Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Quantum geometric localization length and localization criticality in an ideally flat Chern band

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In an isolated, ideally flat Chern band with weak local disorder, the localization length is set by the band's quantum geometric length, so band geometry, not the microscopic disorder, controls localization and the mobility edge.

desk verdict A genuinely new numerical framework and a plausible but not yet proven claim; the linear xi0-xi_geo relation rests on a narrow parameter window and an unextrapolated limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08042 v1 pith:JZEAHAY4 submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.dis-nn

Xu-Cheng Wang , Yang Qi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.dis-nn PACS 72.15.Rn73.43.-f
keywords flatChernbandlocalizationlengthquantummetricgeometrichybridWannierbasismobilityedgeunitaryclassintegerHalltransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that, in an isolated and ideally flat Chern band with weak local disorder, the localization length is controlled by the band's quantum geometry rather than by the microscopic disorder potential. Concretely, it claims the proportionality $\xi_0 \sim \xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$, where $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ is the quantum geometric length obtained from the quantum metric through the minimal spread of maximally localized hybrid Wannier functions. Using transfer matrix calculations in that Wannier basis on the $\pi$-flux model, the authors extract localization lengths and critical exponents and find the linear geometric scaling in the universal regime, together with a crossover from a universal exponent $\nu \approx 2.15$ to $2.19$ to continuously varying larger exponents as the quantum metric evolves from Dirac-like to nodal-line-like. If correct, the result would explain why flat Chern bands in moir\'e materials remain conducting despite modest mobilities, and would tie the long-contested criticality of the integer quantum Hall transition to band geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quantum geometric length $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}(k_y)=\sqrt{\Omega_I(k_y)}$, where $\Omega_I(k_y)=a\int dk_x/(2\pi)\, g_{xx}(k)$ is the gauge-invariant part of the hybrid Wannier variance; the parallel-transport gauge makes the Wannier functions maximally localized, and their spatial spread is exactly this geometric quantity. This length plays a double role: it quantifies how much of the short-wavelength disorder is averaged out inside each Wannier packet, and it controls the exponential decay of the Wannier matrix elements that justifies the finite cutoff $l_0$ in the transfer matrix. The numerical machinery is the transfer matrix method in this hybrid Wannier basis, whose Lyapunov exponents give $\lambda_M$, combined with a two-parameter scaling analysis using the factorization ansatz $\Gamma_M(x)=\Gamma_0(M^{1/\nu}x)\,\Gamma_1(f(M))$, which separates the relevant from the marginally irrelevant scaling field and yields both $\nu$ and $\xi_0$. The $\pi$-flux model with manual flattening $H_{\mathrm{flat}}(k)=H(k)/|\varepsilon_k|$ supplies an exactly flat Chern band whose quantum geometry can be tuned continuously by $t_2/t_1$.

What would settle it

Fix the disorder strength and energy, tune the quantum metric across the universal regime, and measure the localization length directly in the full two-dimensional disordered flat-band model without Wannier truncation, for example by exact diagonalization on finite clusters; if $\xi_0$ no longer grows linearly with $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$, or if increasing the transfer-matrix cutoff $l_0$ beyond the $10^{-3}$ threshold shifts $\nu$ meaningfully, the claimed geometric control of localization is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (2): the localization length $\xi_0$ in an isolated, ideally flat Chern band obeys $\xi_0 \sim \xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$, with the quantum geometric length $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}(k_y)=\sqrt{\Omega_I(k_y)}$ and $\Omega_I(k_y)=a\int dk_x/(2\pi)\, g_{xx}(k_x,k_y)$ the minimal gauge-invariant Wannier variance in the maximally localized hybrid Wannier basis. The argument is that a Wannier wave packet of spatial spread $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ averages the bare disorder potential, so a band with larger $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ sees a smoother, weaker effective disorder and is more delocalized. Numerically, the authors flatten the $\pi$-flux model while preserving its eigenstates, add local disorder, and run transfer matrix calculations in the parallel-transport hybrid Wannier basis. They observe that in the universal (unitary-class) regime the localization length follows $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ linearly, and that tuning $t_2/t_1$ so the quantum metric concentrates on nodal lines drives the effective critical exponent upward, consistent with a crossover toward the orthogonal-class fixed point even though the topological gap stays open. The paper also derives a quantum geometric mobility edge $E_m/W=(\xi_0/M)^{1/\nu}$, connecting $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ to the width of Hall plateaus in finite systems.

Load-bearing premise

The transfer-matrix calculation truncated in the maximally localized Wannier basis at a finite cutoff $l_0$, together with the factorization ansatz in the scaling analysis, must faithfully reproduce the localization length and critical exponent of the full disordered flat-band model; if either step biases the extracted $\xi_0$ or $\nu$, the linear relation $\xi_0 \sim \xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ would be a numerical artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within the universal regime, a flat Chern band with twice the quantum geometric length will have roughly twice the localization length at fixed disorder strength, making plateau transitions sharper and mobility edges higher.
  • Landau levels, whose quantum metric is flat, recover the familiar magnetic-length control $\xi_0 \sim l_B$ as a limiting case.
  • The measured critical exponent $\nu \approx 2.15(1)$ to $2.19(2)$ in the Dirac-metric regime is independent of disorder type (white-noise versus Anderson), placing flat Chern bands in the same unitary-class fixed point as disordered Dirac fermions.
  • Because the effective exponent increases when the quantum metric becomes nodal-line-like, devices with different moir\'e geometries are predicted to show different apparent critical exponents even with identical disorder.
  • The mobility-edge formula $E_m/W=(\xi_0/M)^{1/\nu}$ turns the geometric length into a directly testable finite-size prediction for twisted-moir\'e samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not claim this explicitly, but the Wannier-spread mechanism suggests the same proportionality $\xi_0 \sim \xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ should hold in fractional Chern insulators, where the quantum metric also sets the many-body energy scale.
  • A testable separation follows from the definition: two flat bands with equal Chern number and nearly identical Berry curvature but different metric anisotropy should have different localization lengths, since $\xi_{\mathrm{geo}}$ depends on $g_{xx}$ rather than on the Berry curvature alone.
  • The data locate the non-universal behavior on the large-$t_2/t_1$ side where the metric concentrates on nodal lines, implying that it is the momentum-space locus of the quantum metric, not merely its magnitude, that selects the universality class; this is our inference from their plots, not a stated theorem.
  • A natural check of the crossover scenario is that at fixed large $t_2/t_1$, increasing the system width $M$ should make the effective exponent continue to grow toward larger values if the orthogonal-class fixed point controls the scaling, while a purely finite-size artifact would saturate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the localization length of an isolated, ideally flat Chern band with weak local disorder is proportional to a quantum geometric length derived from the minimal hybrid Wannier spread (Eqs. (2), (6)-(7)). To test this, the authors develop a transfer-matrix calculation in the maximally localized hybrid Wannier basis and study the pi-flux model with flattened bands. They report a universal critical exponent nu=2.15-2.19 for small t2/t1, which they associate with the Dirac fixed point, and a crossover to larger effective exponents for large t2/t1, which they attribute to the orthogonal class. Within the universal regime, they find an approximately linear relation between xi0 and the momentum-averaged quantum geometric length, and they use this to predict a quantum geometric mobility edge.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (2) would establish quantum geometry as the governing length scale for localization in flat Chern bands, connecting to experiments in moire materials and offering a new angle on the IQHT critical exponent puzzle. The transfer-matrix approach in the optimally localized hybrid Wannier basis is a methodological innovation, and the consistency of the exponent between white-noise and Anderson disorder is a strength. However, the central linear relation is supported by a narrow range of xi_geo and relies on a finite-size approximation that is not yet shown to be converged; the Dirac-fixed-point identification is also not benchmarked. The paper is therefore suggestive but not yet conclusive.

major comments (4)
  1. [Quantum geometric localization length, Eq. (12)] The extraction of xi0 replaces lim_{M->infty} Gamma_M(0) in Eq. (12) with Gamma_M(0) at the largest accessible M, as stated below Eq. (12). Over the universal branch in Fig. 4(d), the momentum-averaged geometric length varies by only about 10 percent, so a t2/t1-dependent finite-M correction could produce the apparent linear relation Eq. (2) even if the true thermodynamic xi0 is independent of xi_geo. Please provide a convergence test of xi0, e.g., a plot of Gamma_M(0) versus 1/M for several t2/t1 values, and report the extrapolated value.
  2. [Critical exponent of the unitary class, Fig. 3(a)] The universal exponent nu=2.15(1)-2.19(2) is attributed to the Dirac fixed point, but it is not benchmarked against an independent determination. The quoted IQHT window is 2.3-2.6, and the disordered-Dirac calculation of Ref. [49] gives nu=2.33(3) at E=0, both outside the reported range. The suggestion that IQHT lies in a crossover regime is not testable from the present data. To support the universality claim, the authors should compute the exponent for a genuinely gapless Dirac model with the same transfer-matrix method, or soften the identification.
  3. [Supplemental Material III C] In the Supplemental Material (Sec. III C, Eq. (S41)), the cutoff l0 is chosen from the decay of disorder matrix elements in the same hybrid Wannier basis whose spread defines xi_geo. Since that decay length scales with xi_geo, the truncation error varies with t2/t1. Convergence with respect to l0 is tested for nu (Table S1) but not for xi0. If xi0 depends on l0 in a t2/t1-dependent manner, the proportionality in Fig. 4(d) could be an artifact. Please show xi0 for at least two values of l0 at representative t2/t1.
  4. [Fig. 4(d)] The linear relation Eq. (2) is supported by data over a narrow interval of xi_geo (roughly 0.34 to 0.37, about 10 percent variation). The error bars in Fig. 4(d) are not defined in the caption, and the fitted slope and its uncertainty are not reported. The authors should quote the slope, intercept, and goodness of fit; if the uncertainty is comparable to the 10 percent variation, the evidence for a linear relation is weak.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text] The notation for the quantum geometric length is inconsistent: both 'xi_geo' and 'xi_geo.' appear in the main text; please use one notation consistently.
  2. [Fig. 3(a)] In Fig. 3(a), the grey ribbon for the IQHT window is not described in the caption; please state the quoted range (2.3-2.6) explicitly.
  3. [SM Eq. (S35)] In the Supplemental Material, Eq. (S35) gives the transfer matrix, but the dimensions and arrangement of the blocks are not fully explained, making it difficult to verify the implementation; a short derivation or diagram would help.
  4. [References] The main text cites Ref. [18] for the Supplemental Material without a URL or arXiv identifier; please provide a working link.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed relation xi0 ~ xi_geo is a numerical correlation from an independent transfer-matrix calculation, not an identity built into the definitions.

full rationale

The central claim Eq. (2) is an empirical correlation, not a derivation, and I find no step where it reduces to its own inputs. xi_geo is computed from the band geometry via Eqs. (6)-(7) as the minimal hybrid Wannier spread. xi0 is obtained from an independent transfer-matrix calculation of the disordered flat-band Hamiltonian in the hybrid Wannier basis (Eq. 8), with a standard two-parameter scaling analysis (Eqs. 9-11) and Eq. (12) relating the collapsed curve's slope to xi0. The localization length is a property of the disordered Hamiltonian and is never set equal to the Wannier spread; the transfer-matrix output depends on disorder strength, energy, and strip width. The shared basis is a representation choice, not a definitional tie: the disorder is defined in the atomic basis and then projected, and the truncation l0 is a controlled numerical parameter. In the universal regime, l0 ranges from 10 to 4 (Table S2) while the momentum-averaged xi_geo varies only by about 9% (Fig. 4d), so the observed linear dependence is not trivially l0 proportional to xi_geo. The heuristic Wannier-averaging argument in the introduction is a motivation, not the quantitative derivation. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are used; the scaling analysis follows established external methodology. The absence of an explicit xi0 convergence test with l0 is a numerical robustness concern, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The 'quantum geometric localization length' is a proposed relation between existing concepts, not a new entity.

free parameters (2)
  • l0 (Wannier cutoff) = varies with t2/t1; chosen so the norm ratio is at most 1e-3
    Computational cutoff for the transfer matrix. It is selected by hand and controls the effective bandwidth of the disorder matrices, so the central numerical results depend on it. Convergence in nu is tested in Table S1, but xi0 values are not systematically re-checked at multiple l0.
  • scaling window E/W = [0, 0.2] for most fits, with [0, 0.3] or [0, 0.4] in some cases
    The energy range used for the finite-size scaling fits is chosen by hand. The extracted exponents vary somewhat with the window, and the reported values are taken from these chosen windows.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The flattened model H_flat = H/|epsilon_k| preserves locality, with exponentially decaying hoppings, as proved in Ref. [17].
    Used to justify the spatial block structure for the transfer matrix. If false, the basis is not local and the truncation fails.
  • standard math Under the parallel transport gauge, the minimal hybrid Wannier variance equals Omega_I = a times the integral of g_xx over kx, a result from Ref. [20].
    Basis for defining xi_geo in Eq. (7).
  • ad hoc to paper The factorization ansatz Eq. (10), Gamma_M(x) = Gamma_0(M^{1/nu} x) Gamma_1(f(M)), is a valid description of the scaling data.
    The scale-invariance form is assumed rather than derived. The data collapse quality supports it, but a different form could change nu.
  • domain assumption The observed universal exponent nu around 2.15 to 2.19 is identified with the conjectured Dirac fixed point of the unitary class from Ref. [16].
    No independent calculation of the Dirac fixed point exponent is cited, and the value sits below the quoted IQHT window of 2.3 to 2.6.
  • ad hoc to paper At t2/t1 = infinity, the localization transition belongs to the orthogonal class with nu = infinity in 2D, and this fixed point drags the effective exponent upward even while the finite-t2/t1 band gap remains open.
    The orthogonal class is not the actual symmetry class at finite t2/t1 because the gap is open and time-reversal symmetry is broken. The crossover scenario is qualitative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum geometric localization length and localization criticality in an ideally flat Chern band." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JZEAHAY4

@misc{pith2026260808042,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum geometric localization length and localization criticality in an ideally flat Chern band},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JZEAHAY4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08042}
}
read the original abstract

We propose that the localization length in an isolated, ideally flat Chern band is set by quantum geometry. We explore the corresponding localization transition and its critical scaling by applying transfer matrix calculations in the maximally localized hybrid Wannier basis, whose spatial spread is exactly characterized by a quantum geometric length. Remarkably, upon tuning the quantum metric of the Chern band, we observe a crossover from a universal regime controlled by the Dirac fixed point to a non-universal regime with continuously varying critical exponents. Within the universal regime, the localization length exhibits a pronounced linear dependence on the quantum geometric length, supporting its quantum geometric nature. These findings provide a novel quantum geometric perspective on the localization in quantum Hall systems such as twisted moir\'e superlattices, and shed new light on the long-standing controversy over the criticality of the integer quantum Hall transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08042 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic plot of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Localization length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Critical exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Localization length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    S. Bera, J. Dieplinger, and N. P. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174213 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  3. [2]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  4. [3]

    As a result,W serves as the only energy scale of the system and is set to unity once for all

    Since we focus on the isolated lower band, the band mixing is strictly prohibited; this assumption is justified in the weak- disorder regime where the disorder strengthWis sig- nificantly smaller than the band gap. As a result,W serves as the only energy scale of the system and is set to unity once for all. We then formulate the disordered flat-band Hamil...

    work page

  5. [4]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  6. [5]

    Y. J. Chung, K. A. Villegas Rosales, K. W. Baldwin, P. T. Madathil, K. W. West, M. Shayegan, and L. N. Pfeiffer, Nature Materials20, 632 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  8. [7]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

Show all 68 references
  1. [8]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    B. A. Bernevig, L. Fu, L. Ju, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nat. Phys.21, 1702 (2025)

    2025

  3. [10]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, National Science Review12, nwae334 (2024), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/12/3/nwae334/59204701/nwae334.pdf

    2024

  4. [11]

    Cheng, Quantum geometric tensor (fubini-study met- ric) in simple quantum system: A pedagogical introduc- tion (2013), arXiv:1012.1337 [quant-ph]

    R. Cheng, Quantum geometric tensor (fubini-study met- ric) in simple quantum system: A pedagogical introduc- tion (2013), arXiv:1012.1337 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Roy, Phys

    R. Roy, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  6. [13]

    Ma, J.-X

    X.-L. Ma, J.-X. Hu, and K. T. Law, Universal boundary- modes localization from quantum metric length (2025), arXiv:2509.05114 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  7. [14]

    Luo, X.-L

    X.-J. Luo, X.-L. Ma, and K. T. Law, Tunable quantum metric and band topology in bilayer dirac model (2025), arXiv:2509.23622 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  8. [15]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 011002 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Huckestein, Rev

    B. Huckestein, Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 357 (1995)

    1995

  10. [17]

    A. W. W. Ludwig, M. P. A. Fisher, R. Shankar, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. B50, 7526 (1994)

    1994

  11. [18]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Refer to the Supplemental Material atURL

  13. [20]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  14. [21]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  15. [22]

    Qi, Phys

    X.-L. Qi, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 126803 (2011)

    2011

  16. [23]

    C. H. Lee, R. Thomale, and X.-L. Qi, Phys. Rev. B88, 035101 (2013)

    2013

  17. [24]

    Slevin and T

    K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Phys. Rev. B80, 041304 (2009)

    2009

  18. [25]

    Nuding, A

    W. Nuding, A. Kl¨ umper, and A. Sedrakyan, Phys. Rev. B91, 115107 (2015)

    2015

  19. [26]

    E. J. Dresselhaus, B. Sbierski, and I. A. Gruzberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 026801 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Wegner, Physics Reports67, 15 (1980)

    F. Wegner, Physics Reports67, 15 (1980)

    1980

  21. [28]

    Hikami, Phys

    S. Hikami, Phys. Rev. B24, 2671 (1981)

    1981

  22. [29]

    Wegner, Nuclear Physics B316, 663 (1989)

    F. Wegner, Nuclear Physics B316, 663 (1989)

    1989

  23. [30]

    H. P. Wei, D. C. Tsui, M. A. Paalanen, and A. M. M. Pruisken, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1294 (1988)

    1988

  24. [31]

    W. Li, G. A. Cs´ athy, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 206807 (2005)

    2005

  25. [32]

    W. Li, C. L. Vicente, J. S. Xia, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 216801 (2009)

    2009

  26. [33]

    S. Kaur, T. Chanda, K. R. Amin, D. Sahani, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, U. Ghorai, Y. Gefen, G. J. Sreejith, and A. Bid, Nat Commun15, 8535 (2024)

    2024

  27. [34]

    J. T. Chalker and P. D. Coddington, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics21, 2665 (1988)

    1988

  28. [35]

    Kramer, T

    B. Kramer, T. Ohtsuki, and S. Kettemann, Physics Re- ports417, 211 (2005)

    2005

  29. [36]

    Amado, A

    M. Amado, A. V. Malyshev, A. Sedrakyan, and F. Dom ´ ınguez-Adame, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 066402 (2011)

    2011

  30. [37]

    Obuse, I

    H. Obuse, I. A. Gruzberg, and F. Evers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 206804 (2012)

    2012

  31. [38]

    Huckestein and B

    B. Huckestein and B. Kramer, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1437 (1990)

    1990

  32. [39]

    Liu and S

    D. Liu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B49, 2677 (1994)

    1994

  33. [40]

    Huo and R

    Y. Huo and R. N. Bhatt, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1375 (1992)

    1992

  34. [41]

    Q. Zhu, P. Wu, R. N. Bhatt, and X. Wan, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024205 (2019)

    2019

  35. [42]

    Puschmann, P

    M. Puschmann, P. Cain, M. Schreiber, and T. Vojta, Phys. Rev. B99, 121301 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    K. S. Huang, S. Raghu, and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 056802 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    E. J. Dresselhaus, B. Sbierski, and I. A. Gruzberg, Annals of Physics435, 168676 (2021)

    2021

  38. [45]

    Onoda and N

    M. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 206601 (2003)

    2003

  39. [46]

    Chang, W

    C.-Z. Chang, W. Zhao, J. Li, J. K. Jain, C. Liu, J. S. Moodera, and M. H. W. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 126802 (2016)

    2016

  40. [47]

    Mildner, M

    J. Mildner, M. D. Caio, G. M¨ oller, N. R. Cooper, and M. J. Bhaseen, Topological phase transitions in the dis- ordered haldane model (2023), arXiv:2312.16689 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    M. N. Ivaki, I. Sahlberg, and T. Ojanen, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043301 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Sbierski, E

    B. Sbierski, E. J. Dresselhaus, J. E. Moore, and I. A. Gruzberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 076801 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Kawamura, M

    M. Kawamura, M. Mogi, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, Y. Kozuka, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B102, 041301 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    P. C. Adak, S. Sinha, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Nature Reviews Materials9, 481 (2024). 8

    2024

  45. [53]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. He, X. Xu, Y. Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    C. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Z. Bi, and Y. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2316749121 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    T. Wang, M. Wang, W. Kim, S. G. Louie, L. Fu, and M. P. Zaletel, Topology, magnetism and charge order in twisted mote2 at higher integer hole fillings (2023), arXiv:2312.12531 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Graf and F

    A. Graf and F. Pi´ echon, Phys. Rev. B104, 085114 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Phys. Rev. B104, 045103 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026002 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    J.-X. Hu, S. A. Chen, and K. T. Law, Commun. Phys.8, 20 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    T. M. Gunawardana, A. M. Turner, and R. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023046 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    MacKinnon and B

    A. MacKinnon and B. Kramer, Z. Phys. B53, 1 (1983)

    1983

  54. [62]

    Kramer and A

    B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, Reports on Progress in Physics56, 1469 (1993)

    1993

  55. [63]

    Slevin and T

    K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, New Journal of Physics16, 015012 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    Slevin, Y

    K. Slevin, Y. Asada, and L. I. Deych, Phys. Rev. B70, 054201 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Zhang and S.-J

    Y.-Y. Zhang and S.-J. Xiong, Phys. Rev. B72, 132202 (2005)

    2005

  58. [66]

    Crisanti, G

    A. Crisanti, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani,Products of Random Matrices, edited by M. Cardona, P. Fulde, K. Von Klitzing, H.-J. Queisser, and H. K. V. Lotsch, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 104 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993)

    1993

  59. [67]

    Quantum geometric localization length and localization criticality in an ideally flat Chern band

    A. Sorge, pyfssa 0.7.6 (2015). 1 Supplementary Material for “Quantum geometric localization length and localization criticality in an ideally flat Chern band” CONTENTS I.π-flux model and quantum geometry 1 A. Quantum geometry basics 2 B. Quantum geometric lengths 3 II. Maximal...

    2015

  60. [68]

    (S16), theπ-flux model in the topological phase (t 1, t2 ̸= 0) breaks these basic, especially C4, symmetries (even when combined symmetries are considered)

    However, except for the combined anti-unitary symmetry Eq. (S16), theπ-flux model in the topological phase (t 1, t2 ̸= 0) breaks these basic, especially C4, symmetries (even when combined symmetries are considered). Consequently,ξ 2D geo. andξ GL are generally different as sho...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.