • domain assumption The channel is static during each symbol interval and changes only between bits.
    Experimental channel randomizes HWP angles between bits; Discussion explicitly notes the scheme fails when the channel changes faster than the data rate.
  • domain assumption Optical coherence matrix tomography (OCmT) with maximum likelihood estimation yields a physically valid coherence matrix close to the true output.
    Appendix on tomographic reconstruction; the fidelity claim depends on the accuracy of this reconstruction and the thresholding rule.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JNHWLDMJ

@misc{pith2026250719683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JNHWLDMJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19683}
}
read the original abstract

In optical communications, logical bits are encoded in physical degrees-of-freedom (DoFs) of the electromagnetic field. Consequently, optical scattering in a communications channel compromises the information transfer. In the worst-case-scenario, bit-to-bit stochastically varying scattering that couples the DoFs to each other -including even unused DoFs -can decouple the transmitter and receiver when relying on conventional physical encoding schemes, and preclude the utilization of adaptive techniques as a counter-measure. Here we show that partially coherent optical fields help circumvent the worst-case-scenario of rapidly varying, strong optical scattering, even when the channel is rendered informationally opaque for conventional approaches. Using a channel in which the spatial and polarization DoFs are relevant, we encode the logical bits in the unitarily invariant coherence rank (the number of non-zero eigenvalues of the field coherence matrix) and prepare our partially coherent fields with maximal entropies of 0, 1, 1.585, and 2 bits for rank-1, rank-2, rank-3, and rank-4 coherence matrices, respectively. This scheme demonstrates scattering-immune optical communications with 100 % fidelity. These results unveil an unexpected utility for partially coherent light in optical communications through challenging environments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    Landauer ,\ title title Information is physical , \ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author R. Landauer ,\ title title Information is physical , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Today \ volume 44 ,\ pages 23--29 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    author author G. P. \ Agrawal ,\ @noop title Fiber-Optic Communication Systems \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ address New York ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Ursin , author F

    author author R. Ursin , author F. Tiefenbacher , author T. Schmitt-Manderbach , author H. Weier , author T. Scheidl , author M. Lindenthal , author B. Blauensteiner , author T. Jennewein , author J. Perdigues , author P. Trojek , author B. Ömer , author M. Fürst , author M. Meyenburg , author J. Rarity , author Z. Sodnik , author C. Barbieri , author H. ...

    work page 2007

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Li , author N

    author author G. Li , author N. Bai , author N. Zhao , \ and\ author C. Xia ,\ title title Space-division multiplexing: the next frontier in optical communication , \ @noop journal journal Adv. Opt. Photon. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 413--487 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  2. [10]

    author author A. E. \ Willner , author H. Huang , author Y. Yan , author Y. Ren , author N. Ahmed , author G. Xie , author C. Bao , author L. Li , author Y. Cao , author Z. Zhao , author J. Wang , author M. P. J. \ Lavery , author M. Tur , author S. Ramachandran , author A. F....

    2015

  3. [11]

    \ Ho \ and\ author J

    author author K.-P. \ Ho \ and\ author J. M. \ Kahn ,\ title title Linear propagation effects in mode-division multiplexing systems , \ @noop journal journal J. Lightwave Technol. \ volume 32 ,\ pages 614--628 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  4. [12]

    Cao , author T

    author author H. Cao , author T. C i z m \'a r , author S. Turtaev , author T. Tyc , \ and\ author S. Rotter ,\ title title Controlling light propagation in multimode fibers for imaging, spectroscopy, and beyond , \ @noop journal journal Adv. Opt. Photon. \ volume 15 ,\ pages ...

    2023

  5. [13]

    author author R. K. \ Tyson ,\ @noop title Principles of Adaptive Optics \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address Boston ,\ year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  6. [14]

    author author R. W. \ Duffner \ and\ author R. Q. \ Fugate ,\ @noop title The Adaptive Optics Revolution: A History \ ( publisher Univ. New Mexico Press ,\ year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  7. [15]

    Ren , author G

    author author Y. Ren , author G. Xie , author H. Huang , author N. Ahmed , author Y. Yan , author L. Li , author C. Bao , author M. P. J. \ Lavery , author M. Tur , author M. A. \ Neifeld , author R. W. \ Boyd , author J. H. \ Shapiro , \ and\ author A. E. \ Willner ,\ title t...

    2014

  8. [16]

    Carpenter , author B

    author author J. Carpenter , author B. J. \ Eggleton , \ and\ author J. Schr \"o der ,\ title title Observation of E isenbud-- W igner-- S mith states as principal modes in multimode fibre , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Photon. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 751--757 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  9. [17]

    Defienne , author M

    author author H. Defienne , author M. Reichert , \ and\ author J. W. \ Fleischer ,\ title title Adaptive quantum optics with spatially entangled photon pairs , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 233601 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  10. [18]

    author author N. H. \ Valencia , author S. Goel , author W. McCutcheon , author H. Defienne , \ and\ author M. Malik ,\ title title Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1112--1116 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  11. [19]

    Zhou , author B

    author author Y. Zhou , author B. Braverman , author A. Fyffe , author R. Zhang , author J. Zhao , author A. E. \ Willner , author Z. Shi , \ and\ author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ title title High-fidelity spatial mode transmission through a 1-km-long multimode fiber via vectorial time ...

    2021

  12. [20]

    author author Z. D. \ Walton , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , author A. V. \ Sergienko , author B. E. A. \ Saleh , \ and\ author M. C. \ Teich ,\ title title Decoherence-free subspaces in quantum key distribution , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 0879...

    2003

  13. [21]

    Nelson , author J

    author author W. Nelson , author J. P. \ Palastro , author C. C. \ Davis , \ and\ author P. Sprangle ,\ title title Propagation of B essel and A iry beams through atmospheric turbulence , \ @noop journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. A \ volume 31 ,\ pages 603--609 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  14. [22]

    Zhao \ and\ author J

    author author Y. Zhao \ and\ author J. Wang ,\ title title High-base vector beam encoding/decoding for visible-light communications , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 4843--4846 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  15. [23]

    author author M. A. \ Cox , author C. Rosales-Guzm \'a n , author M. P. J. \ Lavery , author D. J. \ Versfeld , \ and\ author A. Forbes ,\ title title On the resilience of scalar and vector vortex modes in turbulence , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Express \ volume 24 ,\ pages ...

    2016

  16. [24]

    Mphuthi , author R

    author author N. Mphuthi , author R. Botha , \ and\ author A. Forbes ,\ title title Are B essel beams resilient to aberrations and turbulence? \ @noop journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. A \ volume 35 ,\ pages 1021--1027 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  17. [25]

    Zhu , author M

    author author Z. Zhu , author M. Janasik , author A. Fyffe , author D. Hay , author Y. Zhou , author B. Kantor , author T. Winder , author R. W. \ Boyd , author G. Leuchs , \ and\ author Z. Shi ,\ title title Compensation-free high-dimensional free-space optical communication ...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Born \ and\ author E

    author author M. Born \ and\ author E. Wolf ,\ @noop title Principles of Optics ,\ edition 7th \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge Univ. Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  19. [27]

    Wolf ,\ @noop title Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light \ ( publisher Cambridge Univ

    author author E. Wolf ,\ @noop title Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light \ ( publisher Cambridge Univ. Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  20. [28]

    author author J. W. \ Goodman ,\ @noop title Statistical Optics \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ address Hoboken, New Jersey ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  21. [29]

    Baleine \ and\ author A

    author author E. Baleine \ and\ author A. Dogariu ,\ title title Variable coherence scattering microscopy , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 193904 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  22. [30]

    author author J. W. \ Goodman ,\ @noop title Speckle Phenomena in Optics \ ( publisher Roberts and Company Publishers ,\ address Colorado ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  23. [31]

    author author H. E. \ Kondakci , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author B. E. A. \ Saleh ,\ title title Lattice topology dictates photon statistics , \ @noop journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 8948 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  24. [32]

    Han , author N

    author author S. Han , author N. Bender , \ and\ author H. Cao ,\ title title Tailoring 3D speckle statistics , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 093802 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  25. [33]

    Bender , author H

    author author N. Bender , author H. Haig , author D. N. \ Christodoulides , \ and\ author F. W. \ Wise ,\ title title Spectral speckle customization , \ @noop journal journal Optica \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1260--1268 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  26. [34]

    Waller , author G

    author author L. Waller , author G. Situ , \ and\ author J. W. \ Fleischer ,\ title title Phase-space measurement and coherence synthesis of optical beams , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Photon. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 474--479 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  27. [35]

    Nardi , author S

    author author A. Nardi , author S. Divitt , author M. Rossi , author F. Tebbenjohanns , author A. Militaru , author M. Frimmer , \ and\ author L. Novotny ,\ title title Encoding information in the mutual coherence of spatially separated light beams , \ @noop journal journal Op...

    2022

  28. [36]

    author author D. L. P. \ Vitullo , author C. C. \ Leary , author P. Gregg , author R. A. \ Smith , author D. V. \ Reddy , author S. Ramachandran , \ and\ author M. G. \ Raymer ,\ title title Observation of interaction of spin and intrinsic orbital angular momentum of light , \...

    2017

  29. [37]

    Xiong , author C

    author author W. Xiong , author C. Hsu , author Y. Bromberg , author J. Antonio-Lopez , author R. Amezcua Correa , \ and\ author H. Cao ,\ title title Complete polarization control in multimode fibers with polarization and mode coupling , \ @noop journal journal Light Sci. App...

    2018

  30. [38]

    author author A. F. \ Abouraddy ,\ title title What is the maximum attainable visibility by a partially coherent electromagnetic field in Y oung's double-slit interference? \ @noop journal journal Opt. Express \ volume 25 ,\ pages 18320--18331 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  31. [39]

    Okoro , author H

    author author C. Okoro , author H. E. \ Kondakci , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author K. C. \ Toussaint ,\ title title Demonstration of an optical-coherence converter , \ @noop journal journal Optica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1052--1058 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  32. [40]

    Harling , author V

    author author M. Harling , author V. Kelkar , author C. Okoro , author M. Diouf , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author K. C. \ Toussaint ,\ title title Reversible inter-degree-of-freedom optical-coherence conversion via entropy swapping , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Expre...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Harling , author V

    author author M. Harling , author V. Kelkar , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author K. C. \ Toussaint ,\ title title Reversible coherence conversion across optical degrees-of-freedom: a tutorial , \ @noop journal journal J. Opt. \ volume 25 ,\ pages 053502 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  34. [42]

    Harling , author V

    author author M. Harling , author V. A. \ Kelkar , author K. C. \ Toussaint , \ and\ author A. F. \ Abouraddy ,\ title title Locked entropy in partially coherent optical fields , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 109 ,\ pages L021501 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    2024

  35. [43]

    Harling , author V

    author author M. Harling , author V. A. \ Kelkar , author K. C. \ Toussaint , \ and\ author A. F. \ Abouraddy ,\ title title Isoentropic partially coherent optical fields that cannot be interconverted unitarily , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 110 ,\ pages 01350...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Halder , author A

    author author A. Halder , author A. Norrman , \ and\ author A. T. \ Friberg ,\ title title Poincar \'e sphere representation of scalar two-beam interference under spatial unitary transformations , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 46 ,\ pages 5619--5622 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  37. [45]

    Brosseau \ and\ author A

    author author C. Brosseau \ and\ author A. Dogariu ,\ title title Symmetry properties and polarization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield , \ @noop journal journal Prog. Opt. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 315--380 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  38. [46]

    Gori , author M

    author author F. Gori , author M. Santarsiero , \ and\ author R. Borghi ,\ title title Vector mode analysis of a Y oung interferometer , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 31 ,\ pages 858--860 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  39. [47]

    author author K. H. \ Kagalwala , author G. Di G iuseppe , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author B. E. A. \ Saleh ,\ title title Bell's measure in classical optical coherence , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Photon. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 72--78 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  40. [48]

    Wolf ,\ title title New theory of partial coherence in the space–frequency domain

    author author E. Wolf ,\ title title New theory of partial coherence in the space–frequency domain. part I : spectra and cross spectra of steady-state sources , \ @noop journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 343--351 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  41. [49]

    author author A. F. \ Abouraddy , author K. H. \ Kagalwala , \ and\ author B. E. A. \ Saleh ,\ title title Two-point optical coherency matrix tomography , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 39 ,\ pages 2411--2414 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  42. [50]

    author author K. H. \ Kagalwala , author H. E. \ Kondakci , author A. F. \ Abouraddy , \ and\ author B. E. A. \ Saleh ,\ title title Optical coherency matrix tomography , \ @noop journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 15333 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  43. [51]

    Dimitrov \ and\ author H

    author author S. Dimitrov \ and\ author H. Haas ,\ @noop title Principles of LED Light Communications: Towards Networked Li-Fi \ ( publisher Cambridge Univ. Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  44. [52]

    author author D. F. V. \ James , author P. G. \ Kwiat , author W. J. \ Munro , \ and\ author A. G. \ White ,\ title title Measurement of qubits , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 64 ,\ pages 052312 ( year 2001 a ) NoStop

    2001

  45. [53]

    author author B. E. A. \ Saleh \ and\ author M. C. \ Teich ,\ @noop title Principles of Photonics \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  46. [54]

    Roques-Carmes , author S

    author author C. Roques-Carmes , author S. Fan , \ and\ author D. Miller ,\ title title Measuring, processing, and generating partially coherent light with self-configuring optics , \ @noop journal journal arXiv:2402.00704 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bogaerts , author D

    author author W. Bogaerts , author D. P \'e rez , author J. Capmany , author D. A. B. \ Miller , author J. Poon , author D. Englund , author F. Morichetti , \ and\ author A. Melloni ,\ title title Programmable photonic circuits , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 586 ,\ ...

    2020

  48. [56]

    author author A. F. \ Abouraddy , author A. V. \ Sergienko , author B. E. A. \ Saleh , \ and\ author M. C. \ Teich ,\ title title Quantum entanglement and the two-photon S tokes parameters , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Comm. \ volume 201 ,\ pages 93--98 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  49. [57]

    author author D. F. V. \ James , author P. G. \ Kwiat , author W. J. \ Munro , \ and\ author A. G. \ White ,\ title title Measurement of qubits , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052312 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 64 ,\ pages 052312 ( year 2001 b ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.