pith. sign in

arxiv: 1201.5168 · v5 · pith:K7ZE3SPFnew · submitted 2012-01-25 · 🧮 math.CO

The maximum agreement subtree problem

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords subtreetreesalphacommonleavesbalancedbinarycase
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we investigate an extremal problem on binary phylogenetic trees. Given two such trees $T_1$ and $T_2$, both with leaf-set ${1,2,...,n}$, we are interested in the size of the largest subset $S \subseteq {1,2,...,n}$ of leaves in a common subtree of $T_1$ and $T_2$. We show that any two binary phylogenetic trees have a common subtree on $\Omega(\sqrt{\log{n}})$ leaves, thus improving on the previously known bound of $\Omega(\log\log n)$ due to M. Steel and L. Szekely. To achieve this improved bound, we first consider two special cases of the problem: when one of the trees is balanced or a caterpillar, we show that the largest common subtree has $\Omega(\log n)$ leaves. We then handle the general case by proving and applying a Ramsey-type result: that every binary tree contains either a large balanced subtree or a large caterpillar. We also show that there are constants $c, \alpha > 0$ such that, when both trees are balanced, they have a common subtree on $c n^\alpha$ leaves. We conjecture that it is possible to take $\alpha = 1/2$ in the unrooted case, and both $c = 1$ and $\alpha = 1/2$ in the rooted case.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.