Novel first-order phase transition and critical points on $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory in $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$

Akihiro Iwanaka; Daiki Suenaga; Daisuke Fujii; Masakiyo Kitazawa

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 19 references

Novel first-order phase transition and critical points on $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory in $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that SU(3) Yang–Mills theory on a torus with one spatial direction squeezed develops a first-order phase transition that ends at two Ising-like critical points.

desk verdict Proceedings summary of the group's own prior work: solid lattice measurement, transparent model, but the 'novel' first-order transition is a model prediction whose four fitted parameters are the only source of the claimed discontinuity. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08892 v1 pith:K3C2JW4H submitted 2025-02-13 hep-lat

Masakiyo Kitazawa , Daisuke Fujii , Akihiro Iwanaka , Daiki Suenaga This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lat

keywords SU(3)Yang-MillsT^2xR^2compactificationPolyakovloopfirst-orderphasetransitioncriticalpoint2DIsinguniversalityclasspressureanisotropylatticegaugetheory

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what happens to hot SU(3) Yang–Mills theory when one spatial direction is made periodic and short, so the geometry is $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$ rather than $\mathbb{R}^3\times S^1$. Lattice simulations show that the pressure anisotropy caused by the compact direction is much weaker than in a free boson gas, only becoming noticeable at very short extents. To understand this, the authors build an effective model with two Polyakov loops, one for each compactified direction, and fix its four cross-coupling parameters to reproduce the lattice thermodynamics. The model then predicts a first-order phase transition in the deconfined phase, at $L_x T$ around 1.17 and $T/T_d$ around 2.69, terminating at critical points that should belong to the two-dimensional $\mathbb{Z}_2$ (Ising) universality class. If true, this is a phase transition with no analog in the infinite-volume theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a phenomenological free-energy density for two Polyakov loops, $f(\theta_\tau, \theta_x; L_\tau, L_x) = f_{\rm pert} + f_{\rm pot}$, with the potential term split as $f_{\rm pot} = f_{\rm sep} + f_{\rm cross}$. The separate term is the known $S^1\times\mathbb{R}^3$ potential applied to each loop, while the cross term, containing four free parameters, encodes the interplay of the temporal and spatial compactifications. Tuning those parameters to lattice data makes the model predict the first-order transition; the cross term is essential, because without it the lattice pressure anisotropy is not reproduced.

What would settle it

Look for the predicted discontinuity in lattice simulations: with $N_\tau = 16$ or finer and $L_x T$ scanned finely near 1.17 at $T/T_d \approx 2.69$, the pressure ratio $R$ should show a jump at some $L_x T$ if the transition is real; if instead $R$ varies smoothly through that region within small statistical errors, or if the jump position shifts erratically with lattice spacing, the model's first-order transition is an artifact of the ansatz.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the interplay between the two Polyakov loops, not any single order parameter, drives a new first-order phase transition on $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$. In the model, the free-energy density is the sum of a perturbative term and a potential term; the potential separates into a sum of two single-loop potentials plus a cross term with four free parameters. The model reproduces the lattice pressure ratio and energy density, and then predicts a discontinuous jump in thermodynamic quantities on a line in the $L_\tau$–$L_x$ plane. One first-order line lies entirely in the $\mathbb{Z}_3$-broken deconfined phase and terminates at finite $L_\tau$ and $L_x$, at around $(L_\tau T_d, L_x T_d) = (0.25, 2.54)$ and $(2.54, 0.25)$. Because the correlation length grows beyond both compact directions near the endpoint, the authors argue that the critical points are in the two-dimensional Ising universality class.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction stands on the assumed four-parameter form of the cross term coupling the two Polyakov loops; if the true loop interaction in the Yang–Mills path integral has a different shape, the first-order line and its endpoints need not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the transition exists, the pressure ratio $(P_x+\delta)/(P_z+\delta)$ jumps discontinuously at $L_x T \simeq 1.17$ and $T/T_d \simeq 2.69$, a feature absent in the infinite-volume theory.
The phase diagram on the $L_\tau$–$L_x$ plane contains two first-order lines; one connects to the ordinary confinement transition in the large-$L_x$ limit, and the other lies entirely in the $\mathbb{Z}_3$-broken phase and ends at two finite critical points.
Near either endpoint, the long correlation length makes the system effectively two-dimensional, so the critical exponents should match the 2D Ising universality class.
The existing lattice data at $L_x T = 4/3$ and $7/6$ show a rapid change around $T/T_d \simeq 3$, which is consistent with, but not yet a confirmation of, the discontinuity.
Because the model also reproduces individual thermodynamic quantities besides the ratio, the prediction is tied to a successful description of the lattice data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same mechanism—competition between two Polyakov-loop order parameters—might generate analogous first-order transitions for other gauge groups, such as $SU(N)$ with $N>3$, or in QCD with dynamical quarks where the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ symmetry is explicitly broken.
A dedicated lattice scan with finer spacing and larger statistics around $L_x T \approx 1.17$ and $T/T_d \approx 2.69$ could either confirm the discontinuity or rule out the four-parameter cross term; measuring the order-parameter distribution would distinguish a genuine transition from a smooth crossover.
If confirmed, the transition would be a concrete finite-size effect in the deconfined gluon plasma; calculations of Casimir-type pressure in Yang–Mills boxes would need to account for a discontinuous jump, not just smooth anisotropy.
The prediction gives a target for studying dimensional reduction: at the critical endpoint the system should behave as a 2D Ising model, so scaling fits of lattice data near that point could test the universality claim directly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear [Colleague],

Quick take: this is a clean, well-written proceedings article from Kitazawa et al. summarizing work they have already published. The lattice measurement of anisotropic pressure in SU(3) YM on T^2 x R^2, done with the gradient-flow energy-momentum tensor, is solid and the qualitative result — that pressure stays isotropic down to Lx T ~ 1.3, whereas a free scalar shows a large anisotropy already at Lx T = 2 — looks convincing. The effective model with two Polyakov loops is also transparent and reproduces the lattice ratios reasonably well.

What this paper does not do is present anything new relative to the literature it cites. The lattice data are from Ref. [2] (1904.00241), the model construction is from Ref. [3] (2210.09363), and the first-order transition and critical endpoints are already reported in Ref. [4] (2404.07899), also by this group. The title and abstract say "novel," but the novelty belongs to the earlier PRD paper, not to this proceedings contribution.

The soft spot, and it is a real one, is the model dependence of the headline claim. The first-order line in Fig. 5 comes from the four-parameter cross term f_cross in Eq. (4), whose form is chosen phenomenologically and whose parameters are fitted to the same lattice data it is used to explain. The authors state in Sec. 3.2 that the lattice data are "not sufficiently fine to verify the existence of the discontinuity." That is honest, but it means the central prediction is an extrapolation of a fitted ansatz, not a robust consequence of the lattice-constrained model. A different symmetry-allowed cross term that fits the same smooth, sparse points might not produce any first-order transition. The authors do not test that.

That said, the paper itself is not misleading about its status: it repeatedly says "model analysis indicates" and notes the need for future lattice verification. The lattice data on their own are a useful finite-size effect, and the model prediction is a concrete, testable target for future simulations.

For a reader: I would bring this to a reading group only if the topic is central to your work; otherwise it is a competent but incremental summary. I would not cite this proceedings over the original PRD papers. For peer review, if this were submitted as a full article, I would send it to a serious referee: the lattice part is respectable and the model claim, while fragile, deserves scrutiny. The main referee instruction would be to demand a robustness check of f_cross and a clear statement that the transition is a model prediction, not a measured property.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies SU(3) Yang-Mills theory on T^2 x R^2, i.e., a thermal system with an additional periodic spatial compactification of length L_x. The lattice part uses the gradient-flow energy-momentum tensor to measure the pressure ratio P_x/P_z and a related ratio R defined in Eq. (1) at several temperatures and values of L_x T. It finds that the pressure remains nearly isotropic down to L_x T around 1.3-1.4, much smaller than in the free scalar theory, and then changes sharply. The second part builds an effective model with two Polyakov-loop variables along the two compact directions, with free energy f = f_pert + f_pot, f_pot = f_sep + f_cross, where f_cross is a four-parameter phenomenological cross term fitted to the lattice data. The model reproduces the measured ratios and, as its main result, predicts a first-order transition line inside the deconfined phase, one segment of which terminates at two critical points that the paper claims belong to the 2D Ising universality class.

Significance. The paper combines a standard lattice observable with a simple two-order-parameter effective model, and it is transparent about the phenomenological status of f_cross. If the predicted first-order transition and critical endpoints were shown to follow from the Yang-Mills dynamics, they would constitute a genuinely new finite-size phase structure: a transition with no S^1 x R^3 analog, occurring at moderate T/T_d and O(1) values of L_x T_d. The lattice result that pressure anisotropy sets in only at very small L_x T compared with the free theory is an interesting input in its own right. However, the central prediction is an output of the four-parameter f_cross, whose explicit form is not given in the manuscript, and no direct lattice evidence of a discontinuity exists. The significance is therefore conditional on a robustness check or a controlled derivation.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 3.1, Eq. (4)] The first-order transition line and critical endpoints in Fig. 5 are determined by the four free parameters in f_cross, whose functional form is fixed by symmetry and limiting-behavior constraints rather than derived from the Yang-Mills path integral. The lattice data used for the fit (Sec. 2) are smooth at the studied points, and Sec. 3.2 states that they are 'not sufficiently fine to verify the existence of the discontinuity.' A fit to smooth, sparse pressure ratios cannot by itself constrain the non-convex structure of f_cross that produces a first-order line. I ask for one of the following: a controlled derivation of f_cross, a robustness scan over other symmetry-allowed cross terms that fit the same data, or direct lattice evidence of the discontinuity (e.g., hysteresis or metastability).
[Sec. 3.1] The explicit form of f_cross is not included in this manuscript; the text refers to Ref. [4] for 'detailed arguments and its explicit form.' Because the central phase diagram is an output of that function, the proceedings is not self-contained: a reader cannot check the symmetries, the limiting behavior, or the four-parameter structure from the presented material. Please include the explicit expression and the constraints in an appendix, or unambiguously present Fig. 5 as a summary of Ref. [4] rather than as a result derived in this paper.
[Sec. 2] The lattice results are shown only for N_tau = 12 and 16, with no continuum extrapolation. Since the model parameters in Sec. 3.1 are fitted to these data, unquantified O(a^2) cutoff effects could change the fitted f_cross and hence the location, or even the existence, of the predicted first-order transition. Please add a continuum-extrapolation study of the ratio R in Eq. (1), or at least an estimate of discretization errors large enough to bound the resulting shift in the model parameters.
[Sec. 3.2, Fig. 5] The phase diagram is shown without any indication of the uncertainty inherited from the four-parameter fit. The paper does not report the fitted parameter values, a goodness-of-fit measure, or how the first-order line moves when the parameters are varied within their uncertainties. Because the central prediction is an emergent feature of the fitted free energy, please provide a sensitivity analysis or propagate the fit uncertainties so that the robustness of the transition line can be assessed.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 5] The labels 'Lattice fit1' and 'Lattice fit2' in the left panel are not explained in the text or caption; please specify what these curves denote and how they relate to the four-parameter fit.
[Sec. 3.2] The sentence 'the agreement becomes worth for lower T' appears to contain a typo; it should read 'becomes worse for lower T'.
[Eq. (1), Fig. 4] The notation is inconsistent between Eq. (1), where the shift is delta, and Fig. 4, where the same quantity is written as Delta/4; please align the symbols and define Delta.
[Sec. 3.2] The statement that the critical endpoints belong to the 2D Ising universality class is plausible from the dimensional-reduction argument, but it is presented without a finite-size scaling or critical-exponent computation; it would be safer to label it a conjecture.
[Sec. 2] The free-boson comparison in Fig. 1 uses several mass-temperature ratios m/T, but the text does not explain whether these are meant to mimic the gluon mass or are merely illustrative; a brief clarification would help.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The headline first-order transition and Z2 endpoints are emergent outputs of a four-parameter f_cross potential fitted to the same lattice thermodynamics; the paper is transparent, but the 'prediction' is not independent of the fitted input.

fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (4); Abstract; Sec. 3.2]
"The form of f_cross employed here contains four free parameters, which are determined so as to reproduce the lattice results in Ref. [2]. ... The model is constructed to reproduce thermodynamics measured on the lattice. The model analysis indicates the existence of a novel first-order phase transition and critical points as its endpoints."

The four parameters in f_cross are fitted to the lattice thermodynamics of Ref. [2], and the same fitted free energy is then minimized to produce the phase diagram in Fig. 5. The first-order line and its endpoints are not directly seen in the lattice data; the paper concedes the current lattice data are 'not sufficiently fine to verify the existence of the discontinuity.' Thus the headline transition is an output of the fitted ansatz rather than an independent prediction. Because the transition is a non-convex feature of the chosen four-parameter form, it is not forced by the data or derived from the Yang-Mills path integral; it reduces to the model construction plus the fit.
self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.1]
"In Ref. [3], it was found that the introduction of f_cross is essential in reproducing the lattice data. The form of the cross term f_cross is determined in a phenomenological manner ... see Ref. [4] for detailed arguments and its explicit form."

The load-bearing premise that the cross term is 'essential' is justified by citation to Ref. [3], by the present authors, and the explicit form that produces the transition is delegated to Ref. [4], also by the present authors. The reader cannot verify whether the transition is generic or an artifact without accepting the authors' previous ansatz. This is a self-citation chain supporting the key ingredient of the central claim, although not a fully closed definitional circle.

full rationale

The lattice simulation in Sec. 2 is genuine independent input: pressure ratios are measured with the gradient-flow energy-momentum tensor, and the paper does not claim a first-order signal there. The circularity enters at the model step. Equation (4) builds f_pot from f_sep + f_cross, and f_cross's four free parameters are fitted to the same lattice thermodynamics from Ref. [2]. The phase diagram in Fig. 5, including the 'novel' first-order line and the Z2 endpoints, is obtained by minimizing this fitted free energy. The paper explicitly states that the lattice data are not fine enough to verify the discontinuity, so the prediction has no independent check inside the paper. This is not a full equivalence: the first-order line is an emergent non-convex feature, not literally equal to a fitted data point. But the central claim is not robustly separated from the fitted ansatz; a different symmetry-allowed cross term fitting the same smooth data could alter or remove the transition. The universality-class argument and the perturbative parts are not circular. Because the paper is transparent about the phenomenological status, and because the model does have some predictive content beyond the fitted points, the circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model prediction rests on a free energy with two Polyakov-loop variables, a potential split into a known single-loop part and an ad hoc cross term with four fitted parameters. The prediction that a first-order transition exists inside the deconfined phase depends on these choices. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are introduced; the two Polyakov loops are standard order parameters.

free parameters (2)

Four parameters of the cross term f_cross(theta_tau, theta_x) = Not quoted in this paper (explicit form in Ref [4])
These parameters are determined so as to reproduce the lattice pressure ratio data from Ref [2]. The first-order transition line and critical endpoint locations in Fig. 5 depend directly on these fitted values.
Parameters of the Polyakov-loop potential f_pot^{S1 x R3} from Ref [10] = Not quoted in this paper (from Dumitru et al., PRD 86, 105017)
The model inherits the single-loop potential from the Dumitru et al. matrix model, which itself was fitted to pure gauge thermodynamics. This potential appears in f_sep in Eq. (5) and contributes to the free energy that generates the phase diagram.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Two Polyakov-loop phases theta_tau and theta_x are sufficient dynamical variables for the phase structure of SU(3) Yang-Mills on T^2 x R^2.
Invoked in Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3). The model reduces the full gauge theory to a free energy depending only on the two Polyakov loop eigenvalue phases.
domain assumption The free energy separates into a perturbative gluon part and a potential part, f = f_pert + f_pot.
Used in Eqs. (2) and (3). This is a standard effective-model ansatz, taken from Refs [9,10].
ad hoc to paper The potential splits into f_sep + f_cross, with f_sep built from the S1 x R3 potential of Ref [10] for each direction.
Asserted in Eqs. (4) and (5). The split is a phenomenological choice, not derived from the underlying theory.
ad hoc to paper The explicit form of f_cross, constrained only by symmetries and limiting behavior, with four free parameters, captures the true cross-coupling of the two Polyakov loops.
Stated in Sec. 3.1: the form is determined in a phenomenological manner and the four parameters are fitted to lattice data. The predicted phase diagram is contingent on this ansatz.
domain assumption At the critical endpoints, the correlation length grows beyond L_tau and L_x, so the effective dimensionality becomes two and the universality class is that of the two-dimensional Ising model.
Argued in Sec. 3.2. This is a consistency argument rather than a direct computation of critical exponents.
domain assumption The gradient-flow small-flow-time expansion yields the renormalized energy-momentum tensor used for pressure measurements.
Invoked in Sec. 2 and based on Refs [5-7]. The lattice pressures P_x and P_z are obtained through this method.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel first-order phase transition and critical points on $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory in $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K3C2JW4H

@misc{pith2026250208892,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel first-order phase transition and critical points on $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory in $\mathbbT^2\times\mathbbR^2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K3C2JW4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08892}
}

abstract

We investigate the thermodynamics and phase structure of $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory on $\mathbb{T}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$ with anisotropic spatial volumes in Euclidean spacetime in lattice numerical simulations and an effective model. In lattice simulations, the energy-momentum tensor defined through the gradient flow is used for the analysis of the stress tensor on the lattice. It is found that a clear pressure anisotropy is observed only at a significantly shorter spatial extent compared with the free scalar theory. We then study the thermodynamics obtained on the lattice in an effective model that incorporates two Polyakov loops along two compactified directions as dynamical variables. The model is constructed to reproduce thermodynamics measured on the lattice. The model analysis indicates the existence of a novel first-order phase transition and critical points as its endpoints. We argue that the interplay of the Polyakov loops induces the first-order transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08892 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Pressure ratio 𝑃𝑥/𝑃𝑧 as a function of 𝐿𝑥𝑇 for various values of 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 and 𝑁𝑡 = 16, 12 [2]. The behavior of 𝑃𝑥/𝑃𝑧 in the free scalar theory is also shown by the lines for several values of mass-temperature ratio 𝑚/𝑇. symmetry is restored in this limit. In the free-boson result, a clear deviation from this limit is observed already at 𝐿𝑥𝑇 = 2. However, the lattice results show 𝑃𝑥/𝑃𝑧 = 1 within statistics even at 𝐿𝑥𝑇 = … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Ratio (𝑃𝑥 + 𝛿)/(𝑃𝑧 + 𝛿) for various values of 𝑇 and 𝐿𝑥𝑇. The left (right) panel shows the ratio as a function of 𝐿𝑥𝑇 (𝑇/𝑇𝑐). The solid line in the left panel shows the ratio in the massless free scalar theory. The arrows in the right panel show the ratio in the massless free scalar theory for each 𝐿𝑥𝑇. value as 𝑇 is increased, but the difference is still large even at 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 = 25. In this way, the lattice results show… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** 𝐿𝑥𝑇 dependence of the pressure ratio 𝑝𝑥/𝑝𝑧 at 𝑇/𝑇d = 1.68 and 2.10, together with the lattice data in Sec. 2 [4]. In the present study, we extend the model in Ref. [10] to T 2 × R 2 by introducing two Polyakov loops as dynamical degrees of freedom; the Polyakov loop along 𝑥 direction, Ω𝑥, is introduced in addition to the conventional temporal loop Ω𝜏. The free-energy density read 𝑓 (𝜃® 𝜏, 𝜃® 𝑥; 𝐿𝜏, 𝐿𝑥) = 𝑓pert(𝜃® 𝜏,… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Left: 𝐿𝑥𝑇 dependence of the ratio 𝑅 = (𝑝𝑥 + 𝛿/4)/(𝑝𝑧 + 𝛿/4) in Eq. (1) for several values of 𝑇/𝑇d. Right: 𝑇/𝑇d dependence of 𝑅 for various 𝐿𝑥𝑇. Paper 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 LτTd L x Td Phase diagram Lattice fit1 Lattice fit2 A B Z symme…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Left: Phase diagram on the 𝐿𝜏–𝐿𝑥 plane, where the first-order phase transitions are shown by the solid lines. Right: Behavior of Ω𝜏 as a function of 𝐿𝜏 and 𝐿𝑥. model analysis. Our analyses also show that our model well reproduces individual thermodynamic quantities bes…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[2]

Kitazawa, S

M. Kitazawa, S. Mogliacci, I. Kolbé and W.A. Horowitz,Anisotropic pressure induced by finite-size effects in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 094507 [1904.00241]

arXiv 2019
[3]

Effective model for pure Yang-Mills theory on $\mathbb{T}^2\times \mathbb{R}^2$ with Polyakov loops

D. Suenaga and M. Kitazawa,Effective model for pure Yang-Mills theory onT2× R2 with Polyakov loops,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074502 [2210.09363]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[4]

Novel first-order phase transition and critical points in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory with spatial compactification

D. Fujii, A. Iwanaka, M. Kitazawa and D. Suenaga,Novel first-order phase transition and critical points in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory with spatial compactification,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 094016 [2404.07899]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[1]

Casimir,On the Attraction Between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates, Indag

H.B.G. Casimir,On the Attraction Between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates, Indag. Math. 10 (1948) 261

work page 1948
[5]

Suzuki,Energy–momentum tensor from the Yang–Mills gradient flow, PTEP 2013(2013) 083B03 [1304.0533]

H. Suzuki,Energy–momentum tensor from the Yang–Mills gradient flow, PTEP 2013(2013) 083B03 [1304.0533]

arXiv 2013
[6]

Kitazawa, T

M. Kitazawa, T. Iritani, M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda and H. Suzuki,Equation of State for SU(3) Gauge Theory via the Energy-Momentum Tensor under Gradient Flow, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 114512 [1610.07810]

arXiv 2016
[7]

Iritani, M

T. Iritani, M. Kitazawa, H. Suzuki and H. Takaura,Thermodynamics in quenched QCD: energy–momentum tensor with two-loop order coefficients in the gradient flow formalism, PTEP 2019 (2019) 023B02 [1812.06444]

arXiv 2019
[8]

Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

M. Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

arXiv 2010

Show all 19 references

[9]

Meisinger, T.R

P.N. Meisinger, T.R. Miller and M.C. Ogilvie,Phenomenological equations of state for the quark gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 034009 [hep-ph/0108009]

2002 arXiv
[10]

Dumitru, Y

A. Dumitru, Y. Guo, Y. Hidaka, C.P.K. Altes and R.D. Pisarski,Effective Matrix Model for Deconfinement in Pure Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 105017 [1205.0137]

2012 arXiv
[11]

Hanada, S

M. Hanada, S. Matsuura and F. Sugino,Two-dimensional lattice for four-dimensional N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills,Prog. Theor. Phys.126 (2011) 597 [1004.5513]

2011 arXiv
[12]

Ünsal and L.G

M. Ünsal and L.G. Yaffe,Large-N volume independence in conformal and confining gauge theories, JHEP 08(2010) 030 [1006.2101]

2010 arXiv
[13]

Mandal and T

G. Mandal and T. Morita,Phases of a two dimensional large N gauge theory on a torus, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 085007 [1103.1558]

2011 arXiv
[14]

Ishikawa, K

T. Ishikawa, K. Nakayama, D. Suenaga and K. Suzuki,𝐷 mesons as a probe of Casimir effect for chiral symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034016 [1905.11164]

2019 arXiv
[15]

Chernodub, V.A

M.N. Chernodub, V.A. Goy, A.V. Molochkov and A.S. Tanashkin,Casimir boundaries, monopoles, and deconfinement transition in (3+1)- dimensional compact electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 114506 [2203.14922]. 8 𝑆𝑈(3) Yang-Mills theory onT2× R2 Masakiyo Kitazawa

2022 arXiv
[16]

Hayashi and Y

Y. Hayashi and Y. Tanizaki,Semiclassics for the QCD vacuum structure through T2-compactification with the baryon-’t Hooft flux,JHEP 08 (2024) 001 [2402.04320]

2024 arXiv
[17]

Fujii, K

D. Fujii, K. Nakayama and K. Suzuki,Dual chiral density wave induced oscillating Casimir effect, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 014039 [2402.17638]

2024 arXiv
[18]

Fujii, K

D. Fujii, K. Nakayama and K. Suzuki,Lifshitz formulas for finite-density Casimir effect, 2408.08384
[19]

Fujii, K

D. Fujii, K. Nakayama and K. Suzuki,Casimir effect in magnetic dual chiral density waves, 2411.11957. 9

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Kitazawa, S

M. Kitazawa, S. Mogliacci, I. Kolbé and W.A. Horowitz,Anisotropic pressure induced by finite-size effects in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 094507 [1904.00241]

arXiv 2019

[2] [3]

Effective model for pure Yang-Mills theory on $\mathbb{T}^2\times \mathbb{R}^2$ with Polyakov loops

D. Suenaga and M. Kitazawa,Effective model for pure Yang-Mills theory onT2× R2 with Polyakov loops,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074502 [2210.09363]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[3] [4]

Novel first-order phase transition and critical points in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory with spatial compactification

D. Fujii, A. Iwanaka, M. Kitazawa and D. Suenaga,Novel first-order phase transition and critical points in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory with spatial compactification,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 094016 [2404.07899]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[4] [1]

Casimir,On the Attraction Between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates, Indag

H.B.G. Casimir,On the Attraction Between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates, Indag. Math. 10 (1948) 261

work page 1948

[5] [5]

Suzuki,Energy–momentum tensor from the Yang–Mills gradient flow, PTEP 2013(2013) 083B03 [1304.0533]

H. Suzuki,Energy–momentum tensor from the Yang–Mills gradient flow, PTEP 2013(2013) 083B03 [1304.0533]

arXiv 2013

[6] [6]

Kitazawa, T

M. Kitazawa, T. Iritani, M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda and H. Suzuki,Equation of State for SU(3) Gauge Theory via the Energy-Momentum Tensor under Gradient Flow, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 114512 [1610.07810]

arXiv 2016

[7] [7]

Iritani, M

T. Iritani, M. Kitazawa, H. Suzuki and H. Takaura,Thermodynamics in quenched QCD: energy–momentum tensor with two-loop order coefficients in the gradient flow formalism, PTEP 2019 (2019) 023B02 [1812.06444]

arXiv 2019

[8] [8]

Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

M. Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP 08(2010) 071 [1006.4518]

arXiv 2010