Pith. sign in

REVIEW

MS 1603.6+2600: an Accretion Disc Corona source?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0309229 v1 pith:JV3BW7GP submitted 2003-09-08 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords x-raysourcems1603observedaccretionargueburstcorona
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We have observed the eclipsing low-mass X-ray binary MS1603.6+2600 with Chandra for 7 ksec. The X-ray spectrum is well fit with a single absorbed powerlaw with an index of ~2. We find a clear sinusoidal modulation in the X-ray lightcurve with a period of 1.7+-0.2 hours, consistent with the period of 1.85 hours found before. However, no (partial) eclipses were found. We argue that if the X-ray flare observed in earlier X-ray observations was a type I X-ray burst then the source can only be an Accretion Disc Corona source at a distance between ~11-24 kpc (implying a height above the Galactic disk of ~8-17 kpc). It has also been proposed in the literature that MS1603.76+2600 is a dipper at ~75 kpc. We argue that in this dipper scenario the observed optical properties of MS1603.6+2600 are difficult to reconcile with the optical properties one would expect on the basis of comparisons with other high inclination low-mass X-ray binaries, unless the X-ray flare was not a type I X-ray burst. In that case the source can be a nearby soft X-ray transient accreting at a quiescent rate as was proposed by Hakala et al.(1998) or a high inclination source at ~15-20 kpc.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools