REVIEW 1 cited by
Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science, I argue that philosophy has had, and still has, far more influence on physics than is commonly assumed. I maintain that the current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science. I also suggest that recent important empirical results, such as the detection of the Higgs particle and gravitational waves, and the failure to detect supersymmetry where many expected to find it, question the validity of certain philosophical assumptions common among theoretical physicists, inviting us to engage in a clearer philosophical reflection on scientific method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Multiverse: a Philosophical Introduction
A philosopher's introduction compares three multiverse proposals and tentatively concludes 'Yes, No and Maybe': a non-Lewisian philosophical multiverse is believable, the Everettian multiverse is not, and the cosmolog...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.