Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.00698 v1 pith:KD4P2TRD submitted 2016-07-03 stat.ME econ.EM

classification stat.MEecon.EM
keywords experimentsinferencerandomizedsettingsanalysesdiscusstreatmentgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this review, we present econometric and statistical methods for analyzing randomized experiments. For basic experiments we stress randomization-based inference as opposed to sampling-based inference. In randomization-based inference, uncertainty in estimates arises naturally from the random assignment of the treatments, rather than from hypothesized sampling from a large population. We show how this perspective relates to regression analyses for randomized experiments. We discuss the analyses of stratified, paired, and clustered randomized experiments, and we stress the general efficiency gains from stratification. We also discuss complications in randomized experiments such as non-compliance. In the presence of non-compliance we contrast intention-to-treat analyses with instrumental variables analyses allowing for general treatment effect heterogeneity. We consider in detail estimation and inference for heterogeneous treatment effects in settings with (possibly many) covariates. These methods allow researchers to explore heterogeneity by identifying subpopulations with different treatment effects while maintaining the ability to construct valid confidence intervals. We also discuss optimal assignment to treatment based on covariates in such settings. Finally, we discuss estimation and inference in experiments in settings with interactions between units, both in general network settings and in settings where the population is partitioned into groups with all interactions contained within these groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Post Launch Evaluation of Policies in a High-Dimensional Setting

    stat.ML 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-phase synthetic-control pipeline with nearest-neighbor matching and high-dimensional regression estimates post-launch treatment effects at scale, but its debiasing step is tuned on the same experiments used for ...

Pith tools