Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 116 references

Near-infrared characterization of evolved massive stars in M31 and M33

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Near-infrared K-band spectroscopy of six evolved massive stars in M31 and M33 detects CO band emission that reclassifies ambiguous optical objects as B[e] supergiants, places one in a post-red-supergiant stage, and points to a…

desk verdict Honest, useful NIR classifications of six evolved massive stars; the two headline claims (post-RSG status, binary) are both weaker than the abstract implies, but the authors flag the gaps themselves. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19249 v1 pith:K5FXQ3Q2 submitted 2025-07-25 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords massivestarsB[e]supergiantsluminousbluevariablesrednear-infraredspectroscopyCObandemissioncarbonisotoperatioM31andM33
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that near-infrared K-band spectra can break classification deadlocks among evolved massive stars that optical spectra alone cannot resolve. Observing six stars in M31 and M33, the authors detect CO band emission around two M31 objects and reclassify them as B[e] supergiants—hot evolved stars with dense circumstellar disks—with one most likely caught in the post-red-supergiant phase. They also argue that a third M31 star is a B[e] supergiant, that a featureless M31 object is likely an LBV in an S Dor cycle, and that an M33 star is a possible binary pairing a hot LBV/B[e] supergiant with a red supergiant, a combination never before confirmed. If right, the work would show that molecular and hydrogen-recombination diagnostics in the near-infrared are decisive where optical classification is ambiguous, and it would add a rare evolutionary stepping-stone to the map of massive-star lives.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing diagnostic is the CO first-overtone band spectrum in the K band: emission from the $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO band heads, modeled with a Keplerian-rotating-disk code under LTE, yields the gas temperature, column density, projected rotation velocity, and the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO abundance ratio. That ratio is the evolutionary clock—it tracks the surface $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio, which drops from the interstellar value near 90 toward values below 5 only after the red-supergiant phase. Pfund-series hydrogen emission supplies the complementary probe of ionized-wind density in hotter objects, and CO absorption identifies cool late-type components, as in the candidate binary.

What would settle it

A higher-quality K-band spectrum of J004320.97+414039.6 with $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO above 5 would falsify the post-red-supergiant classification; alternatively, a completed radial-velocity curve for J013242.26+302114.1 that follows 500–1000 day red-supergiant pulsations rather than a roughly 530-day orbit would falsify the binary claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the near-infrared K-band region, through CO first-overtone band emission and hydrogen Pfund-series emission, exposes the nature of evolved massive stars that optical spectra leave ambiguous. CO band emission indicates dense, warm (roughly 1500–2200 K) circumstellar rings, and the modeled $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratio reads the star's surface carbon-isotope enrichment at the time the gas was ejected. For J004320.97+414039.6 the ratio is about 3, which on rotating 20 solar-mass evolutionary tracks is reached only after the red-supergiant phase, placing the star in a post-red-supergiant stage. For J013242.26+302114.1 in M33, pure CO absorption reveals a red supergiant whose radial velocity wanders by at least 9 km/s; together with a spectral energy distribution that requires both a hot 22,000–24,000 K star and a cool 4,000 K component, this supports a binary of a hot LBV or B[e] supergiant with a red supergiant secondary, which, if confirmed, would be the first such system known.

Load-bearing premise

The post-red-supergiant classification of J004320.97+414039.6 stands on the modeled $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratio of about 3 being the true surface carbon-isotope ratio of the ejected gas, measured from a low-signal spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • J004320.97+414039.6 joins the small set of post-red-supergiant B[e] supergiants, marking the evolutionary transition from the red-supergiant phase back to a hot phase.
  • CO band emission should be treated as a decisive discriminator between B[e] supergiants and LBV candidates in extragalactic surveys, breaking the optical degeneracy between these classes.
  • The candidate binary J013242.26+302114.1, if confirmed with a complete orbit, would be the first known red-supergiant binary with an evolved massive primary, providing a testbed for binary evolution and mass transfer.
  • For J004229.87+410551.8, the featureless K-band spectrum plus brightening and reddening since 2002 supports an ongoing S Dor cycle, meaning its classification as an LBV should be tested with fresh optical spectroscopy.
  • The persistent CO emission and Na I doublet in J004621.08+421308.2 confirm that its molecular disk has remained stable over roughly eight years.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct prediction is that higher-signal-to-noise K-band spectroscopy of J004320.97+414039.6 will keep $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO below about 5; if the measured ratio instead rises above that, the post-red-supergiant reading would be an artifact of noise or telluric residuals.
  • The same $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO method could be applied to other extragalactic B[e] supergiant candidates with ambiguous optical classifications, turning the technique into a population-level census of post-red-supergiant stars.
  • If the binary is real, its roughly 9 km/s semi-amplitude implies a long period, and a completed radial-velocity curve should show a period above about 530 days—the Roche-lobe limit derived in the paper—allowing the pulsation alternative to be excluded.
  • The paper's assumption that the CO ring is in Keplerian rotation is not directly tested; a non-Keplerian outflow geometry would change derived column densities and isotope ratios, so time-resolved or interferometric measurements of the ring kinematics would strengthen the classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new GNIRS K-band spectra (R~5900, 2.2-2.4 microns) for six evolved massive stars in M31 and M33, five of which had previously ambiguous optical classifications. For each target the authors model the detected CO band emission (two M31 objects) or hydrogen Pfund emission (two objects) and combine the results with literature photometry, SED modeling, and radial velocities. They classify J004320.97+414039.6 and J004621.08+421308.2 as B[e] supergiants, argue that J004320 is most likely in a post-red supergiant stage based on 13C enrichment (12CO/13CO ~ 3), propose J004415.00+420156.2 as a B[e] supergiant, confirm Var 83 as an LBV, find J004229.87+410551.8 featureless and possibly an LBV in an S Dor cycle, and argue that J013242.26+302114.1 is most likely a binary system comprising a hot B-type emission-line object and a red supergiant, potentially the first of its kind.

Significance. If the classifications hold, the paper demonstrates that K-band CO and Pfund diagnostics can resolve optical ambiguities in extragalactic evolved massive stars and identifies a rare post-RSG B[e]SG candidate and a possibly first LBV/B[e]SG+RSG binary. The observations are new and useful: four objects receive their first near-infrared spectra, the model fits are quantitative and reported with parameters, and the analysis makes good use of archival APOGEE radial velocities and long-term photometry. The paper also contains explicit caveats about the weakest data. However, the two headline claims--the post-RSG status of J004320 and the binary nature of J013242--rest on fragile evidence, so the significance of the work is conditional on additional data or a more cautious presentation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2.2, Table 4, Fig. 7] The binary interpretation of J013242.26+302114.1 is not yet supported by the radial-velocity data. The claimed semi-amplitude of at least ~9 km/s is set by the single 2012 measurement (-121.6 km/s, no quoted uncertainty) against the APOGEE/GNIRS cluster near -100 to -110.8 km/s; the APOGEE values alone span only about 7.5 km/s. The authors themselves note that RSG radial pulsations reach ~10 km/s with periods of 500-1000 d for M_K ~ -11, and their own minimum orbital period estimate of 532 d lies inside that range. With no phase-resolved orbit and no radial-velocity measurement of the hot component, the data do not favor orbital motion over intrinsic pulsation. The abstract and conclusions should state "candidate binary" rather than "most likely a binary" unless additional epochs or a coherent radial-velocity curve are provided.
  2. [§3.1, Table 2, Fig. 2] The post-RSG classification of J004320.97+414039.6 rests entirely on the fitted 12CO/13CO ratio of 3 +/- 1 in a spectrum with S/N = 16 and telluric remnants in the red portion. The modeling assumes LTE and a particular (Keplerian or equatorial-outflow) geometry, and the mapping to the stellar surface 12C/13C at the time of ejection depends on single-star rotating evolutionary tracks. No systematic-error analysis is given for the telluric correction, continuum placement, or optical depth, so it is not demonstrated that the ratio is robustly below the RSG threshold of 5. Since this is the load-bearing evidence for the "post-red supergiant" statement in the abstract, the paper should either add a quantitative robustness test (e.g., varying the continuum, line-formation geometry, or optical depth) or downgrade the claim to provisional pending higher-S/N data.
  3. [§4.1.1] The argument that a featureless K-band spectrum "tentatively excludes" a B[e]SG classification is weakened by the paper's own statement that only about 50% of B[e]SGs show CO band emission, and by the possibility that Pfund emission is weak or absent in some B[e]SGs. The conclusion that J004229.87+410551.8 is not a B[e]SG therefore relies more on the literature-based concern about IR excess contamination than on the new spectrum alone, and the wording should reflect this asymmetry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains a corrupted text fragment ("20 MO •") and the color-bar label "12C/13C" should be explicitly defined as the carbon isotope abundance ratio.
  2. [Table 4] The Drout et al. (2012) radial-velocity measurement is listed without an uncertainty; please add an estimated uncertainty or state explicitly why none is available.
  3. [§4.2.2] The statement that the single-star ages of the two components "have at least the same order of magnitude" is presented as supporting binarity, but a 3-4 Myr age difference is substantial; this argument should be removed or explicitly framed as non-constraining.
  4. [§2] Please clarify how the rest-wavelength shift was determined for objects with no intrinsic spectral features, given that for J004229.87+410551.8 no shift is applied.
  5. [Table 1] The abbreviation "cLBV" is used without definition at first occurrence; please expand it in the table caption or in Section 1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; classifications rest on new K-band observations compared with external literature diagnostics.

full rationale

The paper's central results are inferred from newly obtained GNIRS K-band spectra, not from parameters that were defined in terms of the conclusions. The CO band emission and Pfund-line detections are direct observational features; their interpretation uses external, previously established diagnostics (e.g., CO emission as a B[e]SG indicator, evolutionary tracks, literature photometry) rather than a self-referential definition. The fitted 12CO/13CO ratios are model outputs that are then compared with independent stellar evolution tracks, so the post-RSG classification is an inference, not a tautology. The binary hypothesis for J013242.26+302114.1 is explicitly presented as tentative, with the authors noting that the radial-velocity variations 'might also have a different origin' and that follow-up is needed; the SED modelling is used as supporting evidence after the K-band spectrum already indicated a cool component, not as a circular substitute. Self-citations to the authors' earlier CO/Pfund codes and classification criteria are methodological reuse of tools validated on other samples, and they do not smuggle in the present conclusions. No load-bearing derivation reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All free parameters are model fits to the observed spectra and SED, not constants introduced to force a result. The main axioms are standard line-formation and stellar-atmosphere assumptions, plus the evolutionary-track calibration of the carbon isotope ratio and the orbital interpretation of the RSG radial velocities. No new physical entities are postulated; the proposed binary is a hypothesis about known star types, so invented_entities is empty.

free parameters (9)
  • CO gas temperature = J004320: 2200 K; J004621: 1500 K (both +/-100 K)
    Fitted to CO band-head spectra in Section 3.1; controls molecular band strengths.
  • CO column density = J004320: (3+/-1)e21 cm^-2; J004621: (5+/-1)e22 cm^-2
    Fitted column density through the modeled CO ring in Section 3.1.
  • Carbon isotope ratio 12CO/13CO = J004320: 3+/-1; J004621: 50+/-10
    Fitted from relative CO band-head strengths; this ratio is the basis for the post-RSG interpretation of J004320.
  • CO line-of-sight rotation velocity = 60+/-10 km/s for both CO-emitting objects
    Fitted projected rotation velocity in the CO disk model, Table 2.
  • CO Gaussian velocity broadening = 2+/-0.5 km/s for both CO-emitting objects
    Fitted thermal plus turbulent broadening term in the CO model, Table 2.
  • Hydrogen density in Pfund line region = J004415: 1.9e13 cm^-3; Var 83: 4.9e13 cm^-3
    Derived from the maximum detected Pfund line using Menzel case B recombination, Table 3.
  • Maximum Pfund quantum number = J004415: n=47; Var 83: n=40
    Fitted highest Pfund transition observed; used as the hydrogen density diagnostic, Table 3.
  • Hot component SED parameters = T_eff = 22000-24000 K, A_V = 0.65-0.7 mag
    Fit to the UV and blue optical SED of J013242 in Section 4.2.2.
  • Cool component SED parameters = T_eff = 4000 K, log g = 1.0
    Kurucz grid minimum adopted for the RSG in the SED fit; the authors state these are upper limits and the model is for demonstration.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CO band emission forms under LTE in a dense, warm molecular ring around the star.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 to justify the CO modeling code; considered reasonable for high column densities but not directly verified for these targets.
  • domain assumption The observed double-peaked CO band heads trace rotational motion, and the projected rotation velocity model captures the line formation geometry.
    Used in Section 3.1 to convert band-head profiles into ring parameters; the authors note an equatorial outflow could produce similar profiles.
  • domain assumption Pfund lines form in an optically thin ionized wind under Menzel case B recombination at T_e = 10,000 K.
    Used in Section 3.2 to convert detected Pfund series to hydrogen densities; the authors note the temperature choice mainly affects normalization.
  • domain assumption Single-star rotating evolutionary tracks at solar metallicity connect the surface 12C/13C ratio to evolutionary phase.
    Used in Section 3.1 and Figure 2 to argue that a ratio below 5 implies passage through the RSG phase; binary effects and M31 metallicity are not modeled.
  • domain assumption The SED of J013242 is a sum of a Kurucz hot-star model and a 4000 K cool-star model with Cardelli extinction and R_V = 3.2.
    Underlies the binary luminosity and radius estimates in Section 4.2.2; field contamination and line-of-sight projection are not excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper The RSG radial velocity changes of about 9 km/s are orbital motion rather than intrinsic pulsation or convection.
    Required for the binary hypothesis; the authors themselves list RSG pulsations with similar amplitude and period as an alternative in Section 4.2.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Near-infrared characterization of evolved massive stars in M31 and M33." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K5FXQ3Q2

@misc{pith2026250719249,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Near-infrared characterization of evolved massive stars in M31 and M33},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K5FXQ3Q2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19249}
}
read the original abstract

The upper region of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram is populated by massive stars in a diversity of evolutionary stages, and the classification of these stars is often based on observed characteristics exclusively in the optical spectral range. The near-infrared regime provides useful complementary information that can help resolving ambiguities in stellar classification and add valuable information about circumstellar envelopes or late-type companions. We present new, near-infrared medium-resolution K-band spectra for a sample of six evolved massive stars, four in M31 and two in M33. The spectra are obtained with the Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph (GNIRS) at the Gemini North telescope. We detect CO band emission from the environment of two M31 objects, J004320.97+414039.6 and J004621.08+421308.2, which we classify as B[e] supergiants, with J004320.97+414039.6 being most likely in a post-red supergiant stage. Two objects have pure emission from the hydrogen Pfund series. Of these, we propose that J004415.00+420156.2 in M31 could also be a B[e] supergiant while J013410.93+303437.6 (Var 83) is a well-known luminous blue variable (LBV) in M33. The M31 star J004229.87+410551.8 has a featureless spectrum and its evolutionary stage remains inconclusive; it could be an LBV undergoing an S Dor cycle. The object J013242.26+302114.1 in M33 displays a pure absorption spectrum, including CO bands, consistent with its identification as a cool star. Radial velocity measurements of this red component, combined with modelling of the spectral energy distribution, suggest that J013242.26+302114.1 may be a binary system consisting of an LBV or B[e] supergiant primary and a red supergiant secondary. If confirmed, it would represent the first of its kind.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19249 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Best-fitting models (red) to the circumstellar emission and absorption seen in the normalized GNIRS spectra (black) of our objects. The parameters for the CO band and Pfund line emission are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The parameters for the atmospheric model are listed in the corresponding panel. The order of the objects follows the one in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. for evolutionary tracks of a star at solar metallicity (which is similar to the metallicity of M31) with an initial mass of 20 M⊙ and for rotation rates Ω/Ωcrit = 0.1 − 0.5 in steps of 0.1 (Ekström et al. 2012). The tracks are interpolations obtained by the tool SYCLIST4 (Yusof et al. 2022). With increasing rotation velocity of the star, the enrichment in 13C on the stellar surface starts earlier in the evolution, b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time series observations of J004229.87+410551.8 collected in 𝑔 band with ZTF (gray points) and 𝐵𝑉𝑅𝐼 filters (coloured points). For clarity of the plot, the error bars of the ZTF measurements (which are of similar size as for the 𝐵𝑉𝑅𝐼 photometry) are omitted. The errorbars of the data from 2002 are smaller than the symbol size. The black arrows mark the dates of spectroscopic observations in the optical (Massey et al… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time series observations of J013410.93+303437.6 (Var 83) col￾lected in 𝐵𝑉𝑅𝐼 filters. The black arrow marks the date of our K-band obser￾vations. over about 12 years (from July 2012 to February 2024). The light curves display irregular brightness variations of 0.7 − 0.8…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Location of the hot and cool components of J013242.26+302114.1 in the HR diagram along with evolutionary tracks for rotating stars with solar metallicity (from Ekström et al. 2012) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial velocity curve of the RSG component in J013242.26+302114.1. MNRAS 000, 1–11 (2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

  2. [2]

    F., Borges Fernandes M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20871.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..284A 423, 284

    Aret A., Kraus M., Muratore M. F., Borges Fernandes M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20871.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..284A 423, 284

  3. [3]

    L., Vallverd \'u R., Torres A

    Arias M. L., Vallverd \'u R., Torres A. F., Kraus M., 2021, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021BAAA...62..104A 62, 104

  4. [4]

    Arroyo-Torres B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...575A..50A 575, A50

  5. [5]

    C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0c2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131f8003B 131, 068003

    Bellm E. C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0c2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131f8003B 131, 068003

  6. [6]

    Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..77B 686, A77

    Bonanos A. Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A..77B 686, A77

  7. [7]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

  8. [8]

    S., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00667816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Ap&SS.224...25C 224, 25

    Carr J. S., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00667816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Ap&SS.224...25C 224, 25

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    W., Bedding T

    Chatys F. W., Bedding T. R., Murphy S. J., Kiss L. L., Dobie D., Grindlay J. E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4832C 487, 4832

  2. [10]

    S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..72C 548, A72

    Cidale L. S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..72C 548, A72

  3. [11]

    S., Castro N., Garcia M., Herrero A., Najarro F., Negueruela I., Ritchie B

    Clark J. S., Castro N., Garcia M., Herrero A., Najarro F., Negueruela I., Ritchie B. W., Smith K. T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118440 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...541A.146C 541, A146

  4. [12]

    S., Negueruela I., Gonz \'a lez-Fern \'a ndez C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A..15C 561, A15

    Clark J. S., Negueruela I., Gonz \'a lez-Fern \'a ndez C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...561A..15C 561, A15

  5. [13]

    R., Kraus M., Arias M

    Cochetti Y. R., Kraus M., Arias M. L., Cidale L. S., Eenm \"a e T., Liimets T., Torres A. F., Djupvik A. A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abae62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160..166C 160, 166

  6. [14]

    J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112.1450C 112, 1450

    Corral L. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/118113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112.1450C 112, 1450

  7. [15]

    M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: 2003yCat.2246....0C

  8. [16]

    Z., Neugent K

    Dorn-Wallenstein T. Z., Neugent K. F., Levesque E. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959..102D 959, 102

  9. [17]

    R., Massey P., Meynet G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750...97D 750, 97

    Drout M. R., Massey P., Meynet G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750...97D 750, 97

  10. [18]

    P., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..368E 268, 368

    Eggleton P. P., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..368E 268, 368

  11. [19]

    Ekstr \"o m S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...537A.146E 537, A146

  12. [20]

    J., Stanway E

    Eldridge J. J., Stanway E. R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-100646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ARA&A..60..455E 60, 455

  13. [21]

    H., Rodgers B., Joyce R

    Elias J. H., Rodgers B., Joyce R. R., Lazo M., Doppmann G., Winge C., Rodr \' guez-Ardila A., 2006a, in McLean I. S., Iye M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 6269, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy. p....

  14. [22]

    H., Joyce R

    Elias J. H., Joyce R. R., Liang M., Muller G. P., Hileman E. A., George J. R., 2006b, in McLean I. S., Iye M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 6269, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy. p. 62694C, @doi 1...

  15. [23]

    Fabrika S., Sholukhova O., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..140..309F 140, 309

  16. [24]

    F., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035824 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..217F 437, 217

    Fabrika S., Sholukhova O., Becker T., Afanasiev V., Roth M., Sanchez S. F., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035824 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..217F 437, 217

  17. [25]

    Georgy C., Saio H., Meynet G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439L...6G 439, L6

  18. [26]

    S., Humphreys R

    Gordon M. S., Humphreys R. M., Jones T. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/50 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...50G 825, 50

  19. [27]

    F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.1450G 135, 1450

    Gray D. F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.1450G 135, 1450

  20. [28]

    H., Meynet G., Ekstr \"o m S., Georgy C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A..30G 564, A30

    Groh J. H., Meynet G., Ekstr \"o m S., Georgy C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A..30G 564, A30

  21. [29]

    M., Conti P

    Hanson M. M., Conti P. S., Rieke M. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192366 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..107..281H 107, 281

  22. [30]

    Heger A., Langer N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317239 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544.1016H 544, 1016

  23. [31]

    E., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528..368H 528, 368

    Heger A., Langer N., Woosley S. E., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528..368H 528, 368

  24. [32]

    H., Lebzelter T., Fekel F

    Hinkle K. H., Lebzelter T., Fekel F. C., Straniero O., Joyce R. R., Prato L., Karnath N., Habel N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe01 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904..143H 904, 143

  25. [33]

    Hubble E., Sandage A., 1953, @doi [ ] 10.1086/145764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953ApJ...118..353H 118, 353

  26. [34]

    M., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155797 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...219..445H 219, 445

    Humphreys R. M., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155797 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...219..445H 219, 445

  27. [35]

    M., Davidson K., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994PASP..106.1025H 106, 1025

    Humphreys R. M., Davidson K., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/133478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994PASP..106.1025H 106, 1025

  28. [36]

    M., Massey P., Freedman W

    Humphreys R. M., Massey P., Freedman W. L., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ.....99...84H 99, 84

  29. [37]

    M., Davidson K., Grammer S., Kneeland N., Martin J

    Humphreys R. M., Davidson K., Grammer S., Kneeland N., Martin J. C., Weis K., Burggraf B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/46 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...46H 773, 46

  30. [38]

    M., Weis K., Davidson K., Bomans D

    Humphreys R. M., Weis K., Davidson K., Bomans D. J., Burggraf B., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/1/48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790...48H 790, 48

  31. [39]

    M., Gordon M

    Humphreys R. M., Gordon M. S., Martin J. C., Weis K., Hahn D., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa582e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...64H 836, 64

  32. [40]

    M., Davidson K., Hahn D., Martin J

    Humphreys R. M., Davidson K., Hahn D., Martin J. C., Weis K., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cef , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844...40H 844, 40

  33. [41]

    M., Stangl S., Gordon M

    Humphreys R. M., Stangl S., Gordon M. S., Davidson K., Grammer S. H., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf1ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157...22H 157, 22

  34. [42]

    Josselin E., Plez B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469..671J 469, 671

  35. [43]

    T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..199...37K 199, 37

    Kang Y., Rey S.-C., Bianchi L., Lee K., Kim Y., Sohn S. T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..199...37K 199, 37

  36. [44]

    Z., Kochanek C

    Khan R., Stanek K. Z., Kochanek C. S., Sonneborn G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219...42K 219, 42

  37. [45]

    L., Walterbos R

    King N. L., Walterbos R. A. M., Braun R., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...507..210K 507, 210

  38. [47]

    D., de Wit W

    Koumpia E., Oudmaijer R. D., de Wit W. J., M \'e rand A., Black J. H., Ababakr K. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1998 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.2766K 515, 2766

  39. [48]

    Z., Yuan W., Macri L

    Kourniotis M., Bonanos A. Z., Yuan W., Macri L. M., Garcia-Alvarez D., Lee C. H., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...601A..76K 601, A76

  40. [49]

    L., Cidale L., Torres A

    Kourniotis M., Kraus M., Arias M. L., Cidale L., Torres A. F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2087 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.3706K 480, 3706

  41. [50]

    L., Cidale L

    Kourniotis M., Kraus M., Arias M. L., Cidale L. S., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf028 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540L..28K 540, L28

  42. [51]

    Kraus M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200811020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...494..253K 494, 253

  43. [52]

    Kraus M., 2019, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies7040083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Galax...7...83K 7, 83

  44. [53]

    R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...362..158K 362, 158

    Kraus M., Kr \"u gel E., Thum C., Geballe T. R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...362..158K 362, 158

  45. [54]

    X., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...517A..30K 517, A30

    Kraus M., Borges Fernandes M., de Ara \'u jo F. X., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...517A..30K 517, A30

  46. [55]

    E., Nickeler D

    Kraus M., Oksala M. E., Nickeler D. H., Muratore M. F., Borges Fernandes M., Aret A., Cidale L. S., de Wit W. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220442 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..28K 549, A28

  47. [56]

    S., Arias M

    Kraus M., Cidale L. S., Arias M. L., Oksala M. E., Borges Fernandes M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/780/1/L10 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780L..10K 780, L10

  48. [57]

    Kraus M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628493 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

  49. [58]

    L., Cidale L

    Kraus M., Arias M. L., Cidale L. S., Torres A. F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.4308K 493, 4308

  50. [59]

    L., Torres A

    Kraus M., Kourniotis M., Arias M. L., Torres A. F., Nickeler D. H., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11030076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Galax..11...76K 11, 76

  51. [60]

    L., 1992, in Barbuy B., Renzini A., eds, International Astronomical Union Vol

    Kurucz R. L., 1992, in Barbuy B., Renzini A., eds, International Astronomical Union Vol. 149, The Stellar Populations of Galaxies. p. 225

  52. [61]

    L., Hinkle K

    Lambert D. L., Hinkle K. H., Hall D. N. B., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...248..638L 248, 638

  53. [62]

    Lamers H. J. G. L. M., Zickgraf F.-J., de Winter D., Houziaux L., Zorec J., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...340..117L 340, 117

  54. [63]

    E., Rothman L

    Li G., Gordon I. E., Rothman L. S., Tan Y., Hu S.-M., Kassi S., Campargue A., Medvedev E. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...15L 216, 15

  55. [64]

    B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00915.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408L...6L 408, L6

    Liermann A., Kraus M., Schnurr O., Fernandes M. B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00915.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408L...6L 408, L6

  56. [65]

    L., Zhao Y

    Luo A. L., Zhao Y. H., Zhao G., et al. 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog: LAMOST DR7 catalogs (Luo+, 2019) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: V/156. Originally published in: 2019RAA..in.prep..L

  57. [66]

    Mahy L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A...4M 657, A4

  58. [67]

    S., Borges Fernandes M., Arias M

    Maravelias G., Kraus M., Cidale L. S., Borges Fernandes M., Arias M. L., Cur \'e M., Vasilopoulos G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1747 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..320M 480, 320

  59. [68]

    Z., Tramper F., de Wit S., Yang M., Bonfini P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.122M 666, A122

    Maravelias G., Bonanos A. Z., Tramper F., de Wit S., Yang M., Bonfini P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.122M 666, A122

  60. [69]

    Z., Tramper F., Munoz-Sanchez G., Christodoulou E., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11030079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Galax..11...79M 11, 79

    Maravelias G., de Wit S., Bonanos A. Z., Tramper F., Munoz-Sanchez G., Christodoulou E., 2023, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies11030079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Galax..11...79M 11, 79

  61. [70]

    Marchant P., Bodensteiner J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-105936 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ARA&A..62...21M 62, 21

  62. [71]

    C., Humphreys R

    Martin J. C., Humphreys R. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7e2e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...81M 154, 81

  63. [72]

    Martins F., Palacios A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A..16M 560, A16

  64. [73]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8003M 131, 018003

    Masci F. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131a8003M 131, 018003

  65. [74]

    B., Stecher T

    Massey P., Bianchi L., Hutchings J. B., Stecher T. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...469..629M 469, 629

  66. [75]

    Massey P., Olsen K. A. G., Hodge P. W., Strong S. B., Jacoby G. H., Schlingman W., Smith R. C., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2478M 131, 2478

  67. [76]

    T., Olsen K

    Massey P., McNeill R. T., Olsen K. A. G., Hodge P. W., Blaha C., Jacoby G. H., Smith R. C., Strong S. B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134.2474M 134, 2474

  68. [77]

    F., Morrell N., Hillier D

    Massey P., Neugent K. F., Morrell N., Hillier D. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...83M 788, 83

  69. [78]

    F., Smart B

    Massey P., Neugent K. F., Smart B. M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/3/62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152...62M 152, 62

  70. [79]

    J., Hyland A

    McGregor P. J., Hyland A. R., Hillier D. J., 1988a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165964 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...324.1071M 324, 1071

  71. [80]

    J., Hillier D

    McGregor P. J., Hillier D. J., Hyland A. R., 1988b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...334..639M 334, 639

  72. [81]

    J., Hyland A

    McGregor P. J., Hyland A. R., McGinn M. T., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&A...223..237M 223, 237

  73. [82]

    W., Eenens P

    Morris P. W., Eenens P. R. J., Hanson M. M., Conti P. S., Blum R. D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...470..597M 470, 597

  74. [83]

    F., de Wit W

    Muratore M. F., de Wit W. J., Kraus M., Aret A., Cidale L. S., Borges Fernandes M., Oudmaijer R. D., Wheelwright H. E., 2012, in Carciofi A. C., Rivinius T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 464, Circumstellar Dynamics at High Resolution. p. 67 (...

  75. [84]

    F., Kraus M., Oksala M

    Muratore M. F., Kraus M., Oksala M. E., Arias M. L., Cidale L., Borges Fernandes M., Liermann A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...13M 149, 13

  76. [85]

    F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abd47b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908...87N 908, 87

    Neugent K. F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abd47b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908...87N 908, 87

  77. [86]

    F., Levesque E

    Neugent K. F., Levesque E. M., Massey P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aae4e0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..225N 156, 225

  78. [87]

    F., Levesque E

    Neugent K. F., Levesque E. M., Massey P., Morrell N. I., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875..124N 875, 124

  79. [88]

    F., Levesque E

    Neugent K. F., Levesque E. M., Massey P., Morrell N. I., Drout M. R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ababaa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..118N 900, 118

  80. [89]

    E., Kraus M., Arias M

    Oksala M. E., Kraus M., Arias M. L., Borges Fernandes M., Cidale L., Muratore M. F., Cur \'e M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01323.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426L..56O 426, L56

  81. [90]

    E., Kraus M., Cidale L

    Oksala M. E., Kraus M., Cidale L. S., Muratore M. F., Borges Fernandes M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321568 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

  82. [91]

    D., de Wit W

    Oudmaijer R. D., de Wit W. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220185 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...551A..69O 551, A69

  83. [92]

    D., Davies B., de Wit W

    Oudmaijer R. D., Davies B., de Wit W. J., Patel M., 2009, in Luttermoser D. G., Smith B. J., Stencel R. E., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 412, The Biggest, Baddest, Coolest Stars. p. 17 ( @eprint arXiv 0801.2315 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0801.2315

  84. [93]

    H., Negueruela I., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ab712b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4...12P 4, 12

    Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Barb \'a R. H., Negueruela I., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ab712b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4...12P 4, 12

  85. [94]

    R., Thilker D., Lennon D

    Patrick L. R., Thilker D., Lennon D. J., Bianchi L., Schootemeijer A., Dorda R., Langer N., Negueruela I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.5847P 513, 5847

  86. [95]

    R., Lennon D

    Patrick L. R., Lennon D. J., Schootemeijer A., Bianchi L., Negueruela I., Langer N., Thilker D., Dorda R., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.18554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241218554P p. arXiv:2412.18554

  87. [96]

    B., Maccarone T

    Peacock M. B., Maccarone T. J., Knigge C., Kundu A., Waters C. Z., Zepf S. E., Zurek D. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15952.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402..803P 402, 803

  88. [97]

    Plez B., 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

  89. [98]

    Sana H., et al., 2012, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1223344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Sci...337..444S 337, 444

  90. [99]

    Sarkisyan A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497..687S 497, 687

  91. [100]

    Sholukhova O., Bizyaev D., Fabrika S., Sarkisyan A., Malanushenko V., Valeev A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2597 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.2459S 447, 2459

  92. [101]

    N., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240615270S p

    Sholukhova O. N., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240615270S p. arXiv:2406.15270

  93. [102]

    Shporer A., Mazeh T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10554.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370.1429S 370, 1429

  94. [103]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

  95. [104]

    Solovyeva Y., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly241 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484L..24S 484, L24

  96. [105]

    D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabc59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...73S 859, 73

    Soraisam M. D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabc59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...73S 859, 73

  97. [106]

    Sz \'e csi D., Agrawal P., W \"u nsch R., Langer N., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A.125S 658, A125

  98. [107]

    M., Davidson K., Jones T

    Szeifert T., Humphreys R. M., Davidson K., Jones T. J., Stahl O., Wolf B., Zickgraf F. J., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...314..131S 314, 131

  99. [108]

    F., Cidale L

    Torres A. F., Cidale L. S., Kraus M., Arias M. L., Barb \'a R. H., Maravelias G., Borges Fernandes M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731723 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

  100. [109]

    A., Kudritzki R.-P., Jacobs B

    U V., Urbaneja M. A., Kudritzki R.-P., Jacobs B. A., Bresolin F., Przybilla N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...704.1120U 704, 1120

  101. [110]

    F., Sholukhova O., Fabrika S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00654.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.396L..21V 396, L21

    Valeev A. F., Sholukhova O., Fabrika S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00654.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.396L..21V 396, L21

  102. [111]

    R., Fitzpatrick E

    Walborn N. R., Fitzpatrick E. L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASP..112...50W 112, 50

  103. [112]

    J., 2020, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies8010020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Galax...8...20W 8, 20

    Weis K., Bomans D. J., 2020, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies8010020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Galax...8...20W 8, 20

  104. [113]

    Wittkowski M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...606L...1W 606, L1

  105. [114]

    N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-014-1944-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Ap&SS.354...97Y 354, 97

    Yershov V. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-014-1944-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Ap&SS.354...97Y 354, 97

  106. [115]

    Yusof N., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac230 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.2814Y 511, 2814

  107. [116]

    de Jager C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s001590050009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&ARv...8..145D 8, 145

  108. [117]

    T., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJS...29..303V 29, 303

    van den Bergh S., Herbst E., Kowal C. T., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJS...29..303V 29, 303

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.