Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.10602 v1 pith:JWTDUQ7W submitted 2018-05-27 physics.hist-ph

classification physics.hist-ph
keywords philosophyphysicsneedsphilosophicalscienceanti-philosophicalargueassumed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science, I argue that philosophy has had, and still has, far more influence on physics than is commonly assumed. I maintain that the current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science. I also suggest that recent important empirical results, such as the detection of the Higgs particle and gravitational waves, and the failure to detect supersymmetry where many expected to find it, question the validity of certain philosophical assumptions common among theoretical physicists, inviting us to engage in a clearer philosophical reflection on scientific method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Multiverse: a Philosophical Introduction

    physics.hist-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A philosopher's introduction compares three multiverse proposals and tentatively concludes 'Yes, No and Maybe': a non-Lewisian philosophical multiverse is believable, the Everettian multiverse is not, and the cosmolog...

Pith tools