pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 1203.0224 · v2 · pith:KHMB7TMFnew · submitted 2012-03-01 · 💻 cs.DS · cs.CC

Label Cover instances with large girth and the hardness of approximating basic k-spanner

classification 💻 cs.DS cs.CC
keywords problembasicgirthlargecoverepsilonlabelspanner
0
0 comments X p. Extension
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{KHMB7TMF}

Prints a linked pith:KHMB7TMF badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We study the well-known Label Cover problem under the additional requirement that problem instances have large girth. We show that if the girth is some $k$, the problem is roughly $2^{\log^{1-\epsilon} n/k}$ hard to approximate for all constant $\epsilon > 0$. A similar theorem was claimed by Elkin and Peleg [ICALP 2000], but their proof was later found to have a fundamental error. We use the new proof to show inapproximability for the basic $k$-spanner problem, which is both the simplest problem in graph spanners and one of the few for which super-logarithmic hardness was not known. Assuming $NP \not\subseteq BPTIME(2^{polylog(n)})$, we show that for every $k \geq 3$ and every constant $\epsilon > 0$ it is hard to approximate the basic $k$-spanner problem within a factor better than $2^{(\log^{1-\epsilon} n) / k}$ (for large enough $n$). A similar hardness for basic $k$-spanner was claimed by Elkin and Peleg [ICALP 2000], but the error in their analysis of Label Cover made this proof fail as well. Thus for the problem of Label Cover with large girth we give the first non-trivial lower bound. For the basic $k$-spanner problem we improve the previous best lower bound of $\Omega(\log n)/k$ by Kortsarz [Algorithmica 1998]. Our main technique is subsampling the edges of 2-query PCPs, which allows us to reduce the degree of a PCP to be essentially equal to the soundness desired. This turns out to be enough to essentially guarantee large girth.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.