Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 39 references

On spectral curves and complexified boundaries of the phase-lock areas in a model of Josephson junction

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the complexified union of all phase-lock boundary families in the Josephson model is exactly four irreducible two-dimensional analytic surfaces, and establishes the irreducibility of the spectral curves that makes…

desk verdict The irreducibility proof is clean and the four-component complexification theorem is a real new result; the main risk is the weight of imported results from the same group, but nothing I saw makes the chain circular. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08491 v3 pith:K2A3JMOH submitted 2019-08-22 math.DS math.AG

Alexey Glutsyuk , Igor Netay This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.AG MSC 34M0334M5037E4514H45
keywords Josephsonjunctionphase-lockareasspectralcurvedoubleconfluentHeunequationirreducibilitycomplexificationrotationnumbermonodromy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to prove that the complexified family of all phase-lock area boundaries in a standard Josephson junction model is far simpler than the countable union of real boundary surfaces would suggest: its Zariski closure in $C^{3}$ consists of exactly four two-dimensional irreducible components, distinguished by the parity of the rotation number and by which fixed point of the Poincaré map is involved. The key step is a theorem that each spectral curve Γ_l, defined as the zero set of the determinant of a tridiagonal l×l matrix, is irreducible for every positive integer l. From this irreducibility the authors derive the four-component structure and several supporting results, including the absence of real ovals on the spectral curves and a genus formula confirmed for l up to 20. If the paper is right, an infinite countable union of analytic boundary surfaces collapses into a single rigid complex four-component object, meaning all phase-lock boundaries share one complexification regardless of rotation number or frequency.

What carries the argument

The central object is the l-th spectral curve Γ_l = {P_l(λ, μ²) = 0}, the zero locus of the determinant of a tridiagonal l×l matrix H_l + λId. The key mechanism is the irreducibility of the polynomial P_l(λ, μ²), proved via a Newton-diagram argument after the variable change (λ, μ²) = (λ, R − λ): the determinant becomes det M(λ, R), whose Newton diagram at the origin is a single edge, forcing any factorization to split along that edge and yielding irreducibility. Irreducibility of Γ_l then follows because Γ_l is a double cover of the irreducible curve {P_l = 0} branched only at points with μ = 0, and a small circuit around the origin in the smooth branch lifts to connect the two sheets. This irreducibility, combined with the identification of generalized simple intersections with points of Γ_l, lets the authors show that the complexified family of each parity-sign boundary component is an irreducible algebraic curve, and then that all boundary surfaces of the same parity and sign coincide as analytic sets.

What would settle it

Compute the monodromy index ρ_q for a dense set of complex points on the four claimed components for a small l, for example l = 2 or l = 3, by analytic continuation of the real boundary surfaces; finding any point whose index parity differs from the parity of the corresponding rotation number would contradict Proposition 2.13 and hence the distinctness conclusion of Theorem 1.22.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the minimal complex analytic subset of $C^{3}$_{(B,A,r)} with r = 1/(2ω) containing the union over all ω > 0 and all integer s of the curves ∂L_s(ω) × {1/(2ω)} is the union of exactly four distinct irreducible two-dimensional analytic subsets: the even- and odd-parity families, each split into the two signs ± corresponding to the fixed point ±π/2 of the Poincaré map. This is Theorem 1.22. The proof rests on Theorem 1.3, which states that for every l the spectral curve Γ_l = {P_l(λ, μ²) = 0} is irreducible, and on Theorem 1.20, which states that the complexified families of generalized simple intersections on each axis are two irreducible algebraic curves. The distinctness of the four components is shown by an index-parity argument: away from a nowhere dense singular subset, the associated Riccati solution has no zeros or poles on the unit circle, and its index has parity equal to the parity of the rotation number.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain depends on previously established results, imported without reproof, that identify generalized simple intersections with parameters for which the special Heun equation has a polynomial solution, and that the eigenvalues of the tridiagonal matrix H_l are real and simple; if either of these failed in the parameter ranges used here, the four-component complexification would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The countable union of all phase-lock boundary families in R^3 has a Zariski closure with exactly four irreducible components, so any future construction of the boundary complexification must land inside one of these four surfaces.
  • The real spectral curves Γ_l are smooth in the upper half-plane and have no ovals, giving a clean topological picture of the real boundaries for every l and constraining the possible shapes of phase-lock area portraits.
  • For each axis Λ_l and all sufficiently small ω, the axis contains exactly l generalized simple intersections, depending analytically on ω, one on each phase-lock boundary of matching parity (Corollary 1.19).
  • The Monotonicity Conjecture holds for all generalized simple intersections with s ≠ l (Theorem 1.30), and if the conjecture holds in full it implies the previously open Constriction Conjecture 1.13.
  • In Heun-equation terms, the locus of parameters where the monodromy operator has a multiple eigenvalue contains the real boundary points in at most two irreducible components, even and odd (Theorem 5.8).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the index-parity argument is topological and likely robust, so the same four-component complexification may persist for nearby non-overdamped or weakly damped Josephson models where a complexified monodromy still makes sense.
  • Beyond the paper: the irreducibility of Γ_l suggests the spectral curves form an algebraic family whose singularities and genera are governed by a single explicit formula; the genus conjecture confirmed for l ≤ 20 gives a concrete prediction at l = 21 or l = 22 that could be checked by standard normalization algorithms.
  • Beyond the paper: the four-component structure implies that each component is a determinantal surface built from the same tridiagonal matrices H_l, which could yield explicit equations for the boundary complexification and allow direct computation of its singular loci.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the three-parameter family of special double confluent Heun equations (1.1), concentrating on the spectral curves Gamma_l={P_l(lambda,mu^2)=0} defined by the determinant of the tridiagonal matrix H_l. The main new results are: (1) irreducibility of the polynomials P_l and of the curves Gamma_l for every l in N (Theorems 1.2, 1.3); (2) a computer-assisted verification of a conjectured genus formula for l <= 20 and a proof that the conjectured value is an upper bound; (3) a no-ovals theorem for the real spectral curves; (4) the structural theorem (Theorem 1.20) that the generalized simple intersections on the axis Lambda_l complexify to exactly two irreducible curves; and (5) the central theorem (Theorem 1.22) that the complexification of the union, over all frequencies and all rotation numbers, of the boundaries of the phase-lock areas is the union of exactly four distinct irreducible two-dimensional analytic subsets, labeled by parity and by the fixed point +i or -i of the complexified monodromy. The paper also proves a partial result toward the Monotonicity Conjecture and states several open problems about complex constrictions and the surfaces Sigma_+ and Sigma_-.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 1.22 is a striking structural statement: a countable family of real analytic boundary surfaces coming from a nonlinear dynamical system has a complexification with only four irreducible components. The proof is a well-organized chain that combines a clean, self-contained Newton-diagram irreducibility proof (Section 2.1) with imported prior results of Buchstaber--Tertychnyi and of the authors themselves, especially the identification of generalized simple intersections with points of real spectral curves (Theorem 1.17) and the real-simplicity theorem for eigenvalues of H_l (Theorem 1.9). The paper is explicit about which statements are proven, which are verified by computation, and which remain conjectural; the genus formula and the Monotonicity Conjecture are honestly labeled as open. The inclusion of computer code for the genus computations is a useful reproducibility feature, although the displayed code has a boundary-error issue (see below). The paper's own limitation statements and conjectures are clearly separated from the load-bearing theorems, and I do not see an internal inconsistency in the main derivation.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, Proposition 2.10] The sentence invoking regularity 'as in Proposition 2.8' is not literally correct, because Proposition 2.8 establishes regularity of Sigma_± only at simple intersections, whereas Proposition 2.10 concerns growth points where the monodromy is the identity. The missing argument is short: at the identity Möbius transformation, the fixed-point condition M(i)=i is a smooth complex hypersurface, and the derivative of the monodromy family in B is nonzero by monotonicity of the Poincaré map, so the same transversality argument applies. The authors should add this justification so the proof of Proposition 2.10 is self-contained.
  2. [§1.2 and Figure 2] The displayed SageMath code contains the loop 'for i in range(1, 20)', which in Python computes l=1,...,19 only; this does not cover the stated verification for l <= 20 including g(Gamma_20)=81. The loop should read 'range(1, 21)' or the claim should be adjusted to l <= 19.
  3. [§4, Proposition 4.3] The text 'Leg l in N' should read 'Let l in N'; this appears to be a typographical error.
  4. [§1.3 and §5.1] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: 'correspongding' in Section 1.3, 'idendical' in Proposition 5.5, and 'as l -> 0' in the proof of Corollary 1.19, which should read 'as omega -> 0'.
  5. [§5.1, Question 4] The notation 'hat L_± = Sigma_±' is introduced without recalling that hat L_± means the union hat L^even_± union hat L^odd_±; defining this near Question 4 would make the question unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the four-component complexification theorem is supported by an independent irreducibility proof and cited prior correspondence theorems, with no fitted input or self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: Theorem 1.2 proves irreducibility of P_l by a Newton-diagram argument (Proposition 2.1, Corollary 2.2) that is self-contained and does not assume the target; Theorem 1.3 follows by a degree-two preimage argument. The application to phase-lock boundaries (Theorems 1.20 and 1.22) imports the correspondence between generalized simple intersections and polynomial solutions (Theorem 1.17, cited to [11,5]) and the real-simplicity theorem for H_l (Theorem 1.9, [11]), but these are prior results with stated assumptions that do not include the four-component conclusion, and they are not fitted to the data used here; under the rules they count as real independent evidence even though some coauthors overlap. The minimality assertion in Theorem 1.22 is virtually a consequence of the definitions of L̂odd(even)_±, but the substantive content of the theorem—irreducibility and distinctness of the four components—is proved through Propositions 2.7, 2.9, 2.10, and 2.13 via analytic germs, monodromy index parity, and the irreducibility of the spectral curves. Proposition 2.10's appeal to regularity 'as in Proposition 2.8' at growth points is under-detailed, since Proposition 2.8 is stated only for simple intersections, but this is an exposition gap, not a circular reduction: at a growth point the monodromy is the identity and the same transversality argument is available. No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to forbid alternatives. I therefore find no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data anywhere in the paper; the proofs are parameter-free. The central claim depends on a network of previously established theorems about the Josephson model and Heun equations, mainly due to Buchstaber-Tertychnyi and the present authors, which are cited but not reproved. The genus computation relies on computer algebra with no machine-checked certificate. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Theorem 1.9 (Buchstaber-Tertychnyi): for mu != 0 the eigenvalues of H_l are real and simple, so P_l(lambda, mu^2) has l distinct real roots in lambda.
    Cited from [11, p.974]; used throughout Section 4 to order the roots lambda_j(mu) and in the absence-of-ovals proof of Theorem 1.8.
  • domain assumption Theorem 1.17: generalized simple intersections in the axis Lambda_l correspond to real parameters for which Heun equation (1.1) has a polynomial solution.
    Imported from [11] and [5]; this is the bridge from the dynamical Josephson system to the spectral curves Gamma_l, and it underpins Theorems 1.18, 1.20, and 1.22.
  • domain assumption Boundary components partial L_{s,+-} are graphs of analytic functions, growth points have abscissa sqrt(s^2 omega^2 + 1), and constrictions obey the restrictions stated in [19].
    Used in the proofs of Theorems 1.18, 1.21, 1.30 and Proposition 4.3; cited to [10], [19], and [20].
  • domain assumption Proposition 2.4, cited from [26]: boundary orbits through +-pi/2 are 2 pi-periodic and invariant under the symmetry I.
    Used to prove Theorem 1.21 and the index-parity distinctness of the four components in Proposition 2.13.
  • standard math Genus formula for an irreducible curve of bidegree (d1, d2) in P1 x P1: g = (d1 - 1)(d2 - 1) minus the sum of delta-invariants of singular points.
    Standard algebraic geometry, cited to Serre [33]; used to prove the genus upper bound and to reduce the genus conjecture to smoothness of the affine curve.
  • standard math Newton-diagram behavior of products of analytic germs: the upper component of the Newton diagram of a product is the Minkowski sum of the corresponding components of the factors.
    Standard analytic geometry fact used in the irreducibility proof of Theorem 1.2.
  • domain assumption The SageMath and Singular computations of geometric genus for l up to 20 are correct.
    The paper provides the listing in Figure 2 but no independent certificate or formal proof; the genus formula conjecture for l up to 20 relies on these computations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On spectral curves and complexified boundaries of the phase-lock areas in a model of Josephson junction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2A3JMOH

@misc{pith2026190808491,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On spectral curves and complexified boundaries of the phase-lock areas in a model of Josephson junction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2A3JMOH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08491}
}
abstract

The paper deals with a three-parameter family of special double confluent Heun equations that was introduced and studied by V.M.Buchstaber and S.I.Tertychnyi as an equivalent presentation of a model of overdamped Josephson junction in superconductivity. The parameters are $l,\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb R$. Buchstaber and Tertychnyi described those parameter values, for which the corresponding equation has a polynomial solution. They have shown that for $\mu\neq0$ this happens exactly when $l\in\mathbb N$ and the parameters $(\lambda,\mu)$ lie on an algebraic curve $\Gamma_l\subset\mathbb C^2_{(\lambda,\mu)}$ called the $l$-th spectral curve and defined as zero locus of determinant of a remarkable three-diagonal $l\times l$-matrix. They studied the real spectral curves and obtained important results with applications to phase-lock areas in model of Josephson junction, which is a family of dynamical systems on 2-torus. In the present paper we prove irreducibility of complex spectral curves. We also calculate their genera for $l\leqslant20$ and present a conjecture on general genus formula. We apply the irreducibility result to the phase-lock areas, which are those level sets of the rotation number function $\rho$ on the parameter space of the above-mentioned family of dynamical systems that have non-empty interiors. The family of their boundaries is a countable union of analytic surfaces. We show that, unexpectedly, its complexification is a complex analytic subset consisting of just four irreducible components, and we describe them. We present a Monotonicity Conjecture on the evolution of the phase-lock area portraits and a partial positive result towards its confirmation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08491 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Some examples of curves Γl (I.V.Netay). 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Listing of the code computing genera of some curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase-lock areas and their constrictions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase-lock areas and their constrictions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Approximate phase-lock areas for ω ≃ 0.27; the marked points are generalized simple intersections. This hand-made figure, which is taken from [5, fig. 2], illustrates open Conjecture 1.13: for every r ∈ Z all the constrictions of the phase-lock area Lr lie in its axis …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left-moving tangencies (conjecturally non-exis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left-moving tangencies (conjecturally non-exis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Some examples of curves Ξ+ l in the affine chart r ≠ 0. by Buchstaber–Tertychnyi Theorem 1.9 (see [11, p.974, theorem 1]). Set Rj(µ) ∶= λj(µ) + µ 2 . In the case, when Rj(µ) > 0, set ωj(µ) ∶= √ 1 4Rj(µ) > 0, Bj(µ) ∶= lωj(µ), Aj(µ) ∶= 2µωj(µ), Πj(µ) ∶= (Bj(µ), Aj(µ)). (…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arnold, V. I. Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Dif- ferential Equations, Second edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical S ciences], 250. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Ordinary differential equations

    Arnold, V.I.; Ilyashenko, Yu.S. Ordinary differential equations. Ency- clopaedia Math. Sci., 1 (1988), 1–148

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect, John Wiley and Sons, New York–Chichester–Brisbane–Toront o– Singapore, 1982

    Barone, A.; Paterno, G. Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect, John Wiley and Sons, New York–Chichester–Brisbane–Toront o– Singapore, 1982

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    On determinants of modified Bessel functions and entire solutions of double confluent Heun equa tions

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Glutsyuk, A.A. On determinants of modified Bessel functions and entire solutions of double confluent Heun equa tions. Non- linearity, 29 (2016), 3857–3870

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    On monodromy eigenfunctions of Heun equations and boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of over- damped Josephson effect

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Glutsyuk, A.A. On monodromy eigenfunctions of Heun equations and boundaries of phase-lock areas in a model of over- damped Josephson effect. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 297 (2017), 50–89

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Electrodynamic prop- erties of a Josephson junction biased with a sequence of δ-function pulses

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychniy, S.I. Electrodynamic prop- erties of a Josephson junction biased with a sequence of δ-function pulses. J. Exper. Theoret. Phys., 93 (2001), No.6, 1280–1287. 47

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    On properties of the differential equation describing the dynamics of an overdam ped Josephson junction, Russian Math

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I. On properties of the differential equation describing the dynamics of an overdam ped Josephson junction, Russian Math. Surveys, 59:2 (2004), 377–378

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Peculiarities of dynamics of a Josephson junction shifted by a sinusoidal SHF current (in Russian)

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; and Tertychnyi, S.I. Peculiarities of dynamics of a Josephson junction shifted by a sinusoidal SHF current (in Russian). Radiotekhnika i Elektronika, 51:6 (2006), 757–762

    work page 2006

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    The rotation number quantization effect , Theoret and Math

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I. The rotation number quantization effect , Theoret and Math. Phys., 162 (2010), No. 2, 211–221

    2010

  2. [10]

    The system on torus modeling the dynamics of Josephson junction, Russ

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Karpov, O.V.; Tertychnyi, S.I. The system on torus modeling the dynamics of Josephson junction, Russ. Math. Surveys, 67 (2012), 178–180

    2012

  3. [11]

    Explicit solution family for the equa- tion of the resistively shunted Josephson junction model

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Tertychnyi, S.I. Explicit solution family for the equa- tion of the resistively shunted Josephson junction model. Theoret. and Math. Phys., 176 (2013), No.2, 965–986

    2013

  4. [12]

    Holomorphic solutions of the double confluent Heun equation associated with the RSJ model of the J osephson junction

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Tertychnyi, S.I. Holomorphic solutions of the double confluent Heun equation associated with the RSJ model of the J osephson junction. Theoret. and Math. Phys., 182:3 (2015), 329–355

    2015

  5. [13]

    Automorphisms of solution space of special double confluent Heun equations, Funct

    Buchstaber, V.M.; Tertychnyi, S.I. Automorphisms of solution space of special double confluent Heun equations, Funct. Anal. Appl., 50:3 (2016), 176–192

    2016

  6. [14]

    Effect of ac impedance on dc voltage-current charac- teristics of superconductor weak-link junctions, J

    McCumber, D.E. Effect of ac impedance on dc voltage-current charac- teristics of superconductor weak-link junctions, J. Appl. Phys., 39 (1968), No.7, 3113–3118

    1968

  7. [15]

    The Geometry of syzygies

    David Eisenbud, “The Geometry of syzygies” , Springer, 2005

    2005

  8. [16]

    Foote, R.L., Geometry of the Prytz Planimeter, Reports on Math. Phys. 42:1/2 (1998), 249–271

    1998

  9. [17]

    Tractrices, bicycle tire tracks, hatchet planimeters, and a 100-year-old conjecture, Amer

    Foote, R.L.; Levi, M.; Tabachnikov, S. Tractrices, bicycle tire tracks, hatchet planimeters, and a 100-year-old conjecture, Amer. Math. Monthly, 103 (2013), 199–216

    2013

  10. [18]

    Oscillation matrices and kernels and small vibrations of mechanical systems, Dept

    Gantmakher, F.R.; Krein, M.G. Oscillation matrices and kernels and small vibrations of mechanical systems, Dept. Commerce USA. Joint Publ. Service (1961) (Translated from Russian.) 48

    1961

  11. [19]

    On the adjacency quantization in an equation modeling the Jose phson effect, Funct

    Glutsyuk, A.A.; Kleptsyn, V.A.; Filimonov, D.A.; Schu rov, I.V. On the adjacency quantization in an equation modeling the Jose phson effect, Funct. Analysis and Appl., 48 (2014), No.4, 272–285

    2014

  12. [20]

    On constrictions of phase-lock areas in model of over- damped Josephson effect and transition matrix of the double- confluent Heun equation, J

    Glutsyuk A. On constrictions of phase-lock areas in model of over- damped Josephson effect and transition matrix of the double- confluent Heun equation, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 25 (2019), Issue 3, 323–349

    2019

  13. [21]

    Griffiths, Ph.; Harris, J., Principles of algebraic geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York - Chichester - Brisbane - Toronto, 1978

    1978

  14. [22]

    Dynamical systems

    Ilyashenko, Yu.S. Lectures of the summer school “Dynamical systems”, Poprad, Slovak Republic, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    Phase-lock effect for equations modeling resistively shunted Josephson junctio ns and for their perturbations, Funct

    Ilyashenko, Yu.S.; Filimonov, D.A.; Ryzhov, D.A. Phase-lock effect for equations modeling resistively shunted Josephson junctio ns and for their perturbations, Funct. Analysis and its Appl. 45 (2011), No. 3, 192–203

    2011

  16. [24]

    Three-diagonal matrices and their appli- cations

    Ilyin, V.P.; Kuznetsov, Yu.I. Three-diagonal matrices and their appli- cations. Moscow, Nauka, 1985

    1985

  17. [25]

    Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys

    Josephson, B.D. Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Phys. Lett., 1 (1962), No. 7, 251–253

    1962

  18. [26]

    Josephson effect and slow-fast systems

    Kleptsyn, V.A.; Romaskevich, O.L.; Schurov, I.V. Josephson effect and slow-fast systems. [In Russian.] Nanostuctures. Mathematical physics and Modelling, 8 (2013), 31–46

    2013

  19. [27]

    Asymptotic properties of Arnold tongues and Josephson effect, Mosc

    Klimenko, A.V.; Romaskevich, O.L. Asymptotic properties of Arnold tongues and Josephson effect, Mosc. Math. J., 14:2 (2014), 367–384

    2014

  20. [28]

    Systems with Josephson junctions: Basic Theory, Izdat

    Likharev, K.K.; Ulrikh, B.T. Systems with Josephson junctions: Basic Theory, Izdat. MGU, Moscow, 1978

    1978

  21. [29]

    On the approximate integration method due to Academician S

    Luzin, N.N. On the approximate integration method due to Academician S. A. Chaplygin, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 6:6(46) (1951), 3–27

    1951

  22. [30]

    Singular points of complex surfaces , Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1968

    Milnor, J. Singular points of complex surfaces , Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1968

    1968

  23. [31]

    Schmidt, V.V., Introduction to physics of superconductors (in Russian), MCCME, Moscow, 2000. 49

    2000

  24. [32]

    Quantum coherent effects, phase transitions, and the dissipative dynamics of ultra small tunnel junction s, North- Holland, 1990

    Sch¨ on, G.; Zaikin, A.D. Quantum coherent effects, phase transitions, and the dissipative dynamics of ultra small tunnel junction s, North- Holland, 1990

    1990

  25. [33]

    J. P. Serre, Groupes alg´ ebriques et corps de classes , Hermann, Paris, 1959

    1959

  26. [34]

    Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling, Rev

    Shapiro, S.; Janus, A.; Holly, S. Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling, Rev. Mod. Phys., 36 (1964), 223– 225

    1964

  27. [35]

    Yu.; Lay, W

    Slavyanov, S. Yu.; Lay, W. Special Functions: a unified theory based on singularities Oxford University Press, 2000

    2000

  28. [36]

    Stewart, W.C., Current-voltage characteristics of Josephson junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett., 12 (1968), No. 8, 277–280

    1968

  29. [37]

    The modelling of a Josephson junction and Heun poly- nomials, Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0601064

    Tertychnyi, S.I. The modelling of a Josephson junction and Heun poly- nomials, Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0601064

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Complete description of determinantal representations of smooth irreducible curves

    Vinnikov, V. Complete description of determinantal representations of smooth irreducible curves. Lin. Alg. Appl. 125 (1989), 103–140

    1989

  31. [39]

    Self-adjoint determinantal representations of real plane curves

    Vinnikov, V. Self-adjoint determinantal representations of real plane curves. Math. Annalen, 296:1 (1993), 453–479. 50

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.