Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Field White Dwarf Mass Distribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.05292 v1 pith:KHWRQJQ5 submitted 2016-06-16 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords masswhitedistributionsdwarffindmassesobservedsample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We revisit the properties and astrophysical implications of the field white dwarf mass distribution in preparation of Gaia applications. Our study is based on the two samples with the best established completeness and most precise atmospheric parameters, the volume-complete survey within 20 pc and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) magnitude-limited sample. We explore the modelling of the observed mass distributions with Monte Carlo simulations, but find that it is difficult to constrain independently the initial mass function (IMF), the initial-to-final-mass relation (IFMR), the stellar formation history (SFH), the variation of the Galactic disk vertical scale height as a function of stellar age, and binary evolution. Each of these input ingredients has a moderate effect on the predicted mass distributions, and we must also take into account biases owing to unidentified faint objects (20 pc sample), as well as unknown masses for magnetic white dwarfs and spectroscopic calibration issues (SDSS sample). Nevertheless, we find that fixed standard assumptions for the above parameters result in predicted mean masses that are in good qualitative agreement with the observed values. It suggests that derived masses for both studied samples are consistent with our current knowledge of stellar and Galactic evolution. Our simulations overpredict by 40-50% the number of massive white dwarfs (M > 0.75 Msun) for both surveys, although we can not exclude a Salpeter IMF when we account for all biases. Furthermore, we find no evidence of a population of double white dwarf mergers in the observed mass distributions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A New Sirius-like System at Only 21 Parsecs: An Elusive White Dwarf Companion to the Nearby K-dwarf HD 38230

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HD 38230 B is a gravitationally bound white dwarf at 21 pc with a dynamical mass of 0.71 solar masses on a ~1400-year orbit.

  2. Gravitational Wave Modeling of White-Dwarf--Compact-Object Binaries and Observational Outlook

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WD–CO binaries produce unique GW waveforms with a sharp f_max cutoff; LGWA/DECIGO will detect many end stages, while terrestrial detectors will not mistake them for sub-solar compact objects.

  3. Detecting White Dwarf Binary Mergers with Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAGIS Space and AEDGE could detect white-dwarf-binary mergers in the 10 mHz–1 Hz band, giving early warning of Type Ia supernova explosions at rates of roughly one every four years and a few hundred per year, respectively.

Pith tools