Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 39 references

Vehicular Multi-Tier Distributed Computing with Hybrid THz-RF Transmission in Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims a joint THz-RF scheduling scheme that splits each vehicle's task among local CPU, ground edge, and LEO satellite can maximize computation efficiency, measured as total task bits per joule, by alternately optimizing four…

desk verdict A well-assembled system model whose central task-allocation 'optimal' solution is an underdetermined line with an unspecified intercept, so Algorithm 2 doesn't actually solve the stated problem. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15577 v1 pith:KAJDO6QK submitted 2025-01-26 eess.SP

Ni Zhang , Kunlun Wang , Wen Chen , Jing Xu , Yonghui Li , Arumugam Nallanathan This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords satellite-terrestrialintegratednetworksvehicularmulti-tierdistributedcomputingterahertzcommunicationnon-orthogonalmultipleaccessorthogonalfrequencydivisiontaskoffloadingcomputationefficiencyalternatingoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Connected vehicles can generate tasks too large for one onboard computer, so this paper proposes splitting each task across three tiers: the vehicle's own CPU, a ground edge server reached through roadside units, and a LEO satellite. The link to the satellite uses terahertz (THz) waves with orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), while the terrestrial link uses non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) with vehicles grouped in clusters. The authors define computation efficiency as total task bits per joule and formulate a non-convex problem that jointly chooses the task split, the OFDMA bandwidth fractions, the NOMA transmit powers, and the subchannel-to-cluster matching. Their solution decomposes this problem into four subproblems and updates them alternately, and the simulations included in the paper show higher computation efficiency than five benchmark allocation policies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the computation efficiency ratio $J = \sum_{m=1}^{M} C_m \,/\, \sum_{m=1}^{M} E_m$, the total task data bits divided by the total energy consumed across local, terrestrial-edge, and satellite processing. Four allocation variables carry the optimization: task-split coefficients $\theta_m$ (fraction to the BS) and $\zeta_m$ (fraction to the LEO satellite), OFDMA bandwidth fractions $\alpha_m$, NOMA transmit powers $P_m$, and binary subchannel-cluster matches $\eta_{f,n}$. The key mechanism is alternating optimization: the non-convex coupled problem P0 is decoupled into four subproblems, each solved while the other variables are fixed. The OFDMA and NOMA subproblems use a quadratic transformation that turns the fractional objective into an equivalent concave form; the subchannel matching subproblem is solved by a many-to-one two-sided matching algorithm; and the task-allocation subproblem is solved by closed-form linear relations. A high-SNR approximation of the NOMA rate as $R_m \approx 1.44 P_m \sum_{f\in F} w_{f,k}\eta_{f,n} |h_{n,k}|^2 d_{nR,m}^{-\rho'}/n_0$ (Theorem 1) simplifies the power subproblem.

What would settle it

For a fixed instance, run Algorithm 2 with the closed-form task allocation (32)-(33) using two different values of $Z$, and compare the resulting computation efficiency to a reference that solves the task-allocation subproblem P1 exactly by enumeration or linear programming; if the efficiencies differ or the closed-form point is not the maximizer of P1 given fixed $\alpha$, $\eta$, and $P$, then the algorithm does not obtain the claimed maximum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that its alternating-optimization algorithm obtains the maximum computation efficiency for the proposed satellite-terrestrial integrated vehicular multi-tier distributed computing system. Given fixed values of the other variables, the task-allocation subproblem is treated as linear programming with closed-form coefficients; the OFDMA bandwidth and NOMA power subproblems are turned into concave problems by quadratic transformation; and the subchannel-vehicle assignment is solved as a many-to-one two-sided matching problem whose convergence yields a stable matching. Iterating these steps from feasible starting values until the relative efficiency change is below $10^{-5}$ or 50 iterations is claimed to reach the optimum. The paper's simulations then compare this scheme against priority-local, priority-edge, random, one-to-one, water-filling, and average-allocation benchmarks and report that the proposed scheme gives the highest computation efficiency among the tested settings.

Load-bearing premise

The optimization's task-allocation step assumes equations (32)-(33) give the optimal split, but those equations contain an unspecified intercept constant $Z$ and no derivation is shown, so the claimed optimum is not fully determined unless a concrete rule for $Z$ is supplied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the scheme works as claimed, a single vehicle can dynamically split its task so that local, edge, and satellite processors jointly maximize bits per joule while meeting a per-task deadline.
  • THz-OFDMA gives the satellite link interference-free orthogonal sub-channels, while NOMA lets multiple vehicles share a terrestrial sub-channel; the optimization decides how much each tier is used.
  • The alternating algorithm converges within a fixed number of iterations, with per-iteration complexity on the order of $M^2 + N^2$, so the claimed gain is achieved at polynomial computational cost.
  • In the reported simulations, computation efficiency falls as the number of vehicles or task size rises and rises as the maximum tolerable delay grows, so the benefit is largest in lightly loaded, deadline-tolerant regimes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One detail the paper leaves open is how to choose the intercept $Z$ in equations (32)-(33); a concrete implementation would need a rule for $Z$, and the reported gains should be checked against that choice.
  • The same alternating decomposition should extend to multiple LEO satellites or to a latency-objective variant, since each subproblem's structure does not depend on having exactly one satellite.
  • A threshold interpretation is plausible: if each tier's marginal energy per bit is roughly constant, the optimal split would push tasks toward the lowest-marginal-cost tier, with the linear relations (32)-(33) tracing that boundary; perturbing one tier's energy coefficient would test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a satellite-terrestrial integrated network (STIN) for vehicular multi-tier distributed computing, where each vehicle can compute locally, offload through an RSU to a ground BS using NOMA, and offload directly to a LEO satellite using THz OFDMA. It formulates a non-convex computation-efficiency maximization problem over task allocation, THz bandwidth allocation, NOMA power allocation, and subchannel-vehicle matching, and proposes an alternating optimization algorithm with linear programming, quadratic transformation, and many-to-one matching. Simulation results are reported to show that the proposed scheme improves computation efficiency relative to several benchmarks. The central claims are that the task-allocation subproblem is solved optimally and that the alternating algorithm obtains the maximum computation efficiency.

Significance. If correct, the scheme would contribute a useful design for joint communication and computation resource allocation in STIN-based vehicular networks. The paper addresses a timely problem, and the system model is broad, combining hybrid THz/RF links with both satellite and terrestrial edge servers. The decomposition into four subproblems is a reasonable organizational strategy, and the many-to-one matching approach for subchannel allocation is an appropriate tool. However, the manuscript does not provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, and the key analytic steps needed to support the optimality claims are missing or invalid. As a result, the reported simulation gains cannot be attributed to a well-defined algorithm.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV-A, Eqs. (32)-(36)] The claimed optimal task allocation is not derived and is underdetermined. Equations (32) and (33) are the same line written in two ways; substituting one into the other gives an identity. The constant Z, described as an intercept, is never specified, so Algorithm 2 Step 4 is not executable. Moreover, for fixed alpha, eta, and P, P1 maximizes C_m divided by an affine function of theta_m and zeta_m, i.e., a linear-fractional program whose optimum lies at an extreme point of the feasible polytope, not on an arbitrary line. The coefficient signs in (35)-(36) also do not match the marginal energy coefficients in (28): the theta_m coefficient in E_m is -L_m phi_loc_m Z_m^2 + ... whereas F_m contains +L_m phi_loc_m Z_m^2, so (32) does not even represent a level set of the energy denominator. This is a load-bearing error: without a correct task-allocation update, the alternating algorithm does not solve P0.
  2. [Section IV-C and Appendix A, Theorem 1] The rate approximation (43) replaces the finite-bandwidth NOMA rate log2(1+SINR) by the infinite-bandwidth limit 1.44*SINR. That limit is valid only when the signal-to-noise ratio per unit bandwidth tends to zero; it is not valid for the channel model in (8), which includes intra-cluster interference and a finite subchannel bandwidth w_{f,k}. Additionally, (43) uses the noise power n0 as if it were a noise spectral density, making the expression dimensionally inconsistent. Since (43) defines Phi_m in (45) and is used in the power-allocation subproblem, the power update is not based on the original rate model.
  3. [Section VIII and Algorithm 2] The conclusion states that the proposed method obtains the maximum computation efficiency, but no convergence or optimality proof is provided for the alternating procedure. The stopping condition in Algorithm 2, 'while (E(k)-E(k-1))/E(k) > 10^-5 or k <= 50', is always true for k <= 50 because of the 'or' condition, and E(k) is never defined (the objective is J). Figure 2, described in the convergence section, plots iterations of the matching sub-algorithm only, not the joint alternating algorithm. The global optimality claim is therefore unsupported.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III, constraint (30l)] The parameter xi_m in constraint (30l) is never defined or assigned a value in Table I; it appears to be a typo for zeta_m and should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (8)] The summation index in the interference term should be a different variable, e.g., i from k+1 to K; as written, the expression is ambiguous.
  3. [Eqs. (12)-(13)] The beamforming vector definitions b_u and h_j are inconsistent with b_m and h_m used in the SINR expression; please clarify the dimensions and the indices.
  4. [Section IV-B, Eqs. (38) and (41)] The quadratic transformation for the ratio sum(C_m)/sum(E_m) uses a single auxiliary scalar, but y_m is introduced per vehicle; please align the notation with the standard quadratic-transform method and correct the reference, since [37] is Boyd and Vandenberghe rather than the quadratic-transform paper.
  5. [Algorithm 1] The variables mrank and mrank' in Step 14 and the phrase 'randomly selected to be placed in nonempty' are undefined; the pseudocode should be rewritten for clarity.
  6. [Figure captions] Several figure labels and legends in the manuscript appear garbled; ensure that the final figures have readable axis labels and legends.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the computation-efficiency objective is optimized directly against external benchmarks, and the cited methods come from non-author sources; the Section IV-A task-allocation gap is an underived formula, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is a direct numerical optimization of the stated computation-efficiency objective (29), decomposed into four subproblems and solved iteratively in Algorithm 2. No parameter is fitted to data and then reported as a prediction; the simulation section compares the proposed JTORA scheme against standard benchmarks such as priority-local, priority-edge, random allocation, one-to-one matching, water-filling, and average allocation. The THz channel model is imported from the external reference [23], the quadratic transformation method is cited to the standard text [37], and the many-to-one matching approach is cited to [27], [29], and [38]; none of these load-bearing methodological citations are authored by the present authors. The author self-citations that do appear, such as [1], [2], [3], [10], [12], [19], and [26], are used for background context or as related work, not as the justification for the central result. The genuine weak point is Section IV-A: equations (32) and (33) are asserted as the 'optimal solution' for task allocation but contain an unspecified constant Z 'introduced by intercept,' are not derived from the linear-fractional problem P1, and are relied on by Algorithm 2 step 4. This is an omitted derivation or underdetermination and a correctness risk, but it is not a case where a predicted quantity reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain. Therefore the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The optimization depends on imported channel models, a standard NOMA decoding assumption, and two under-specified parameters (Z and xi_m). The only new element is the integrated THz-RF multi-tier formulation; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Intercept Z in the task-allocation solution = not specified
    Appears in eqs. (32)-(33) as the y-intercept of the claimed optimal theta_m-zeta_m line. Its value is never defined or chosen; without a rule to fix Z, the task-allocation step is underdetermined.
  • xi_m in constraint (30l) = not specified
    Used in the satellite-rate constraint R_s^m >= xi_m C_m / (T_max^m - T_sat^m) but never defined; it may be a typo for zeta_m. The ambiguity changes the feasible region.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption THz channel received power follows the model of [23], including molecular absorption and LOS dominance.
    Adopted from prior work to derive SINR and offloading rates; real THz channels with NLOS or interference would alter the results.
  • ad hoc to paper The capacity formula can be replaced by its infinite-bandwidth limit log2(1+x) ≈ 1.44 x in the NOMA transmission rate (Theorem 1).
    The limit is exact only as bandwidth approaches infinity; the finite subchannel bandwidths used in simulation do not satisfy this, and no accuracy check is provided.
  • standard math NOMA decoding follows the SIC order h_{n,1} > h_{n,2} > ... > h_{n,k}.
    Standard NOMA assumption that determines the interference terms in eq. (8).
  • ad hoc to paper The optimal task allocation is characterized by linear equations with a constant intercept Z.
    This is the load-bearing assumption of Section IV-A; it is asserted without proof and is not generally true for linear-fractional programs.
  • domain assumption RSUs have no computational capability and act only as relays with MMSE beamforming.
    Modeling choice that defines the terrestrial edge path; adding compute at the RSU would change the problem structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vehicular Multi-Tier Distributed Computing with Hybrid THz-RF Transmission in Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KAJDO6QK

@misc{pith2026250115577,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vehicular Multi-Tier Distributed Computing with Hybrid THz-RF Transmission in Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KAJDO6QK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15577}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose a Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Network (STIN) assisted vehicular multi-tier distributed computing (VMDC) system leveraging hybrid terahertz (THz) and radio frequency (RF) communication technologies. Task offloading for satellite edge computing is enabled by THz communication using the orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) technique. For terrestrial edge computing, we employ non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and vehicle clustering to realize task offloading. We formulate a non-convex optimization problem aimed at maximizing computation efficiency by jointly optimizing bandwidth allocation, task allocation, subchannel-vehicle matching and power allocation. To address this non-convex optimization problem, we decompose the original problem into four sub-problems and solve them using an alternating iterative optimization approach. For the subproblem of task allocation, we solve it by linear programming. To solve the subproblem of sub-channel allocation, we exploit many-to-one matching theory to obtain the result. The subproblem of bandwidth allocation of OFDMA and the subproblem of power allocation of NOMA are solved by quadratic transformation method. Finally, the simulation results show that our proposed scheme significantly enhances the computation efficiency of the STIN-based VMDC system compared with the benchmark schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15577 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. System model. We divide the vehicles into N clusters with K vehicles in each cluster, K is random and the largest K is qmax. Hn,k is denoted as the kth vehicle in the nth cluster. In the NOMA transmission process, ηf,n ∈ {0, 1} denotes the sub-channel matching coefficients to match the F sub-channels with the N cluster vehicles, ηf,n = 1 means that the fth sub-channel is occupied by the nth cluster of vehicles, and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Iterations of VSMA under different sub-channels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Computation efficiency vs the number of vehicles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Computation efficiency versus maximum tolerable del [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Computation efficiency versus the number of sub-chan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Computation efficiency with different allocation me [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hybrid intelli gent reflecting surface and cell-free massive MIMO-aided over-t he-air com- putation for digital twin,

    J. Di, N. Zhang, J. Wan, S. Li, and K. Wang, “Hybrid intelli gent reflecting surface and cell-free massive MIMO-aided over-t he-air com- putation for digital twin,” in 2024 IEEE 44th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems W orkshops (ICDCSW) , pp. 59–63, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Co mputation efficient task offloading and bandwidth allocation in VEC net works,

    N. Zhang, S. Liang, K. Wang, Q. Wu, and A. Nallanathan, “Co mputation efficient task offloading and bandwidth allocation in VEC net works,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 73, May. 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Hybrid task offloadin g and resource optimization in vehicular edge computing network s,

    Y . Liu, C. Tan, K. Wang, and W. Chen, “Hybrid task offloadin g and resource optimization in vehicular edge computing network s,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 13, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Optimizing com putation offloading in satellite-UAv-served 6G IoT: A deep learning a pproach,

    B. Mao, F. Tang, Y . Kawamoto, and N. Kato, “Optimizing com putation offloading in satellite-UAv-served 6G IoT: A deep learning a pproach,” IEEE Network , vol. 35, pp. 102–108, Aug. 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Performance gu aranteed partial offloading for mobile edge computing,

    U. Saleem, Y . Liu, S. Jangsher, and Y . Li, “Performance gu aranteed partial offloading for mobile edge computing,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) , pp. 1–6, Feb. 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Energy-efficient jo int task offloading and resource allocation in OFDMA-based collabor ative edge computing,

    L. Tan, Z. Kuang, L. Zhao, and A. Liu, “Energy-efficient jo int task offloading and resource allocation in OFDMA-based collabor ative edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 21, pp. 1960–1972, Sep. 2022

    work page 1960

  7. [7]

    SS-OFDMA: Spatial -spread orthogonal frequency division multiple access for teraher tz networks,

    B. Zhai, A. Tang, C. Peng, and X. Wang, “SS-OFDMA: Spatial -spread orthogonal frequency division multiple access for teraher tz networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 39, pp. 1678– 1692, Apr. 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Robust design for intelligent reflecting surface- assisted MIMO- OFDMA terahertz IoT networks,

    W. Hao, G. Sun, M. Zeng, Z. Chu, Z. Zhu, O. A. Dobre, and P . Xiao, “Robust design for intelligent reflecting surface- assisted MIMO- OFDMA terahertz IoT networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, pp. 13052–13064, Jan. 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Downlink OFDMA with DFT-precoding for tera-hertz communications,

    S. Lee, H. Kim, Y . Park, H. Lee, and J. Lee, “Downlink OFDMA with DFT-precoding for tera-hertz communications,” in GLOBECOM 2020 - 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference , pp. 1–6, Dec. 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Reinforcement lear ning based latency minimization in secure NOMA-MEC systems with hybri d SIC,

    K. Wang, H. Li, Z. Ding, and P . Xiao, “Reinforcement lear ning based latency minimization in secure NOMA-MEC systems with hybri d SIC,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 22, pp. 408–422, Aug. 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Computation offloa ding in NOMA-enabled vehicular fog computing networks,

    Z. Lin, Y . Lin, Q. Zhang, and P . Chen, “Computation offloa ding in NOMA-enabled vehicular fog computing networks,” in ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications , pp. 6120–6125, Oct. 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Task offloa ding in NOMA-based fog computing networks: A deep Q-learning appro ach,

    K. Wang, Y . Zhou, Y . Y ang, X. Y uan, and X. Luo, “Task offloa ding in NOMA-based fog computing networks: A deep Q-learning appro ach,” in 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) , pp. 1– 6, Feb. 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Joint load bala ncing and offloading in vehicular edge computing and networks,

    Y . Dai, D. Xu, S. Maharjan, and Y . Zhang, “Joint load bala ncing and offloading in vehicular edge computing and networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, pp. 4377–4387, Oct. 2019. 13

    2019

  6. [14]

    Joint dynam ic task offloading and resource scheduling for WPT enabled space-ai r-ground power internet of things,

    J. Liu, X. Zhao, P . Qin, S. Geng, and S. Meng, “Joint dynam ic task offloading and resource scheduling for WPT enabled space-ai r-ground power internet of things,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 660–677, Nov. 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Joint multi-task offloading and resource allocation for mobile ed ge computing systems in satellite IoT,

    F. Chai, Q. Zhang, H. Y ao, X. Xin, R. Gao, and M. Guizani, “ Joint multi-task offloading and resource allocation for mobile ed ge computing systems in satellite IoT,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology , vol. 72, pp. 7783–7795, Jan. 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Energy-cons trained computation offloading in space-air-ground integrated net works using distributionally robust optimization,

    Y . Chen, B. Ai, Y . Niu, H. Zhang, and Z. Han, “Energy-cons trained computation offloading in space-air-ground integrated net works using distributionally robust optimization,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 70, Sep. 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Ultra-dense LEO: Integrating terrestrial-satellite networks into 5G and be yond for data offloading,

    B. Di, H. Zhang, L. Song, Y . Li, and G. Y . Li, “Ultra-dense LEO: Integrating terrestrial-satellite networks into 5G and be yond for data offloading,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 18, pp. 47–62, Dec. 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Channel modeling and performance analysis of airplane-sa tellite tera- hertz band communications,

    J. Kokkoniemi, J. M. Jornet, V . Petrov, Y . Koucheryavy, and M. Juntti, “Channel modeling and performance analysis of airplane-sa tellite tera- hertz band communications,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technol- ogy, vol. 70, pp. 2047–2061, Feb. 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Sum-rate max imization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted terahertz comm unications,

    Y . Pan, K. Wang, C. Pan, H. Zhu, and J. Wang, “Sum-rate max imization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted terahertz comm unications,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology , vol. 71, pp. 3320–3325, Jan. 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    ESN reinfo rcement learning for spectrum and flight control in THz-enabled dron e networks,

    S. Krishna Moorthy, M. Mcmanus, and Z. Guan, “ESN reinfo rcement learning for spectrum and flight control in THz-enabled dron e networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking , vol. 30, pp. 782–795, Feb. 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Two-sta ge deep energy optimization in IRS-assisted UA V-based edge co mputing systems,

    J. Wu, Z. Y u, J. Guo, Z. Tang, T. Wang, and W. Jia, “Two-sta ge deep energy optimization in IRS-assisted UA V-based edge co mputing systems,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 24, pp. 449– 465, Sep. 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    IRS/UA V-based edge-computing an d traffic- offioading over 6G THz mobile wireless networks,

    F. Wang and X. Zhang, “IRS/UA V-based edge-computing an d traffic- offioading over 6G THz mobile wireless networks,” in ICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications , pp. 6480–6485, Oct. 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Joint rate and cov erage optimization for the THz/RF multi-band communications of s pace- air-ground integrated network in 6G,

    X. Y uan, F. Tang, M. Zhao, and N. Kato, “Joint rate and cov erage optimization for the THz/RF multi-band communications of s pace- air-ground integrated network in 6G,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, pp. 6669–6682, Dec. 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    EC-SAGINs: E dge- computing-enhanced space–air–ground-integrated networ ks for internet of vehicles,

    S. Y u, X. Gong, Q. Shi, X. Wang, and X. Chen, “EC-SAGINs: E dge- computing-enhanced space–air–ground-integrated networ ks for internet of vehicles,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, pp. 5742–5754, Sep. 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    MEC in NOMA-hetnet s: A joint task offloading and resource allocation approach,

    G. Zheng, C. Xu, H. Long, and X. Zhao, “MEC in NOMA-hetnet s: A joint task offloading and resource allocation approach,” in 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , pp. 1– 6, May. 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Onl ine task scheduling and resource allocation for intelligent NO MA-based industrial internet of things,

    K. Wang, Y . Zhou, Z. Liu, Z. Shao, X. Luo, and Y . Y ang, “Onl ine task scheduling and resource allocation for intelligent NO MA-based industrial internet of things,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Com- munications, vol. 38, pp. 803–815, Mar. 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    D elay- aware computation offloading in NOMA MEC under differentiat ed up- loading delay,

    M. Sheng, Y . Dai, J. Liu, N. Cheng, X. Shen, and Q. Y ang, “D elay- aware computation offloading in NOMA MEC under differentiat ed up- loading delay,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, pp. 2813–2826, Jan. 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Hybrid noma of floading in multi-user mec networks,

    Z. Ding, D. Xu, R. Schober, and H. V . Poor, “Hybrid noma of floading in multi-user mec networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi- cations, vol. 21, pp. 5377–5391, Jan. 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Energy-minimization task offloading and resource allocation for mobile edge computing in NOMA he teroge- neous networks,

    C. Xu, G. Zheng, and X. Zhao, “Energy-minimization task offloading and resource allocation for mobile edge computing in NOMA he teroge- neous networks,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 69, pp. 16001–16016, Nov. 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Mobility-aware performa nce in hybrid RF and terahertz wireless networks,

    M. T. Hossan and H. Tabassum, “Mobility-aware performa nce in hybrid RF and terahertz wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communi- cations, vol. 70, pp. 1376–1390, Dec. 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Interference and covera ge analysis in coexisting RF and dense terahertz wireless networks,

    J. Sayehvand and H. Tabassum, “Interference and covera ge analysis in coexisting RF and dense terahertz wireless networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 9, pp. 1738–1742, Jun. 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Common throughput maximization in U A V- enabled OFDMA systems with delay consideration,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Common throughput maximization in U A V- enabled OFDMA systems with delay consideration,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 66, pp. 6614–6627, Aug. 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    IRS-aid ed NOMA in a cell free massive MIMO system,

    A. Rafieifar, H. Ahmadinejad, and A. Falahati, “IRS-aid ed NOMA in a cell free massive MIMO system,” in 2022 30th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) , pp. 874–879, Jul. 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Optimization of beamforming matrix design for multi-cell mimo with swipt systems,

    W. N. Suryani Firuz Wan Ariffin, M. R. Nakhai, H. L. Zakari a, N. B. Mohd Hashim, and A. S. Md Zain, “Optimization of beamforming matrix design for multi-cell mimo with swipt systems,” in 2020 IEEE 8th Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC) , pp. 31–36, Jan. 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Joint user schedu ling and hybrid beamforming design for cooperative mmwave networks ,

    P . Ni, Z. Wang, H. Li, M. Li, and Q. Liu, “Joint user schedu ling and hybrid beamforming design for cooperative mmwave networks ,” in 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (W CNC), pp. 1–6, May. 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    Weighted spec tral effi- ciency optimization for hybrid beamforming in multiuser ma ssive mimo- ofdm systems,

    J. Du, W. Xu, C. Zhao, and L. V andendorpe, “Weighted spec tral effi- ciency optimization for hybrid beamforming in multiuser ma ssive mimo- ofdm systems,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology , vol. 68, pp. 9698–9712, Jul. 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    S. P . Boyd and L. V andenberghe, Convex optimization . Cambridge university press, 2004

    2004

  30. [38]

    Jo int subchan- nel and power allocation for noma enhanced D2D communicatio ns,

    J. Zhao, Y . Liu, K. K. Chai, Y . Chen, and M. Elkashlan, “Jo int subchan- nel and power allocation for noma enhanced D2D communicatio ns,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 65, pp. 5081–5094, Aug. 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Joint location, bandwidth and power optimization fo r thz-enabled uav communications,

    L. Xu, M. Chen, M. Chen, Z. Y ang, C. Chaccour, W. Saad, and C. S. Hong, “Joint location, bandwidth and power optimization fo r thz-enabled uav communications,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 25, pp. 1984– 1988, Mar. 2021

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.