Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 58 references

An Explicit Link between Extreme Value Theory and Compositional Data Analysis

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Extreme-value and compositional covariances are the same matrices, linked by three maps, so methods transfer both ways.

desk verdict Clean algebraic unification of Hüsler–Reiss and Aitchison covariance languages that immediately yields usable transfers both ways. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09567 v1 pith:K7YM5SM2 submitted 2026-07-10 stat.ME

Manuel Hentschel , Sebastian Engelke This is my paper
classification stat.ME MSC 62G3262H1262H20
keywords extremevaluetheorycompositionaldataanalysisHüsler–Reissdistributionvariogramlog-ratiocovariancegraphicalmodelsobliqueprojectionsdimensionalityreduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multivariate extremes and compositional data both care about relative structure rather than absolute scale. Extremes separate a shared radial size from a relative profile; compositions live on the simplex and are analysed through log-ratios. Both fields therefore built families of rank-deficient covariance objects: extremal variograms, extremal-function covariances and their precisions on one side; variation arrays, centred log-ratio covariances and additive log-ratio covariances on the other. The paper proves these objects sit in exactly the same algebraic diagram, related by the variogram map, oblique projections along the all-ones vector, and the Moore–Penrose inverse. Once the shared diagram is in place, sparse graphical models developed for Hüsler–Reiss extremes become intrinsic logistic-normal graphs for compositions, and log-ratio principal components, weighted biplots, amalgamation clustering and stepwise log-ratio selection become exploratory tools for multivariate extremes. The unification is concrete enough that existing algorithms can be reused with only a change of input transformation.

What carries the argument

The commutative diagram of Proposition 4.1: three elementary maps—the variogram map γ, the covariance projections π_{1v^⊥} along the all-ones vector, and the Moore–Penrose inverse—that organise all the rank-deficient covariance and precision objects appearing in both fields.

What would settle it

Find a Hüsler–Reiss dataset and a compositional dataset whose estimated variation-array / extremal-variogram matrices cannot be mapped into each other by the three operations of the diagram, or show that an intrinsic logistic-normal graph recovered by the adapted algorithm fails to recover the true sparsity pattern of the centred precision on synthetic data generated from Definition 5.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The extremal variogram, the family of extremal-function covariance and precision matrices of a Hüsler–Reiss model, and the compositional variation array together with its centred and additive log-ratio covariances are precisely the matrices of Proposition 4.1: they are related by the three maps γ (variogram), π_{1v^⊥} (covariance projection along the all-ones direction) and the Moore–Penrose inverse, so every representation in one field is algebraically identical to a representation in the other.

Load-bearing premise

Every component must be fully present (no asymptotic independence in extremes, no zeros on the simplex), so that the relative structure lives on a single hyperplane complementary to the all-ones vector.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sparse precision patterns learned for Hüsler–Reiss extremes become intrinsic logistic-normal graphical models for compositional data, estimated by the majority-vote algorithm cglearn.
  • Log-ratio analysis, weighted biplots, amalgamation clustering and stepwise log-ratio selection become off-the-shelf exploratory tools for extremal functions and extremal variograms.
  • A single soft-threshold weighted estimator of the extremal variogram can replace hard thresholding by re-using the row-weighting idea of weighted log-ratio analysis.
  • Any future algorithm that manipulates one of the matrices in the diagram automatically yields a corresponding algorithm in the other field by applying the three maps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once zeros and asymptotic independence are handled by the subface or replacement methods already sketched in the outlook, the same diagram would organise mixture models across disconnected components, giving a common language for both fields’ sparse substructures.
  • The two-dimensional kernel case (all-ones plus a decay-rate vector) suggested by linear compositional processes would immediately supply a time-inhomogeneous analogue of the extremal variogram that has not yet been used in extremes.
  • Because the algebraic correspondence is basis-free, software libraries for one field can be wrapped rather than rewritten, lowering the barrier to cross-domain applications in geochemistry, hydrology and ecology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper establishes an algebraic identification between the covariance structures of Hüsler–Reiss multivariate extremes and those of Aitchison compositional data analysis. Both families are shown to sit inside the same commutative diagram (Proposition 4.1, Figure 5) generated by three maps: the variogram map γ, the family of covariance projections π_{1v^⊥} along the all-ones vector, and the Moore–Penrose inverse. Corollaries 4.2 and 4.6 specialise the diagram to the extremal variogram / extremal-function covariances / singular precision matrices of a Hüsler–Reiss model and to the compositional variation array / CLR / ALR covariances of a composition. The identification is then used to transfer methods in both directions: an intrinsic logistic-normal graphical model for compositions (Definition 5.1, Algorithm 1 cglearn) is obtained from Hüsler–Reiss graphical models, while log-ratio analysis, weighted LRA, amalgamation clustering and stepwise log-ratio selection are applied to extremal functions (Danube data). Full proofs of the projection and pseudoinverse identities appear in Appendices A–C.

Significance. If the algebraic identification holds, the paper supplies a clean, parameter-free dictionary that lets practitioners move covariance estimators, graphical models and dimension-reduction tools between two mature literatures that have previously only been linked informally. The central diagram is pure linear algebra (verified by direct Moore–Penrose and kernel–image arguments), so the transfer is not an analogy but an exact specialisation. Concrete deliverables include a new class of intrinsic logistic-normal graphical models for compositions, the cglearn algorithm, and the first systematic application of weighted LRA and amalgamation clustering to multivariate extremes. The scope restriction to full asymptotic dependence / strictly positive compositions is stated explicitly (§6.1) and does not undermine the diagram itself. The work therefore constitutes a genuine methodological bridge rather than a re-packaging of existing results.

minor comments (4)
  1. In §5.1.3 the comparison of cglearn with CCLasso on the gemas data is purely descriptive (shared-edge ratios). A short simulation under the intrinsic logistic-normal model that reports edge-recovery rates for both methods would make the relative performance clearer.
  2. Figure 11 shows a modest MSE gain for the weighted variogram estimator, but the simulation design (n=1000, d=10, single Γ) is narrow. A brief remark on sensitivity to the radial-weight choice would help readers judge robustness.
  3. Notation for the singular precision Θ₁ is introduced in (2.6) and reused for compositions; a one-sentence reminder in §4.3 that the same symbol now denotes the CLR precision would reduce momentary confusion for readers coming from only one of the two fields.
  4. The reference list already covers the main EVT and CoDA sources; adding the recent geometric modelling paper of Kakampakou & Wadsworth (2025) cited in the introduction would complete the “prior parallels” paragraph.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed link is an algebraic identification verified by direct projection and Moore–Penrose identities, not a prediction forced by its inputs.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim is that the extremal variogram / compositional variation array, the family of projected covariances Σ_v (including CLR and ALR forms), and their Moore–Penrose precisions Θ_v are exactly the objects related by the three maps of Proposition 4.1 (variogram map γ, covariance projections π_{1v^⊥}, and pseudoinverse). Section 3 defines oblique projections and covariance projections for general complementary subspaces; Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 4.1 then verify the required kernel–image and Moore–Penrose relations by direct calculation (Appendix C). Corollaries 4.2 and 4.6 simply specialise those identities to Hüsler–Reiss extremal functions and to log-ratio covariances of compositions; no parameter is fitted to produce the claimed equivalence. Later methodological transfers (intrinsic logistic-normal graphical models via cglearn, weighted LRA / amalgamation applied to extremal functions) inherit the same non-circular character: they reuse the algebraic correspondence rather than re-deriving it from data. Self-citations to the authors’ prior EVT work supply background definitions of extremal functions and Hüsler–Reiss graphical models, but the uniqueness of the diagram and the transfer constructions are proved inside the paper and do not rest on an unverified self-citation chain. The full-asymptotic-dependence / no-zeros restriction is an explicit scope assumption (§6.1), not a circular step. Score 0 is therefore the honest finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The algebraic core rests only on standard linear algebra (oblique projections, Moore–Penrose inverses, conditionally negative definite matrices). Domain assumptions are the classical ones of each field (asymptotic dependence for EVT, strictly positive compositions for CoDA). The sole invented modelling object is the intrinsic logistic-normal graphical model, which is defined by transporting the already-published Hüsler–Reiss precision sparsity pattern.

free parameters (3)
  • graphical-lasso / neighbourhood-selection penalty λ
    Chosen so that the estimated graph has a target number of edges (simulation) or an ad-hoc edge count (gemas); not fixed by theory.
  • threshold probability p for extremal sample
    Hard threshold used to approximate the limiting generalised Pareto sample; performance plots show the usual bias–variance trade-off.
  • observation weights r_k in weighted variogram
    Chosen proportional to radial component or its CDF; free design choice that softens the hard threshold.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Oblique projectors along complementary subspaces are well-defined and satisfy the product and inverse relations of Lemma 3.2
    Classical linear algebra; used throughout §3–4.
  • domain assumption Hüsler–Reiss extremal functions are Gaussian with covariances related by the stated projections (Corollary 4.2)
    Standard property of the Hüsler–Reiss model; required for the precision matrices to be exactly the projected pseudoinverses.
  • domain assumption Compositional data are strictly positive so that all log-ratios exist (and, dually, full asymptotic dependence so that no component is −∞)
    Stated in §2.2 and §6.1; without it the projections onto hyperplanes complementary to 1 are not defined on the whole support.
invented entities (1)
  • intrinsic logistic-normal graphical model
    purpose: Sparse conditional-independence model for compositions obtained by placing a sparse singular precision on the CLR coordinates
    Defined in Def. 5.1 by direct transport of the Hüsler–Reiss graphical model; no independent empirical existence claimed outside this construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Explicit Link between Extreme Value Theory and Compositional Data Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7YM5SM2

@misc{pith2026260709567,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Explicit Link between Extreme Value Theory and Compositional Data Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7YM5SM2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09567}
}
read the original abstract

Extreme value theory and compositional data analysis both study settings where relative information plays a central role. In multivariate extreme value theory, threshold exceedance limits satisfy homogeneity properties that separate the radial size of an extreme event from its relative profile. In compositional data analysis, positive vectors are analysed up to multiplicative scale, and inference is based on ratios or log-ratios between components. Consequently, both fields have developed several covariance and dependence representations of the underlying relative structure. In the H\"usler-Reiss model for extremes, these include variogram, covariance, and precision parametrizations. In compositional data analysis, analogous representations arise from pairwise log-ratios, centred log-ratios, and additive log-ratios. We establish an explicit link between the two fields that relates these different representations by a small set of simple transformations, including oblique projections, H\"usler-Reiss inverses, and the variogram map. From a methodological perspective, leveraging this algebraic connection enables the transfer of statistical approaches from one field to the other. For instance, we introduce intrinsic logistic-normal graphical models for compositional data, which are based on H\"usler-Reiss graphical models for extremes. Conversely, we explore how dimensionality reduction methods from compositional data analysis can be applied to the analysis of multivariate extremes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09567 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the limit in (2.1) with a finite dataset and threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the decomposition of the conditioned vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Original sample of positive values w ∈ (0,∞) 2 (left), compositionally closed vector x = C(w) ∈ ∆ (centre left), followed by computation of the centred log-ratios CLR(x) (centre right), and the additive log-ratios ALR1(x), embedded in R d by inserting a zero in the first component (right). rescaled to the interior of the (d − 1)-simplex, denoted ∆ = {x ∈ R d | xi > 0, P i xi = 1} via the closure operator C defined a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Lemma 3.2. The left and right panels show the effect of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Commutative diagram showing the relationship between covariance matrices, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same example as in Figure 3, but represented as taking logarithms, followed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: True graph structure of the simulated intrinsic logistic-normal graphical model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Graph structures estimated for the gemas dataset by cglearn (left) and CCLasso (centre). Vertices correspond to components of the composition, and edges indicate non￾zero entries in the estimated precision and correlation matrix, respectively. The right panel shows the…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Biplots of the first two log-ratio principal components for the Danube dataset, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Application of amalgamation-based hierarchical clustering and stepwise log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Performance of the weighted variogram estimator with different weighting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Illustration of Lemma 3.2. Arrows indicate a mapping from the set at its tail [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Commutative diagram illustrating the relations in Lemma A.3. All maps in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Illustration of Lemma 3.4. top row, where each map is simply a projection along U onto the target image, is not preserved for the mappings between (transposed) pseudoinverses. Instead, a more varied set of projections appears, and mappings between MV and MW for V, W ̸…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Afriat, S. N. (1957). Orthogonal and oblique projectors and the characteristics of pairs of vector spaces. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 53:800 -- 816

    1957

  2. [2]

    Aitchison, J. (1983). Principal component analysis of compositional data. Biometrika , 70(1):57--65

    1983

  3. [3]

    Aitchison, J. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data . Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. OCLC: 858944307

    1986

  4. [4]

    C., and Engelke, S

    Asadi, P., Davison, A. C., and Engelke, S. (2015). Extremes on river networks. Ann. Appl. Statist. , 9(4):2023--2050

    2015

  5. [5]

    L., and Segers, J

    Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Teugels, J. L., and Segers, J. (2004). The Secura Belgian Re Data , chapter 6.2. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester. Section 6.2 in Chapter 6, Case Studies

    2004

  6. [6]

    Billheimer, D., Guttorp, P., and Fagan, W. F. (2001). Statistical interpretation of species composition. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 96(456):1205--1214

    2001

  7. [7]

    Chiapino, M., Sabourin, A., and Segers, J. (2019). Identifying groups of variables with the potential of being large simultaneously. Extremes , 22

    2019

  8. [8]

    Coles, S., Heffernan, J., and Tawn, J. (1999). Dependence measures for extreme value analyses. Extremes , 2:339--365

    1999

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Coles, S. G. and Tawn, J. A. (1991). Modelling extreme multivariate events. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. , 53(2):377--392

    1991

  2. [10]

    Dupuis, D. (1998). Exceedances over high thresholds: A guide to threshold selection. Extremes , 1(3):251--261

    1998

  3. [11]

    J., Gozzi, C., Buccianti, A., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V

    Egozcue, J. J., Gozzi, C., Buccianti, A., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2024). Exploring geochemical data using compositional techniques: A practical guide. Journal of Geochemical Exploration , 258:107385

    2024

  4. [12]

    J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., and Barcelo-Vidal, C

    Egozcue, J. J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., and Barcelo-Vidal, C. (2003). Isometric Logratio Transformations for Compositional Data Analysis . Mathematical Geology, Vol. 35, No. 3

    2003

  5. [13]

    Engelke, S., Hentschel, M., Lalancette, M., and Röttger, F. (2024). Graphical models for multivariate extremes

    2024

  6. [14]

    and Hitz, A

    Engelke, S. and Hitz, A. S. (2020). Graphical models for extremes (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol , 82(4):871--932

    2020

  7. [15]

    and Ivanovs, J

    Engelke, S. and Ivanovs, J. (2021). Sparse structures for multivariate extremes. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. , 8:241--270

    2021

  8. [16]

    Engelke, S., Ivanovs, J., and Strokorb, K. (2025). Graphical models for infinite measures with applications to extremes. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 35(5):3490--3542

    2025

  9. [17]

    Engelke, S., Lalancette, M., and Volgushev, S. (2022). Learning extremal graphical structures in high dimensions. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00840

    2022

  10. [18]

    Engelke, S., Malinowski, A., Kabluchko, Z., and Schlather, M. (2015). Estimation of H üsler- R eiss distributions and B rown- R esnick processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol , 77(1):239--265

    2015

  11. [19]

    and Volgushev, S

    Engelke, S. and Volgushev, S. (2022). Structure learning for extremal tree models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , 84(5):2055--2087

    2022

  12. [20]

    Fang, H., Huang, C., Zhao, H., and Deng, M. (2015). CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso . Bioinformatics , 31(19):3172--3180

    2015

  13. [21]

    Fang, H., Huang, C., Zhao, H., and Deng, M. (2017). gcoda: Conditional dependence network inference for compositional data. Journal of Computational Biology , 24

    2017

  14. [22]

    and Alm, E

    Friedman, J. and Alm, E. J. (2012). Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLOS Computational Biology , 8(9):1--11

    2012

  15. [23]

    Gabriel, K. R. (1971). The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika , 58(3):453--467

    1971

  16. [24]

    Greenacre, M. (2018a). Compositional Data Analysis in Practice . Chapman & Hall / CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

  17. [25]

    Greenacre, M. (2018b). Variable selection in compositional data analysis using pairwise logratios. Mathematical Geosciences , 51

  18. [26]

    Greenacre, M. (2020). Amalgamations are valid in compositional data analysis, can be used in agglomerative clustering, and their logratios have an inverse transformation. Applied Computing and Geosciences , 5:100017

    2020

  19. [27]

    Greenacre, M. (2021). Compositional data analysis. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application , 8(Volume 8, 2021):271--299

    2021

  20. [28]

    and Lewi, P

    Greenacre, M. and Lewi, P. (2009). Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of compositional data, contingency tables and ratio-scale measurements. Journal of Classification , 26(1):29--54

    2009

  21. [29]

    E., de Carvalho , M., and Chen, Y

    Hanson, T. E., de Carvalho , M., and Chen, Y. (2017). Bernstein polynomial angular densities of multivariate extreme value distributions. Statistics & Probability Letters , 128:60--66

    2017

  22. [30]

    Hentschel, M., Engelke, S., and Segers, J. (2025). Statistical inference for H üsler–- R eiss graphical models through matrix completions. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 120(550):909--921

    2025

  23. [31]

    Hentschel, M., Röttger, F., Segers, J., and Engelke, S. (2026). Directional variograms for multivariate extremes

    2026

  24. [32]

    Hron, K., Menafoglio, A., Palarea‐Albaladejo, J., Filzmoser, P., Talsk \'a , R., and Egozcue, J. J. (2021). Weighting of parts in compositional data analysis: Advances and applications. Mathematical Geosciences , 54:71--93

    2021

  25. [33]

    and Reiss, R.-D

    H \"u sler, J. and Reiss, R.-D. (1989). Maxima of normal random vectors: Between independence and complete dependence . Statist. Prob. Letters , 7(4):283--286

    1989

  26. [34]

    and Wadsworth, J

    Kakampakou, L. and Wadsworth, J. L. (2025). Geometric modelling of spatial extremes

    2025

  27. [35]

    D., Müller, C

    Kurtz, Z. D., Müller, C. L., Miraldi, E. R., Littman, D. R., Blaser, M. J., and Bonneau, R. A. (2015). Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLOS Computational Biology , 11(5):1--25

    2015

  28. [36]

    and Oesting, M

    Lederer, J. and Oesting, M. (2023). Extremes in high dimensions: Methods and scalable algorithms. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04258

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ledford, A. W. and Tawn, J. A. (1997). Modelling dependence within joint tail regions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) , 59(2):475--499

    1997

  30. [38]

    Lhaut, S., Rootz\'en, H., and Segers, J. (2025). Simulation of multivariate extremes: A wasserstein–aitchison gan approach. Extremes , 29:157 -- 194

    2025

  31. [39]

    D., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J

    Lloyd, C. D., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J. J. (2012). Compositional data analysis in population studies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers , 102(6):1251--1266

    2012

  32. [40]

    Lubbe, S., Filzmoser, P., and Templ, M. (2021). Comparison of zero replacement strategies for compositional data with large numbers of zeros. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems , 210:104248

    2021

  33. [41]

    and Bühlmann, P

    Meinshausen, N. and Bühlmann, P. (2006). High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. The Annals of Statistics , 34(3):1436--1462

    2006

  34. [42]

    and Wintenberger, O

    Meyer, N. and Wintenberger, O. (2024). Multivariate sparse clustering for extremes. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 119(547):1911--1922

    2024

  35. [43]

    Mourahib, A., Kiriliouk, A., and Segers, J. (2024). Multivariate generalized pareto distributions along extreme directions. Extremes , 28:239--272

    2024

  36. [44]

    C., Lam, H., and Engelke, S

    Pasche, O. C., Lam, H., and Engelke, S. (2026). Extreme conformal prediction: Reliable intervals for high-impact events. Extremes , 29:129--155

    2026

  37. [45]

    Poon, S.-H., Rockinger, M., and Tawn, J. (2004). Extreme value dependence in financial markets: Diagnostics, models, and financial implications. The Review of Financial Studies , 17(2):581--610

    2004

  38. [46]

    Resnick, S. (2004). The extremal dependence measure and asymptotic independence. Stochastic Models , 20(2):205--227

    2004

  39. [47]

    Rootz\'en, H., Segers, J., and Wadsworth, J. L. (2018). Multivariate generalized Pareto distributions: Parametrizations, representations, and properties. J. Multivariate Anal. , 165:117--131

    2018

  40. [48]

    and Tajvidi, N

    Rootz \'e n, H. and Tajvidi, N. (2006). Multivariate generalized P areto distributions. Bernoulli , 12:917--930

    2006

  41. [49]

    and Held, L

    Rue, H. and Held, L. (2005). Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications , volume 104 of Monographs on statistics and applied probability . Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla

    2005

  42. [50]

    Röttger, F., Engelke, S., and Zwiernik, P. (2023). Total positivity in multivariate extremes . Ann. Statist. , 51(3):962 -- 1004

    2023

  43. [51]

    L., Tawn, J

    Smith, R. L., Tawn, J. A., and Coles, S. G. (1997). Markov chain models for threshold exceedances. Biometrika , 84(2):249--268

    1997

  44. [52]

    Stein, M. L. (2023). A weighted composite log-likelihood approach to parametric estimation of the extreme quantiles of a distribution. Extremes , 26(3):469--507. Published online 29 March 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    and Yanai, H

    Takane, Y. and Yanai, H. (1999). On oblique projectors. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 289(1):297--310

    1999

  46. [54]

    Templ, M., Hron, K., and Filzmoser, P. (2011). rob C ompositions: an R -package for robust statistical analysis of compositional data . J ohn W iley and S ons

    2011

  47. [55]

    Wan, P. (2026). Characterizing extremal dependence on a hyperplane. Biometrika , 113(2):asag015

    2026

  48. [56]

    and Zhou, C

    Wan, P. and Zhou, C. (2023). Graphical lasso for extremes. Available from https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15054

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Ying, J., Cardoso, J. V. d. M., and Palomar, D. P. (2020). Nonconvex sparse graph learning under laplacian constrained graphical model. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , NIPS '20, Red Hook, NY, USA. Curran Associates Inc

    2020

  50. [58]

    and Lin, Y

    Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. (2007). Model selection and estimation in the gaussian graphical model. Biometrika , 94(1):19--35

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.