Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Voids in massive neutrino cosmologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1506.03088 v2 pith:KIT7BNPJ submitted 2015-06-09 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords mattervoidsdensitycosmologiesgalaxymassiveneutrinonumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Cosmic voids are a promising environment to characterize neutrino-induced effects on the large-scale distribution of matter in the universe. We perform a comprehensive numerical study of the statistical properties of voids, identified both in the matter and galaxy distributions, in massive and massless neutrino cosmologies. The matter density field is obtained by running several independent $N$-body simulations with cold dark matter and neutrino particles, while the galaxy catalogs are modeled by populating the dark matter halos in simulations via a halo occupation distribution (HOD) model to reproduce the clustering properties observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) II Data Release 7. We focus on the impact of massive neutrinos on the following void statistical properties: number density, ellipticities, two-point statistics, density and velocity profiles. Considering the matter density field, we find that voids in massive neutrino cosmologies are less evolved than those in the corresponding massless neutrinos case: there is a larger number of small voids and a smaller number of large ones, their profiles are less evacuated, and they present a lower wall at the edge. Moreover, the degeneracy between $\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_{\nu}$ is broken when looking at void properties. In terms of the galaxy density field, we find that differences among cosmologies are difficult to detect because of the small number of galaxy voids in the simulations. Differences are instead present when looking at the matter density and velocity profiles around these voids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Cosmic Voids Matter: Pristine Evolution

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Cosmic voids traced by halos become stable at late times, and the matter around them evolves linearly, supporting their use as clean dark-energy probes.

  2. Fast(er)PM and Moving Mesh: JAX-native Geometric Multigrid Methods

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Warm-started Chebyshev geometric multigrid is competitive with distributed FFTs for FastPM and enables a differentiable moving-mesh particle–mesh gravity solver in JAX.

  3. Constraining Neutrino Mass with the Void Weak Lensing Effect

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulations of void-shear cross-correlation demonstrate that void lensing can constrain total neutrino mass to σ(M_ν)=0.096 eV without shape noise and 0.340 eV with Stage-III-like noise.

  4. Cosmic voids evolution in modified gravity via hydrodynamics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Voids in luminal Galileon gravity are always unscreened, and a reality requirement on the fifth force rules out ~82% of the favored parameter space, yielding a redshift-dependent minimum void depth.

  5. Void spin distribution as a powerful probe of $\sigma_{8}$

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Void spin distributions, fitted by a generalized Gamma function, are shown in simulations to vary sensitively with sigma8 but not with Omega_cdm h^2, neutrino mass, or dark energy equation of state, offering a new deg...

Pith tools