Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Exciton dynamics and exciton-phonon coupling in bulk and thin flakes of layered van der Waals antiferromagnet Ni$_2$P$_2$S$_6$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies the sharp 1.476 eV photoluminescence line in layered antiferromagnetic Ni2P2S6 as a Zhang-Rice exciton and the regularly spaced ~117 cm-1 satellite peaks as its phonon sidebands, with both vanishing at…

desk verdict Solid but conditional: the Zhang-Rice assignment leans on an explicitly withheld sub-bandgap spectrum, and the phonon-spacing mismatch is secondary. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19612 v1 pith:K7E3D7LL submitted 2025-07-25 cond-mat.other cond-mat.str-el

Nasaru Khan , Yuliia Shemerliuk , Sebastian Selter , Bernd Büchner , Saicharan Aswartham , Pradeep Kumar This is my paper
classification cond-mat.othercond-mat.str-el
keywords Zhang-Riceexcitonexciton-phononcouplingNi2P2S6vanderWaalsantiferromagnetphotoluminescencephononsidebandspolarizationanisotropytwo-dimensionalmagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the sharp 1.476 eV photoluminescence line in the layered antiferromagnet Ni2P2S6 comes from a Zhang-Rice exciton, and that the six satellite peaks spaced about $117 \pm 8$ cm$^{-1}$ from it are phonon sidebands—direct spectral evidence that the exciton hybridizes with the lattice. If the assignment is right, Ni2P2S6 becomes a two-dimensional magnetic platform where excitons, phonons, and antiferromagnetic order can be studied and tuned together: the sidebands and the exciton itself vanish at temperatures well below the Néel temperature, and that quenching temperature drops as flakes get thinner. The paper also reports that the emission is linearly polarized to about 40% at 4 K and scales linearly with excitation power at low powers, giving a concrete optical anisotropy that could matter for polarized emitters.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Zhang-Rice exciton, a spin-singlet bound state of a hole on the Ni d-shell and its surrounding S p orbitals (the Zhang-Rice singlet), which the paper assigns to the 1.476 eV emission. The argument for exciton-phonon hybridization is carried by the phonon-sideband ladder: a series of Lorentzian peaks P1–P6 on the low-energy side of the exciton, equally spaced by about $117 \pm 8$ cm$^{-1}$ (0.0146 eV), whose positions stay fixed under changing excitation power and flake thickness while their intensities follow a common power law. That spacing, matched to the A$_g$ phonon near 131 cm$^{-1}$, is what turns a single sharp emission line into evidence for a dressed, phonon-hybridized quasiparticle.

What would settle it

Measure the emission under resonant excitation tuned to the 1.476 eV zero-phonon line and perform polarization-resolved PL and Raman on the sidebands: if the roughly 117 cm$^{-1}$ spacing does not track the 131 cm$^{-1}$ A$_g$ phonon's temperature or polarization response, or if the sidebands persist under a different excitation geometry, the phonon-sideband and Zhang-Rice exciton assignment would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the sharp, intense, roughly 2 meV wide emission at 1.476 eV seen at 4 K in Ni2P2S6 is a Zhang-Rice exciton—a spin-orbital-entangled singlet formed from a Ni d orbital and its surrounding S p orbitals—rather than a conventional interband transition, and that the six satellite peaks spaced by about $117 \pm 8$ cm$^{-1}$ on its low-energy side are phonon sidebands of the same exciton. It supports this by showing that the emission survives sub-bandgap excitation, that the sideband spacing is consistent with the A$_g$ phonon near 131 cm$^{-1}$, that the sideband positions are nearly independent of flake thickness and excitation power, and by documenting a roughly 40% linear polarization degree at 4 K. The same measurements show the exciton and its sidebands quench at about 120 K in bulk and about 60 K in 10 nm flakes, well below the Néel temperature, which the paper reads as evidence that the exciton's coherence is tied to magnetic order and is tunable by dimensionality.

Load-bearing premise

The phonon-sideband story assumes that the regularly spaced about 117 cm$^{-1}$ satellites are replicas of the same A$_g$ phonon reported at about 131 cm$^{-1}$, an unexplained 11% mismatch; if they belong to a different phonon, to multi-phonon replicas, or to a second excitonic species, the hybridization claim loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central assignment holds, the roughly 117 cm$^{-1}$ sideband ladder provides a quantitative measure of exciton-phonon coupling strength in Ni2P2S6 that can be compared across thicknesses and temperatures.
  • The reduction of the exciton survival temperature from about 120 K in bulk to about 60 K in 10 nm flakes means the excitonic coherence can be engineered by exfoliation thickness.
  • The roughly 40% linear polarization degree makes Ni2P2S6 a candidate for polarization-sensitive optoelectronic devices such as anisotropic emitters or light modulators.
  • Sub-bandgap excitation still producing the 1.476 eV line indicates the emission is an intrinsic excitonic state rather than an interband transition, which can guide future resonant excitation experiments.
  • The persistence of the broad continuum up to about 270 K, well above the Néel temperature, tracks two-magnon scattering and separates magnetic-continuum physics from the shorter-lived exciton coherence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Zhang-Rice assignment is correct, the same resonant PL sideband structure should appear in isostructural TM2P2S6 compounds with different transition metals, with sideband spacing set by the metal-related phonon frequency; a systematic comparison could map how orbital character controls exciton-phonon coupling.
  • The unexplained gap between the observed 117 cm$^{-1}$ sideband spacing and the 131 cm$^{-1}$ A$_g$ phonon could be probed by temperature-dependent Raman or phonon-dispersion measurements: if the A$_g$ mode softens at 4 K, or if another phonon matches more closely, the sideband identification would be settled without invoking new exciton physics.
  • The thickness dependence of the quenching temperature is larger than the expected change in magnetic ordering, hinting that dielectric screening or surface effects, not magnetism alone, set exciton stability; a monolayer study would separate these contributions.
  • Because the polarization appears in emission (scattered-light selection) rather than absorption (incident-light selection), the anisotropy likely reflects the emitting dipole orientation; time-resolved PL could test whether the roughly 40% polarization is intrinsic or arises from a specific orientation selection effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports temperature-, power-, and polarization-dependent photoluminescence of bulk and thin exfoliated flakes of the layered antiferromagnet Ni2P2S6. The central claims are that the sharp emission peak at ~1.476 eV is a Zhang-Rice (ZR) exciton, that the six satellite peaks spaced by ~117 cm-1 are phonon sidebands evidencing exciton-phonon hybridization, that the emission is linearly polarized to ~40% at 4 K, and that the exciton and its sidebands vanish at thickness-dependent temperatures well below the Néel temperature. The paper also fits the temperature-dependent peak energy and linewidth with Varshni, O'Donnell-Chen, and acoustic/LO phonon broadening models, and attributes a broad low-energy continuum to two-magnon scattering.

Significance. If the ZR-exciton assignment is correct, the paper offers a potentially important optical signature of spin-orbital entanglement in a two-dimensional antiferromagnet, with promising anisotropy and thickness tunability. The extensive temperature-, power-, and polarization-dependent dataset and the quantitative fits are valuable, and the observed ~40% linear polarization degree is striking. However, the central identification of the 1.476 eV peak as a ZR exciton is supported by a control measurement that is explicitly not shown, and the phonon-sideband assignment rests on a spacing that does not exactly match the cited Ag phonon energy. These issues are load-bearing for the main conclusions, so the work in its present form is not yet fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, first paragraph] The assignment of the 1.476 eV peak (EA) as a Zhang-Rice exciton is critically dependent on the sentence 'EA persists even under sub-bandgap excitation (e.g., 785 nm or 1.58 eV, data not shown)'. This is the only direct experimental control that distinguishes a ZR exciton from defect-bound emission or a d-d transition in the measured PL, and the data are explicitly withheld. Without this spectrum, the subsequent temperature- and thickness-dependent 'ZR exciton dynamics' may describe the wrong entity. Please provide the sub-bandgap PL spectrum (even in the Supplementary Information) and discuss its shape, intensity, and comparison with above-gap excitation.
  2. [§3.5, Figure 8] The satellite peaks P1-P6 are fitted with a spacing of ~117±8 cm-1, but the cited Ag phonon mode is at ~131 cm-1. The 14 cm-1 (~11%) mismatch is not addressed; this gap is roughly twice the stated uncertainty and weakens the assignment of P1-P6 as phonon sidebands of that specific mode. The authors should either explain the discrepancy (e.g., anharmonicity, different branch, or multi-phonon combinations) or provide corroborating evidence, such as polarization-resolved PL showing the same anisotropy for the sidebands as for EA, a resonance Raman measurement, or an overlay of the Raman spectrum on the same energy scale.
  3. [§3.2, linewidth model and Table S3] The fitted E_LO values are ~180-198 K (Table S3), yet the text states that 'above ~70 K, the thermal energy surpasses the LO phonon energy' and that the LO contribution exhibits 'a linear temperature dependence beyond this point'. Since kBT at 70 K is approximately 49 cm-1, far below the fitted E_LO of ~125-138 cm-1, this statement is inconsistent with the authors' own fit parameters. Please re-examine the crossover analysis and either correct the temperature threshold or revise the interpretation of the linewidth decomposition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, Experimental details] Flake thicknesses are stated to be characterized by AFM, but no AFM images or thickness profiles are shown in the main text or Supplementary Information; please provide them.
  2. [§3.5, paragraph on temperature dependence] The temperature-dependent phonon sideband data for the 15 nm flake are referenced as 'not shown here'; please include these data or remove the reference.
  3. [§3.4, power-law interpretation] The interpretation of the power-law exponent α is nonstandard: the text states that α≈0.6-0.7 at 30 K and 80 K 'suggest predominant radiative recombination' and that 'for pure radiative processes, α is expected to remain below unity'. In most semiconductor PL literature, α≈1 indicates excitonic recombination and α<1 is often associated with nonradiative or defect-mediated recombination. Please revise this discussion for consistency with standard interpretations.
  4. [Supplementary Figure S3] The 'exciton-phonon coupling branches EP1 and EP2' introduced in Figure S3 are not defined or discussed in the main text; please clarify what these branches represent and how they relate to the P1-P6 peaks.
  5. [Data availability statement] The statement that 'all data that supports the findings are included within the article and supplementary file' is inconsistent with the explicit 'data not shown' statement for the sub-bandgap excitation measurement; please reconcile.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; measured peak spacings and free-parameter fits are self-contained, with an unreported sub-bandgap control noted as missing support but not as a circular step.

full rationale

This is an experimental PL study, not a derivation chain built on prior results of the same authors. The assignment of the sharp 1.476 eV peak to a Zhang-Rice exciton is an interpretive attribution supported by external literature (refs. 12, 28-29) and by the statement that the peak persists under 785 nm sub-bandgap excitation; that statement is currently unsupported because the spectrum is marked 'data not shown,' but an unreported control is a missing-evidence issue, not a constructional circularity. The claimed 117 +/- 8 cm-1 sideband spacing is read directly from the fitted PL spectrum and then compared with, rather than fitted to, the ~131 cm-1 Ag Raman mode; the 14 cm-1 mismatch weakens the phonon assignment but does not make the measured spacing an input to itself. The Varshni, O'Donnell-Chen, and Rudin-type linewidth fits treat E_0, sigma, beta, S, E_P, gamma_0, lambda_AC, lambda_LO, and E_LO as free parameters; these are consistency checks with the data, not predictions forced by construction. The power-law exponent and the ~40% linear polarization degree are directly measured quantities. The only self-citation, ref. [10], is used for introductory context on phonon-magnon interactions and correlations and does not carry the central claim. Overall, the paper's quantitative claims are self-contained experimental observations with standard phenomenological fits, so no circular step meeting the required quote-and-reduction standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new theoretical entities; it applies standard empirical fitting models and an existing exciton assignment to new PL data. The free parameters are fit constants for temperature, power, and linewidth models, plus spectral decomposition parameters. The main unstated load is the prior Zhang-Rice exciton interpretation and the reliability of the manually constructed spectral baseline.

free parameters (6)
  • Varshni E0, sigma, beta = Bulk: E0=1476.09±0.02 meV, sigma=3.78±0.72e-4 eV/K, beta=230.34±34.39 K; similar for 20 nm and 15 nm flakes
    Fit to temperature-dependent EA peak energy in Figure 2(a) using the Varshni relation; each sample has its own parameters.
  • O'Donnell-Chen E0, S (Huang-Rhys), E_P = Bulk: S=0.15±0.05, E_P=8.51±2.54 meV; flakes give S=0.24 and E_P=10-23 meV
    Fit to the same temperature-dependent peak energy using a second empirical model; the Huang-Rhys parameter quantifies exciton-phonon coupling strength.
  • Linewidth Gamma0, lambda_AC, lambda_LO, E_LO = Gamma0=0.77-1.83 meV; lambda_AC=16-21 ueV/K; lambda_LO=19-25 meV; E_LO=180-198 K
    Fit to temperature-dependent FWHM using the Rudin exciton-phonon broadening model; E_LO is an effective LO phonon energy extracted from the same data rather than measured independently.
  • Power-law exponent alpha and prefactor eta = alpha=1.10 at 4 K, 0.70 at 30 K, 0.60 at 80 K; eta=30.86, 8.76, 2.38
    Fit to integrated PL intensity versus excitation power at three temperatures; the exponent is used to infer recombination mechanisms.
  • Lorentzian and Gaussian peak parameters for P1-P6, EA, SA, SB, PA, PB = Not tabulated except sideband spacing 117±8 cm-1
    Spectral decomposition into overlapping peaks and a continuum baseline; the sideband spacing is obtained from these fits.
  • Linear polarization degree delta = ~40% at 4 K
    Computed from polarized PL intensities I_b and I_a; no uncertainty or measurement statistics are reported.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Zhang-Rice exciton model applies to Ni2P2S6, with the EA peak originating from transitions between ZR singlet and triplet states.
    Used in Section 3.1 to assign the 1.476 eV peak; the paper itself notes competing mechanisms (Hund-type excitons, spin-flip d-d transitions, ZR excitons) remain under debate.
  • domain assumption All PL peaks and sidebands are well described by Lorentzian line shapes on a constructed continuum baseline.
    Central to extracting peak positions, widths, and the 117 cm-1 spacing; the baseline construction is described only qualitatively.
  • standard math Varshni and O'Donnell-Chen empirical relations describe the temperature dependence of the exciton energy.
    Used in Section 3.2 to fit EA(T); these are established empirical models not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The exciton linewidth follows the Rudin model with acoustic and LO phonon contributions.
    Used in Section 3.2 to fit FWHM(T); the model is standard for semiconductors but is one of several possible broadening mechanisms.
  • domain assumption The broad PL continuum PB is related to two-magnon scattering, consistent with Raman studies.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 to interpret the continuum persisting above TN; the paper calls for further studies to confirm the origin.
  • domain assumption Magnetic order weakens with reduced flake thickness and vanishes in the monolayer limit.
    Used in Section 3.1 to explain the faster disappearance of EA in thinner flakes; taken from prior literature rather than measured in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exciton dynamics and exciton-phonon coupling in bulk and thin flakes of layered van der Waals antiferromagnet Ni$_2$P$_2$S$_6$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7E3D7LL

@misc{pith2026250719612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exciton dynamics and exciton-phonon coupling in bulk and thin flakes of layered van der Waals antiferromagnet Ni$_2$P$_2$S$_6$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7E3D7LL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19612}
}
read the original abstract

The Zhang-Rice (ZR) singlet is an intriguing quantum state offering potential to realize a spin-orbit-entangled bosonic quasiparticle, which gives rise to the Zhang-Rice exciton. Its formation is attributed to the correlation between a localized d-orbital of a transition metal and the p-orbitals of the neighbouring ligands. The layered two-dimensional (2D) antiferromagnetic Ni2P2S6 system provide an excellent platform to probe the ZR exciton dynamics along with the role of exciton-phonon coupling. Here, we present a comprehensive study of ZR exciton and coupling with the phonons in bulk and few-layered single crystals of Ni2P2S6 using temperature, polarization and power-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. At cryogenic temperatures, the PL spectra reveal distinct phonon sidebands spaced by an energy difference of nearly 117 cm-1, indicative of exciton-phonon hybridization. Polarization-resolved measurements demonstrate a strong optical anisotropy, with a linear polarization degree of ~ 40 % at 4 K. Excitation power variation highlights linear scaling of PL intensity in the low-power regime, followed by spectral deformation at higher powers attributed to the phonon-assisted recombination and exciton saturation effects. ZR exciton and phonon side bands survival temperature decreases with decreasing flake thickness suggesting their tunability. The emergence and suppression of phonon sidebands with temperature and flake thickness emphasize dimensional sensitivity and coherence limits of excitonic states. Our findings position Ni2P2S6 as a promising candidate for tunable and anisotropic optoelectronic applications, while offering insight into quasiparticle interactions in 2D magnetic systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo -Herrero, X. Xu, Nature, 546, 270, (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, X. Zhang, Nature, 546, 265, (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, J.-G. Nature, 563, 47, (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    C. Gong, X. Zhang, Science, 363, 4450, (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Huang, M

    B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, X. Xu, Nat. Mater., 19, 1276, (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    M. Mi, H. Xiao, L. Yu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Cao, Y. Wang, Mater. Today Nano, 24, 100408, (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Rahman, J

    S. Rahman, J. F. Torres, A. R. Khan, Y. Lu, ACS Nano, 15, 17175, (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, Y. Tserkovnyak, Rev. Mod. Phys. , 90, 015005, (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Kimel, A

    A.V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsvetkov, R.V. Pisarev, T. Rasing, Nature, 429, 850, (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    Khan et al., 2D Mater., 11, 035018 (2024)

    N. Khan et al., 2D Mater., 11, 035018 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    S. Y. Kim, T. Y. Kim, L. J. Sandilands, S. Sinn, M.-C. Lee, J. Son, S. Lee, K. Y. Choi, W. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. Jeon, H. -D. Kim, C. -H. Park, J. -G. Park, S. J. Moon, T. W. Noh, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 136402, (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    S. Kang, K. Kim, B. H. Kim, J. Kim, K. I. Sim, J. U. Lee, S. Lee, K. Park, S. Yun, T. Kim, A. Nag, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Li, L. Chapon, K. J. Zhou, Y. W. Son, J. H. Kim, H. Cheong, J. G. Park, Nature, 583, 785, (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    X. Wang, J. Cao, Z. Lu, A. Cohen, H. Kitadai, T. Li , Q. Tan, M. Wilson, C. H. Lui, D. Smirnov, S. Sharifzadeh, X. Ling, Nat. Mater., 20, 964 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Hwangbo, Q

    K. Hwangbo, Q. Zhang, Q. Jiang, Y. Wang, J. Fonseca, C. Wang, G. M. Diederich, D. R. Gamelin, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, W. Yao, X. Xu, Nat. Nanotechnol., 16, 655, (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    J. H. Lee et al., Adv. Funct. Mater, 2405153, 1, (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    P. A. Joy, S. Vasudevan, Phys.Rev.B., 46, 5425, (1992)

    1992

  9. [17]

    A. R. Wildes, V. Simonet, E. Ressouche, G. J. Mcintyre, M. Avdeev, E. Suard, S. A. J. Kimber, D. Lançon, G. Pepe, B. Moubaraki, T. J. Hicks, Phys. Rev. B., 92, 224408 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    K. Kim, S. Y. Lim, J. -U. Lee, S. Lee, T. Y. Kim, K. Park, G. S. Jeon, C. -H. Park, J.-G. Park, H. Cheong, Nat. Commun., 10, 345 (2019). 17

    2019

  11. [19]

    Basnet, A

    R. Basnet, A. Wegner, K. Pandey, S. Storment, J. Hu, Phys. Rev. Mater., 5, 064413 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Wang et al., Sci

    X. Wang et al., Sci. Adv., 8, eabl7707 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Afanasiev, J

    D. Afanasiev, J. R. Hortensius, M. Matthiesen, S. Mañas -Valero, M. Šiškins, M. Lee, E. Lesne, H. S. J. van der Zant, P. G. Steeneken, B. A. Ivanov, E. Coronado, A. D. Caviglia, Sci. Adv. ,7, eabf3096, (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B, 37, 3759 (1988)

    1988

  15. [23]

    C. A. Belvin et al., Nat. Commun., 12, 4837 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    He et al., Nat

    W. He et al., Nat. Commun., 15, 3496 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Jana et al., Phys

    D. Jana et al., Phys. Rev. B, 108, 115149 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Klaproth et al., Phys

    T. Klaproth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 131, 256504 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Shcherbakov et al., ACS Nano, 17, 10423 (2023)

    A. Shcherbakov et al., ACS Nano, 17, 10423 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Song et al., Nat

    F. Song et al., Nat. Commun., 15, 7841 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Wang et al., Nat

    X. Wang et al., Nat. Commun., 15, 8011 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Rosenblum et al., Phys

    S. Rosenblum et al., Phys. Rev. B, 49, 4352 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    Rosenblum and R

    S. Rosenblum and R. Merlin, Phys. Rev. B, 59, 6317 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Y. P. Varshni, Physica, 34, 149 (1967)

    1967

  25. [33]

    K. P. O’Donnell and X. Chen, App. Phys. Lett., 58, 2924 (1991)

    1991

  26. [34]

    Rudin et al., Phys

    S. Rudin et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 42, 11218 (1990)

    1990

  27. [35]

    R. M. Martin and T. C. Damen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 26, 86 (1971)

    1971

  28. [36]

    Kumar et al., J

    D. Kumar et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 32, 415702 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Martini, A.A

    S. Martini, A.A. Quivy, A. Tabata, Leite R, J Appl Phys, 90, 2280 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    S. Jin, Y. Zheng, A. Li, J Appl Phys, 82, 3870, (1997)

    1997

  31. [39]

    Antonius, S

    G. Antonius, S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B, 105, 085111(2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Kondo, N

    M. Kondo, N. Okada, K. Domen, K. Sugiura, C. Anayama, T. Tanahashi , J. Electron. Mater. 23, 355 (1994). 18 Figure 1. Temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra for Ni₂P₂S₆. (a) Bulk sample and (b) 10 nm-thick flake, illustrating spectral evolution with increasing tempera...

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.