Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Flux Globalization Based Well-Balanced Path-Conservative Central-Upwind Schemes for Shallow Water Linearized Moment Equations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A flux-globalization central-upwind scheme exactly preserves moving-water and lake-at-rest steady states of shallow water moment equations, friction included.

desk verdict Solid niche application of the flux-globalization PCCU framework to moment equations with friction, but the moving-water WB claim rests on an unverified citation and a sign typo; referee it with focus on Remark 3.2. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23144 v1 pith:JXW64CGH submitted 2025-05-29 math.NA cs.NA

Yangyang Cao , Qian Huang , Julian Koellermeier , Alexander Kurganov , Yongle Liu This is my paper
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 76M1265M0886-0835L6535L67
keywords shallowwaterlinearizedmomentequationswell-balancedschemesfluxglobalizationpath-conservativecentral-upwindnonconservativehyperbolicsystemsmoving-watersteadystatesfrictiontermsLegendrepolynomialexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops second-order path-conservative central-upwind schemes for the hyperbolic shallow water linearized moment equations, a depth-averaged model in which the horizontal velocity is expanded in Legendre polynomials. The central claim is that after rewriting the system in quasi-conservative form with a global flux and reconstructing equilibrium variables, the scheme exactly preserves both lake-at-rest and moving-water steady states, including states with friction that involve nonlocal integrals. This matters because without a well-balanced property, small perturbations of these equilibria are drowned in numerical noise unless the mesh is impractically fine, and because earlier schemes for these moment equations did not cover the friction case. Numerical benchmarks with smooth solutions, small perturbations of steady states, and dam breaks support the claim.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the global flux $K(U)=F(U)-R(U)$, where $R$ collects integrals of the nonconservative product, the topography source, and friction from an arbitrary base point. Because $R$ contains nonconservative products, its one-sided values are computed by path-conservative integration along a linear segment in the equilibrium variables $E=(q,E,E_1,\ldots,E_N)$, with cell and interface contributions approximated by trapezoidal-like quadratures $B_k$ and $B_{\Psi,k+1/2}$ derived from the identity $M(U)E_x=0$. Reconstructing $E$ rather than $U$, and solving for the point values $\hat h^\pm$ and $\hat\alpha_i^\pm$ with a common cell-interface topography, is what makes the one-sided fluxes equal at steady states and gives the scheme its well-balanced property.

What would settle it

Evaluate the one-sided global fluxes $K^-_{k+1/2}$, $K^+_{k+1/2}$, and $K^+_{k-1/2}$ directly at a discretely sampled moving-water equilibrium with friction $\nu>0$ and discontinuous bottom topography, as in Example 1, Cases (b) and (c); if the three values are not equal, the well-balancedness claim for (2.2) is false. A complementary test is to run the scheme on such an equilibrium for a long time and check whether $q$, $E$, and $E_i$ drift away from their initial values at a rate distinguishable from round-off.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the steady-state structure of the shallow water linearized moment equations with topography and friction can be encoded exactly into a numerical flux. The system contains a nonconservative product $Q(U)U_x$, a slope source $-ghZ_x$, and a friction term $P(U)$; its steady states solve $F(U)_x-Q(U)U_x-S(U)-P(U)=0$, equivalently $M(U)E_x=0$ with equilibrium variables $q=hu$, $E$, and $E_i$ defined through (2.2)-(2.3). The scheme reconstructs these equilibrium variables, computes the global flux $K=F-R$ by path-conservative quadrature over cells and over a path joining one-sided states, and forms a central-upwind numerical flux from the one-sided $K$ values. At steady states satisfying (2.1) or (2.2), the one-sided global fluxes coincide, $K^+_{k-1/2}=K^-_{k+1/2}=K^+_{k+1/2}$, so the numerical flux reproduces the steady flux and the update vanishes. Numerical examples show convergence to discrete steady states, accurate capture of small perturbations on coarse meshes, and clean shock-and-rarefaction resolution in dam-break problems.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme's exact preservation of moving-water steady states with friction rests on applying a previously proved well-balancedness theorem to a system that includes nonlocal friction terms; if that theorem does not cover them, exact preservation is unproven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Lake-at-rest and moving-water steady states of the shallow water linearized moment equations are preserved to round-off, so small perturbations of these states can be simulated accurately on coarse meshes of about one hundred cells.
  • The same flux-globalization construction handles nonconservative products and friction without a Riemann solver, and applies to the whole $N$-moment hierarchy rather than only the two-moment examples shown.
  • Dam-break solutions with extreme initial velocity profiles are captured without the small nonphysical waves reported for the previous frictionless scheme, and friction visibly changes the highest-moment profile.
  • The construction provides a template for well-balanced computation of other shallow-water-type moment models with nonlinear and nonconservative source terms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper does not give a self-contained proof of exact well-balancedness for the moving-water equilibria with friction; Remark 3.2 delegates the equality of one-sided global fluxes to a theorem in [40] that was established for systems without the nonlocal friction integrals $P$ and $P_i$. If that theorem's hypotheses do not transfer to (1.1)-(1.4), exact preservation of (2.2)
  • Editorial inference: because $R$ is defined by integrals from an arbitrary base point, the scheme is inherently nonlocal, and the exact well-balancedness is tied to the particular trapezoidal and midpoint quadrature rules used in (3.4)-(3.9); changing the quadrature would change which discrete equilibria are preserved exactly.
  • Editorial inference: the construction appears largely independent of the one-dimensional setting beyond the form of the integrals, so extending the path-conservative quadrature to cell edges could yield a testable two-dimensional or multilayer version of the scheme.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops second-order flux-globalization-based path-conservative central-upwind (PCCU) schemes for the one-dimensional hyperbolic shallow water linearized moment equations (HSWLME) with non-flat bottom topography and friction. The scheme reconstructs equilibrium variables q, E, E_i, uses a global flux K obtained by path-conservative integration, and is claimed to be well-balanced in the sense of exactly preserving both lake-at-rest and moving-water steady states, including states with friction. The numerical section reports convergence to discrete steady states, small-perturbation tests, and dam-break problems for N=2 and N=8 moments, comparing the proposed scheme with a non-well-balanced variant and with an earlier scheme from [36]. The central well-balancedness claim for moving-water equilibria with friction is asserted in Remark 3.2 by reference to a theorem in the authors' prior paper [40], without a derivation in the present manuscript.

Significance. If the well-balancedness claim is fully established, the paper provides a useful extension of the flux-globalization PCCU framework to a moment model whose equilibrium variables are nonlocal and depend on friction integrals. The scheme is presented with explicit formulas for the quadratures, the reconstruction, and the numerical fluxes, and its free parameters are limited to the standard minmod limiter and desingularization parameters; no target quantities are fitted to data. The numerical experiments show clear improvements over a non-well-balanced version in steady-state and perturbation tests, and the dam-break results indicate that the scheme captures shocks and rarefactions without the nonphysical waves reported for earlier methods. However, the exact preservation of moving-water equilibria with friction is the paper's headline claim, and it is currently supported mainly by a deferred reference to [40] whose hypotheses are not verified for the nonlocal, quadrature-dependent equilibrium variables used here.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Remark 3.2 and §2, Eqs. (2.2)–(2.3)] The central well-balancedness claim for moving-water equilibria with friction is not proved in this manuscript. Remark 3.2 states that at steady states satisfying (2.2), the equality K^+_{k-1/2}=K^-_{k+1/2}=K^+_{k+1/2} 'immediately follows from [40, Theorem 4.1]'. However, the equilibrium variables E and E_i in (2.2) contain the nonlocal integrals P and P_i defined in (2.3), and in the discrete scheme these integrals are approximated by the trapezoidal and midpoint rules in (3.4), (3.6), and (3.9). Theorem 4.1 of [40] was established for equilibrium variables that are local functions of U; the present paper does not verify that the theorem's hypotheses survive the nonlocal, quadrature-dependent definition of E and E_i, nor does it show that the discrete P_k and P_{i,k} make the reconstructed E exactly constant at a continuous moving-water equilibrium. As written, the proof establishes at most exact preservation of a discrete equilibrium defined through the same quadratures, not exact preservation of the continuous steady states of (2.2). This gap is load-bearing for the abstract's claim of exact preservation of moving-water equilibria with friction. The authors should either provide a direct proof for the nonlocal case or explicitly restate the well-balanced property as a discrete-equilibrium property, adjusting the claims accordingly.
  2. [§1, Eq. (1.5)] Equation (1.5) has an incorrect sign for the friction term: it reads F_x - Q U_x - S(U) + P(U) = 0, whereas the steady-state form of (1.1) is F_x - Q U_x - S(U) - P(U) = 0, which is the form used in (2.4) and in the steady-state system in §2. The sign inconsistency does not appear to affect the later construction, since (2.4) is consistent with (1.1), but it indicates that the steady-state algebra was not fully checked and it must be corrected. Because the well-balanced property is defined through this steady-state equation, a reader must be able to rely on the sign convention being uniform throughout.
  3. [§4, Examples 1–2] The numerical experiments do not directly test exact preservation of a continuously prescribed moving-water equilibrium with friction. In Example 1 the solutions are evolved to large time and the resulting discrete steady states are reported; in Example 2 these discrete steady states are then perturbed. This demonstrates convergence to and stability of the scheme's own discrete equilibria, which is a common and useful validation, but it does not confirm that the scheme exactly preserves the continuous steady states of (2.2). A direct test that initializes an analytically known moving-water equilibrium (with constant q, E, E_i) and measures the preservation error over a long time on several meshes would provide evidence for the exact well-balanced claim; at present that evidence is missing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4, Examples 3–4] The phrase 'finial time' should be 'final time' in both examples.
  2. [§3, Eq. (3.3)] In the formula for a^-_{k+1/2}, the term involving (α_i)^+_{k+1/2} appears to be missing an opening parenthesis: the expression reads '3( α i)+ k+1/2 )^2' while the analogous term in a^+ has the correct parenthesization. Please check and correct this typographical error.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (3.4)] In the first displayed equation of (3.4), the summation index uses 'xj' in the integral limit; this should presumably be 'xk'.
  4. [§3.2, formula for B^{(i)}_{Ψ,k+1/2}] The last term of B^{(i)}_{Ψ,k+1/2} uses the left-cell value h^-_{k-1/2} and u^-_{k-1/2}, but by analogy with the other terms and with B^{(i)}_k it should use the values at k+1/2; please verify and correct the index.
  5. [§4] No convergence rates are measured for the smooth or dam-break examples; the paper would be strengthened by reporting experimental orders of accuracy on a smooth test, since the scheme is described as second-order.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the moving-water well-balanced property is a structural consequence of the equilibrium-variable reconstruction and the flux-globalization framework, not a fitted or self-imported result.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions. The equilibrium variables q, E, and E_i in (2.2) are derived from the steady-state relation M(U)E(U)_x = 0 in (2.4), not calibrated to numerical output. The flux-globalization and path-conservative construction follows the framework of the authors' prior work [40], and Remark 3.2's appeal to [40, Theorem 4.1] is a theorem application rather than an imported conclusion: once E is reconstructed as a piecewise-linear variable and the path is taken linear in E, the quadratures B_k and B_Ψ in Section 3.2 are designed so that constant E makes all one-sided global fluxes equal. The nonlocal friction integrals P and P_i enter only through the definition of E and E_i, and the discrete quadratures (3.4), (3.6), and (3.9) are part of the discretized equilibrium relation; this affects consistency order, but it is not a circular input. The numerical experiments in Section 4 check convergence to discrete steady states and responses to perturbations around them; using the scheme's own discrete steady state for perturbation tests is a standard well-balanced validation practice, not the fitting of a quantity that is later called a prediction. The sign mismatch between (1.5) and (2.4) is a typographical or correctness issue, not a self-referential reduction, and it is corrected in the actual steady-state analysis. Under the review rules, the self-citation to [40] does not raise the circularity score because the cited theorem is parameter-free and the paper supplies the required structural relation (2.4)-(2.5) for its application; the central claim is therefore self-contained rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scheme has no fitted constants. The only hand-chosen numbers are standard numerical tuning parameters, and the central WB property does not depend on their values. The key unproved input is the extension of [40, Theorem 4.1] to the friction case, which is an ad-hoc assumption rather than an independently verified theorem. No new physical entities are introduced; P and P_i are integral equilibrium variables, not new physical objects.

free parameters (2)
  • generalized minmod limiter parameter theta = theta = 1.3
    Chosen in all numerical tests to control numerical dissipation; not fitted to the target steady states and does not affect the well-balanced property.
  • desingularization parameter epsilon = epsilon = 1e-6
    Introduced in Remark 3.1 to avoid division by small h and q; standard numerical regularization, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Nonconservative products Q(U)U_x are interpreted along a linear path in equilibrium variables E
    Section 3.2 defines B_k and B_{Psi,k+1/2} using the path E_{k+1/2}(s)=E^- + s(E^+ - E^-); for nonconservative systems different paths define different weak solutions, so this choice is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Eigenvalue estimates and hyperbolicity of HSWLME from [36]
    Used in (3.3) for local speeds a^+ and a^-; taken as background from prior work without reproof.
  • ad hoc to paper Theorem 4.1 of [40] applies to the friction-perturbed HSWLME scheme
    Invoked in Remark 3.2 for WB preservation of moving-water equilibria; no proof or verification of hypotheses for the nonlocal P and P_i terms is provided.
  • standard math Weak solutions for nonconservative systems are defined by measure-valued and path-conservative theory
    Background from [24,44,45,49] for interpreting Q(U)U_x; standard in the literature.
  • domain assumption Friction coefficients nu and lambda are positive constants
    The equilibrium integrals (2.3) and the numerical tests assume constant positive nu and lambda.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flux Globalization Based Well-Balanced Path-Conservative Central-Upwind Schemes for Shallow Water Linearized Moment Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JXW64CGH

@misc{pith2026250523144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flux Globalization Based Well-Balanced Path-Conservative Central-Upwind Schemes for Shallow Water Linearized Moment Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JXW64CGH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23144}
}
read the original abstract

We develop second-order path-conservative central-upwind (PCCU) schemes for the hyperbolic shallow water linearized moment equations (HSWLME), which are an extension of standard depth-averaged models for free-surface flows. The proposed PCCU schemes are constructed via flux globalization strategies adapted to the nonconservative form via a path-conservative finite-volume method. The resulting scheme is well-balanced (WB) in the sense that it is capable of exactly preserving physically relevant steady states including moving-water ones. We validate the proposed scheme on several benchmarks, including smooth solutions, small perturbation of steady states, and dam-break scenarios. These results demonstrate that our flux globalization based WB PCCU schemes provide a reliable framework for computing solutions of shallow water moment models with nonlinear and nonconservative features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23144 by the authors.

Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Example 1, Case (a): h, q, E, E1, and E2 computed by the WB and NWB PCCU schemes over the continuous (top two rows) and discontinuous (bottom two rows) Z. N = 8 coefficients, such that u(x, 0) ≡ 1 and α1(x, 0) ≡ − 3 5 , α2(x, 0) ≡ − 1 7 , α3(x, 0) ≡ − 1 15 , α4(x, 0) ≡ − 3 77 , α5(x, 0) ≡ − 1 39 , α6(x, 0) ≡ − 1 55 , α7(x, 0) ≡ − 3 221 , α8(x, 0) ≡ − 1 95 . We compute the numerical solutions using the WB PCCU scheme… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Same as in Figures 4.1 and 4.2, but for Case (c). including higher-order moments to resolve vertical variations. Future work includes extensions to more complex shallow water moment models, two-dimensional models, and the inclusion of more physical effects like bedload transport, sediments, or different friction models. Acknowledgment The work of Y. Cao was supported in part by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Example 2 (small perturbation): The difference h(x, t) − heq(x) computed using 100 and 1000 uniform cells at times t = 0.8 in Case (a) and t = 2 in Cases (b) and (c). -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 1 2 3 4 5 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.5 1 1.5 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 …
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: Example 3: h, u, α1, and α8 computed by the WB PCCU scheme. ν = 0. supported in part by the SNFS grants 200020 204917 and UZH Posdoc Grant, 2024/Verf¨ugung Nr.FK-24-110. The publication is part of the project HiWAVE with file number VI.Vidi.233.066 of the research EN…
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.6. Figure 4.6: Example 3: Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4_6.png]
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.7. Figure 4.7: Example 4: h, u, α1, and α8 computed by the WB PCCU scheme. ν = 0. where the slopes (ϕx)k have to be evaluated using a nonlinear limiter. In our numerical experi￾ments, we have used the generalized minmod limiter (see [46, 48, 54]): (ϕx)k = minmod  θ ϕk+1 − ϕk ∆x , …
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.8. Figure 4.8: Example 4: Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High order global flux schemes for general steady state preservation of shallow water moment equations with non-conservative products

    math.NA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new global-flux WENO finite volume framework preserves steady states of shallow water moment equations with non-conservative products, without requiring analytical steady states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [36]

    Koellermeier and E

    J. Koellermeier and E. Pimentel-Garc ´ıa, Steady states and well-balanced schemes for shallow water moment equations with topography , Appl. Math. Comput., 427 (2022). Paper No. 127166

    work page 2022

  2. [40]

    Kurganov, Y

    A. Kurganov, Y. Liu, and R. Xin , Well-balanced path-conservative central-upwind schemes based on flux globalization , J. Comput. Phys., 474 (2023). Paper No. 111773

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Audusse and M.-O

    E. Audusse and M.-O. Bristeau , Finite-volume solvers for a multilayer Saint-Venant system, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 17 (2007), pp. 311–319

    work page 2007

  4. [2]

    Audusse, M.-O

    E. Audusse, M.-O. Bristeau, M. Pelanti, and J. Sainte-Marie , Approximation of the hydrostatic Navier-Stokes system for density stratifie d flows by a multilayer model: kinetic interpretation and numerical solution , J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), pp. 3453–3478

    work page 2011

  5. [3]

    Audusse, M.-O

    E. Audusse, M.-O. Bristeau, B. Perthame, and J. Sainte-Mari e, A multilayer Saint-Venant system with mass exchanges for shallow water fl ows. Derivation and numerical validation, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 45 (2011), pp. 169–200

    work page 2011

  6. [4]

    Bassi, L

    C. Bassi, L. Bonaventura, S. Busto, and M. Dumbser , A hyperbolic reformulation of the Serre-Green-Naghdi model for general bottom topographies, Comput. & Fluids, 212 (2020). Paper No. 104716. Flux Globalization Based PCCU Schemes for HSWLME 19

    work page 2020

  7. [5]

    Bonaventura, E

    L. Bonaventura, E. D. Fern ´andez-Nieto, J. Garres-D ´ıaz, and G. Narbona- Reina, Multilayer shallow water models with locally variable numb er of layers and semi- implicit time discretization , J. Comput. Phys., 364 (2018), pp. 209–234

    work page 2018

  8. [6]

    Bristeau, A

    M.-O. Bristeau, A. Mangeney, J. Sainte-Marie, and N. Seguin , An energy- consistent depth-averaged Euler system: derivation and pr operties, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 20 (2015), pp. 961–988

    work page 2015

Show all 55 references
  1. [7]

    Busto, M

    S. Busto, M. Dumbser, S. Gavrilyuk, and K. Ivanova , On thermodynamically com- patible finite volume methods and path-conservative ADER di scontinuous Galerkin schemes for turbulent shallow water flows , J. Sci. Comput., 88 (2021). Paper No. 28

    2021

  2. [8]

    Y. Cao, A. Kurganov, and Y. Liu , Flux globalization based well-balanced path- conservative central-upwind scheme for the thermal rotati ng shallow water equations , Com- mun. Comput. Phys., 34 (2023), pp. 993–1042

    2023

  3. [9]

    Y. Cao, A. Kurganov, Y. Liu, and R. Xin , Flux globalization based well-balanced path- conservative central-upwind schemes for shallow water mod els, J. Sci. Comput., 92 (2022). Paper No. 69

    2022

  4. [10]

    Y. Cao, A. Kurganov, Y. Liu, and V. Zeitlin , Flux globalization based well-balanced path-conservative central-upwind scheme for two-layer th ermal rotating shallow water equa- tions, J. Comput. Phys., 474 (2023). Paper No. 111790

    2023

  5. [11]

    Caselles, R

    V. Caselles, R. Donat, and G. Haro , Flux-gradient and source-term balancing for certain high resolution shock-capturing schemes , Comput. & Fluids, 38 (2009), pp. 16–36

    2009

  6. [12]

    M. J. Castro, P. G. LeFloch, M. L. Mu ˜noz-Ruiz, and C. Par ´ es, Why many theo- ries of shock waves are necessary: convergence error in form ally path-consistent schemes , J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), pp. 8107–8129

    2008

  7. [13]

    M. J. Castro, T. Morales de Luna, and C. Par ´ es, Well-balanced schemes and path- conservative numerical methods , in Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Prob- lems, vol. 18 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Elsevier/North-Ho lland, Amsterdam, 2017, pp. 131–175

    2017

  8. [14]

    M. J. Castro and C. Par ´ es, Well-balanced high-order finite volume methods for systems of balance laws , J. Sci. Comput., 82 (2020). Paper No. 48

    2020

  9. [15]

    M. J. Castro D ´ıaz, A. Kurganov, and T. Morales de Luna , Path-conservative central-upwind schemes for nonconservative hyperbolic systems, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 53 (2019), pp. 959–985

    2019

  10. [16]

    Chalons , Path-conservative in-cell discontinuous reconstruction schemes for non conser- vative hyperbolic systems , Commun

    C. Chalons , Path-conservative in-cell discontinuous reconstruction schemes for non conser- vative hyperbolic systems , Commun. Math. Sci., 18 (2020), pp. 1–30

    2020

  11. [17]

    X. Chen, A. Kurganov, and Y. Liu , Flux globalization based well-balanced central-upwind schemes for hydrodynamic equations with general free energ y, J. Sci. Comput., 95 (2023). Paper No. 95. 20 Y. Cao, Q. Huang, J. Koellermeier, A. Kurganov & Y. Liu

    2023

  12. [18]

    Y. Chen, A. Kurganov, and M. Na , A flux globalization based well-balanced path- conservative central-upwind scheme for the shallow water fl ows in channels , ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 57 (2023), pp. 1087–1110

    2023

  13. [19]

    Cheng, A

    Y. Cheng, A. Chertock, M. Herty, A. Kurganov, and T. Wu , A new approach for designing moving-water equilibria preserving schemes for the shallow water equations , J. Sci. Comput., 80 (2019), pp. 538–554

    2019

  14. [20]

    Chertock, S

    A. Chertock, S. Cui, A. Kurganov, S ¸. N. ¨Ozcan, and E. Tadmor , Well-balanced schemes for the Euler equations with gravitation: Conserva tive formulation using global fluxes , J. Comput. Phys., 358 (2018), pp. 36–52

    2018

  15. [21]

    Chertock, M

    A. Chertock, M. Herty, and S ¸. N. ¨Ozcan, Well-balanced central-upwind schemes for 2 × 2 systems of balance laws , in Theory, Numerics and Applications of Hyperbolic Problems I, vol. 236 of Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Spr inger, 2018, pp. 345–361

    2018

  16. [22]

    Chertock, A

    A. Chertock, A. Kurganov, M. Redle, and V. Zeitlin , Locally divergence-free well- balanced path-conservative central-upwind schemes for ro tating shallow water MHD , J. Com- put. Phys., 518 (2024). Paper No. 113300

    2024

  17. [23]

    Chu and A

    S. Chu and A. Kurganov , Flux globalization based well-balanced central-upwind sc heme for one-dimensional blood flow models , Calcolo, 60 (2023). Paper No. 2

    2023

  18. [24]

    Dal Maso, P

    G. Dal Maso, P. G. Lefloch, and F. Murat , Definition and weak stability of noncon- servative products, J. Math. Pures Appl., 74 (1995), pp. 483–548

    1995

  19. [25]

    Donat and A

    D. Donat and A. Martinez-Gavara , Hybrid second order schemes for scalar balance laws, J. Sci. Comput., 48 (2011), pp. 52–69

    2011

  20. [26]

    Dumbser, A

    M. Dumbser, A. Hidalgo, and O. Zanotti , High order space-time adaptive ADER- WENO finite volume schemes for non-conservative hyperbolic systems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 268 (2014), pp. 359–387

    2014

  21. [27]

    E. D. Fern ´andez-Nieto, E. H. Kon ´ e, and T. Chac ´on Rebollo , A multilayer method for the hydrostatic Navier-Stokes equations: a particular weak solution , J. Sci. Comput., 60 (2014), pp. 408–437

    2014

  22. [28]

    E. D. Fern ´andez-Nieto, M. Parisot, Y. Penel, and J. Sainte-Marie , A hierarchy of dispersive layer-averaged approximations of Euler equati ons for free surface flows , Commun. Math. Sci., 16 (2018), pp. 1169–1202

    2018

  23. [29]

    Garres-D´ıaz, M

    J. Garres-D´ıaz, M. J. Castro D ´ıaz, J. Koellermeier, and T. Morales de Luna , Shallow water moment models for bedload transport problems , Commun. Comput. Phys., 30 (2021), pp. 903–941

    2021

  24. [30]

    Garres-D´ıaz, C

    J. Garres-D´ıaz, C. Escalante, T. Morales de Luna, and M. J. Castro D ´ıaz, A general vertical decomposition of Euler equations: multil ayer-moment models , Appl. Numer. Math., 183 (2023), pp. 236–262. Flux Globalization Based PCCU Schemes for HSWLME 21

    2023

  25. [31]

    Gasc ´on and J

    L. Gasc ´on and J. M. Corder ´an, Construction of second-order TVD schemes for nonho- mogeneous hyperbolic conservation laws , J. Comput. Phys., 172 (2001), pp. 261–297

    2001

  26. [32]

    Gottlieb, D

    S. Gottlieb, D. Ketcheson, and C.-W. Shu , Strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multistep time discretizations , World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2011

    2011

  27. [33]

    Gottlieb, C.-W

    S. Gottlieb, C.-W. Shu, and E. Tadmor , Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods, SIAM Rev., 43 (2001), pp. 89–112

    2001

  28. [34]

    Huang, J

    Q. Huang, J. Koellermeier, and W.-A. Yong , Equilibrium stability analysis of hyper- bolic shallow water moment equations , Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), pp. 6459–6480

    2022

  29. [35]

    Koellermeier, P

    J. Koellermeier, P. Krah, and J. Kusch , Macro-micro decomposition for consistent and conservative model order reduction of hyperbolic shall ow water moment equations: a study using POD-Galerkin and dynamical low-rank approximation , Adv. Comput. Math., 50 (2024). Paper No. 76

    2024

  30. [37]

    Koellermeier and M

    J. Koellermeier and M. Rominger , Analysis and numerical simulation of hyperbolic shallow water moment equations , Commun. Comput. Phys., 28 (2020), pp. 1038–1084

    2020

  31. [38]

    Kowalski and M

    J. Kowalski and M. Torrilhon , Moment approximations and model cascades for shallow flow, Commun. Comput. Phys., 25 (2019), pp. 669–702

    2019

  32. [39]

    Kurganov and C.-T

    A. Kurganov and C.-T. Lin , On the reduction of numerical dissipation in central-upwin d schemes, Commun. Comput. Phys., 2 (2007), pp. 141–163

    2007

  33. [41]

    Kurganov, Y

    A. Kurganov, Y. Liu, and V. Zeitlin , A well-balanced central-upwind scheme for the thermal rotating shallow water equations , J. Comput. Phys., 411 (2020). Paper No. 109414

    2020

  34. [42]

    Kurganov, S

    A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova , Semi-discrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 (2001), pp. 707–740

    2001

  35. [43]

    Kurganov and E

    A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor , New high resolution central schemes for nonlinear conser- vation laws and convection-diffusion equations , J. Comput. Phys., 160 (2000), pp. 241–282

    2000

  36. [44]

    P. G. LeFloch , Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws , in The theory of classical and nonclassical shock waves, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z¨ urich, B irkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2002

    2002

  37. [45]

    Hyperbolic Differ

    , Graph solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic systems , J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 1 (2004), pp. 643–689. 22 Y. Cao, Q. Huang, J. Koellermeier, A. Kurganov & Y. Liu

    2004

  38. [46]

    Lie and S

    K.-A. Lie and S. Noelle , On the artificial compression method for second-order nonos cil- latory central difference schemes for systems of conservati on laws , SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2003), pp. 1157–1174

    2003

  39. [47]

    Martinez-Gavara and R

    A. Martinez-Gavara and R. Donat , A hybrid second order scheme for shallow water flows, J. Sci. Comput., 48 (2011), pp. 241–257

    2011

  40. [48]

    Nessyahu and E

    H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor , Nonoscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conser va- tion laws , J. Comput. Phys., 87 (1990), pp. 408–463

    1990

  41. [49]

    Par ´ es, Numerical methods for nonconservative hyperbolic systems : a theoretical frame- work, SIAM J

    C. Par ´ es, Numerical methods for nonconservative hyperbolic systems : a theoretical frame- work, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 44 (2006), pp. 300–321

    2006

  42. [50]

    Par ´ es, Path-conservative numerical methods for nonconservative hyperbolic systems , in Numerical Methods for Balance Laws, vol

    C. Par ´ es, Path-conservative numerical methods for nonconservative hyperbolic systems , in Numerical Methods for Balance Laws, vol. 24, Quad. Mat. Dept. Ma th. Seconda Univ. Napoli, Caserta, 2009, pp. 67–121

    2009

  43. [51]

    Pimentel-Garc ´ıa, M

    E. Pimentel-Garc ´ıa, M. J. Castro, C. Chalons, T. Morales de Luna, and C. Par ´ es, In-cell discontinuous reconstruction path-conservative methods for non conser- vative hyperbolic systems—second-order extension , J. Comput. Phys., 459 (2022). Paper No. 111152

    2022

  44. [52]

    K. A. Schneider, J. M. Gallardo, D. S. Balsara, B. Nkonga, and C. Par´ es, Multidimensional approximate Riemann solvers for hyperbo lic nonconservative systems. Ap- plications to shallow water systems , J. Comput. Phys., 444 (2021). Paper No. 110547

    2021

  45. [53]

    Scholz, J

    U. Scholz, J. Kowalski, and M. Torrilhon , Dispersion in shallow moment equations , Commun. Appl. Math. Comput., 6 (2024), pp. 2155–2195

    2024

  46. [54]

    P. K. Sweby , High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic c onservation laws , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21 (1984), pp. 995–1011

    1984

  47. [55]

    Yamazaki, Z

    Y. Yamazaki, Z. Kowalik, and K. F. Cheung , Depth-integrated, non-hydrostatic model for wave breaking and run-up , Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 61 (2009), pp. 473–497

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.