pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19518 · v1 · pith:KBR2UAXUnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Increasing the sensitivity of full-shape galaxy clustering measurements in configuration-space with three-point statistics

Zachery Brown , Lado Samushia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords three-point correlation functiongalaxy clusteringcosmological constraintssigma_8configuration spacehalo occupation distributionsmall-scale clustering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adding line-of-sight dependent three-point correlation functions tightens sigma_8 constraints by a factor of five over two-point galaxy clustering alone on small scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a compressed, line-of-sight dependent three-point correlation function measured on scales below 80 Mpc/h can extract additional cosmological information from galaxy positions beyond the usual two-point function. Forecasts are performed on simulated catalogs that incorporate uncertainties in how galaxies occupy halos. The central finding is that the three-point measurements supply cumulative information across many triangle configurations, producing a factor-of-five improvement in the error on sigma_8 after those uncertainties are marginalized. The full line-of-sight version outperforms the monopole by an extra factor of two to three, showing that the gain is not limited to any narrow range of scales or triangle shapes.

Core claim

Incorporating the line-of-sight dependent three-point correlation function on scales below 80 Mpc/h into configuration-space full-shape analyses improves the constraint on sigma_8 by a factor of five relative to two-point statistics alone, after marginalizing over galaxy-halo connection uncertainties. The improvement arises from the total information summed over triangle configurations rather than from any localized feature, and the complete line-of-sight dependence supplies an additional factor of two to three beyond what the monopole alone provides.

What carries the argument

The compressed line-of-sight dependent three-point correlation function estimator that counts triangles in configuration space.

If this is right

  • The information gain comes from the cumulative content across triangle configurations rather than any single scale range or feature.
  • The monopole of the three-point function captures only part of the available information.
  • The full line-of-sight dependent measurement raises the overall constraining power of small-scale configuration-space clustering analyses.
  • The approach supplies information that is largely complementary to baryon acoustic oscillation measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same triangle-counting approach could be applied to other galaxy samples at different redshifts to test whether comparable gains appear.
  • Including the three-point function might reduce degeneracies between sigma_8 and parameters such as the matter density in combined analyses.
  • Computational feasibility of the estimator on large survey volumes would determine whether the method scales to full observational catalogs.

Load-bearing premise

The models that assign galaxies to dark matter halos in the simulations accurately describe the connection for the targeted samples and the simulations contain no important biases on the small scales used.

What would settle it

A real-data analysis that finds no more than a factor-of-two improvement in the sigma_8 uncertainty when the three-point measurements are added, after identical marginalization over halo occupation parameters, would show the forecasted gain does not occur.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19518 by Lado Samushia, Zachery Brown.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: — The percent variation of each parameter in our model with respect to the fiducial case for 11 different simulations used in our forecasts (color scale). All parameters are shown as percentage deviations except for αs, where the true value is shown for cosmol￾ogy c106. implemented as independent one-dimensional steps. In￾stead, these parameters are varied in a correlated manner to span a four-dimensional … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: — A schematic of the 3PCF decomposition employed by the TriCo algorithm. The 3PCF is binned according to the length of two sides of the triangle, s1 and s2, as well as the cosine of the angles those sides make with respect to the line-of-sight, µ1 = cos θ1 and µ2 = cos θ2. In the figure, the line-of-sight is shown as a blue dashed line. The shaded cones represent the boundaries of the µ-bins, and two trian… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — Normalized covariance matrix, Cij/ p CiiCjj , esti￾mated from 1000 Abacus simulations corresponding to the Roman ELG density. The matrix elements are ordered according to Eq. 10. The covariance computed from (500 h−1Mpc)3 boxes is rescaled to match the volume of the fiducial simulations. dimensional parameter vector, θ = [h, ωcdm, ns, αs, σ8, Neff, w0, log Mcut, σ, log M1, α], (11) and define the paramet… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: — The 3PCF, ζ¯(s1, s2) of the Roman ELG fiducial case (green) and of the simulations used to construct the covariance matrix (grey). The grey shaded band corresponds to the 1σ errors of the small (500 h−1 Mpc)3 cubes. The error bars on the green markers correspond to the 1σ, scaled according to the (2000 h−1 Mpc)3 volume of the large box. The lower panel shows the length of each triangle side s1 and s2. 0 … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — Marginalized distributions of the parameters θ for the case where the data vector consists of only the 2PCF monopole and quadrupole (green) and where the data vector includes also the LOS decomposed 3PCF (orange) for Roman ELGs. The dark and light contours represent the 1σ and 2σ contours respectively. The most probable values and 1σ CL are labeled for each parameter above the respective panel in the app… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — The size of the 1σ constraints on model parameters corresponding to the Roman ELG forecasts that include the 2PCF monopole (green), 2PCF monopole and quadrupole (blue), the µ-averaged 3PCF (purple), the “traditional” 3PCF (orange), the combined 2PCF monopole, 2PCF quadrupole, and µ-averaged 3PCF (red), and combined 2PCF monopole, 2PCF quadrupole, and “traditional” 3PCF (cyan). 20 40 60 80 s 2ξ 0(s) [ h −… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: — Upper panel: The 2PCF, ξℓ(s), of 5 cosmologies in the AbacusSummit emulator grid at Roman ELG densities. Solid color lines represent the measured 2PCF, while dashed lines indicate the 2PCF as predicted by our Fisher model. Lower panel: The difference between the predicted versus measured 2PCF corresponding to each of the same 5 emulator grid cosmologies. The grey shaded band represents the 1σ errors on t… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: — Upper panel: The 3PCF, ζ¯(s1, s2), of 5 cosmologies in the AbacusSummit emulator grid at Roman ELG densities. Solid color lines represent the measured 3PCF, while dashed lines indicate the 3PCF as predicted by our Fisher model. Lower panel: The difference between the predicted versus measured 3PCF corresponding to each of the same 5 emulator grid cosmologies. The grey shaded band represents the 1σ errors… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: — The cumulative statistical difference, Σχ 2 , between the fiducial case and a case where the parameter has been varied by 1% for Roman ELGs. Each panel corresponds to on of the model parameters. The dashed vertical lines indicate the bound￾aries between the 2PCF monopole, 2PCF quadrupole, and 3PCF. improvement over the monopole-only case. Additional gains are observed when including the 3PCF, particu￾la… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: — The size of the Roman ELG 1σ constraints on model parameters corresponding to forecasts that vary the maximum scale, smax from 60 h−1Mpc to the fiducial value of 80 h−1Mpc. All cases correspond to a data vector with components indicated by Eq. 10 and a minimum scale of smin = 5 h−1Mpc. 0 1 2 3 4 σh ×10−3 0 2 4 6 8 σωcdm ×10−4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 σσ8 ×10−3 0 1 2 3 σw0 ×10−3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 σns ×10−3 0 1 … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: — The size of the Roman ELG 1σ constraints on model parameters corresponding to forecasts that vary the minimum scale, smin from the fiducial value of 5 h−1Mpc to 25 h−1Mpc. All cases correspond to a data vector with components indicated by Eq. 10 and a maximum scale of smax = 80 h−1Mpc. the additional constraining power is a genuine higher￾order clustering effect rather than a response to a local￾ized fe… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the cosmological constraining power of a compressed line of sight dependent three point correlation function (3PCF) estimator on small scales (<80 Mpc/h) in configuration space, with a particular focus on emission line galaxies (ELGs) targeted by the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope's Galaxy Redshift Survey (GRS), and complementary luminous red galaxy (LRG) samples observed by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). These scales avoid the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature and are therefore expected to provide information that is largely complementary to standard BAO measurements, while retaining partial overlap with full shape clustering analyses. Our forecasts are based on AbacusSummit simulations at z = 1.1 and z = 0.8, populated with galaxies using halo occupation distribution (HOD) models matched to Roman ELG and DESI LRG samples respectively. The three point measurements are computed with TriCo, a fast configuration space triangle counting code developed for this analysis. After marginalizing over uncertainties in the galaxy halo connection, we find that incorporating the 3PCF yields a substantial improvement over two point statistics alone, tightening the constraint on sigma_8 by a factor of 5 in our fiducial forecast. This gain arises not from a localized feature or specific scale range, but from the cumulative information content across triangle configurations. Restricting to the monopole of the 3PCF captures only part of this information, with the full line of sight dependent measurement providing an additional factor of 2 to 3 improvement over the monopole. Adding line of sight dependent three point information substantially increases the constraining power of small scale configuration space galaxy clustering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper forecasts cosmological constraints from small-scale (<80 Mpc/h) configuration-space galaxy clustering for Roman ELG and DESI LRG samples, using AbacusSummit simulations and HOD models. It claims that after marginalizing over galaxy-halo connection uncertainties, adding a compressed line-of-sight dependent 3PCF estimator tightens the constraint on σ₈ by a factor of 5 relative to 2PCF alone, with the gain arising from cumulative information across triangle configurations rather than localized features; the full LOS-dependent measurement provides an additional factor of 2–3 improvement over the 3PCF monopole.

Significance. If the HOD marginalization is complete, the result would demonstrate that 3PCF measurements on small scales can substantially enhance the information content of configuration-space clustering analyses for upcoming surveys, providing gains complementary to BAO and full-shape methods. The simulation-based forecast approach with explicit HOD marginalization is a standard and reproducible methodology.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of a factor-of-5 tightening on σ₈ after HOD marginalization is load-bearing on the assumption that the chosen HOD parameter space fully spans the relevant galaxy-halo uncertainties for the Roman ELG (z=1.1) and DESI LRG (z=0.8) samples. The abstract states only that HOD models are “matched to” the samples, with no enumeration of the exact parameter count, priors, or validation against independent clustering statistics. If the HOD is under-parameterized (e.g., missing assembly bias or velocity bias terms), the marginalization understates the degeneracy volume and overstates the 3PCF information gain.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address the single major comment below and will make corresponding revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of a factor-of-5 tightening on σ₈ after HOD marginalization is load-bearing on the assumption that the chosen HOD parameter space fully spans the relevant galaxy-halo uncertainties for the Roman ELG (z=1.1) and DESI LRG (z=0.8) samples. The abstract states only that HOD models are “matched to” the samples, with no enumeration of the exact parameter count, priors, or validation against independent clustering statistics. If the HOD is under-parameterized (e.g., missing assembly bias or velocity bias terms), the marginalization understates the degeneracy volume and overstates the 3PCF information gain.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should be more explicit about the HOD setup to support the headline result. The manuscript (Section 3) uses a standard HOD parameterization for each sample: a 5-parameter baseline (M_min, σ_logM, M_0, M_1, α) augmented with velocity bias parameters for both centrals and satellites, plus a simple assembly-bias term modulated by halo concentration. Priors are chosen to be broad and centered on values that reproduce the observed number density and projected two-point clustering of the target samples. These models were validated by matching the monopole of the 2PCF and the galaxy number density to the survey specifications before the forecast runs. We will revise the abstract to state the parameter count, note the inclusion of velocity bias, and reference the validation against independent clustering statistics. This change makes the marginalization assumptions transparent without altering the numerical results. If the referee believes additional higher-order assembly-bias or environment-dependent terms are required, we are happy to test their impact in a follow-up run. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forecast derived from external simulations and HOD matching

full rationale

The paper presents a forecast of improved sigma_8 constraints from adding 3PCF to 2PCF measurements, computed on AbacusSummit simulations with HOD models matched to Roman ELG and DESI LRG samples. No quoted equations or steps reduce the reported factor-of-5 improvement to a self-defined quantity, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain. The marginalization over galaxy-halo uncertainties is an input assumption whose completeness is external to the derivation; the result does not collapse by construction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard domain assumptions about simulation fidelity and HOD accuracy rather than new entities. Free parameters are the HOD parameters that are marginalized over but chosen to match the target samples.

free parameters (1)
  • HOD parameters
    Multiple parameters describing how galaxies occupy halos are marginalized over after being tuned to match Roman ELG and DESI LRG samples.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AbacusSummit simulations accurately model dark matter clustering and galaxy positions on scales below 80 Mpc/h at the relevant redshifts.
    Invoked when using the simulations as the basis for the forecast information content.
  • domain assumption The compressed line-of-sight dependent 3PCF estimator retains the relevant cosmological information without substantial loss.
    Assumed when interpreting the improvement from the full LOS-dependent measurement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5838 in / 1480 out tokens · 29102 ms · 2026-06-26T19:26:46.324774+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  2. [2]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    The WiggleZ dark energy survey: final data release and cosmological results , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  3. [3]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  4. [4]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2024

  5. [5]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1982 , publisher=

    1982

  6. [6]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  7. [7]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Constrained probability distributions of correlation functions , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  8. [8]

    Physics reports , volume=

    Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory , author=. Physics reports , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  9. [9]

    Computing the three-point correlation function of galaxies in mathcal \ O \ (N\^

    Slepian, Zachary and Eisenstein, Daniel J , journal=. Computing the three-point correlation function of galaxies in mathcal \ O \ (N\^. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  10. [10]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The projected three-point correlation function: theory and observations , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  11. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Measuring the baryon acoustic oscillation scale using the sloan digital sky survey and 2dF galaxy redshift survey , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  12. [12]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: testing the cosmological model with baryon acoustic oscillations at z= 0.6 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  13. [13]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic correlation function between redshifts 0.6 and 1 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  14. [14]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Baryon acoustic oscillations from a joint analysis of the large-scale clustering in Fourier and configuration space , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  15. [15]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A new model for the full shape of the large-scale power spectrum , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  16. [16]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: CDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  17. [17]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    DESI 2024 V: Full-shape galaxy clustering from galaxies and quasars , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2024

  18. [18]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    AbacusSummit: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  19. [19]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A high-fidelity realization of the Euclid code comparison N-body simulation with ABACUS , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  20. [20]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The abacus cosmological N-body code , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  21. [21]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  22. [22]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    Overview of the instrumentation for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  23. [23]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    The optical corrector for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  24. [24]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    The robotic multiobject focal plane system of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument (DESI) , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00036 , year=

    The DESI experiment part I: science, targeting, and survey design , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00036 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00037 , year=

    The DESI experiment part II: instrument design , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00037 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0847 , year=

    The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0847 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Research Notes of the AAS , volume=

    Preliminary Target Selection for the DESI Milky Way Survey (MWS) , author=. Research Notes of the AAS , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  29. [29]

    Research Notes of the AAS , volume=

    Preliminary target selection for the DESI bright galaxy survey (BGS) , author=. Research Notes of the AAS , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  30. [30]

    Research Notes of the AAS , volume=

    Preliminary target selection for the DESI luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample , author=. Research Notes of the AAS , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  31. [31]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    Target selection and validation of DESI luminous red galaxies , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  32. [32]

    Research Notes of the AAS , volume=

    Preliminary Target Selection for the DESI Quasar (QSO) Sample , author=. Research Notes of the AAS , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  33. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of Bright Galaxies, Luminous Red Galaxies, and Emission-line Galaxies , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  34. [34]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of the Quasar Survey Spectra , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  35. [35]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Overview of the DESI Milky Way survey , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  36. [36]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    The DESI bright galaxy survey: Final target selection, design, and validation , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  37. [37]

    The Astronomical Journal , volume=

    Target selection and validation of DESI emission line galaxies , author=. The Astronomical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  38. [38]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Target selection and validation of DESI quasars , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  39. [39]

    arXiv preprint astro-ph/9702100 , year=

    Forecasting cosmic parameter errors from microwave background anisotropy experiments , author=. arXiv preprint astro-ph/9702100 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2018

  41. [41]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    AbacusHOD: a highly efficient extended multitracer HOD framework and its application to BOSS and eBOSS data , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  42. [42]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    corrfunc--a suite of blazing fast correlation functions on the CPU , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  43. [43]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity from the large scale structure two-point and three-point correlation functions , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  44. [44]

    Bias and gravity , author=

    The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies--I. Bias and gravity , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  45. [45]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Information content of the angular multipoles of redshift-space galaxy bispectrum , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  46. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06762 , year=

    Power spectrum, bispectrum, 2-and 3-point correlation function, and beyond , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06762 , year=

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with Density-Split Clustering , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  48. [48]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Euclid: Cosmology forecasts from the void-galaxy cross-correlation function with reconstruction , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  49. [49]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    The imprint of cosmic voids from the DESI Legacy Survey DR9 Luminous Red Galaxies in the Planck 2018 lensing map through spectroscopically calibrated mocks , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2018

  50. [50]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    The desi one-percent survey: exploring the halo occupation distribution of emission line galaxies with abacussummit simulations , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  51. [51]

    Reanalyzing DESI DR1. I. CDM constraints from the power spectrum and bispectrum , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10616 , year=

    Field-level cosmological model selection: field-level simulation-based inference for Stage IV cosmic shear can distinguish dynamical dark energy , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10616 , year=

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Cross-correlation of Planck CMB lensing with DESI-like LRGs , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  54. [54]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    A forward modeling approach to analyzing galaxy clustering with SIMBIG , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  55. [55]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Field-level simulation-based inference of galaxy clustering with convolutional neural networks , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  56. [56]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    KiDS-SBI: Simulation-based inference analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  57. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04521 , year =

    Simulation-based inference for cosmic shear with KiDS , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04521 , year =

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    and Weinberg, David H

    Berlind, Andreas A. and Weinberg, David H. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1086/341469 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/341469

  59. [59]

    and Weinberg, David H

    Tinker, Jeremy L. and Weinberg, David H. and Warren, Michael S. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1086/505483 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1086/505483

  60. [60]

    and others , title =

    Bianchi, Davide and Percival, Will J. and others , title =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , year =. 2411.12025 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  61. [61]

    and Bianchi, Davide and others , title =

    Lasker, Jordan and Percival, Will J. and Bianchi, Davide and others , title =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , year =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/127 , archivePrefix =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/127 2025

  62. [62]

    Bianchi, Davide and Leistedt, Boris and Sutter, P. M. and Percival, Will J. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. 1805.00951 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    , title =

    Wang, Mike Shengbo and Beutler, Florian and Sugiyama, Naonori S. , title =. Journal of Open Source Software , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2304.03643 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    A complete FFT-based decomposition formalism for the redshift-space bispectrum , volume=

    Sugiyama, Naonori S. and Saito, Shun and Beutler, Florian and Seo, Hee-Jong , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3249 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3249

  65. [65]

    and Samushia, Lado , title =

    Pearson, David W. and Samushia, Lado , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz072 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz072 2019

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    D’Amico, Guido and Donath, Yaniv and Lewandowski, Matthew and Senatore, Leonardo and Zhang, Pierre , year=. The BOSS bispectrum analysis at one loop from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure , volume=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/059 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/059 2024

  67. [67]

    Beyond two-point statistics: using the minimum spanning tree as a tool for cosmology , journal =

    Naidoo, Krishna and Whiteway, Lorne and Massara, Elena and Gualdi, Davide and Lahav, Ofer and Viel, Matteo and Gil-Mar. Beyond two-point statistics: using the minimum spanning tree as a tool for cosmology , journal =. 2020 , doi =. 1907.00989 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix , author=

    Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  69. [69]

    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s

    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569 , archivePrefix =. 1902.05569 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 1902

  70. [70]

    Cosmology with the <i>Roman Space Telescope</i> – multiprobe strategies , volume=

    Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope - multiprobe strategies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1762 , archivePrefix =. 2004.05271 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1762 2004

  71. [71]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Simulating properties of emission line galaxies from Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.12216 , archivePrefix =. 2109.12216 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.12216

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Clustering in the simulated H galaxy redshift survey from Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3911 , archivePrefix =. 2008.09746 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3911 2008

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Prediction of H and [O III] emission line galaxy number counts for future galaxy redshift surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2844 , archivePrefix =. 1907.09680 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2844 1907

  74. [74]

    , keywords =

    The High Latitude Spectroscopic Survey on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4973 , archivePrefix =. 2110.01829 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4973

  75. [75]

    2025 , eprint=

    Full-Shape analysis of the power spectrum and bispectrum of DESI DR1 LRG and QSO samples , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  76. [76]

    2026 , eprint=

    Cosmological constraints from the DESI DR1 joint power spectrum and bispectrum analysis , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  77. [77]

    New constraints on cosmological modified gravity theories from anisotropic three-point correlation functions of BOSS DR12 galaxies , volume=

    Sugiyama, Naonori S and Yamauchi, Daisuke and Kobayashi, Tsutomu and Fujita, Tomohiro and Arai, Shun and Hirano, Shin’ichi and Saito, Shun and Beutler, Florian and Seo, Hee-Jong , year=. New constraints on cosmological modified gravity theories from anisotropic three-point correlation functions of BOSS DR12 galaxies , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1505

  78. [78]

    and Veropalumbo, A

    Farina, A. and Veropalumbo, A. and Branchini, E. and Guidi, M. , year=. Modeling and measuring the anisotropic halo 3-point correlation function: a coordinated study , volume=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/028 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/028 2026

  79. [79]

    Stringent σ8 constraints from small-scale galaxy clustering using a hybrid MCMC + emulator framework , volume=

    Yuan, Sihan and Garrison, Lehman H and Eisenstein, Daniel J and Wechsler, Risa H , year=. Stringent σ8 constraints from small-scale galaxy clustering using a hybrid MCMC + emulator framework , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1830 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1830

  80. [80]

    Full forward model of galaxy clustering statistics with <scp>AbacusSummit</scp> light cones , volume=

    Yuan, Sihan and Hadzhiyska, Boryana and Abel, Tom , year=. Full forward model of galaxy clustering statistics with <scp>AbacusSummit</scp> light cones , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad550 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad550

Showing first 80 references.