Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Capacity & Perimeter from $\alpha$-Hermite Bounded Variation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the space of functions of bounded variation associated with the α-Hermite hydrogen-atom operator satisfies Sobolev, isoperimetric, and isocapacity inequalities, and that a restricted perimeter repairs the failure of…

desk verdict Solid extension of the BV-capacity-perimeter framework to α-Hermite operators, with a robust central Sobolev inequality, but the manuscript ships with a few fixable proof gaps. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07889 v1 pith:K4EB2I3N submitted 2019-08-21 math.CA

Jizheng Huang , Pengtao Li , Yu Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CA MSC 42B3547A6032U20
keywords α-HermiteboundedvariationHermiteoperatorperimetercapacitySobolevinequalityisoperimetriccoareaformulaisocapacity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a bounded-variation calculus for the $\alpha$-Hermite operator $H_\alpha = \Delta - (\alpha-1)|x|^\alpha$, the quantum Hamiltonian of a hydrogen atom fixed at the origin in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Taking the classical case $\alpha=1$ as a guide, the authors define the $\alpha$-Hermite variation, perimeter, and capacity through a generalized gradient whose coefficients carry the weight $x|x|^{(\alpha-2)/2}$. Their central result is the Sobolev inequality $\|f\|_{L^{d/(d-1)}(\mathbb{R}^d)} \lesssim \|\nabla_{H_\alpha}f\|(\mathbb{R}^d)$ for every $f$ in the $\alpha$-Hermite BV space, which they prove is equivalent to an isoperimetric inequality and, via the coarea formula, to an isocapacity inequality for sets. Because the induced perimeter fails the symmetry $P_{H_\alpha}(E)=P_{H_\alpha}(E^c)$ when $\alpha>1$, the paper introduces a restricted perimeter that restores this symmetry and uses it to show that sets of finite restricted $\alpha$-Hermite perimeter have mean curvature in $L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized gradient $\nabla_{H_\alpha}$ assembled from the operators $A^{\pm}_{i,\alpha}=\partial_{x_i}\pm\sqrt{\alpha-1}\,x_i|x|^{(\alpha-2)/2}$, which deform Euclidean derivatives by the radial weight $\psi(x)=x|x|^{(\alpha-2)/2}$. The argument rides on the coarea formula of Theorem 1.10, $\|\nabla_{H_\alpha}f\|(\Omega)\approx \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}P_{H_\alpha}(\{f>t\},\Omega)\,dt$, which turns variation into perimeters of superlevel sets; together with the classical Sobolev inequality and the comparison $|\nabla f|\le |\nabla_{H_\alpha}f|\le \sqrt{2}\,(|\nabla f|+\sqrt{\alpha-1}\,|x|^{\alpha/2}|f|)$, this formula drives the Sobolev inequality and its isoperimetric and isocapacity consequences. The restricted perimeter $\widetilde{P}_{H_\alpha}$, defined by imposing one linear constraint on the admissible test functions, repairs the failure $P_{H_\alpha}(E)\ne P_{H_\alpha}(E^c)$ and is the tool used for the mean-curvature result.

What would settle it

Take $\alpha=3/2$ and a bounded BV function supported in a neighbourhood of the origin, such as $\mathbf{1}_{B(0,1)}$, and check whether a sequence of smooth compactly supported functions can approximate it with $\int|\nabla_{H_\alpha}u_h|\,dx$ converging to $\|\nabla_{H_\alpha}u\|$; the paper's proof of Theorem 1.5 requires the term $J_2$ to be controlled by $\varepsilon\operatorname{Lip}(\psi,\Omega)$, and $\operatorname{Lip}(\psi,\Omega)=+\infty$ for this $\alpha$. If no such smooth approximation exists, the coarea formula and the Sobolev inequality are not established in the range $1\le\alpha<2$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.11: for every $f\in BV_{H_\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ one has $\|f\|_{L^{d/(d-1)}(\mathbb{R}^d)} \lesssim \|\nabla_{H_\alpha}f\|(\mathbb{R}^d)$, and this Sobolev inequality is equivalent to the isoperimetric inequality $|E|^{1-1/d}\lesssim P_{H_\alpha}(E)$ for bounded sets of finite $\alpha$-Hermite perimeter. Theorem 2.10 then derives the isocapacity inequality $|M|^{(d-1)/d}\lesssim \operatorname{cap}(M,BV_{H_\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^d))$ for compact sets and the converse estimate $\operatorname{cap}(M,BV_{H_\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^d))\lesssim |M|+P_{H_\alpha}(M)$ for connected compact sets with smooth boundary, so the $\alpha$-HBV capacity behaves like the classical BV capacity. The paper also shows this capacity is an outer measure and enjoys the regularity properties spelled out in Theorem 2.3, derives a duality formula expressing it as the supremum of Radon measures in the dual space, and establishes a trace/restriction theorem for measures. Finally, it proves that every set of finite restricted $\alpha$-Hermite perimeter admits a mean curvature in $L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$, extending the classical mean-curvature result for sets of finite perimeter to the asymmetric Hermite setting.

Load-bearing premise

The approximation theorem that drives the coarea formula and the Sobolev inequality assumes the weight function $\psi(x)=x\,|x|^{(\alpha-2)/2}$ is Lipschitz continuous on the domain, but this fails near the origin for every $1\le\alpha<2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $\alpha$-HBV capacity is an outer measure with the regularity properties of Theorem 2.3, so the standard potential-theoretic machinery applies to it.
  • The isocapacity inequality $|M|^{(d-1)/d}\lesssim \operatorname{cap}(M,BV_{H_\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^d))$ means that a compact set of small capacity must have small volume, exactly as in the classical BV theory.
  • The trace/restriction theorem gives a necessary and sufficient condition on a Radon measure to support the endpoint Sobolev inequality from $BV_{H_\alpha}$.
  • Taking $\alpha=1$ recovers the classical BV theory, with the $\alpha$-perimeter equal to twice the usual perimeter.
  • Every set of finite restricted $\alpha$-Hermite perimeter minimises the variational functional $F_{u,H_\alpha}$ of (3.1) for some $u\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The restricted perimeter's constraint (1.16) acts as a calibration condition on the admissible test fields; one could investigate whether it selects the natural surface measure for the weighted geometry, just as calibrated perimeters repair complement asymmetry in other weighted settings.
  • The equivalence in Theorem 2.10 suggests that the $\alpha$-HBV isocapacity inequality could be sharpened to an identity splitting volume and perimeter, in the spirit of earlier splitting theorems for sharp Sobolev inequalities; looking for the sharp constant is a direct next step.
  • A natural extension is to build the $p$-capacity theory for $1<p<\infty$ using the $\alpha$-Hermite Sobolev spaces and test whether the trace and isocapacity theorems of Section 2 hold uniformly in $p$.
  • Since the weight $|x|^{\alpha/2}$ vanishes at the origin, the boundary case $\alpha\to 1^+$ interpolates between Euclidean and increasingly weighted geometries; one could test whether the isoperimetric constant degenerates as $\alpha$ grows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces spaces of functions of α-Hermite bounded variation, BV_Hα(R^d), associated with the operator H_α=Δ−(α−1)|x|^α for α∈[1,∞), using a 2d-component generalized gradient. It develops basic Banach-space properties, a lower semicontinuity result, an approximation theorem, a coarea formula, and Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities for these spaces. It then defines an α-HBV capacity, establishes measure-theoretic and duality properties, proves trace and isocapacity equivalences, and introduces a restricted α-Hermite perimeter that restores complement symmetry. This restricted perimeter is used to extend the Barozzi–Gonzalez–Tamanini mean-curvature theorem to the α-Hermite setting.

Significance. If the gaps noted below are repaired, the paper would provide a coherent BV theory for a family of Schrödinger-type operators with polynomial potentials and would connect functional capacity, perimeter, and mean curvature in a nontrivial way. A genuine strength is that the central Sobolev inequality, Theorem 1.11(i), is sound: for any test vector ψ∈C_c^1(R^d;R^d), taking φ=(ψ/2,ψ/2) gives |∫ f divψ dx|≤‖∇_{H_α}f‖, so the classical distributional derivative is controlled and the classical Gagliardo–Nirenberg–Sobolev inequality applies. The introduction of the restricted perimeter is a useful device because PHα lacks the classical complement symmetry, and the ball estimates in Corollary 1.13 quantify this asymmetry explicitly. The main weaknesses are concentrated in the proofs of the approximation theorem, the coarea formula, the trace theorem, and one isocapacity direction; these are repairable but are not merely cosmetic.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 1.5, proof of the J2 estimate] The estimate for J2 in the proof of Theorem 1.5 asserts that ψ(x)=x_k|x|^{(α−2)/2} is Lipschitz on Ω for all α∈[1,∞). This is false for 1≤α<2: near x=0 one has |ψ(x)|≈|x|^{α/2} and |∇ψ(x)|≈|x|^{α/2−1}, which is unbounded when α<2. Since Theorem 1.5 is invoked in Theorem 1.6, Theorem 1.10, Theorem 1.11, Lemma 2.7, and Theorem 2.9, this is a load-bearing gap in the manuscript as written. The Sobolev inequality itself survives, because the test-vector argument with φ=(ψ/2,ψ/2) reduces Theorem 1.11(i) to the classical BV Sobolev inequality, but the approximation theorem still needs a separate proof for α∈[1,2), for instance using the Hölder continuity of ψ.
  2. [Theorem 1.10, proof after (1.12)] The reverse inequality in the coarea formula is not completed as written. The estimate is first obtained for smooth functions, and the passage to f∈BV_Hα uses Theorem 1.5 together with lower semicontinuity, but the displayed bound contains the term √2(α−1)∫∫_{f≥t}|x|^{α/2}dxdt. To pass this term through an approximating sequence f_k one needs convergence of ∫|f_k||x|^{α/2}dx, which is not part of the L1 plus variation approximation supplied by Theorem 1.5. This matters because the coarea formula is used in Theorem 2.2, Lemma 2.7, and Theorem 2.10. The missing inequality is likely true for α>1 via the test pair φ=(ψ,−ψ), which controls the weighted L1 norm by ‖∇_{H_α}f‖, but the proof must make this explicit.
  3. [Theorem 2.9, proof of (iii)⇒(i)] The displayed chain of estimates in this part is not a valid derivation of the trace inequality. The layer-cake formula contains t^{p−1}dt, not t^{α−1}dt, and the passage from (∫_0^∞ μ({|f|>t})t^{p−1}dt)^{1/p} to ∫_0^∞ μ({|f|>t})^{1/p}dt is asserted without a supporting Hardy-type argument. As printed this step is the core of the implication and must be corrected or replaced by a standard trace-theorem argument for BV-type capacities.
  4. [Theorem 2.10(ii), proof around E_δ] The assertion P(E_δ)→0 as δ→0 is false for a d-dimensional compact set M with nonempty smooth boundary. For M=closed unit ball, E_δ={1<|x|<1+r} has classical perimeter (d−1)ω_d[(1+r)^{d−1}+1], which tends to 2(d−1)ω_d, not 0. Consequently the claimed convergence ‖∇_{H_α}f_δ‖_{L1}→PHα(M) does not follow from the displayed inequalities, and the proof of (2.3)⇒(2.4) is incomplete. The desired limit may still be true, but it requires a sharper estimate of PHα({dist(·,M)<r})−PHα(M) rather than a bound by the perimeter of the shell.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Global typesetting] Several mathematical symbols are corrupted in the production text, including '/greaterorsimilar', '/nequal', and the spacing in 'V ariation'; these should be corrected in the final version.
  2. [Corollary 1.13 and Remark 1.14] The notation PHα(B(0,s)^c) is used before the asymmetry of the perimeter is discussed; a forward reference to Remark 1.14 would help the reader.
  3. [Equation (1.11)] The factor √2 in the comparison |∇f|≤|∇_{H_α}f|≤√2(|∇f|+√(α−1)|x|^{α/2}|f|) is consistent with the 2d-component definition of ∇_{H_α}, but this normalization is not explained and should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Theorem 2.3] The phrase that cap(·,BV(R^d)) is 'not only an outer measure' is slightly misleading: the proof establishes monotonicity, countable subadditivity, and Choquet-type continuity for compact and increasing families, not the usual outer-measure regularity; rephrasing would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Sobolev inequality rests on the classical GNS inequality plus the gradient domination (1.11); the capacity and isocapacity results follow from coarea and isoperimetric inequalities rather than from their own conclusions.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the central Sobolev inequality (Theorem 1.11(i)) is obtained from the approximation result (Theorem 1.5), the classical Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality, and the pointwise comparison |∇f|≤|∇H_α f| from (1.11); none of these ingredients contains the conclusion. The isoperimetric inequality (ii) is the specialization f=1_E, and the equivalence (iii) is proved via the coarea formula (Theorem 1.10) and a standard layer-cake argument, not by assuming the target inequality. The geometric description of capacity (Theorem 2.2) and the isocapacity equivalences (Theorem 2.10) are derived from the coarea formula, the definition of capacity, and Theorem 1.11; the 'moreover, the inequalities are true' parts are proved from Theorem 1.11(ii), not imported from the claimed conclusion. The only author self-citation is the preprint [19], used solely to supply the definition of the Sobolev 1-capacity (Definition 2.5) and compared in Proposition 2.6; it is not used to prove Theorem 1.11 or Theorem 2.10, so it is not load-bearing. Separately, the proof of Theorem 1.5 assumes ψ(x)=x_k|x|^{(α−2)/2} is Lipschitz on Ω, which is false for α∈[1,2); this is an internal proof gap and a correctness risk, not circularity, and Theorem 1.11(i) can be recovered without Theorem 1.5 because every classical distributional derivative is dominated by the α-Hermite variation. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's results rest on standard real analysis (Riesz representation, Hahn-Banach, classical Sobolev and GNS inequalities, divergence theorem) and on several unproved or under-proved domain assumptions: the self-adjointness and factorization of H_α, the claimed analogues of coarea and Sobolev for the restricted perimeter, and the compactness used in the Massari minimization. No free numerical parameters are fitted to data. The only newly introduced object is the restricted perimeter ~P_{H_α}, a definition intended to restore complement symmetry.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption H_α = Δ − (α−1)|x|^α is self-adjoint on C_c^∞(R^d) and admits the factorization H_α = 1/2 Σ(A^+_{i,α}A^-_{i,α}+A^-_{i,α}A^+_{i,α}) with the stated A^± definitions.
    Stated in the introduction without proof. Self-adjointness and the commutation structure are standard for polynomial potentials, but the paper does not demonstrate them for the whole range α∈[1,∞).
  • domain assumption The analogue of the coarea formula, Sobolev inequality, and isoperimetric inequality hold for the restricted α-Hermite perimeter ~P_{H_α}.
    Section 1.2, after Lemma 1.16: 'In the same manner, we can list the analogues of previous results for ~P_{H_α}(·), such as the coarea formula, the Sobolev inequality, the isoperimetric inequality.' These are asserted without proof and are used as background for Section 3.
  • domain assumption Minimizing sequences for the Massari-type functional F_λ(F) = ~P_{H_α}(F) + λΛ(E\F) are compact in L^1_loc(R^d).
    Theorem 3.1, Step I: 'It is well known that every minimizing sequence is compact in L^1_loc(R^d).' This relies on unproved local compactness of BV_{H_α} and on the lower semicontinuity of ~P_{H_α}.
  • standard math Classical BV theory, the Riesz representation theorem, the Hahn-Banach theorem, and the Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality.
    Used throughout, e.g., in the proofs of Lemma 1.3, Lemma 1.2, and Theorem 1.11, with references to [3] and [11].
invented entities (1)
  • Restricted α-Hermite perimeter ~P_{H_α}
    purpose: A perimeter functional satisfying ~P_{H_α}(E) = ~P_{H_α}(E^c) for all sets, needed to replace P_{H_α} in the mean-curvature theory of Section 3.
    Defined in Definition 1.15 via the normalization condition (1.16). It is an ad hoc modification designed to repair the failure of complement symmetry shown in (1.15). There is no external or experimental evidence; it is a definition, not a prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Capacity & Perimeter from $\alpha$-Hermite Bounded Variation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K4EB2I3N

@misc{pith2026190807889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Capacity & Perimeter from $\alpha$-Hermite Bounded Variation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K4EB2I3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07889}
}
abstract

Let $\mathcal{H}_{\alpha}=\Delta-(\alpha-1)|x|^{\alpha}$ be an $[1,\infty)\ni\alpha$-Hermite operator for the hydrogen atom located at the origin in $\mathbb R^d$. In this paper, we are motivated by the classical case $\alpha=1$ to investigate the space of functions with $\alpha$-{\it Hermite Bounded Variation} and its functional capacity and geometrical perimeter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adams and L

    D. Adams and L. Hedberg, Function Spaces and Potential Th eory, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1996

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Ambrosio, Fine properties of sets of finite perimeter i n doubling metric measure spaces, Set-V alued and V ariational Analysis 10 (2002), 111-128

    L. Ambrosio, Fine properties of sets of finite perimeter i n doubling metric measure spaces, Set-V alued and V ariational Analysis 10 (2002), 111-128

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco and D. Pallara, Functions of bounde d variation and free discontinuity problems, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New Y ork, 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Baldi and F

    A. Baldi and F. Montefalcone, A note on the extension of BV functions in metric measure spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 340 (2008), 197-208

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Gonzalez and I

    E, Barozzi, E. Gonzalez and I. Tamanini, The mean curvatu re of a set of finite perimeter, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 99 (1987), no. 2, 313-316

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Massari, V ariational mean curvatures i n abstract measure spaces, Calc

    E, Barozzi and U. Massari, V ariational mean curvatures i n abstract measure spaces, Calc. V ar. 55:75 (2016), 1-16

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Bongioanni and J

    B. Bongioanni and J. Torrea, Sobolev spaces associated t o the harmonic oscillator, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 116 (2003), 337-360

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Bramanti, M

    M. Bramanti, M. Miranda and D. Pallara, Two characteriza tion of BV functions on Carnot groups via the heat semigroup, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 17 (2012), 3845-38 76

    work page 2012

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Carbonaro and G

    A. Carbonaro and G. Mauceri, A note on bounded variation a nd heat semigroup on Riemannian manifolds, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 76 (2007), 155-160

    2007

  2. [10]

    Costea, Sobolev capacity and Hausdor ffmeasures in metric measure spaces, Ann

    S. Costea, Sobolev capacity and Hausdor ffmeasures in metric measure spaces, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Mat h. 34 (2009), 179-194. CAPACITY & PERIMETER FROM α-HERMITE BOUNDED V ARIA TION 35

    2009

  3. [11]

    L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy, Measure theory and fine prop erties of functions, Studies in Advanced Mathe- matics, CRC, Boca Raton, 1992

    1992

  4. [12]

    De Giorgi, Su una teoria generate della misura ( r − 1)-dimensionale in uno spazio ad r dimensioni, Ann

    E. De Giorgi, Su una teoria generate della misura ( r − 1)-dimensionale in uno spazio ad r dimensioni, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 36 (1954), 191-213

    1954

  5. [13]

    De Giorgi, Selected Papers, (L

    E. De Giorgi, Selected Papers, (L. Ambrosio, G. Dal Maso , M. Forti, M. Miranda, S. Spagnolo, Editors) Springer V erlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

    2006

  6. [14]

    De Giorgi, F

    E. De Giorgi, F. Colombini and L. Piccinini, Frontiere o rientate di misura minima equestioni collegate, Ed- itrice Teenico Scientifica, Pisa, 1972

    1972

  7. [15]

    Giusti, Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded va riation, Birkh¨ aser, Boston, Mass., 1984

    E. Giusti, Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded va riation, Birkh¨ aser, Boston, Mass., 1984

    1984

  8. [16]

    Harboure, L

    E. Harboure, L. de Rosa, C. Segovia and J. Torrea, Lp-dimension free boundedness for Riesz transforms associated to Hermite functions, Math. Ann. 328 (2004), 653 -682

    2004

  9. [17]

    Hakkarainen and J

    H. Hakkarainen and J. Kinnunen, The BV -capacity in metr ic spaces, Manuscripta Math. 132 (2010), 51-73

    2010

  10. [18]

    Hakkarainen and N

    H. Hakkarainen and N. Shanmugalingam, Comparisons of r elative BV -capacities and Sobolev capacity in metric spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), 5525-5543

    2011

  11. [19]

    Huang, P

    J. Huang, P . Li and Y . Liu, Characterization for the Sobo lev-type inequality associated with the Hermite operator, preprint

  12. [20]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Xiao, Da. Y ang and Z. Zhai, Regularity and ca pacity for the fractional dissipative operator, J Different. Equ. 259 (2015), 3495-3519

    2015

  13. [21]

    Kurata, An estimate on the heat kernel of magnetic Sch r¨ odinger operators and uniformly elliptic operators with non-negative potentials, J

    K. Kurata, An estimate on the heat kernel of magnetic Sch r¨ odinger operators and uniformly elliptic operators with non-negative potentials, J. London Math. Soc. 62 (2000 ), 885-903

    2000

  14. [22]

    E. M. Landis, s-capacity and its applications to the study of solutions of a second-order elliptic equation with distributions coefficients, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik 5 (1968), 177-204

    1968

  15. [23]

    Lahti and N

    P . Lahti and N. Shanmugalingam, Trace theorems for func tions of bounded variation in metric spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), 2754-2791

    2018

  16. [24]

    Lahti, The variational 1-capacity and BV functions w ith zero boundary values on doubling metric spaces, Adv

    P . Lahti, The variational 1-capacity and BV functions w ith zero boundary values on doubling metric spaces, Adv. Calc. V ar. (2018), doi:10.1515/acv-2018-0024

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    L. Liu, J. Xiao, Da. Y ang and W . Y uan, Gaussian Capacity Analysis, LNM 2225, Springer, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    Liu, BV capacity on the generalized Grushin plane, J

    Y . Liu, BV capacity on the generalized Grushin plane, J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), 409-441

    2017

  19. [27]

    Maz’ya, Conductor and capacitary inequalities for f unctions on topological spaces and their applications to Sobolev-type imbeddings, J

    V . Maz’ya, Conductor and capacitary inequalities for f unctions on topological spaces and their applications to Sobolev-type imbeddings, J. Funct. Anal. 224 (2005), 408 -430

    2005

  20. [28]

    Maz’ya, Sobolev Spaces with Applications to Ellipti c Partial Di fferential Equations, 2nd, revised and augmented edn

    V . Maz’ya, Sobolev Spaces with Applications to Ellipti c Partial Di fferential Equations, 2nd, revised and augmented edn. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  21. [29]

    5. U. Massari and M. Miranda, Minimal Surfaces of Codime nsion One, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984

    1984

  22. [30]

    Miranda, Jr., Functions of bounded variation on “goo d” metric spaces, J

    M. Miranda, Jr., Functions of bounded variation on “goo d” metric spaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. 82 (2003), 975-1004

    2003

  23. [31]

    Molahajloo and M

    S. Molahajloo and M. W . Wong, Diagonalization of Weyl tr ansforms and heat equations for time-dependent Hermite operator, Complex. Anal. Oper. Theory. 5 (2011), 28 3-298

    2011

  24. [32]

    Sjogren and J

    P . Sjogren and J. Torrea, On the boundary convergence of solutions to the Hermite-Schrodinger equation, Collq. Math. 118 (2010), 161-174

    2010

  25. [33]

    Stempak and J

    K. Stempak and J. Torrea, Poisson integrals and Riesz tr ansforms for the Hermite function expansions with weights, J. Funct. Anal. 202 (2003), 443-472

    2003

  26. [34]

    Stinga and J

    P . Stinga and J. Torrea, Regularity properties for the fractional harmonic oscillaor, J. Funct. Anal. 260 (2011), 3097-3131

    2011

  27. [35]

    Thangavelu, Riesz transforms and wave equation for t he Hermite operator, Comm

    S. Thangavelu, Riesz transforms and wave equation for t he Hermite operator, Comm. Partial Di fferential Equations 15 (1990), 1199-1215

    1990

  28. [36]

    Thangavelu, Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expans ions, Mathematical Notes, V ol

    S. Thangavelu, Lectures on Hermite and Laguerre Expans ions, Mathematical Notes, V ol. 42, Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    1993

  29. [37]

    Wang, The a ffine Sobolev-Zhang inequality on BV(Rn), Adv

    T. Wang, The a ffine Sobolev-Zhang inequality on BV(Rn), Adv. Math. 230 (2012), 2457-2473

    2012

  30. [38]

    Wong, The heat equation for Hermite operator on the He isenberg group, Hokkaido Math

    M. Wong, The heat equation for Hermite operator on the He isenberg group, Hokkaido Math. J. 34 (2005), 393-404

    2005

  31. [39]

    Xiao, The sharp Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalit ies split twice, Adv

    J. Xiao, The sharp Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalit ies split twice, Adv. Math. 211 (2007), 417-435

    2007

  32. [40]

    Xiao, The p-Affine Capacity, J

    J. Xiao, The p-Affine Capacity, J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), 947-966

    2016

  33. [41]

    Xiao, Gaussian BV Capacity, Adv

    J. Xiao, Gaussian BV Capacity, Adv. Calc. V ar. 9 (2016), 187-200. 36 JIZHENG HUANG, PENGTAO LI, AND YU LIU

    2016

  34. [42]

    Ziemer, Weakly Differentiable Functions, GTM 120, Springer-V erlag, 1989

    W .P . Ziemer, Weakly Differentiable Functions, GTM 120, Springer-V erlag, 1989. School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, P .R.China. E-mail address: hjzheng@163.com College of Mathematics, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 2660...

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.