Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Acoustic Emission Sensor Network Optimization Based on Grid Loop Search and Particle Swarm Source Location

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11005 v1 pith:JWR3RBMA submitted 2025-01-19 physics.geo-ph

classification physics.geo-ph
keywords locationlayoutmethodoptimizationsensortraditionalaccuracyalgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The layout of acoustic emission sensors plays a critical role in non-destructive structural testing. This study proposes a grid-based optimization method focused on multi-source location results, in contrast to traditional sensor layout optimization methods that construct a correlation matrix based on sensor layout and one source location. Based on the seismic source travel-time theory, the proposed method establishes a location objective function based on minimum travel-time differences, which is solved through the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Furthermore, based on location accuracy across various configurations, the method systematically evaluates potential optimal sensor locations through grid search. Synthetic tests and laboratory pencil-lead break (PLB) experiments are conducted to compare the effectiveness of PSO, genetic algorithm, and simulated annealing, with the following conclusions: (1) In synthetic tests, the proposed method achieved an average location error of 1.78 mm, outperforming that based on the traditional layout, genetic algorithm (GA), and simulated annealing (SA). (2) For different noise cases, the location accuracy separately improved by 24.89% ({\sigma}=0.5{\mu}s), 12.59% ({\sigma}=2{\mu}s), and 15.06% ({\sigma}=5{\mu}s) compared with the traditional layout. (3) For the PLB experiments, the optimized layout achieved an average location error of 9.37 mm, which improved the location accuracy by 59.15% compared with the Traditional layout.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools