Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 54 references

Visuo-Tactile Feedback with Hand Outline Styles for Modulating Affective Roughness Perception

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The outline of a virtual hand changes how rough and emotional touch feels.

desk verdict A useful, well-scoped idea about hand-outline visual style as an affective lever, but the abstract alone doesn't rule out salience or demand confounds; send it to review and ask for controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13504 v1 pith:KBPVCP4F submitted 2025-08-19 cs.HC

Minju Baeck , Yoonseok Shin , Dooyoung Kim , Hyunjin Lee , Sang Ho Yoon , Woontack Woo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords virtualrealityhapticfeedbackaffectivetouchroughnessperceptionhandvisualizationarousalvalencevisuo-tactileintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the way a virtual hand is drawn—sharp versus soft outlines, motion, and color—can actively steer how rough a fingertip vibration feels and how the user rates that feeling on arousal and valence. This would matter because haptic hardware in VR often cannot produce strongly differentiated textures on its own; visual style of the self-avatar could be a cheap, flexible channel for tuning emotional intensity. The reported results single out outline shape as the main driver: sharp contours made the same vibration feel rougher, more arousing, and less pleasant. Color did something narrower, shifting valence only, with red making the experience less positive. All of this was most visible at low haptic intensity, meaning visual cues can fill in affective nuance where the vibration alone is weak.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the 'affective visual cue' layered on the virtual hand outline: line shape (sharp versus soft contours), line motion, and line color, presented together with fingertip vibrations. These cues are meant to operate as an affective channel before object-level texture is even considered. In the results, line shape carries the load: it shifts perceived roughness, arousal, and valence in a consistent direction, while motion and color contribute only partially, with color acting mostly on valence. The authors use these cues to modulate the emotional envelope of the tactile signal, treating the visual outline as an intensifier that is especially effective when the haptic vibration is weak.

What would settle it

Run the sharp versus soft outline conditions with fingertip vibration absent and with participants told the outline style is an arbitrary settings option. If sharp outlines still raise roughness and arousal ratings, the effect is driven by the visual cue itself; if the effect disappears or reverses when the cover story removes demand characteristics, the paper's affective-cue interpretation is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central finding is that affective visual cues applied to the virtual hand outline modulate both the affective response (arousal, valence) and the perceived roughness of concurrent fingertip vibrations. Sharp contours raised perceived roughness and arousal while lowering valence, effectively intensifying the emotional impact of the haptic signal; red coloring lowered valence without changing the roughness or arousal judgments. The authors interpret this as evidence that the visual style of the hand is not a neutral frame but an active component of affective haptic rendering, and that combining expressive hand outlines with tactile feedback lets designers tune emotional quality across a wider perceptual range than vibration alone.

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on participants' self-reports of arousal, valence, and roughness being faithful measures of the experienced affective state, and on the outline style being processed as an affective cue rather than as a low-level attention grab or a clue to what the experiment expects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Designers can use hand outline shape as a tuning dial for affective intensity: sharper contours push the same vibration toward rougher, more arousing, less pleasant territory.
  • Because the visual effect is strongest at low haptic intensities, rendering systems can save vibrational effort and use visual style to cover mid-range affective experiences that the actuator alone cannot deliver.
  • Color can adjust emotional tone, with red acting as a negativity cue, without necessarily changing how rough a stimulus feels.
  • Combining visual and haptic feedback broadens the effective dynamic range of a haptic device beyond what the vibrator alone can express.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the outline effect survives when participants are told the visual style is arbitrary; if sharpness still shifts roughness ratings under that cover story, the affective-cue explanation is stronger than a demand-characteristics account.
  • The same manipulation could plausibly generalize to other self-avatar features such as shape, weight, or texture and to other tactile dimensions such as sharpness or warmth, though the paper itself does not test this.
  • Because the effect concentrates at low haptic intensities, the design pattern may be most useful in mobile or wearable VR where actuators are small and weak, rather than in high-end haptic rigs.
  • An open question this raises is whether outline sharpness works through semantic association (sharp equals rough) or through low-level visual salience; the valence-only result for red hints at color-affect associations rather than pure salience.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a visuo-tactile feedback method for VR in which virtual hand outline styles (line shape, motion, color) are combined with fingertip vibrations. Based on the abstract, it reports that sharp contours increase perceived roughness and arousal and decrease valence, that red color lowers valence, and that these effects are strongest at lower haptic intensities. The supplied full text is corrupted and unreadable, so the review is based on the abstract alone.

Significance. If the reported effects are real and appropriately controlled, the work would be a useful contribution to affective haptic rendering, extending visual-feedback research from object textures to the visualization of the user's own hand. The manuscript's strength is the clear falsifiable prediction that hand-outline contour sharpness modulates roughness and affect. However, because the full text is unreadable and the abstract contains no effect sizes, confidence intervals, sample sizes, or methodological details, the significance cannot be assessed from the submitted version.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Results] The central claim that 'sharp contours enhanced perceived roughness, increased arousal, and reduced valence' is reported without effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, sample size, or analysis details; the manuscript as presented does not provide enough information to verify the main effects or the interaction.
  2. [Abstract, Method (unreadable full text)] The attribution of the effects to 'affective visual cues' is unsupported because the abstract does not mention a control visual style matched in low-level features (line thickness, contrast, luminance, motion energy), a no-tactile baseline, a manipulation check, or a suspicion probe; without these, the results could be explained by visual salience or demand characteristics.
  3. [Abstract, 'especially noticeable at lower haptic intensities'] The claim that visual cues extend affective modulation into mid-level perceptual ranges requires interaction contrasts and simple-effects tests; the abstract reports neither, and a ceiling effect at high haptic intensity is a plausible alternative explanation.
  4. [Full text] The supplied full text is corrupted mojibake, so the Methods, Results, and Discussion sections cannot be reviewed. This is a load-bearing omission because the validity of the central claim depends on the experimental design and statistical analysis that are not accessible.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should define the rating scales used for arousal, valence, and perceived roughness (e.g., Likert anchors and range).
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'affective visual cues' should be operationalized in the abstract or at least in a figure with example stimuli.
  3. [General] If the full text is restored, please ensure tables report means and standard deviations per condition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: outcome measures are independent of the manipulated visual and haptic parameters, and no self-citation chain is load-bearing in the available text.

full rationale

This is an empirical VR perception study. The independent variables are hand-outline visual styles and haptic intensity, while the dependent variables are self-reported roughness, arousal, and valence. The abstract reports statistical effects of those manipulations on those measured outcomes; there is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no equation that defines a target quantity in terms of the data used to produce it, and no invoked uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work. The claim that sharp contours enhance perceived roughness and arousal while reducing valence is an experimental outcome, not a derivation from its own inputs. Concerns about demand characteristics, visual salience, and the absence of a no-tactile baseline are threats to construct validity, not circularity under the stated rules. The supplied full text is corrupted mojibake, so no further equations or citations could be inspected, but the available abstract provides no basis for a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear in the abstract. The central claim rests on standard psychophysical assumptions about subjective ratings and on the assumption that the hand-outline visual manipulations are affectively meaningful.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Self-reported ratings of arousal, valence, and roughness are valid, interval-level measures of the intended constructs.
    The abstract reports only subjective effects, which assumes that Likert-style or SAM ratings capture the perceptual and affective state without significant bias.
  • domain assumption Changes in hand outline style are perceived as affective visual cues rather than as low-level attentional or salience changes.
    The abstract attributes effects to 'affective visual cues', which presupposes that line shape, motion, and color manipulations carry affective semantics independent of salience or novelty.
  • domain assumption The VR environment and haptic actuator deliver consistent, natural, and reproducible stimuli across participants.
    Effects are aggregated across participants; any inconsistency in hardware delivery or latency would confound the reported results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Visuo-Tactile Feedback with Hand Outline Styles for Modulating Affective Roughness Perception." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBPVCP4F

@misc{pith2026250813504,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Visuo-Tactile Feedback with Hand Outline Styles for Modulating Affective Roughness Perception},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBPVCP4F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13504}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a visuo-tactile feedback method that combines virtual hand visualization and fingertip vibrations to modulate affective roughness perception in VR. While prior work has focused on object-based textures and vibrotactile feedback, the role of visual feedback on virtual hands remains underexplored. Our approach introduces affective visual cues including line shape, motion, and color applied to hand outlines, and examines their influence on both affective responses (arousal, valence) and perceived roughness. Results show that sharp contours enhanced perceived roughness, increased arousal, and reduced valence, intensifying the emotional impact of haptic feedback. In contrast, color affected valence only, with red consistently lowering emotional positivity. These effects were especially noticeable at lower haptic intensities, where visual cues extended affective modulation into mid-level perceptual ranges. Overall, the findings highlight how integrating expressive visual cues with tactile feedback can enrich affective rendering and offer flexible emotional tuning in immersive VR interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := STRINGS d dc pc.str doi.urlstr INTEGERS nth.dash doi.string.pos doilen FUNCTION add.doi doi empty "\ doi 'd := "" 'doi.urlstr := #0 'nth.dash := #1 'doi.string.pos := d text.length 'doilen := nth.dash #3 < d doi.string.pos #1 substring 'dc := #1 doi.string.pos + 'doi.string.pos := dc "/" = #1 nth.dash + 'nth....

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := STRINGS d dc pc.str doi.urlstr INTEGERS nth.dash doi.string.pos doilen FUNCTION add.doi doi empty "\ doi 'd := "" 'doi.urlstr := #0 'nth.dash := #1 'doi.string.pos := d text.length 'doilen := nth.dash #3 < d doi.string.pos #1 substring 'dc := #1 doi.string.pos + 'doi.string.pos := dc "/" = #1 nth.dash + 'nth....

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := STRINGS d dc pc.str doi.urlstr INTEGERS nth.dash doi.string.pos doilen FUNCTION add.doi doi empty "\ doi 'd := "" 'doi.urlstr := #0 'nth.dash := #1 'doi.string.pos := d text.length 'doilen := nth.dash #3 < d doi.string.pos #1 substring 'dc := #1 doi.string.pos + 'doi.string.pos := dc "/" = #1 nth.dash + 'nth....

    work page

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := STRINGS d dc pc.str doi.urlstr INTEGERS nth.dash doi.string.pos doilen FUNCTION add.doi doi empty "\ doi 'd := "" 'doi.urlstr := #0 'nth.dash := #1 'doi.string.pos := d text.length 'doilen := nth.dash #3 < d doi.string.pos #1 substring 'dc := #1 doi.string.pos + 'doi.string.pos := dc "/" = #1 nth.dash + 'nth....

    work page

  5. [5]

    Ahmaniemi, J

    T. Ahmaniemi, J. Marila, and V. Lantz. Design of dynamic vibrotactile textures. IEEE Transactions on Haptics , 3(4):245--256, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Alagarai Sampath, B

    Akshita, H. Alagarai Sampath, B. Indurkhya, E. Lee, and Y. Bae. Towards multimodal affective feedback: Interaction between visual and haptic modalities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 2043--2052, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Argelaguet, L

    F. Argelaguet, L. Hoyet, M. Trico, and A. L \'e cuyer. The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation. In 2016 IEEE virtual reality (VR) , pp. 3--10. IEEE, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Asano, S

    S. Asano, S. Okamoto, and Y. Yamada. Vibrotactile stimulation to increase and decrease texture roughness. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems , 45(3):393--398, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Badde, K

    S. Badde, K. T. Navarro, and M. S. Landy. Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch. Cognition , 197:104170, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Bayro and H

    A. Bayro and H. Jeong. Advancing arousal and valence prediction in virtual reality through sentiment analysis integration. In 2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) , pp. 2077--2082. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    TactGlove DK2

    bHaptics Inc. TactGlove DK2 . https://www.bhaptics.com/tactsuit/tactglove-dk2/, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry , 25(1):49--59, 1994

    1994

  5. [13]

    Dozio, F

    N. Dozio, F. Marcolin, G. W. Scurati, L. Ulrich, F. Nonis, E. Vezzetti, G. Marsocci, A. La Rosa, and F. Ferrise. A design methodology for affective virtual reality. International journal of human-computer studies , 162:102791, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Drewing, C

    K. Drewing, C. Weyel, H. Celebi, and D. Kaya. Feeling and feelings: Affective and perceptual dimensions of touched materials and their connection. In 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) , pp. 25--30. IEEE, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Dzedzickis, A

    A. Dzedzickis, A. Kaklauskas, and V. Bucinskas. Human emotion recognition: Review of sensors and methods. Sensors , 20(3):592, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    M. O. Ernst and M. S. Banks. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature , 415(6870):429--433, 2002

    2002

  9. [17]

    M. O. Ernst and H. H. B \"u lthoff. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in cognitive sciences , 8(4):162--169, 2004

    2004

  10. [18]

    Gabana, L

    D. Gabana, L. Tokarchuk, E. Hannon, and H. Gunes. Effects of valence and arousal on working memory performance in virtual reality gaming. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) , pp. 36--41. IEEE, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    G. A. Gescheider, S. J. Bolanowski, T. C. Greenfield, and K. E. Brunette. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: A multidimensional analysis. Somatosensory & motor research , 22(3):127--140, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Gonzalez, F

    F. Gonzalez, F. Gosselin, and W. Bachta. Analysis of hand contact areas and interaction capabilities during manipulation and exploration. IEEE transactions on haptics , 7(4):415--429, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    Guest and C

    S. Guest and C. Spence. What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile perception of texture? International Journal of Psychophysiology , 50(1-2):63--80, 2003

    2003

  14. [22]

    Gunes and B

    H. Gunes and B. Schuller. Categorical and dimensional affect analysis in continuous input: Current trends and future directions. Image and Vision Computing , 31(2):120--136, 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    Hollins and S

    M. Hollins and S. J. Bensma \" a. The coding of roughness. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie exp \'e rimentale , 61(3):184, 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Hollins, S

    M. Hollins, S. J. Bensma \"i a, and S. Washburn. Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosensory & motor research , 18(4):253--262, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    Hollins, A

    M. Hollins, A. Fox, and C. Bishop. Imposed vibration influences perceived tactile smoothness. Perception , 29(12):1455--1465, 2000

    2000

  18. [26]

    K. Jung, S. Kim, S. Oh, and S. H. Yoon. Hapmotion: motion-to-tactile framework with wearable haptic devices for immersive vr performance experience. Virtual Reality , 28(1):13, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Kaya and H

    N. Kaya and H. H. Epps. Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College student journal , 38(3):396--405, 2004

    2004

  20. [28]

    Kilteni, R

    K. Kilteni, R. Groten, and M. Slater. The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments , 21(4):373--387, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Lockyer and L

    M. Lockyer and L. Bartram. Affective motion textures. Computers & Graphics , 36(6):776--790, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Mar \' n-Morales, C

    J. Mar \' n-Morales, C. Llinares, J. Guixeres, and M. Alca \ n iz. Emotion recognition in immersive virtual reality: From statistics to affective computing. Sensors , 20(18):5163, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Martini, D

    M. Martini, D. Perez-Marcos, and M. V. Sanchez-Vives. What color is my arm? changes in skin color of an embodied virtual arm modulates pain threshold. Frontiers in human neuroscience , 7:438, 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    Meuleman and D

    B. Meuleman and D. Rudrauf. Induction and profiling of strong multi-componential emotions in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , 12(1):189--202, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    I. Neto, I. Soares, A. Paiva, and H. Nicolau. Investigating crossmodal correspondences between vibrotactile stimuli, colour, and emotions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , p. 103459, 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    Normand, C

    E. Normand, C. Pacchierotti, E. Marchand, and M. Marchal. How different is the perception of vibrotactile texture roughness in augmented versus virtual reality? In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology , pp. 1--10, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Omata, K

    M. Omata, K. Moriwaki, X. Mao, D. Kanuka, and A. Imamiya. Affective rendering: Visual effect animations for affecting user arousal. In 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems , pp. 737--742. IEEE, 2012

    2012

  28. [36]

    V. G. Prabhu, C. Linder, L. M. Stanley, and R. Morgan. An affective computing in virtual reality environments for managing surgical pain and anxiety. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR) , pp. 235--2351. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    R. J. Rajae-Joordens. The effects of colored light on valence and arousal: Investigating responses through subjective evaluations and psycho-physiological measurements. In Sensing emotions: The impact of context on experience measurements , pp. 65--84. Springer, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    G. Riva, F. Mantovani, C. S. Capideville, A. Preziosa, F. Morganti, D. Villani, A. Gaggioli, C. Botella, and M. Alca \ n iz. Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior , 10(1):45--56, 2007

    2007

  31. [39]

    J. A. Russell. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology , 39(6):1161, 1980

    1980

  32. [40]

    M. V. Sanchez-Vives and M. Slater. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature reviews neuroscience , 6(4):332--339, 2005

    2005

  33. [41]

    Seifi and K

    H. Seifi and K. E. Maclean. A first look at individuals' affective ratings of vibrations. In 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC) , pp. 605--610. IEEE, 2013

    2013

  34. [42]

    Shetty, S

    Y. Shetty, S. Mehta, D. Tran, B. Soni, and T. McDaniel. Emotional response to vibrothermal stimuli. Applied Sciences , 11(19):8905, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Suk and H

    H.-J. Suk and H. Irtel. Emotional response to simple color stimuli. Kansei Engineering International , 7(2):181--188, 2008

    2008

  36. [44]

    Suzuishi, S

    Y. Suzuishi, S. Hidaka, and S. Kuroki. Visual motion information modulates tactile roughness perception. Scientific Reports , 10(1):13929, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Sykownik and M

    P. Sykownik and M. Masuch. The experience of social touch in multi-user virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology , pp. 1--11, 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    Talamo, S

    A. Talamo, S. Marocco, F. Presaghi, V. Vitale, L. Tripodi, S. Cedrone, and L. Di Natale. The impact of immersive visualization on engagement and emotions elicitation. Proceedings DOI , 29:31, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Ujitoko, Y

    Y. Ujitoko, Y. Ban, and K. Hirota. Modulating fine roughness perception of vibrotactile textured surface using pseudo-haptic effect. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 25(5):1981--1990, 2019

    1981

  40. [48]

    Valtchanov and M

    D. Valtchanov and M. Hancock. Enviropulse: Providing feedback about the expected affective valence of the environment. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on human factors in computing systems , pp. 2073--2082, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Voisard, A

    L. Voisard, A. Hatira, M. Sarac, M. Kersten-Oertel, and A. U. Batmaz. Effects of opaque, transparent and invisible hand visualization styles on motor dexterity in a virtual reality based purdue pegboard test. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality ...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Wilms and D

    L. Wilms and D. Oberfeld. Color and emotion: effects of hue, saturation, and brightness. Psychological research , 82(5):896--914, 2018

    2018

  43. [51]

    Wilson and S

    G. Wilson and S. A. Brewster. Multi-moji: Combining thermal, vibrotactile & visual stimuli to expand the affective range of feedback. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 1743--1755, 2017

    2017

  44. [52]

    J. O. Wobbrock, L. Findlater, D. Gergle, and J. J. Higgins. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems , pp. 143--146, 2011

    2011

  45. [53]

    Y. Yoo, T. Yoo, J. Kong, and S. Choi. Emotional responses of tactile icons: Effects of amplitude, frequency, duration, and envelope. In 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) , pp. 235--240. IEEE, 2015

    2015

  46. [54]

    Zhang, R

    Z. Zhang, R. H \'e ron, E. Lecolinet, F. Detienne, and S. Safin. Visualtouch: Enhancing affective touch communication with multi-modality stimulation. In 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction , pp. 114--123, 2019

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.