Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Citation measures and impact within astronomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0401507 v1 pith:K32LONRB submitted 2004-01-23 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords citationsyearscitationfiveimpactnumberaccumulatedactive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

By utilising the inbuilt citation counts from NASA's astrophysics data system (ADS) I derive how many citations refereed articles receive as a function of time since publication. After five years, one paper in a hundred has accumulated 91 or more citations, a figure which rises to 145 citations after ten years. By adding up the number of citations active researchers have received over the past five years I have estimated their relative impact upon the field both for raw citations and citations weighted by the number of authors per paper.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools